Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) (22, −13) — The vector from the ship to the lighthouse is (12, −4) − (2, 5) = (10, −9). Sailing along this vector twice from the start gives (2, 5) + 2 × (10, −9) = (2 + 20, 5 − 18) = (22, −13). '(12, −4)' stops after the ship reaches the lighthouse and ignores the second identical leg. '(−18, 23)' comes from finding the vector the wrong way round, as (2, 5) − (12, −4) = (−10, 9), and then doubling that. '(2, 5)' comes from adding the vector and then subtracting it again, wrongly cancelling the two legs instead of adding them.
- (c) 5√3 m — The cable, the pole and the ground form a right-angled triangle: the ground distance (5 m) is adjacent to the 60° angle, and the height of the pole is opposite it, so height = 5 × tan 60° = 5 × √3 = 5√3 m. 5√3/2 m comes from using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of tan 60°. 5/√3 m comes from using tan 30° = 1/√3, the reciprocal-angle value, instead of tan 60°. 10√3 m comes from doubling the correct height by mistake.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (b) 128.2° — Method: rearrange the area formula for the sine of the enclosed angle, then remember that the inverse sine key returns only the acute angle, so the obtuse angle must be found by subtracting from 180°. Working: 33 = 1/2 × 12 × 7 × sin BAC, so sin BAC = 2 × 33 ÷ (12 × 7) = 66 ÷ 84 = 0.78571. The inverse sine of 0.78571 is 51.787°, and the obtuse angle with the same sine is 180° − 51.787° = 128.213°. Answer: angle BAC = 128.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 51.8° is the acute angle straight off the calculator, given by a candidate who never acts on the instruction that the angle is obtuse; 38.2° comes from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.78571 instead of the inverse sine key; 156.9° comes from forgetting to double the area, so that sin BAC is taken as 33 ÷ 84 = 0.39286, and then subtracting the resulting 23.1° from 180°.
- (c) 5 hours — The distance from the origin to (7, 24) is √(7² + 24²) = √(49 + 576) = √625 = 25 km. Travelling at 5 km per hour, the time taken is 25 ÷ 5 = 5 hours. 25 hours mistakes the distance itself for the time, forgetting to divide by the speed. 125 hours comes from multiplying the distance by the speed, 25 × 5, instead of dividing. 0.2 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 5 ÷ 25, the wrong way round.
- (a) 376.8 cm³ — Volume of a cone = (1/3)πr²h. Substitute r = 6 and h = 10: (1/3) × 3.14 × 6² × 10 = (1/3) × 3.14 × 36 × 10 = (1/3) × 1130.4 = 376.8 cm³.
- (d) No — the volume factor is 2³ = 8, not the area factor 4. — For similar solids, area scales with the square of the length scale factor and volume scales with its cube — different powers of the same number, so they are not usually equal. The length scale factor here is 2, so the area scale factor is 2² = 4 (Priya's figure) but the volume scale factor is 2³ = 8. Priya is wrong: the correct volume scale factor is 8, not 4. The option claiming area and volume always scale by the same factor treats the two as interchangeable, which is only true for the length factor itself. The option giving 6 comes from multiplying the length factor by the number of dimensions (2 × 3) rather than cubing it. The option repeating '4' for volume simply reuses Priya's own area calculation.
- (d) 118° — In an isosceles trapezium, the two angles next to the same parallel side are equal, because the sloping sides are equal in length. So the angle at the other end of the shorter parallel side also equals 118°.
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
- (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
- (c) 1 — sin 30° = 1/2 and cos 60° = 1/2, so sin 30° + cos 60° = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. 0 comes from subtracting the two values instead of adding them (1/2 − 1/2). 1/2 comes from writing down only one of the two exact values and forgetting to add the other. √3 comes from swapping the two angles and working out sin 60° + cos 30° = √3/2 + √3/2 = √3.
- (b) AB = DE — RHS needs a right angle, the hypotenuse, and one OTHER side to be equal; the right angles and hypotenuses are already equal, so a matching pair of the remaining sides, AB = DE, completes RHS. Angle A = angle D is an extra ANGLE fact, not the extra SIDE fact that RHS specifically requires. AC being parallel to DF says nothing about either triangle's side lengths, so it cannot complete a congruence condition. Being drawn the same way up is about orientation on the page, not about any measurement, so it proves nothing about congruence.
- (b) Square — A square has all four sides equal, all four angles equal to 90°, and diagonals that are equal in length and bisect each other at right angles — every part of the description matches, so Square is correct. A rhombus has all four sides equal and diagonals bisecting at right angles, but its interior angles are not generally 90° (only a square, a special rhombus, has that), so it does not fully match. A rectangle has four 90° angles and equal diagonals, but its sides are not all equal in general, so it fails the equal-sides condition. A kite has two pairs of adjacent equal sides rather than all four sides equal, and its diagonals are not generally equal in length, so it fails both conditions.
- (b) 166.3 cm² — Method: split the regular hexagon into 6 identical triangles meeting at the centre, each with two sides of 8 cm and a 60° angle between them, and use Area = (1/2)ab sin C on just one of them. Working: one triangle's area = 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 60° = 27.7 cm² (1 d.p.); the hexagon is 6 of these, so its area is 6 × 27.7 = 166.3 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 166.3 cm². Reporting just one triangle's area, without multiplying by 6, gives 27.7 cm²; treating the angle at the centre as a right angle instead of 60°, using 1/2 × 8 × 8 with no sine factor at all, gives 6 × 32 = 192.0 cm²; and multiplying by 5 instead of 6, miscounting the triangles in the hexagon, gives 5 × 27.7 = 138.6 cm². A regular hexagon always splits into exactly 6 triangles at its centre — count them before you multiply.
- (a) 615.44 cm² — Method: the surface area of a sphere is 4πr². Square the radius, multiply by π, then multiply by 4. Working: r² = 7² = 49, then 3.14 × 49 = 153.86, then 4 × 153.86 = 615.44. Answer: 615.44 cm². The distractors: 153.86 cm² comes from stopping at πr², which is the area of a flat circle of radius 7 cm and leaves out the factor of 4 that a curved surface needs; 87.92 cm² comes from 4 × 3.14 × 7, using the radius itself where the formula asks for its square; 1436.03 cm³ comes from working out the volume of the ball with (4 ÷ 3) × π × r³ instead of its surface area, which is a different measure and carries a cubic unit.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.