Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (d) (−5, −4) — Method: every vertex of a translated shape moves by the same vector, so find that vector from the one vertex whose image is given, then apply it to A. Working: C(4, 5) moves to (0, −1), so across 0 − 4 = −4 and up −1 − 5 = −6, giving the vector $\binom{-4}{-6}$. Applying it to A(−1, 2): −1 − 4 = −5 and 2 − 6 = −4. Answer: the image of A is (−5, −4). Working the vector out as object minus image gives 4 to the right and 6 up, which applied to A gives (3, 8). Getting the horizontal movement right but reversing the vertical one gives (−5, 8). Treating (0, −1) as the image of every vertex ignores that a translation carries each vertex to a different place.
- (c) AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed — By convention, lines marked with the same number of arrows are parallel to each other, but lines marked with a different number of arrows belong to a different, unrelated family of parallel lines. AB and CD both have a single arrow, so AB is parallel to CD. EF has a double arrow, showing it is not part of the same family as AB and CD; it may be parallel to some other line marked with a double arrow, but nothing here confirms it is parallel to AB or CD, so 'AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed' is correct. 'AB, CD and EF are all parallel' and 'EF is parallel to AB' both wrongly treat every arrow mark as showing the same relationship. 'None of the lines are parallel' wrongly assumes a different arrow count rules out any parallel relationship at all, when it actually just signals a different pairing.
- (d) SAS, vertically opposite angle included — AE equals CE and BE equals DE give two pairs of equal sides, and angle AEB equals angle CED because they are vertically opposite angles formed where AC and BD cross; vertically opposite angles are always equal without needing to be measured. This included angle sits between the two known sides in each triangle, giving SAS, so 'SAS, vertically opposite angle included' is correct. 'ASA, vertically opposite angle at E' is wrong because ASA needs two pairs of equal angles with the side between them, but only one angle is known in each triangle here, and the two other known facts are sides, not angles. 'SSS, three equal side pairs' is wrong because only two pairs of sides are given; there is no third pair of equal sides. 'Cannot prove — no angle measured' is wrong because vertically opposite angles are always equal automatically when two straight lines cross, so no separate measurement is needed.
- (a) 10.1 cm — Method: the area formula 1/2 × a × b × sin C contains the unknown side, so substitute what is known and rearrange. Working: 42 = 1/2 × 9.5 × AC × sin 61°. Multiplying both sides by 2 gives 84 = 9.5 × AC × sin 61°, and 9.5 × sin 61° = 9.5 × 0.87462 = 8.3089, so AC = 84 ÷ 8.3089 = 10.1096. Answer: AC = 10.1 cm to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 5.1 cm comes from forgetting to double the area when clearing the factor 1/2 and working out 42 ÷ 8.3089; 18.2 cm comes from using cos 61° in place of sin 61° in the denominator; 7.7 cm comes from multiplying by sin 61° instead of dividing by it, 84 × sin 61° ÷ 9.5, the standard slip when the unknown is inside a product.
- (c) 5 hours — The distance from the origin to (7, 24) is √(7² + 24²) = √(49 + 576) = √625 = 25 km. Travelling at 5 km per hour, the time taken is 25 ÷ 5 = 5 hours. 25 hours mistakes the distance itself for the time, forgetting to divide by the speed. 125 hours comes from multiplying the distance by the speed, 25 × 5, instead of dividing. 0.2 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 5 ÷ 25, the wrong way round.
- (d) 118.0 cm² — Method: a rhombus is made of two congruent triangles either side of a diagonal, each with area 1/2 × 12 × 12 × sin 55°, so the whole rhombus has area 12 × 12 × sin 55° (side² × sin of the interior angle). Working: area = 12² × sin 55° = 118.0 cm². Stopping at one triangle's area, 1/2 × 12² × sin 55°, and forgetting to double it gives 59.0 cm²; using cos 55° instead of sin 55° gives 82.6 cm²; and multiplying the two sides together with no trig term at all gives 144.0 cm². Splitting the rhombus into its two triangles is the safest way to see why the 1/2 disappears from the whole-shape formula.
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (a) 24 cm — The line from the centre to the midpoint of a chord is perpendicular to the chord, so triangle OMA has a right angle at M. By Pythagoras' theorem, AM² = OA² − OM² = 169 − 25 = 144, so AM = 12 cm. AB is twice AM, since M is the midpoint: AB = 2 × 12 = 24 cm. Finding AM = 12 cm correctly but forgetting to double it for the full chord gives 12 cm. Working out 169 − 25 = 144 and forgetting to take the square root gives 144 cm. Subtracting first and then doubling the wrong way, (13 − 5) × 2, gives 16 cm. Doubling AM after finding it correctly is the step that's missing from all three — do it, and you get 24 cm.
- (c) (1/3)b − (1/3)a — Method: PQ runs from P to Q, so PQ = OQ − OP. Working: PQ = (1/3)b − (1/3)a. Answer: PQ = (1/3)b − (1/3)a. Subtracting the other way round gives (1/3)a − (1/3)b, the same vector pointing back from Q to P instead of P to Q; using 2/3 instead of the 1/3 that OP and OQ were actually given as gives (2/3)b − (2/3)a; and using the full vectors a and b with no scaling at all gives b − a, which is AB, not PQ. Always subtract START from END, OQ − OP, and carry the fraction given in the question through to your final vector.
- (d) SAS — two sides, included angle — Each section has two known sides, 3.6 m and 2.4 m, with the 70° angle between them, matching in both sections; this is exactly the SAS condition, so 'SAS — two sides, included angle' is correct. 'SSS — but only two sides given' is wrong because SSS requires three pairs of equal sides, but only two sides are given for each triangle here. 'ASA — angle between two sides' is wrong because ASA requires two angles with a side between them, but only one angle, 70°, is given, not two. 'Cannot prove — only one angle' is wrong because SAS is specifically designed to prove congruence from exactly two sides and the one angle between them, so no further angle is needed.
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (c) A line has no endpoints; a segment has two — A line extends without end in both directions, whereas a line segment is the part of a line between two specific fixed endpoints, so 'a line has no endpoints; a segment has two' is correct. 'A line has two endpoints; a segment has none' reverses these two definitions, so it is wrong. 'A line segment is always curved' is wrong because a line segment is straight, not curved, and does not extend infinitely. 'A line segment is a closed shape' is wrong because a line segment is a straight length between two points, not a polygon.
- (a) 75° — The three angles in the triangle formed by the two supports and the ground add up to 180°. Two of the angles are 34° and 71°, so the third angle is 180 − 34 − 71 = 75, which is 75°. 105° comes from adding the two given angles together instead of subtracting them from 180° (34 + 71 = 105). 146° comes from computing 180 − 34 = 146 and forgetting to also subtract 71°. 37° comes from subtracting the two given angles from each other instead of using the triangle's angle sum (71 − 34 = 37).
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.