Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 46.2 cm — The perimeter of a sector is the arc length plus its two straight radii. The circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 10 = 62.8 cm, and the arc is 150 ÷ 360 of that: 62.8 × 150 ÷ 360 = 26.2 cm (1 d.p.). Adding the two radii, 26.2 + 10 + 10 = 46.2 cm. Giving just the arc length, without adding the straight edges, gives 26.2 cm. Adding only ONE radius instead of two gives 36.2 cm. Using 150 ÷ 180 instead of 150 ÷ 360 for the fraction gives an arc of 52.3 cm and a perimeter of 72.3 cm.
- (c) AB, AC and angle BAC: Area = 1/2 × AB × AC × sin(BAC) — Method: Area = 1/2ab sin C only works when the angle used is the one included between the two sides being multiplied. Working: AB and AC meet at A, and angle BAC is the angle at A between them, so the statement pairing AB, AC and angle BAC is the correct one. The statement that three sides with no angle can still go into 1/2 AB × AC × sin(BAC) is wrong: with no angle known, sin(BAC) cannot be evaluated, so a different method must find an angle first. The statement pairing AB and BC with sin(BAC) is wrong: AB and BC meet at B, so the angle between them is angle ABC, not angle BAC — it names the wrong angle for the sides it uses. The statement pairing AB and AC with sin(ABC) is wrong for the same reason: AB and AC meet at A, so their included angle is angle BAC, and angle ABC is not between them at all.
- (a) 53.5° — Method: use the sine rule BC/sin A = AC/sin B, since BC is opposite angle A and AC is opposite angle B. Working: sin(ABC) = AC × sin(BAC) / BC = 10 × sin 40° / 8, which gives angle ABC = 53.5° or its supplement 180 − 53.5 = 126.5°; since angle ABC is acute, the answer is 53.5°. Taking the obtuse supplement instead gives 126.5°; putting the sides the wrong way round in the ratio (sin B = BC × sin A / AC instead of AC × sin A / BC) gives 30.9°; and using sin 50° in place of sin 40° gives 73.2°. Every sine-rule ratio has two possible angle solutions that add to 180° — the word 'acute' tells you which one to keep.
- (a) 110° — The truss is isosceles, so its two base angles are equal; since the three angles of the triangle add up to 180° and the apex is 40°, each base angle is (180 − 40) ÷ 2 = 70°. The angle between the sloping edge and the joist, extended beyond the base of the truss, sits on a straight line with that 70° base angle, and angles on a straight line add up to 180°, so the required angle is 180 − 70 = 110°. "70°" comes from stopping after finding the base angle and giving it directly, without also using the straight-line fact to find the angle on the OUTSIDE of the truss. "140°" comes from doubling the base angle instead of using the straight-line fact. "20°" comes from taking half of the apex angle (40° ÷ 2), mistaking it for the required angle instead of properly using the triangle's angle sum.
- (a) No — the angle is not between the two sides — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides. Working: the 35° angle is marked away from the corner where the 40 cm and 65 cm edges meet, so it is not the included angle — this is SSA, which is not one of the four basic congruence conditions, so it does not guarantee congruence. Options: 'Yes — SAS' wrongly treats any two sides plus any angle as SAS, without checking the angle's position; 'Yes — SSS' wrongly counts the angle as if it were a third side; 'No — only two sides measured' is not the real reason, since SAS itself only needs two sides, so this reasoning is beside the point. Answer: no, the angle is not between the two sides.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
- (d) £982.20 — Method: find the missing side BC with the cosine rule, add it to AB and AC for the perimeter, then multiply by the cost per metre. Working: BC² = 45² + 38² − 2 × 45 × 38 × cos 110° = 4638.71, so BC = 68.108 m, perimeter = 45 + 38 + 68.108 = 151.108 m, and cost = 151.108 × £6.50 = £982.20 — keep the unrounded perimeter, because the rounded 151.1 m would give £982.15. Forgetting the negative sign in the cosine rule gives BC = 48.0 m and a cost of £851.18; costing only the missing side BC and forgetting to include AB and AC gives £442.70; and stopping after finding the perimeter, without multiplying by the cost per metre, gives £151.11. The perimeter is only the halfway point of this question — the cost still has to be worked out.
- (d) 14.9 cm — By the sine rule, sin(BAC) ÷ BC = sin(ACB) ÷ AB, so sin(BAC) = 7 × sin35° ÷ 10 = 0.4015. This gives angle BAC = 23.7° or angle BAC = 156.3°; since angle BAC is acute, angle BAC = 23.7°. Angle ABC = 180° − 35° − 23.7° = 121.3°. By the sine rule again, AC ÷ sin(ABC) = AB ÷ sin(ACB), so AC = 10 × sin121.3° ÷ sin35° = 14.9 cm. Using angle BAC in the final step instead of angle ABC gives AC = 10 × sin23.7° ÷ sin35° = 7.0 cm — this just recomputes the given side BC. Using angle ACB again in the final step, instead of the newly found angle ABC, gives AC = 10 × sin35° ÷ sin35° = 10.0 cm — this just returns AB unchanged. Making a sign slip when finding angle ABC, computing 180° − 35° + 23.7° = 168.7° instead of subtracting it, and carrying that through gives AC = 10 × sin168.7° ÷ sin35° = 3.4 cm. Find angle BAC, then angle ABC, then apply the sine rule once more, and AC comes to 14.9 cm.
- (c) −1.5 — Since n = k × m, dividing a number in n by the matching number in m gives k: k = −6 ÷ 4 = −1.5 (check with the bottom numbers: −9 ÷ 6 = −1.5, the same value, confirming n is a scalar multiple of m). 1.5 has the correct size but is missing the negative sign. −10 comes from subtracting the top numbers, −6 − 4, instead of dividing them. −24 comes from multiplying the top numbers, −6 × 4, instead of dividing them.
- (d) 118.0 cm² — Method: a rhombus is made of two congruent triangles either side of a diagonal, each with area 1/2 × 12 × 12 × sin 55°, so the whole rhombus has area 12 × 12 × sin 55° (side² × sin of the interior angle). Working: area = 12² × sin 55° = 118.0 cm². Stopping at one triangle's area, 1/2 × 12² × sin 55°, and forgetting to double it gives 59.0 cm²; using cos 55° instead of sin 55° gives 82.6 cm²; and multiplying the two sides together with no trig term at all gives 144.0 cm². Splitting the rhombus into its two triangles is the safest way to see why the 1/2 disappears from the whole-shape formula.
- (b) 22 — Method: add the two drawn lengths together first, then apply the scale to the total. Working: 3 cm + 2.5 cm = 5.5 cm; 5.5 cm × 4 = 22 m. A student who answers 10 has only converted one of the two sections (2.5 cm × 4) and forgotten the other. A student who answers 5.5 has added the two drawn lengths but forgotten to apply the scale at all. A student who answers 44 has doubled the correct answer, effectively applying the scale twice. Answer: 22 m.
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (d) A translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: two reflections in PARALLEL lines combine into a single translation, perpendicular to the lines, of size twice the distance between them; two reflections in lines that CROSS combine into a rotation instead, never a translation. Working: the lines x = 2 and x = 6 are parallel, a distance of 6 − 2 = 4 apart. Doubling this distance gives 2 × 4 = 8, and the translation runs in the direction from the first line towards the second, so the vector is (8, 0). Answer: a translation by the vector (8, 0). Double the distance between the lines rather than using it directly, keep the direction running from the FIRST line reflected to the SECOND, and remember that two reflections in lines that never meet can only give a translation, never a rotation.
- (c) a + (1/2)c — Method: OABC is a parallelogram, so OB = OA + AB, and since AB is equal and parallel to OC, AB = c; this gives OB = a + c. M is the midpoint of AB, so AM = (1/2)AB = (1/2)c. Working: OM = OA + AM = a + (1/2)c. Answer: OM = a + (1/2)c. Adding the whole of AB instead of half of it gives a + c, which is OB, not OM; halving the whole diagonal OB instead of just AB gives (1/2)a + (1/2)c, the midpoint of OB rather than of AB; and flipping the sign on the c-term gives a − (1/2)c, which points back the wrong way along AB. Halve only the side you are told to halve, and check the sign before you commit to an answer.
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.