Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 37.6 m² — Triangle ABC has a right angle at B, so use Pythagoras' theorem to find AC: AC² = AB² + BC² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so AC = 13 m. In triangle ACD, use Area = 1/2 × AC × AD × sin(angle CAD) = 1/2 × 13 × 9 × sin 40° = 58.5 × 0.6428 = 37.6 m² (1 d.p.). Adding AB and BC to get AC = 17 m instead of applying Pythagoras gives 1/2 × 17 × 9 × sin 40° = 49.2 m². Using cos 40° instead of sin 40° gives 1/2 × 13 × 9 × cos 40° = 44.8 m². Substituting AB = 5 m directly instead of finding AC first gives 1/2 × 5 × 9 × sin 40° = 14.5 m².
- (b) 128° — Angle AOC and angle ABC stand on the same arc AC (the minor arc, which does not contain B), so by the angle at the centre theorem angle ABC = 104° ÷ 2 = 52°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so its opposite angles ABC and ADC sum to 180°: angle ADC = 180° − 52° = 128°. A candidate who finds angle ABC = 52° correctly but then treats opposite angles as equal, as in a parallelogram, instead of supplementary, writes down 52° and stops there. Skipping the halving step and using 104° as angle ABC gives 180° − 104° = 76°. Reading off the given centre angle itself as the final answer, without applying either theorem, gives 104°. Work through both theorems in order and you land on 128°.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (b) angle B = angle E — AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the angle INCLUDED between them is angle B; making angle B = angle E completes SAS. Angle A sits between AB and AC, not between AB and BC, so it is not the included angle needed for SAS here. Angle C sits between BC and CA, not between AB and BC, so it is not included either. AC = DF would give a third pair of equal sides, which proves congruence by SSS instead of SAS.
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
- (a) 71° — Method: first use the straight line through T to find the tangent-chord angle RTC, then apply the alternate segment theorem, which states that this angle equals the angle subtended by the chord in the alternate segment. Working: the two rails form a straight line through T, so angle RTC = 180 − 109 = 71 degrees. D lies in the alternate segment of the chord TC, so angle TDC = angle RTC = 71°. Answer: 71°. Find angle RTC FIRST from the straight line before applying the theorem: using the given 109° directly, doubling the tangent-chord angle, or taking its complement from 90° all give the wrong angle at D.
- (c) An L-shape — Method: to find the front elevation, trace the outline of the solid seen from directly in front. Working: the low, wide cuboid gives a wide rectangle across the bottom, and the taller, narrower cuboid sitting on one end adds a narrower rectangle rising above only that end of the base, so the outline steps up on one side only. Answer: an L-shape. The distractors: a rectangle comes from taking the outline of the box the whole solid would just fit inside, ignoring the step created by the taller block. A T-shape comes from placing the taller block in the middle of the base instead of at one end, so that the base would show on both sides of it. A parallelogram comes from copying a face as it is drawn in the sketch — the top of the taller block is drawn as a sloping parallelogram because the solid is drawn at an angle — instead of drawing the true outline seen looking straight at the front.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (a) 44.7 m — Method: the line joining the two tops is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose horizontal side is the gap between the masts and whose vertical side is the difference in their heights, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: the difference in heights is 50 − 30 = 20 m, so d² = 40² + 20² = 1600 + 400 = 2000 and d = √2000 = 44.721…, which is 44.7 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 44.7 m. The distractors: 34.6 m comes from subtracting the squares, √(40² − 20²), instead of adding them; 60.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 40 + 20, rather than using Pythagoras' theorem; 50.0 m is the height of the taller mast, copied from the question in place of the distance asked for.
- (a) 1023 m² — Method: split the quadrilateral along the diagonal AC into two triangles. Triangle ABC has two sides and the angle between them, so the cosine rule gives AC and the area formula gives its area; triangle ACD then has three known sides, so the cosine rule gives an angle and the area formula gives its area. Working: AC² = 40² + 32² − 2 × 40 × 32 × cos 95° = 1600 + 1024 + 223.12 = 2847.12, so AC = 53.358 m. The area of triangle ABC is 1/2 × 40 × 32 × sin 95° = 640 × 0.99619 = 637.56 m². In triangle ACD, cos ADC = (25² + 36² − 2847.12) ÷ (2 × 25 × 36) = (1921 − 2847.12) ÷ 1800 = −0.51451, so angle ADC = 120.965° and sin ADC = 0.85748, giving an area of 1/2 × 25 × 36 × 0.85748 = 385.87 m². The total is 637.56 + 385.87 = 1023.43. Answer: the field has an area of 1023 m² to the nearest square metre. The distractors: 1071 m² comes from taking cos 95° as positive, so the diagonal is found as 49.00 m instead of 53.358 m and the second triangle comes out too large; 2047 m² comes from leaving the factor 1/2 out of both area calculations; 638 m² is the area of triangle ABC alone, written down by a candidate who finds the diagonal and then forgets that the second triangle is part of the field.
- (b) AB = DE — RHS needs a right angle, the hypotenuse, and one OTHER side to be equal; the right angles and hypotenuses are already equal, so a matching pair of the remaining sides, AB = DE, completes RHS. Angle A = angle D is an extra ANGLE fact, not the extra SIDE fact that RHS specifically requires. AC being parallel to DF says nothing about either triangle's side lengths, so it cannot complete a congruence condition. Being drawn the same way up is about orientation on the page, not about any measurement, so it proves nothing about congruence.
- (a) 1/2 — cos 0° = 1 and sin 30° = 1/2, so cos 0° − sin 30° = 1 − 1/2 = 1/2. 1 comes from writing down cos 0° alone and forgetting to subtract sin 30°. 3/2 comes from adding the two values instead of subtracting. −1/2 comes from working out sin 30° − cos 0°, the two terms the wrong way round.
- (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.
- (b) 320° — A bearing is always measured clockwise from north. An angle measured anticlockwise must be converted by subtracting it from 360°: 360 − 40 = 320°, so the bearing is 320°. Choosing 040° treats the anticlockwise angle as if it were already a clockwise bearing, without converting it. Choosing 220° adds 180° to the angle, mixing this up with a back-bearing calculation (40 + 180 = 220). Choosing 400° adds the angle to 360° instead of subtracting it (40 + 360 = 400), giving a bearing greater than a full turn.
- (c) The scale factor is 2, not 1, so the sides are not equal — Congruent shapes must be exactly the same size as well as the same shape, which means a scale factor of 1. Here the scale factor between the triangles is 2, so the sides are different lengths and the triangles cannot be congruent, even though they are similar. 'Similar triangles are never congruent' is too strong — a scale factor of exactly 1 would make them both similar and congruent. 'The angles are not necessarily equal' is wrong, since similar triangles always have equal matching angles. 'Congruent triangles must have a right angle' is an unrelated, false fact about congruence.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.