Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 0.5 — The real distance is 2 × 25000 = 50000 cm. Converting to metres, by dividing by 100, gives 500 m, and converting to kilometres, by dividing by 1000, gives 0.5 km. A candidate who divides the 50000 cm by 1000 in one go, applying the metres-to-kilometres factor straight to the centimetres, gets 50 km. A candidate who divides by 100 twice, treating 100 m as 1 km, gets 5 km. A candidate who slips one extra decimal place when converting 500 m to kilometres gets 0.05 km. The real distance is 0.5 km.
- (b) (6, 3) — For an enlargement centred on the origin, multiply both coordinates by the scale factor: (2 × 3, 1 × 3) = (6, 3). A pupil who adds the scale factor to each coordinate instead of multiplying gets (2 + 3, 1 + 3) = (5, 4). A pupil who multiplies only the x-coordinate gets (6, 1). A pupil who multiplies only the y-coordinate gets (2, 3). The correct image is (6, 3).
- (b) 340 — The real length of the path is 8.5 × 2000 = 17000 cm, which converts to 170 m by dividing by 100. The cyclist rides the path there and back, so the total distance is 170 × 2 = 340 m. A candidate who forgets the return journey gives only the one-way distance, 170 m. A candidate who halves the one-way distance instead of doubling it, reading “there and back” as splitting the journey, gets 85 m. A candidate who doubles the scale factor to 4000 by mistake, getting a one-way length of 340 m, and then doubles that for the return journey, gets 680 m. The total distance the cyclist travels is 340 m.
- (c) A rotation of 180° about the origin — An enlargement by scale factor −1 sends every point (x, y) to (−x, −y) — both coordinates change sign. A rotation of 180° about the origin does exactly the same thing to every point, so the two transformations have identical effect. A reflection in the x-axis only changes the sign of the y-coordinate, sending (x, y) to (x, −y), leaving the x-coordinate untouched. A reflection in the y-axis only changes the sign of the x-coordinate, sending (x, y) to (−x, y), leaving the y-coordinate untouched. Treating a negative scale factor as though it behaves like a positive one gives no transformation at all, but the minus sign is not decorative — it reverses both coordinates. Both signs flip together, which is exactly what a 180° rotation about the origin does.
- (c) 152.2 cm² — Method: find the area of one of the 5 isosceles triangles with 1/2ab sin C, then multiply by 5 for the whole pentagon. Working: one triangle has area 1/2 × 8 × 8 × sin 72° = 30.4338 cm², so the pentagon's area = 5 × 30.4338 = 152.2 cm² — keep the unrounded triangle area, since 5 × 30.4 would give 152.0. Reporting the area of a single triangle and forgetting to multiply by 5 gives 30.4 cm²; multiplying by 6 instead of 5, as for a hexagon, gives 182.6 cm²; and leaving out the 1/2 from each triangle before multiplying by 5 gives 304.3 cm². A regular pentagon splits into exactly 5 triangles at its centre, each with a 72° angle, since 360° ÷ 5 = 72°.
- (c) 1.5 — The area scale factor is the length scale factor squared, so if n is the length factor, n² = 2.25. Taking the positive square root gives n = 1.5 (check: 1.5² = 2.25). 2.25 is just the area factor restated, with no root taken. 1.125 comes from halving 2.25 instead of taking its square root. 5.0625 comes from squaring 2.25 instead of rooting it.
- (b) SAS (two sides and the included angle) — PQ = ST and QR = TU are two pairs of matching sides, and the angle between them (angle Q and angle T) is 90° in both triangles — two sides and the angle between them are equal, so the triangles are congruent by SAS, using only the measurements given. RHS needs the hypotenuses to be known equal; here only the two legs are given, so you would first have to work out each hypotenuse by Pythagoras' theorem — extra working the question rules out. SSS has the same problem: the third side of each triangle is not given, only calculable. ASA needs two angles and the side between them, but here it is two sides and the angle between them that are given, not two angles.
- (a) opposite angles of a parallelogram are equal — P and R are opposite vertices of the parallelogram, and opposite angles of a parallelogram are always equal, which is why angle R equals angle P, 65°. Co-interior angles adding up to 180° is the correct fact for angle Q or angle S, the angles adjacent to P along a side, not for the opposite angle R. Alternate angles are equal is a fact about a transversal crossing two parallel lines, which explains other angle relationships in the parallelogram, not the one between opposite angles P and R directly. Angles on a straight line adding up to 180° applies to two angles that sit together on one straight line, which P and R do not.
- (c) 282.6 cm³ — Volume of a cylinder = πr²h = 3.14 × 3² × 10 = 3.14 × 9 × 10 = 282.6 cm³. (94.2 cm³ comes from using πrh and forgetting to square the radius; 90 cm³ comes from using r²h and leaving π out altogether; 1130.4 cm³ comes from using the diameter, 6 cm, in place of the radius.)
- (a) SSA - not sufficient to prove congruence — The angle given, angle A, is not the angle between sides AB and BC — it is not the included angle — so this data is SSA (side, side, angle), which is not sufficient to prove congruence on its own; two triangles can share this SSA information without being congruent. SAS is wrong because the given angle is not the one included between the two given sides. ASA is wrong because only one angle (A) is given, not two. AAS is wrong for the same reason — only one angle is given, not two.
- (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
- (a) 25° — PA and PB are tangents from the same external point, so PA = PB and OAPB is a kite with right angles at A and B, by the tangent–radius theorem: angle OAP = angle OBP = 90°. The four angles of the kite sum to 360°, so angle AOB = 360° − 90° − 90° − 50° = 130°. Triangle OAB is isosceles because OA = OB, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OAB = (180° − 130°) ÷ 2 = 25°. Using angle APB itself as the apex angle of triangle OAB instead of angle AOB gives (180° − 50°) ÷ 2 = 65°. Using a triangle's angle sum on the four-sided kite, and so counting only one of its two right angles, treats angle AOB as 180° − 90° − 50° = 40°, and halving what is then left of triangle OAB gives (180° − 40°) ÷ 2 = 70°. Finding angle AOB = 130° correctly but forgetting to halve for the isosceles base angle gives 180° − 130° = 50°. Halve that remaining angle, and 25° is what's left for angle OAB.
- (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (b) 28 — Method: total bricks = (number of squares in the footprint) × (the height of the wall in bricks). Working: the footprint has the row of 5 squares plus the 2 squares in the arm that stands out from the middle of that row, and they do not overlap, giving 5 + 2 = 7 squares; multiplying by the height of 4 bricks gives 7 × 4 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 20 comes from using only the row of 5 and ignoring the arm (5 × 4). 24 comes from treating the bottom square of the arm as if it were one of the row's own squares, so the arm is counted as adding only 1 new square instead of 2 (5 + 1 = 6, then 6 × 4). 32 comes from counting the square of the row directly below the arm a second time as part of the arm (5 + 3 = 8, then 8 × 4).
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.