Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 58° — In an isosceles triangle, the base angles opposite the equal sides are equal. Since DE = DF, angle F is the base angle equal to angle E, so angle F = 58°.
- (b) 70 cm³ — Area of the triangular cross-section = base × height ÷ 2. Base × height = 3.5 × 4 = 14 cm², and half of that is 14 ÷ 2 = 7 cm². Volume of the prism = cross-sectional area × length = 7 × 10 = 70 cm³. A pupil who forgets to halve when finding the triangle's area gets 3.5 × 4 × 10 = 140 cm³. A pupil who correctly finds the cross-sectional area but forgets to multiply by the length stops at 7 cm³. A pupil who ignores the height altogether, multiplying base by length, gets 3.5 × 10 = 35 cm³. The correct volume is 70 cm³.
- (a) 2 — Method: recall that the diagonals of a rhombus are always lines of symmetry, whatever its angles are. Working: a rhombus (all sides equal) always has its two diagonals as lines of symmetry, giving 2 lines of symmetry, whether or not the angles are 90°. Options: 0 wrongly assumes a non-square rhombus has no symmetry at all; 4 comes from the number of lines of symmetry a square has, mistaking this rhombus for a square; 1 comes from treating the rhombus like a kite, which has only one diagonal as a line of symmetry. Answer: 2.
- (b) A right-angled triangle — The right angle at Y makes this a right-angled triangle, so that description is correct. Since XY is twice YZ, those two sides cannot be equal. The third side XZ is opposite the right angle, so it is the hypotenuse and is longer than either XY or YZ, so it cannot equal either of them. No two sides are equal, which rules out 'an isosceles triangle' and 'a right-angled isosceles triangle', both of which wrongly assume two equal sides. 'An equilateral triangle' would need all three sides equal, which contradicts XY being twice YZ, so it is wrong too.
- (c) 45° — Method: the tower, the ground and the line of sight form a right-angled triangle in which the 25 m height is opposite the angle of elevation and the 25 m along the ground is adjacent to it, so use tan θ = opposite ÷ adjacent. Working: tan θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, so θ = tan⁻¹(1). Answer: 45°. The distractors: 90° comes from using sin θ = 25 ÷ 25 = 1, which treats the 25 m along the ground as the hypotenuse when it is the side next to the angle; 1° comes from writing down the value of tan θ as though it were the angle itself; 50° comes from adding the two given lengths, 25 + 25, instead of comparing them.
- (a) No — the angle is not between the two sides — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides. Working: the 35° angle is marked away from the corner where the 40 cm and 65 cm edges meet, so it is not the included angle — this is SSA, which is not one of the four basic congruence conditions, so it does not guarantee congruence. Options: 'Yes — SAS' wrongly treats any two sides plus any angle as SAS, without checking the angle's position; 'Yes — SSS' wrongly counts the angle as if it were a third side; 'No — only two sides measured' is not the real reason, since SAS itself only needs two sides, so this reasoning is beside the point. Answer: no, the angle is not between the two sides.
- (d) 10.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the hypotenuse = √(5² + 9²) = √(25 + 81) = √106 = 10.29...≈ 10.3 m. "106 m" is the value under the square root sign, correct as far as it goes but with the final square root step left out. "14 m" comes from adding the two shorter sides, 5 + 9, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all. "10.2 m" comes from rounding 10.29...m down to 10.2 instead of correctly rounding it up to 10.3.
- (d) Wrong - the given angle is not the included angle — Sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the included angle needed for SAS is angle B, not angle A — the information given is SSA. SSA does not prove congruence: with AB = 10 cm, BC = 7 cm and angle A = 40° there are two different triangles that fit, one with angle C ≈ 74.6° and one with angle C ≈ 105.4°, so Sam's triangles need not be the same shape and size at all. Sam is not correct just because two sides and an angle are equal, since the angle must be the one INCLUDED between those two sides. The condition is not ASA either, because ASA needs two angles, and only one angle is given here. It is also not true that nothing matches — the stated lengths and angle DO match between the two triangles; the problem is which angle was given, not whether the values agree.
- (c) 68° — Since PA and PB are both tangents from the external point P, PA = PB, so triangle PAB is isosceles with equal base angles at A and B. The angles of triangle PAB sum to 180°, so angle PAB + angle PBA = 180° − 44° = 136°, and since the two base angles are equal, angle PAB = 136° ÷ 2 = 68°. Angle PAB is the angle between the tangent at A and the chord AB, so by the alternate segment theorem it equals the angle in the alternate segment, angle ACB = 68°. Using angle APB directly as angle ACB, without using the isosceles triangle to find angle PAB first, gives 44°. Halving angle APB directly, rather than subtracting it from 180° before halving, gives 22°. Finding 180° − 44° = 136° correctly but forgetting to divide by 2 for one base angle leaves 136°.
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
- (d) 6√3 cm — Method: AB lies alongside the 30° angle at A and AC is the hypotenuse, so the ratio needed is cosine: cos 30° = AB ÷ AC. Working: the exact value of cos 30° is √3/2, so AB = 12 × √3 ÷ 2, and half of 12 is 6. Answer: AB = 6√3 cm, which is about 10.4 cm. Using sine by mistake gives 12 × 1/2 = 6 cm, which is the length of BC rather than AB. Using tan 30° = 1/√3 gives 12 ÷ √3, which is 4√3 cm. Remembering cos 30° as √3 rather than as √3 halved gives 12√3 cm, longer than the hypotenuse and so impossible.
- (d) (9, −4) — Reflecting (1, 3) in the line x = 4 gives (2 × 4 − 1, 3) = (7, 3). Reflecting (7, 3) in the line y = 1 gives (7, 2 × 1 − 3) = (7, −1). Translating (7, −1) by the vector (2, −3) gives (7 + 2, −1 + (−3)) = (9, −4). Stopping after the two reflections and forgetting the translation gives (7, −1). Applying the translation's y-component with the wrong sign, adding 3 instead of subtracting it, gives (9, 2). Forgetting that the two reflections are centred on (4, 1) rather than the origin, and instead rotating (1, 3) by 180° about the origin to (−1, −3) before translating, gives (1, −6). Do all three steps in order, each one correctly, and the final image is (9, −4).
- (c) 2 — A point 4 cm from A lies on a circle of radius 4 cm centred at A; a point 3 cm from B lies on a circle of radius 3 cm centred at B. Since AB = 5 cm, and 4 + 3 = 7 is greater than 5 while 4 − 3 = 1 is less than 5, the two circles genuinely cross each other, at two separate points, one on each side of line AB. "1" comes from wrongly assuming the circles only touch rather than cross, which would need 4 + 3 to equal exactly 5. "0" comes from wrongly assuming the circles miss each other completely. "4" comes from counting where each circle crosses the line AB itself (two points each) instead of counting where the two circles cross each other.
- (d) A translation by the vector (8, 0) — Method: two reflections in PARALLEL lines combine into a single translation, perpendicular to the lines, of size twice the distance between them; two reflections in lines that CROSS combine into a rotation instead, never a translation. Working: the lines x = 2 and x = 6 are parallel, a distance of 6 − 2 = 4 apart. Doubling this distance gives 2 × 4 = 8, and the translation runs in the direction from the first line towards the second, so the vector is (8, 0). Answer: a translation by the vector (8, 0). Double the distance between the lines rather than using it directly, keep the direction running from the FIRST line reflected to the SECOND, and remember that two reflections in lines that never meet can only give a translation, never a rotation.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.