Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) AB means the segment or its length, shown by context — Method: recall the standard convention for a two-letter label such as AB. Working: AB names the segment AND its length; the sentence around it shows which is meant — 'draw AB' means the segment, 'AB = 5 cm' means the length. Options: 'a different symbol is needed' and 'must be written as |AB|' both describe stricter rules than the convention GCSE actually uses; 'AB can only mean the segment' ignores that the same label is also used for the length. Answer: AB means the segment or its length, shown by context.
- (c) 2 — A point 4 cm from A lies on a circle of radius 4 cm centred at A; a point 3 cm from B lies on a circle of radius 3 cm centred at B. Since AB = 5 cm, and 4 + 3 = 7 is greater than 5 while 4 − 3 = 1 is less than 5, the two circles genuinely cross each other, at two separate points, one on each side of line AB. "1" comes from wrongly assuming the circles only touch rather than cross, which would need 4 + 3 to equal exactly 5. "0" comes from wrongly assuming the circles miss each other completely. "4" comes from counting where each circle crosses the line AB itself (two points each) instead of counting where the two circles cross each other.
- (d) 2 — Method: a point is invariant under a reflection exactly when it lies on the mirror line, so check each vertex's coordinate against the line's equation. Working: the line of reflection is x = 3, so a vertex is invariant only if its x-coordinate equals 3. (3, 1) has x = 3, so it is invariant. (3, 5) has x = 3, so it is also invariant. (6, 1) has x = 6, so it is not invariant, since 6 is not equal to 3. Two of the three vertices are invariant. Answer: 2. Check EVERY vertex against the mirror line's equation rather than assuming a shape either keeps all its vertices fixed or none of them: a vertex is invariant only when it sits exactly on the line, and here two do and one does not.
- (b) Square — A square has all four sides equal, all four angles equal to 90°, and diagonals that are equal in length and bisect each other at right angles — every part of the description matches, so Square is correct. A rhombus has all four sides equal and diagonals bisecting at right angles, but its interior angles are not generally 90° (only a square, a special rhombus, has that), so it does not fully match. A rectangle has four 90° angles and equal diagonals, but its sides are not all equal in general, so it fails the equal-sides condition. A kite has two pairs of adjacent equal sides rather than all four sides equal, and its diagonals are not generally equal in length, so it fails both conditions.
- (c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.
- (b) 8.64 m — The real length is 240 times the model length: 3.6 × 240 = 864 cm. Converting to metres, 864 cm ÷ 100 = 8.64 m. The distractor 864 m comes from finding the length correctly in centimetres but forgetting to convert to metres. The distractor 0.0864 m comes from dividing by 100 a second time, converting 864 cm to metres twice over (864 ÷ 10 000) instead of once. The distractor 86.4 m comes from converting centimetres to metres by dividing by 10 instead of 100.
- (b) 3 — Method: the scale factor is a length of the second triangle divided by the corresponding length of the first, and corresponding means shortest paired with shortest. Working: the shortest side of the first triangle is 3 cm and the shortest side of the second is 9 cm, so the scale factor is 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: 1/3 comes from dividing 3 by 9, which is the scale factor from the second triangle back to the first; 6 comes from subtracting, 9 − 3, treating the scale factor as a difference rather than a multiplier; 1.8 comes from dividing 9 by 5, pairing the second triangle's shortest side with the first triangle's longest side.
- (a) 49° — Method: an exterior angle of a triangle equals the sum of the two interior angles that are not next to it, which here are the angles at A and at C; since those two are equal, the exterior angle is twice the angle at A. Working: 2 × angle A = 98, so angle A = 98 ÷ 2 = 49. Answer: 49°. The distractors: 82° is the interior angle at B, 180 − 98, given in place of the angle at A; 41° comes from finding that interior angle of 82° and halving it, 82 ÷ 2, instead of halving the exterior angle; 98° comes from taking the exterior angle to be equal to the angle at A on its own, with no halving at all.
- (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
- (b) 13 — Method: the straight-line distance between two points on a grid is the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle whose shorter sides are the horizontal gap and the vertical gap between them, so Pythagoras' theorem applies. Working: one point is the origin, so the horizontal gap is 5 and the vertical gap is 12. Then d² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so d = √169 = 13. Answer: 13. The distractors: 17 comes from adding the two gaps, 5 + 12, instead of adding their squares and taking the root; 12 comes from reading off the vertical gap alone and offering that as the whole distance; 7 comes from subtracting the gaps, 12 − 5, as though a distance were a difference.
- (b) 46.8 cm² — Method: for a parallelogram, not a triangle, the two sides and the angle between them give Area = ab sin C — there is no 1/2. Working: Area = 6 × 9 × sin 60° = 46.8 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 46.8 cm². Using the triangle formula, (1/2)ab sin C, on a parallelogram by mistake gives half the true area, 23.4 cm²; using cos 60° instead of sin 60° gives 27.0 cm²; and adding the two sides before multiplying by sin 60° gives 13.0 cm². A parallelogram is exactly two of the triangles this formula was built for, so never carry the 1/2 across from the triangle version.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (a) 33 — Method: total crates = (number of floor positions that actually have crates on them) × (the stack height). Working: there are 4 × 3 = 12 floor positions in the whole arrangement, but one corner position is left empty, leaving 11 filled positions; each filled position is stacked 3 crates high, so 11 × 3 = 33. Answer: 33. The distractors: 36 comes from forgetting to remove the empty corner and using all 12 positions (12 × 3). 35 comes from removing only one crate for the empty corner instead of the full stack of 3 (36 − 1). 11 comes from counting the filled floor positions and stopping there, forgetting that each one carries a stack 3 crates high.
- (c) 15 cm — Method: going from the smaller tile to the larger one, every length is multiplied by the scale factor 5 ÷ 3. Working: 9 ÷ 3 = 3, and 3 × 5 = 15. Answer: 15 cm. The distractors: 11 cm comes from adding the difference between the parts of the ratio, 5 − 3 = 2, to the 9 cm side, treating a ratio as a gap rather than a multiplier; 45 cm comes from multiplying by 5 and forgetting to divide by 3; 27 cm comes from multiplying by 3, which is the part of the ratio belonging to the smaller tile.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.