Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 15 cm — Method: any two sides of a triangle must together be longer than the third, so the third side must be longer than the difference of the two given sides and shorter than their sum. Working: the difference is 20 − 8 = 12 cm and the sum is 20 + 8 = 28 cm, so the third side must be between 12 cm and 28 cm, and 15 cm lies inside that range. Answer: 15 cm. The distractors: 12 cm is exactly the difference, so the three lengths would lie flat along a straight line and never close into a triangle; 5 cm is shorter than the difference — 5 + 8 = 13 cm cannot reach across the 20 cm side — and is chosen by candidates who check no lower limit at all; 30 cm is longer than the sum of the other two, so those two sides could never meet, and it is chosen by candidates who check no upper limit.
- (a) A rotation of 180° about the origin — Method: composing two reflections in lines that cross is always a single rotation about the point where the lines meet, through twice the angle between them. Working: the x-axis and y-axis meet at the origin at an angle of 90°, so the combined transformation is a rotation about the origin through 2 × 90 = 180 degrees. Answer: a rotation of 180° about the origin. The rotation angle is TWICE the angle between the mirror lines, not the angle itself, and the centre is always where the two lines cross, not some other point, and the result of two reflections in intersecting lines is a rotation, never another reflection.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (a) A square's diagonals are equal in length — A square has two pairs of parallel sides, four equal sides, and diagonals that are equal in length and cross at right angles. This tile's diagonals are not equal, so it is a rhombus that is not a square.
- (a) 110° — The truss is isosceles, so its two base angles are equal; since the three angles of the triangle add up to 180° and the apex is 40°, each base angle is (180 − 40) ÷ 2 = 70°. The angle between the sloping edge and the joist, extended beyond the base of the truss, sits on a straight line with that 70° base angle, and angles on a straight line add up to 180°, so the required angle is 180 − 70 = 110°. "70°" comes from stopping after finding the base angle and giving it directly, without also using the straight-line fact to find the angle on the OUTSIDE of the truss. "140°" comes from doubling the base angle instead of using the straight-line fact. "20°" comes from taking half of the apex angle (40° ÷ 2), mistaking it for the required angle instead of properly using the triangle's angle sum.
- (b) Parallel, since AB and DC are both horizontal lines — A and B both have y-coordinate 1, so AB is horizontal; D and C both have y-coordinate 4, so DC is horizontal too. Two horizontal lines are always parallel, so AB and DC are parallel. "Not parallel, since AB and DC have different lengths" is wrong twice over: AB runs from x = 1 to x = 5 and DC from x = 2 to x = 6, so both are in fact 4 units long, and in any case length has no bearing on whether two lines are parallel — only direction does. "Not parallel, since AB is horizontal and DC is vertical" misreads the coordinates of D and C, which share the y-coordinate 4 and so give a horizontal line, not a vertical one. "Parallel, since A and D have the same x-coordinate" rests on a false claim: A has x-coordinate 1 and D has x-coordinate 2, so they do not share an x-coordinate — and even if they did, it would say nothing about whether AB is parallel to DC.
- (c) 5 m — The horizontal distance is the side adjacent to the 60° angle, and the sloping side is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = hypotenuse × cos 60°. The exact value of cos 60° is 1/2, so horizontal distance = 10 × 1/2 = 5 m. Using the sloping side itself as the horizontal distance, without using any trigonometry at all, gives 10 m. Using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60° finds the vertical height of the tent rather than the horizontal distance: 10 × √3/2 = 5√3 = 8.7 m (1 d.p.). Dividing the sloping side by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it, 10 ÷ 0.5 = 20 m, treats the sloping side as though it were the adjacent side rather than the hypotenuse.
- (a) SSA - not sufficient to prove congruence — The angle given, angle A, is not the angle between sides AB and BC — it is not the included angle — so this data is SSA (side, side, angle), which is not sufficient to prove congruence on its own; two triangles can share this SSA information without being congruent. SAS is wrong because the given angle is not the one included between the two given sides. ASA is wrong because only one angle (A) is given, not two. AAS is wrong for the same reason — only one angle is given, not two.
- (c) minor segment — A chord splits a circle into two segments; the smaller of the two is called the minor segment and the larger one the major segment. "major segment" names the larger region, the opposite of what is asked for. "sector" is a different region altogether, enclosed by two radii and an arc, not by a chord. "arc" is a curved length along the circumference, not an enclosed region at all.
- (d) SSS, using shared side QS — PQ equals RQ and PS equals RS are two given pairs of equal sides, and QS is common to both triangles, so QS equals itself and gives a third pair of equal sides. Three pairs of equal sides is exactly the SSS condition, so 'SSS, using shared side QS' is correct. 'SAS, using the angle at Q' is wrong because no angle is given anywhere in this question; angle PQS and angle RQS are not stated to be equal, and assuming they are would be assuming the very thing being proved. 'Only two pairs of sides — not enough' is wrong because it forgets that the shared side QS is itself a third pair of equal sides. 'Cannot prove — no angle given' is wrong because SSS is one of the four basic congruence conditions and specifically requires no angle at all.
- (d) 1687.5 ml — The length scale factor from the standard bottle to the giant bottle is 1.5, so the volume scale factor is 1.5³ = 3.375. The capacity of the giant bottle is 500 × 3.375 = 1687.5 ml. 750 ml comes from multiplying by the length factor 1.5 directly, without cubing it. 1125 ml comes from using the area scale factor 1.5² = 2.25 instead of the volume scale factor. 2250 ml comes from treating 'cubed' as 'multiplied by 3', giving 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 as the scale factor instead of 1.5³.
- (c) (6, −5) — Method: the translation has already happened, so it must be undone: reverse the vector and apply the reverse to the point that is given. Working: reversing $\binom{-2}{6}$ gives $\binom{2}{-6}$, so the x-coordinate is 4 + 2 = 6 and the y-coordinate is 1 − 6 = −5. Check: from (6, −5) the given vector gives 6 − 2 = 4 and −5 + 6 = 1, which is the point named in the question. Answer: (6, −5). Applying the vector forwards instead of backwards gives (2, 7). Reversing the horizontal movement but not the vertical one gives (6, 7), and reversing the vertical movement but not the horizontal one gives (2, −5).
- (d) No transformation — every point stays exactly where it was — The two vectors (5, −3) and (−5, 3) are opposites, so adding them gives (0, 0): every point ends up exactly where it started, and there is no transformation at all. Misreading the second vector's signs and effectively adding (5, −3) to itself instead of to its opposite gives a translation by the vector (10, −6). Assuming two translations must combine into a reflection gives a reflection in the x-axis — but a reflection reverses orientation, and translations never do. Assuming that two opposite vectors must mean a half turn gives a rotation of 180° about the origin — but a 180° rotation moves every point except its own centre, whereas this pair of translations leaves every single point exactly where it was. Two translations by opposite vectors always cancel exactly, leaving every point unmoved.
- (a) 7.5 cm — Method: two sides and the angle between them are given, so use the cosine rule a² = b² + c² − 2bc cos A, with BC as the side facing the 68° angle. Working: BC² = 7.4² + 5.9² − 2 × 7.4 × 5.9 × cos 68° = 54.76 + 34.81 − 87.32 × 0.3746 = 89.57 − 32.71 = 56.86, and the square root of 56.86 is 7.5405. Answer: BC = 7.5 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 11.1 cm comes from adding the last term instead of subtracting it, 89.57 + 32.71 = 122.28, the commonest sign slip on the cosine rule; 56.9 cm is the value of BC² written down as though it were BC, stopping one step before the square root; 2.9 cm comes from pressing sin instead of cos, using 87.32 × sin 68° = 80.96 as the term to subtract.
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.