Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) an arc of the same radius, centred at B — The perpendicular bisector construction needs two arcs of equal radius, one centred at each end of the segment — after the arc from A, the next step is an arc of exactly the same radius from B, so the two arcs cross at two points; the line through those two crossing points is the perpendicular bisector. "an arc of the same radius, centred at the midpoint of AB" is not possible yet, since the midpoint is only found once both arcs are drawn — it is the RESULT of the construction, not a step in it. "a smaller arc, centred at A again" gives two different-sized arcs from the same point, which never cross to give the bisector. "a straight line joining the ends of the first arc" only connects points on one arc, and locates nothing.
- (d) No — angles must be equal too — A regular polygon must have both all sides equal and all angles equal. This tile has all six sides equal, but its interior angles are not all equal, so it fails the angle condition and is not regular — 'No — angles must be equal too' is correct. 'Yes — all sides are equal' is wrong because equal sides alone are not enough; a shape can have equal sides but unequal angles, as here. 'Yes — six equal sides means regular' is wrong for the same reason: equal sides do not automatically guarantee equal angles. 'No — hexagons can't be regular' is wrong because regular hexagons certainly exist (six equal sides and six equal 120° angles); it is this particular tile that fails to be regular, not hexagons in general.
- (a) SSA - not sufficient to prove congruence — The angle given, angle A, is not the angle between sides AB and BC — it is not the included angle — so this data is SSA (side, side, angle), which is not sufficient to prove congruence on its own; two triangles can share this SSA information without being congruent. SAS is wrong because the given angle is not the one included between the two given sides. ASA is wrong because only one angle (A) is given, not two. AAS is wrong for the same reason — only one angle is given, not two.
- (c) Rectangle — A rectangle has two pairs of parallel sides and four right angles, but does not require all sides to be equal — this matches exactly, so Rectangle is correct. A square also has four right angles and parallel sides, but additionally requires all four sides to be equal, which contradicts 'not all the same length', so it is wrong. A rhombus has two pairs of parallel sides and all four sides equal, but its angles are not generally 90° unless it is also a square, so it does not match the right-angle condition here. A kite has no pairs of parallel sides at all, so it does not match the first condition given.
- (a) A flat surface extending infinitely in two directions — Method: recall the precise geometric meaning of 'plane', versus 'line', 'point' and 'face'. Working: a plane is a flat, two-dimensional surface extending infinitely in every direction within it. Options: 'a straight line extending in one direction' describes a line, not a plane; 'a single fixed position with no size' describes a point; 'a flat, bounded face on a 3D shape' describes a face, a bounded piece of a plane, not the plane itself, which has no boundary. Answer: a flat surface extending infinitely in two directions.
- (c) 40.5 kg — Since the statues are made from the same material, mass is proportional to volume, which scales with the cube of the length scale factor. The length scale factor is 45 ÷ 30 = 1.5, so the volume (and mass) scale factor is 1.5³ = 3.375. The larger statue's mass is 12 × 3.375 = 40.5 kg. 18 kg comes from multiplying by the length factor 1.5 directly. 27 kg comes from using the area scale factor 1.5² = 2.25 instead of the volume scale factor. 54 kg comes from treating 'cubed' as 'multiplied by 3', giving 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 instead of 1.5³.
- (c) exterior angle = sum of the two interior opposite angles — Angle ACD is the exterior angle at C, and the exterior angle of a triangle is always equal to the sum of the two interior angles at the other two vertices — here, angle BAC and angle ABC — so angle ACD = 48° + 67° = 115°. "angles in a triangle add up to 180°" is a true fact, but on its own it only gives the INTERIOR angle at C (180 − 48 − 67 = 65°), not the exterior angle 115° — reaching 115° that way still needs a further step. "angles on a straight line add up to 180°" is the fact that links the interior and exterior angles at C to each other, not the fact that gives 115° directly from the two OTHER angles. "exterior angle is always double the smallest angle" is not a genuine angle fact: double the smallest angle here is 48° × 2 = 96°, not 115°.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
- (a) Similar, but AAA alone does not prove congruence — Three equal corresponding angles (AAA) show that the two triangles are similar — the same shape — but says nothing about their size, so it does not prove congruence. They could be congruent, or one could simply be an enlargement of the other; without matching side lengths, congruence is not established, so 'congruent because AAA proves congruence' is wrong. Equal angles do not force equal sides — a triangle can be enlarged to any size while keeping the same angles, so that option is also wrong. Something CAN be said here — that the triangles are similar — so 'no relationship can be determined' is wrong too.
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (d) 1687.5 ml — The length scale factor from the standard bottle to the giant bottle is 1.5, so the volume scale factor is 1.5³ = 3.375. The capacity of the giant bottle is 500 × 3.375 = 1687.5 ml. 750 ml comes from multiplying by the length factor 1.5 directly, without cubing it. 1125 ml comes from using the area scale factor 1.5² = 2.25 instead of the volume scale factor. 2250 ml comes from treating 'cubed' as 'multiplied by 3', giving 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 as the scale factor instead of 1.5³.
- (a) 62.8 cm — The ribbon goes once around the circular cross-section, so its length equals the circumference: 2πr = 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8 cm.
- (b) 13.3 cm — The apex is directly above the centre of the square base, so the height, half the base diagonal, and a slant edge form a right-angled triangle with the slant edge as the hypotenuse. Half the base diagonal is 14 ÷ 2 = 7 cm. Using Pythagoras' theorem, height = √(15² − 7²) = √(225 − 49) = √176 = 13.3 cm (1 d.p.). Using the slant edge itself as the height, without applying Pythagoras' theorem at all, gives 15 cm. Using the full base diagonal (14 cm) instead of half of it gives √(15² − 14²) = √(225 − 196) = √29 = 5.4 cm (1 d.p.), far too short for a pyramid this size. Adding the two squares instead of subtracting them, √(15² + 7²) = √(225 + 49) = √274 = 16.6 cm (1 d.p.), gives a length longer than the slant edge itself, which cannot be the height.
- (b) 10.5 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length. Working: 7 cm × 1.5 = 10.5 m. A student who answers 8.5 has added the scale factor to the drawing length instead of multiplying (7 + 1.5). A student who answers 14 has rounded the scale factor up to 2 before multiplying. A student who answers 3.5 has divided the drawing length by 2 instead of multiplying it by 1.5. Answer: 10.5 m.
- (a) 44.7 m — Method: the line joining the two tops is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose horizontal side is the gap between the masts and whose vertical side is the difference in their heights, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: the difference in heights is 50 − 30 = 20 m, so d² = 40² + 20² = 1600 + 400 = 2000 and d = √2000 = 44.721…, which is 44.7 m to 1 decimal place. Answer: 44.7 m. The distractors: 34.6 m comes from subtracting the squares, √(40² − 20²), instead of adding them; 60.0 m comes from adding the two sides of the triangle, 40 + 20, rather than using Pythagoras' theorem; 50.0 m is the height of the taller mast, copied from the question in place of the distance asked for.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.