Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 80 cm² — Method: a composite shape made of two rectangles that do not overlap has an area equal to the sum of the two rectangle areas, so work out each area and add them. Working: the first rectangle has area 12 × 4 = 48 cm² and the second has area 4 × 8 = 32 cm², so the total is 48 + 32 = 80. Answer: 80 cm². The distractors: 48 cm² comes from working out the larger rectangle only and treating it as the whole shape; 32 cm² comes from working out the smaller rectangle only; 28 cm comes from adding the four given lengths, 12 + 4 + 4 + 8, which is a distance rather than an area and so carries a plain centimetre unit.
- (b) 128.2° — Method: rearrange the area formula for the sine of the enclosed angle, then remember that the inverse sine key returns only the acute angle, so the obtuse angle must be found by subtracting from 180°. Working: 33 = 1/2 × 12 × 7 × sin BAC, so sin BAC = 2 × 33 ÷ (12 × 7) = 66 ÷ 84 = 0.78571. The inverse sine of 0.78571 is 51.787°, and the obtuse angle with the same sine is 180° − 51.787° = 128.213°. Answer: angle BAC = 128.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 51.8° is the acute angle straight off the calculator, given by a candidate who never acts on the instruction that the angle is obtuse; 38.2° comes from pressing the inverse cosine key on 0.78571 instead of the inverse sine key; 156.9° comes from forgetting to double the area, so that sin BAC is taken as 33 ÷ 84 = 0.39286, and then subtracting the resulting 23.1° from 180°.
- (d) Triangle 2, by 3.6 cm² — Method: find both areas with 1/2ab sin C, then compare them. Working: area of triangle 1 = 1/2 × 10 × 13 × sin 64° = 58.4 cm²; area of triangle 2 = 1/2 × 11 × 12 × sin 70° = 62.0 cm²; triangle 2 is larger, by 62.0 − 58.4 = 3.6 cm². Getting the right difference but naming triangle 1 as the larger one, the subtraction done the wrong way round, gives 'Triangle 1, by 3.6 cm²'; leaving out the 1/2 when finding triangle 1's area (giving 116.8 cm² instead of 58.4 cm²) and then subtracting gives 'Triangle 1, by 54.8 cm²'; and using cos 64° instead of sin 64° for triangle 1 (giving 28.5 cm² instead of 58.4 cm²) gives 'Triangle 2, by 33.5 cm²'. Work out both areas fully and correctly before comparing which is bigger.
- (b) Hexagon — Cutting straight across a prism, at right angles to its length, always gives a cross-section that is the same shape as its end faces. The end faces of a hexagonal prism are hexagons (6-sided), so the cross-section is a hexagon. Choosing Pentagon comes from miscounting the sides of the hexagonal end as five instead of six. Choosing Rectangle comes from cutting along the LENGTH of the prism instead of across it, which gives a rectangular face, not the cross-section asked for. Choosing Triangle comes from confusing a hexagonal prism with a triangular prism.
- (a) 31.4 — Method: first find the circumference of one turn using π × diameter, then multiply by the number of turns. Working: circumference = 3.14 × 0.5 = 1.57 m; total distance = 1.57 × 20 = 31.4 m. A student who answers 15.7 has mistakenly halved the diameter again before multiplying, using 0.25 m instead of 0.5 m. A student who answers 3.14 has simply written down π itself, without completing the circumference or multiplying by the number of turns. A student who answers 62.8 has mistakenly doubled the diameter to 1 m before multiplying, treating the given length as a radius. Answer: 31.4 m.
- (a) 225 — Method: find the interior angle of the regular octagon, then subtract it from 360° to find the reflex angle at the same vertex, since the interior angle and the reflex angle together make a full turn. Working: there are 8 − 2 = 6 triangles' worth of angle in the octagon, so the interior angle = 6 × 180 ÷ 8 = 135; reflex angle = 360 − 135 = 225. Answer: 225°. A candidate who stops after finding the interior angle gives 135. A candidate who works out the exterior angle instead, 360 ÷ 8 = 45, gives 45. A candidate who subtracts the exterior angle from 360° instead of the interior angle, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
- (c) 18 — Rearranging F + V − E = 2 gives E = F + V − 2. Substitute F = 8 and V = 12: 8 + 12 − 2 = 18 edges. Choosing 20 comes from adding the faces and vertices but forgetting to subtract the 2 (8 + 12 = 20). Choosing 22 comes from adding the 2 instead of subtracting it (8 + 12 + 2 = 22). Choosing 16 comes from subtracting 2 twice by mistake (8 + 12 − 2 − 2 = 16).
- (d) 6 — The plan view shows every square of the base footprint, whether or not there is a taller stack above it — the base layer alone already covers a 3 by 2 rectangle of cubes, which is 6 squares. The extra cube on top of a corner cube sits directly above a square that is already counted, so it adds no NEW square to the plan — height does not show up in a plan view, only footprint does. "7" comes from wrongly counting the extra cube as an additional square. "5" comes from missing one square of the base rectangle, perhaps forgetting a corner. "3" comes from counting only one row of the base rectangle and forgetting that the base is two rows deep.
- (b) 18 — Method: convert the real length to centimetres, then divide by the scale factor to shrink it down to the model's size. Working: 4.32 m = 432 cm; 432 cm / 24 = 18 cm. A student who answers 432 has converted the units correctly but forgotten to divide by the scale factor at all. A student who answers 10368 has multiplied by the scale factor instead of dividing (432 x 24). A student who answers 1.8 has converted the metres to centimetres by multiplying by 10 instead of 100, getting 43.2 cm, and then divided by 24. Answer: 18 cm.
- (b) 4 — The scale factor is the distance from the centre to the image, divided by the distance from the centre to the object: (5 − 1) ÷ (2 − 1) = 4 ÷ 1 = 4. (2.5 comes from dividing the raw y-coordinates, 5 ÷ 2, without first subtracting the centre's coordinate; 3 comes from subtracting the two distances instead of dividing them; 0.25 comes from dividing the distances the wrong way round.)
- (b) 6√3 m — The horizontal distance covered by one support is adjacent to the 30° angle, so it equals 6 × cos 30° = 6 × √3/2 = 3√3 m. The total base width is made up of both supports, so it is 2 × 3√3 = 6√3 m. '3√3 m' gives only one support's horizontal distance and forgets to double it for the total width. '6 m' comes from using sin 30° instead of cos 30° for the horizontal distance (6 × sin 30° = 3, doubled to 6). '12 m' comes from doubling the full sloping length of 6 m without using any trigonometry at all.
- (b) Wrong: 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 3.2 l = 3200 ml. — 1 litre = 1000 ml, so 3.2 litres = 3.2 × 1000 = 3200 ml — Sam is wrong because he multiplied by 100 instead of 1000. Saying Sam is correct accepts the wrong multiplier. Saying Sam is wrong only because 3.2 should be rounded first misses the real error, which is the multiplier, not the starting number. Saying '1 litre is 100 ml' misstates the basic fact and blames the wrong part of Sam's working.
- (a) Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°. — A correct proof must build in a strictly logical order: the reflex and non-reflex angles at O, which together make a complete turn about the centre, must be added to 360° before 2a and 2c can be combined and divided. The statement 'Reflex + non-reflex angle BOD = 360°, so 2a + 2c = 360°' is the only one that follows directly from having 2a and 2c already established, and it is exactly what is needed before the final division step. Jumping straight to 'Divide by 2 throughout to get a + c = 180°' skips the step that justifies why 2a + 2c equals 360° in the first place — there is nothing yet to divide. Repeating 'Angle BOD is 2a and 2c, by the centre theorem' does not move the proof forward at all, since that fact has already been established in the sentence given. Introducing 'OB = OD are radii, so triangle OBD is isosceles' brings in an unrelated triangle and an unrelated method that plays no part in this particular proof.
- (c) 11.2 cm — Method: two angles and a side are given, so use the sine rule, a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C, taking care that each side is paired with the angle it faces. Working: BC faces angle BAC = 42°, and AC faces angle ABC = 63°, so AC/sin 63° = 8.4/sin 42°. Multiplying up, AC = 8.4 × sin 63° ÷ sin 42° = 7.4845 ÷ 0.6691 = 11.185. Answer: AC = 11.2 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 6.3 cm comes from writing the ratio upside down, 8.4 × sin 42° ÷ sin 63°, which pairs each side with the angle beside it rather than the angle opposite it; 12.1 cm comes from using the third angle, 180° − 42° − 63° = 75°, in the numerator, which gives the length of AB instead of AC; 12.6 cm comes from assuming the sides are in the same ratio as the angles and working out 8.4 × 63 ÷ 42, which is true for arcs of a circle but never for the sides of a triangle.
- (b) 2 cm — Method: the volume of a cube is edge × edge × edge, so finding the edge from the volume means undoing a cube, not a square or a halving. Working: edge × edge × edge = 8; testing whole numbers, 1 × 1 × 1 = 1 is too small and the next whole number gives 2 × 2 × 2 = 8, which matches. Answer: 2 cm. The distractors: 8 cm comes from writing the volume down as the edge length and changing only the unit; 4 cm comes from halving the volume, 8 ÷ 2, as though a cube were undone by dividing by 2; 2.83 cm is the square root of 8, from taking a square root where a cube root is needed.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.