Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) No — it's a 180° rotation, not a reflection. — A negative scale factor scales the shape by the size of the factor and turns it through 180° about the centre of enlargement — every point of the image lands on the opposite side of the centre from the object. A 180° turn is a rotation, and a rotation never reverses a shape's handedness (its sense), whereas a reflection always does, so the image is not a mirror image: Priti is wrong. The option claiming negative numbers always mean a reflection confuses the sign of a scale factor with the transformation of reflection — they are not the same thing. The option saying only the size changes ignores the sign altogether: the 180° turn does change the way the shape faces, even though it leaves the handedness unchanged. The option equating 'upside down' with 'mirrored' assumes the two always mean the same thing, but a 180° rotation and a reflection in a horizontal line can both look 'upside down' while being different transformations — only the reflection reverses the shape's handedness.
- (a) A square's diagonals are equal in length — A square has two pairs of parallel sides, four equal sides, and diagonals that are equal in length and cross at right angles. This tile's diagonals are not equal, so it is a rhombus that is not a square.
- (b) 2 cm — Method: the volume of a cube is edge × edge × edge, so finding the edge from the volume means undoing a cube, not a square or a halving. Working: edge × edge × edge = 8; testing whole numbers, 1 × 1 × 1 = 1 is too small and the next whole number gives 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, which matches. Answer: 2 cm. The distractors: 8 cm comes from writing the volume down as the edge length and changing only the unit; 4 cm comes from halving the volume, 8 ÷ 2, as though a cube were undone by dividing by 2; 2.83 cm is the square root of 8, from taking a square root where a cube root is needed.
- (b) 75.1 cm² — Method: a segment is a sector with its triangle cut away, so find the sector area and the triangle area (using Area = (1/2)r² sin C on the two radii) and subtract. Working: sector area = (130 ÷ 360) × π × 10² = 113.4 cm² (1 d.p.); triangle area = 1/2 × 10 × 10 × sin 130° = 38.3 cm² (1 d.p.); segment area = 113.4 − 38.3 = 75.1 cm². Answer: 75.1 cm². Reporting the sector area on its own, without subtracting the triangle, gives 113.4 cm²; reporting the triangle area on its own gives 38.3 cm²; and using the reflex angle, 360° − 130° = 230°, in the sector but still subtracting the triangle gives 162.4 cm², which is neither segment — the major segment would be the 230° sector PLUS the triangle, 239.0 cm². The minor segment is the smaller piece, cut off by the shorter arc, so use the angle actually given, 130°, and subtract the triangle from that sector.
- (b) (3, 10) — Method: multiply every part of p by 2, then add the matching parts of q. Working: 2p = (4, 6); adding q gives top 4 + (−1) = 3 and bottom 6 + 4 = 10. Answer: 2p + q = (3, 10). A candidate who forgets to double p first, working out p + q instead, gets (1, 7). A candidate who doubles q instead of p, working out p + 2q, gets (0, 11). A candidate who subtracts q instead of adding it, working out 2p − q, gets (5, 2).
- (b) 62 — Method: co-interior (allied) angles between parallel lines add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 118 = 62. Answer: 62°. A candidate who treats co-interior angles as equal, like corresponding angles, gives 118. A candidate who uses 360° instead of 180°, working out 360 − 118, gets 242. A candidate who subtracts as if the angles were complementary, working out 118 − 90, gets 28.
- (d) 2 — Method: if f is 3 times e, then each part of f equals 3 times the matching part of e. Working: using the bottom numbers, 6 = 3 × k, so k = 2. Answer: k = 2. A candidate who multiplies instead of dividing, working out 6 × 3, gets 18. A candidate who uses the top numbers' ratio instead, 15 ÷ 5, and gives that ratio as k gets 3. A candidate who adds instead of using the multiple relationship, working out 6 + 3, gets 9.
- (d) 59.4° and 120.6° — Method: two sides and an angle that is not between them can describe two triangles, because an acute angle and its supplement have the same sine. Use the sine rule for the angle, then test whether the supplement also fits inside 180°. Working: AB = 9 cm faces angle ACB and BC = 6 cm faces the 35° angle, so sin ACB = 9 × sin 35° ÷ 6 = 5.1622 ÷ 6 = 0.86036. The inverse sine of 0.86036 is 59.358°, and its supplement is 180° − 59.358° = 120.642°. Both survive the angle-sum test, since 35° + 59.4° = 94.4° and 35° + 120.6° = 155.6°, each less than 180°. Answer: angle ACB is 59.4° or 120.6° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 22.5° and 157.5° come from putting the sides the wrong way up, 6 × sin 35° ÷ 9 = 0.38238; 30.6° and 149.4° come from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.86036 instead of the inverse sine key; 59.4° and 85.6° are the two unknown angles of the first triangle, 59.358° and 180° − 35° − 59.358°, given by a candidate who has found one triangle and reported its angles rather than the two possible sizes of the same angle.
- (a) £4.20 — 350 g is 3.5 lots of 100 g, since 350 ÷ 100 = 3.5, so the cost is 3.5 × £1.20 = £4.20. Multiplying the mass in grams directly by the price, without dividing by 100 first, gives £420.00. Working out 100 ÷ 350 instead of 350 ÷ 100 inverts the ratio and gives about £0.34. Rounding 350 g down to 300 g gives 3 × £1.20 = £3.60.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (b) 25 cm² — Method: a square has four equal sides, so divide the perimeter by 4 to recover the side length, then square that side to get the area. Working: 20 ÷ 4 = 5 cm, then 5 × 5 = 25. Answer: 25 cm². The distractors: 400 cm² comes from squaring the perimeter itself, 20 × 20, treating the 20 cm as though it were the side length; 100 cm² comes from dividing the perimeter by 2 rather than by 4, giving a side of 10 cm, and squaring that; 5 cm is the side length, from stopping as soon as the perimeter has been divided by 4 and never squaring it, which also leaves a length where an area was asked for.
- (b) 70 cm³ — Area of the triangular cross-section = base × height ÷ 2. Base × height = 3.5 × 4 = 14 cm², and half of that is 14 ÷ 2 = 7 cm². Volume of the prism = cross-sectional area × length = 7 × 10 = 70 cm³. A pupil who forgets to halve when finding the triangle's area gets 3.5 × 4 × 10 = 140 cm³. A pupil who correctly finds the cross-sectional area but forgets to multiply by the length stops at 7 cm³. A pupil who ignores the height altogether, multiplying base by length, gets 3.5 × 10 = 35 cm³. The correct volume is 70 cm³.
- (a) 10.1 cm — Method: the area formula 1/2 × a × b × sin C contains the unknown side, so substitute what is known and rearrange. Working: 42 = 1/2 × 9.5 × AC × sin 61°. Multiplying both sides by 2 gives 84 = 9.5 × AC × sin 61°, and 9.5 × sin 61° = 9.5 × 0.87462 = 8.3089, so AC = 84 ÷ 8.3089 = 10.1096. Answer: AC = 10.1 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 5.1 cm comes from forgetting to double the area when clearing the factor 1/2 and working out 42 ÷ 8.3089; 18.2 cm comes from using cos 61° in place of sin 61° in the denominator; 7.7 cm comes from multiplying by sin 61° instead of dividing by it, 84 × sin 61° ÷ 9.5, the standard slip when the unknown is inside a product.
- (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.