Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) (−3, 1) — Method: for an enlargement about a centre, first find the vector from the centre to the point, multiply it by the scale factor, INCLUDING its sign, then add the result back onto the centre. Working: the vector from the centre (1, 1) to A(3, 1) is (3 − 1, 1 − 1) = (2, 0). Multiplying by the scale factor −2 gives −2 × 2 = −4 and −2 × 0 = 0, so the scaled vector is (−4, 0). Adding this to the centre gives 1 + (−4) = −3 and 1 + 0 = 1, so the image is (−3, 1). Answer: (−3, 1). A NEGATIVE scale factor keeps its sign all the way through the calculation: do not treat −2 as +2, and do not treat it as a fraction like 1/2, which is the rule for a scale factor between 0 and 1, not a negative one. Always measure the vector from the CENTRE of enlargement, never from the origin, unless the two happen to coincide.
- (b) segment — The region enclosed between a chord and the arc it cuts off is called a segment. A sector is the different region already named in the question, enclosed by the two radii and the arc, not by the chord. A tangent is a straight line that touches the circle at one point, not an enclosed region at all. The circumference is the total distance around the whole circle, a length, not a region.
- (a) 65° — OT and OC are both radii, so triangle OTC is isosceles with OT = OC, and its base angles are equal: angle OTC = angle OCT = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at the point of contact, so angle OTP = 90°. Since C lies inside angle OTP, the chord TC splits this right angle into angle OTC and angle PTC, so angle PTC = angle OTP − angle OTC = 90° − 25° = 65°. Stopping after finding the base angle of the isosceles triangle, without subtracting it from the right angle at T, leaves 25° instead of the angle actually asked for. Adding the base angle to the right angle instead of subtracting it, 90° + 25° = 115°, reverses the direction the two angles combine in. Finding the sum of the two base angles of the isosceles triangle, 180° − 130° = 50°, and stopping there, gives another wrong value entirely.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (c) 5 — The front elevation shows one square for every cube visible from the front, column by column: the left-hand column is 2 cubes high, so it contributes 2 squares; the middle column is 2 cubes high, so it contributes 2 more; the right-hand column is 1 cube high, so it contributes 1. The total is 2 + 2 + 1 = 5 squares. "6" comes from drawing a full 3 by 2 rectangle, treating every column as if it reached the greatest height. "4" comes from losing a square from one of the two tall columns, counting 2 + 1 + 1. "3" comes from counting one square per column — the width of the solid — and ignoring the heights altogether.
- (c) 37.6 m² — Triangle ABC has a right angle at B, so use Pythagoras' theorem to find AC: AC² = AB² + BC² = 5² + 12² = 25 + 144 = 169, so AC = 13 m. In triangle ACD, use Area = 1/2 × AC × AD × sin(angle CAD) = 1/2 × 13 × 9 × sin 40° = 58.5 × 0.6428 = 37.6 m² (1 d.p.). Adding AB and BC to get AC = 17 m instead of applying Pythagoras gives 1/2 × 17 × 9 × sin 40° = 49.2 m². Using cos 40° instead of sin 40° gives 1/2 × 13 × 9 × cos 40° = 44.8 m². Substituting AB = 5 m directly instead of finding AC first gives 1/2 × 5 × 9 × sin 40° = 14.5 m².
- (c) 15/17 — Method: cos θ = adjacent ÷ hypotenuse, so find the hypotenuse with Pythagoras' theorem first and then decide which short side is next to θ. Working: the hypotenuse is √(8² + 15²) = √(64 + 225) = √289 = 17 cm. The angle θ is opposite the 8 cm side, so the side next to it is the 15 cm side, and cos θ = 15 ÷ 17. Answer: 15/17. The distractors: 8/17 is sin θ, opposite over hypotenuse, used in place of the cosine; 8/15 is tan θ, opposite over adjacent; 17/15 comes from writing the cosine ratio upside down, as hypotenuse over adjacent.
- (b) (−2, −1) — Method: apply the reflection to the point first, then rotate the image about the given centre, in the order the question states them. Working: reflecting (3, 4) in the line y = 1 keeps x = 3 and puts the image as far below the line as the point is above it: 4 is 3 units above y = 1, so the image is 3 units below, at 1 − 3 = −2 (the same as 2 × 1 − 4 = −2). The reflected point is (3, −2). Rotating (3, −2) by 90° clockwise about (1, 1): subtracting the centre gives 3 − 1 = 2 and −2 − 1 = −3, the clockwise rule swaps and negates these to give −3 and −2, and adding the centre back gives 1 + (−3) = −2 and 1 + (−2) = −1. The final image is (−2, −1). Answer: (−2, −1). Reflect before you rotate, exactly as the design process is described, and rotate about the CENTRE (1, 1) given in the question rather than the origin: either mistake, or reversing the two steps, sends the tile to a different point.
- (a) 25° — PA and PB are tangents from the same external point, so PA = PB and OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°. The four angles of the kite sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 50° = 130°. Triangle OAB is isosceles because OA = OB, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OAB = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. Using angle APB itself as the apex angle of triangle OAB instead of angle AOB gives (180° − 50°) ÷ 2 = 65°. Using a triangle's angle sum on the four-sided kite, and so counting only one of its two right angles, treats angle AOB as 180° − 90° − 50° = 40°, and halving what is then left of triangle OAB gives (180° − 40°) ÷ 2 = 70°. Finding angle AOB = 130° correctly but forgetting to halve for the isosceles base angle gives 180° − 130° = 50°. Halve that remaining angle, and 25° is what's left for angle OAB.
- (d) Similar, by SAS — Method: read off whether the given sides are equal or only in the same ratio, and where the given angle sits. Sides in proportion point to similarity; sides equal in length would be needed for congruence. Working: AB ÷ DE = AC ÷ DF gives two pairs of corresponding sides in the same ratio, and the equal angle at A and D lies between AB and AC in the first triangle and between DE and DF in the second, so it is the included angle. Two pairs of sides in proportion with the included angle equal is the SAS condition for similarity. Answer: similar, by SAS. The distractors: 'Similar, by AA' quotes a condition that needs two pairs of equal angles, while only one pair is given here; 'Congruent, by SAS' reads AB ÷ DE = AC ÷ DF as AB = DE and AC = DF, turning a statement about proportion into one about equal lengths; 'Congruent, by SSS' makes that same misreading and adds an assumption that the third pair of sides is equal too, which nothing in the question says.
- (a) 2√3/3 — tan 30° = √3/3, so tan 30° + tan 30° = 2 × √3/3 = 2√3/3. √3 comes from wrongly treating tan 30° + tan 30° as tan(30° + 30°) = tan 60° = √3 — adding angles is not the same as adding ratios. √3/3 comes from forgetting to double the value and just writing down tan 30° on its own. 2√3 comes from doubling the numerator of √3/3 but forgetting to keep the denominator of 3.
- (b) (6, 3) — For an enlargement centred on the origin, multiply both coordinates by the scale factor: (2 × 3, 1 × 3) = (6, 3). A pupil who adds the scale factor to each coordinate instead of multiplying gets (2 + 3, 1 + 3) = (5, 4). A pupil who multiplies only the x-coordinate gets (6, 1). A pupil who multiplies only the y-coordinate gets (2, 3). The correct image is (6, 3).
- (d) a rectangle — The shed is a prism, so its two triangular ends are identical and parallel, a fixed distance apart along the shed's length; the floor they stand on is therefore bounded by the base of one triangle, the base of the other, and the two straight edges joining them — a rectangle. Looking straight down, the sloping roof projects onto that same rectangle rather than outside it, so the plan view is a plain rectangle, as long as the shed and as wide as its gable end. "a triangle" is the shape of the END wall, seen from the front or back, not from above. "a triangle with a rectangle attached" wrongly combines a side-elevation feature with the plan — the plan does not show the triangular end wall at all, since looking down hides it completely. "two triangles joined at their bases" describes neither the plan nor any single elevation of this shed.
- (c) They must also be equal — Once two triangles are proved congruent by any condition, including ASA, they are identical in every respect: every pair of corresponding sides and every pair of corresponding angles must be equal, not just the ones originally used to prove the congruence. So the two remaining pairs of corresponding sides must also be equal, making 'they must also be equal' correct. 'They might be equal or not' and 'not enough information to say' both wrongly suggest that congruence only guarantees the specific facts used to prove it, when congruence actually guarantees the triangles are identical overall. 'They must be different' is backwards: the triangles being identical is the entire point of proving congruence, not a reason for a side to differ.
- (d) (−2, 6) — Method: add the top numbers of both vectors to the starting x-coordinate, and the bottom numbers of both vectors to the starting y-coordinate. Working: x-coordinate 2 + 3 + (−7) = −2; y-coordinate −1 + 5 + 2 = 6. Answer: (−2, 6). A candidate who only applies vector u and forgets v gets (5, 4). A candidate who only applies vector v and forgets u gets (−5, 1). A candidate who works out the combined vector u + v but forgets to add it to the starting point gets (−4, 7).
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.