Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (a) Kite — Method: check each named quadrilateral's properties against the three facts given, one at a time. Working: a kite has two pairs of adjacent sides equal (not opposite pairs), one pair of opposite angles equal (the two angles where an unequal pair of sides meet), and exactly one line of symmetry — matching all three facts. Options: a rhombus does have equal adjacent sides, but all four of its sides are equal, both pairs of its opposite angles are equal, and it has two lines of symmetry rather than exactly one; a parallelogram has its opposite sides equal rather than adjacent pairs, both pairs of opposite angles equal, and no line of symmetry at all; a trapezium does not generally have any pair of equal adjacent sides or a line of symmetry. Answer: kite.
- (b) 4 m — The two triangles are similar, so height ÷ shadow is the same for both objects. For the post, height ÷ shadow = 1.2 ÷ 1.8. Flagpole height = 6 × (1.2 ÷ 1.8) = 4 m. A student who multiplies the flagpole's shadow by the post's height without applying the ratio gets 6 × 1.2 = 7.2 m. A student who assumes a constant DIFFERENCE between shadow and height instead of a constant ratio finds the post's shadow minus height, 1.8 − 1.2 = 0.6 m, then subtracts that from the flagpole's shadow to get 6 − 0.6 = 5.4 m.
- (c) cos 45° — cos 45° = √2/2, and √2 cannot be written as an exact fraction, so this value is irrational. tan 0° = 0, sin 90° = 1 and sin 30° = 1/2 are all rational, since each can be written as an exact whole number or fraction.
- (a) a line parallel to both, 3 cm from each — Being equidistant from two parallel lines 6 cm apart means being exactly halfway between them all along their length, tracing out a third line, parallel to both, at 3 cm from each — half of the 6 cm gap. "a line parallel to both, 6 cm from each" repeats the full gap instead of halving it, which puts those points past one of the lines entirely. "a circle of radius 3 cm, centred midway" applies to a locus equidistant from a single fixed POINT, not from two parallel lines running the full length. "the perpendicular bisector of the gap" crosses the gap at right angles and meets each line at only one point — it is not the whole locus, which runs parallel to the lines, not across them.
- (a) 65° — OT and OC are both radii, so triangle OTC is isosceles with OT = OC, and its base angles are equal: angle OTC = angle OCT = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. A tangent is perpendicular to the radius at the point of contact, so angle OTP = 90°. Since C lies inside angle OTP, the chord TC splits this right angle into angle OTC and angle PTC, so angle PTC = angle OTP − angle OTC = 90° − 25° = 65°. Stopping after finding the base angle of the isosceles triangle, without subtracting it from the right angle at T, leaves 25° instead of the angle actually asked for. Adding the base angle to the right angle instead of subtracting it, 90° + 25° = 115°, reverses the direction the two angles combine in. Finding the sum of the two base angles of the isosceles triangle, 180° − 130° = 50°, and stopping there, gives another wrong value entirely.
- (a) 2 — Method: recall that the diagonals of a rhombus are always lines of symmetry, whatever its angles are. Working: a rhombus (all sides equal) always has its two diagonals as lines of symmetry, giving 2 lines of symmetry, whether or not the angles are 90°. Options: 0 wrongly assumes a non-square rhombus has no symmetry at all; 4 comes from the number of lines of symmetry a square has, mistaking this rhombus for a square; 1 comes from treating the rhombus like a kite, which has only one diagonal as a line of symmetry. Answer: 2.
- (a) (−2, 6) — Translating by the vector (−5, 4) means adding −5 to the x-coordinate and adding 4 to the y-coordinate: (3 + (−5), 2 + 4) = (−2, 6). (8, 6) comes from treating −5 as +5, adding instead of subtracting on the x-coordinate. (−2, −2) keeps the x-coordinate correct but subtracts 4 from the y-coordinate instead of adding it. (7, −3) comes from swapping the two components of the vector, applying 4 to the x-coordinate and −5 to the y-coordinate.
- (a) 150° — The arc length is the same fraction of the circumference as the angle is of 360°. The full circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 6 = 37.68 cm, so the angle is 15.7 ÷ 37.68 × 360 = 150°. Treating the 6 cm as a diameter instead of a radius gives a circumference of 18.84 cm and an angle of 300°. Using π = 3 instead of the given 3.14 gives a circumference of 36 cm and an angle of 157°. Treating the fraction 15.7 ÷ 37.68 as being out of 100 rather than 360 gives about 42°.
- (a) 3.75 km — To convert metres to kilometres, divide by 1000: 3750 ÷ 1000 = 3.75 km. Dividing by 100 instead of 1000 gives 37.5 km. Dividing by 10 instead of 1000 gives 375 km. Dividing by 10 000 instead of 1000 gives 0.375 km.
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
- (d) 30.2 cm² — Method: with two sides and the angle between them, use Area = (1/2)ab sin C. Working: Area = 1/2 × 9.4 × 7.2 × sin 63° = 30.2 cm² (1 d.p.). Answer: 30.2 cm². Leaving out the 1/2 altogether gives 60.3 cm²; using cos 63° instead of sin 63° gives 15.4 cm²; and squaring one side instead of multiplying the two different given sides together gives 39.4 cm². Always check you are using sin, not cos, and that the 1/2 is there before you multiply the two given sides together.
- (b) £709 — Method: first find the area of the triangular platform with Area = (1/2)ab sin C, then multiply by the cost per square metre. Working: Area = 1/2 × 11.5 × 8.2 × sin 72° = 44.8 m² (1 d.p.); cost = area × £15.80, which rounds to £709 to the nearest pound. Answer: £709. Leaving out the 1/2 in the area formula doubles the area, giving a cost of £1417; using cos 72° instead of sin 72° gives a much smaller area and a cost of £230; and squaring the 11.5 m side instead of multiplying the two different given sides together gives a cost of £994. Find the exact area first — don't round it early — then multiply by the cost per square metre and round only the final answer.
- (a) Reflect in the x-axis, then translate by (0, 7). — Reflecting in the x-axis sends (x, y) to (x, −y); applied to S's vertices (2, 2), (5, 2) and (2, 5) this gives (2, −2), (5, −2) and (2, −5). Translating this image by the vector (0, 7) adds 7 to every y-coordinate, giving (2, 5), (5, 5) and (2, 2), which matches S′ exactly. Using the correct reflection but translating by (7, 0) instead moves the image sideways rather than upwards, giving (9, −2), (12, −2) and (9, −5) — nowhere near S′. Reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate rather than the y-coordinate, so translating that image by (0, 7) gives (−2, 9), (−5, 9) and (−2, 12), the wrong shape entirely. Rotating 180° about the origin instead of reflecting sends every coordinate to its negative, so translating by (0, 7) gives (−2, 5), (−5, 5) and (−2, 2) — the y-coordinates match S′ but the x-coordinates do not.
- (a) 2 — Gradient = (change in y) ÷ (change in x) = (11 − 3) ÷ (6 − 2) = 8 ÷ 4 = 2. "0.5" comes from dividing the change in x by the change in y the wrong way round: 4 ÷ 8. "8" is only the change in y, forgetting to divide by the change in x at all. "−2" comes from a sign error, as if the y-coordinate had decreased rather than increased.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.