Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 18 — Method: divide the real length by 5 to find how many 'units' of 5 m it contains, then multiply by 2 cm for each unit. Working: 45 ÷ 5 = 9, so the real bridge is 9 lots of 5 m; each lot is represented by 2 cm on the model, so the model length is 9 × 2 = 18 cm. Options: 9 comes from stopping after the division, without multiplying by the 2 cm per unit; 90 comes from multiplying the real length by 2 directly, without dividing by 5 first; 4.5 comes from dividing by 5 and then dividing by 2 again, instead of multiplying by 2. Answer: 18.
- (b) An enlargement, centre O, scale factor −1/2. — A single enlargement with a negative scale factor both changes the size (by the magnitude of the factor) and rotates the image 180° about the centre (giving the inverted orientation) in one transformation. Halving the size needs a magnitude of 1/2, and inverting needs a negative sign, so the scale factor is −1/2, centre O. 'Scale factor 1/2' gives the correct size but no inversion, since a positive scale factor keeps the same orientation. 'A 180° rotation with no change in size' gives the inversion but not the halving — K is described as smaller than J, so size must change too. 'Scale factor −2' inverts correctly but doubles the size instead of halving it.
- (a) 24 — The display is 4 tins wide, 3 tins high and 2 tins deep, and every position in that block is filled, so the total number of tins is the product of all three measurements: 4 × 3 × 2 = 24. "12" comes from multiplying only the width and height shown in the front elevation (4 × 3), forgetting the depth entirely. "9" comes from adding the three measurements (4 + 3 + 2) instead of multiplying them. "6" comes from multiplying only the height and depth (3 × 2), forgetting the width shown by the front elevation.
- (c) 5 m — The horizontal distance is the side adjacent to the 60° angle, and the sloping side is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = hypotenuse × cos 60°. The exact value of cos 60° is 1/2, so horizontal distance = 10 × 1/2 = 5 m. Using the sloping side itself as the horizontal distance, without using any trigonometry at all, gives 10 m. Using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60° finds the vertical height of the tent rather than the horizontal distance: 10 × √3/2 = 5√3 = 8.7 m (1 d.p.). Dividing the sloping side by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it, 10 ÷ 0.5 = 20 m, treats the sloping side as though it were the adjacent side rather than the hypotenuse.
- (c) 18 — Rearranging F + V − E = 2 gives E = F + V − 2. Substitute F = 8 and V = 12: 8 + 12 − 2 = 18 edges. Choosing 20 comes from adding the faces and vertices but forgetting to subtract the 2 (8 + 12 = 20). Choosing 22 comes from adding the 2 instead of subtracting it (8 + 12 + 2 = 22). Choosing 16 comes from subtracting 2 twice by mistake (8 + 12 − 2 − 2 = 16).
- (a) 3 m — Height = sloping length × sin 45° = 3√2 × √2/2 = (3 × 2)/2 = 3 m, since √2 × √2 = 2. 3√2 m comes from forgetting to multiply by sin 45° at all. 3√2/2 m comes from using sin 30° = 1/2 instead of sin 45° = √2/2. 6 m comes from using √2 instead of √2/2 for sin 45°, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 3√2 × √2 = 6.
- (c) AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed — By convention, lines marked with the same number of arrows are parallel to each other, but lines marked with a different number of arrows belong to a different, unrelated family of parallel lines. AB and CD both have a single arrow, so AB is parallel to CD. EF has a double arrow, showing it is not part of the same family as AB and CD; it may be parallel to some other line marked with a double arrow, but nothing here confirms it is parallel to AB or CD, so 'AB ∥ CD only; EF not confirmed' is correct. 'AB, CD and EF are all parallel' and 'EF is parallel to AB' both wrongly treat every arrow mark as showing the same relationship. 'None of the lines are parallel' wrongly assumes a different arrow count rules out any parallel relationship at all, when it actually just signals a different pairing.
- (b) 47.2° — Method: two sides and the angle between them are given, so find the third side with the cosine rule and then use the sine rule for the angle. Working: BC² = 12² + 9² − 2 × 12 × 9 × cos 55° = 144 + 81 − 216 × 0.57358 = 225 − 123.89 = 101.11, so BC = 10.0552 cm. Angle ABC faces AC = 9 cm and the 55° angle faces BC = 10.0552 cm, so sin ABC = 9 × sin 55° ÷ 10.0552 = 7.3724 ÷ 10.0552 = 0.73318, and the inverse sine of 0.73318 is 47.154°. Since AC is not the longest side, angle ABC is not the largest angle and the acute value is the one that fits. Answer: angle ABC = 47.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 77.8° comes from pairing the angle at B with AB = 12 cm, the side beside it, instead of AC = 9 cm, the side it faces, which actually produces angle ACB; 23.2° comes from a sign slip in the cosine rule step, 225 + 123.89 = 348.89, giving BC = 18.68 cm before the sine rule is applied; 37.9° comes from dividing by AB = 12 cm rather than by the side facing the 55° angle.
- (b) Cuboid — not necessarily a cube — A solid with 6 faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices in which every face is a rectangle is a cuboid, but nothing here confirms that all the edges are the same length, so the box could be a cube or a non-cube cuboid; the most that can be concluded is that it is a cuboid, making 'Cuboid — not necessarily a cube' correct. 'Cube — only a cube fits this' is wrong because a cube is just one particular cuboid; a general cuboid with different length, width and height has exactly the same face, edge and vertex counts and rectangular faces. 'Triangular prism' is wrong because a triangular prism has 5 faces, 9 edges and 6 vertices, and two of its faces are triangles, so it matches neither the counts nor the face shape. 'Not enough information' is wrong because rectangular faces with these counts do pin the solid down to the cuboid family, even though they cannot pin down a cube specifically.
- (d) 63.6 — Method: the three angles inside the triangle formed by the two ladders and the ground add up to 180°. Working: 180 − 58.2 − 58.2 = 63.6. Answer: 63.6°. A candidate who assumes the top angle equals the base angles gives 58.2. A candidate who subtracts only one base angle from 180°, working out 180 − 58.2, gets 121.8. A candidate who doubles the base angle instead of subtracting it twice from 180°, working out 2 × 58.2, gets 116.4.
- (a) 150° — The arc length is the same fraction of the circumference as the angle is of 360°. The full circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 6 = 37.68 cm, so the angle is 15.7 ÷ 37.68 × 360 = 150°. Treating the 6 cm as a diameter instead of a radius gives a circumference of 18.84 cm and an angle of 300°. Using π = 3 instead of the given 3.14 gives a circumference of 36 cm and an angle of 157°. Treating the fraction 15.7 ÷ 37.68 as being out of 100 rather than 360 gives about 42°.
- (b) $\binom{-0.4}{-7}$ — The overall movement is the sum of the two vectors: (−1.2 + 0.8, −4.5 + (−2.5)) = (−0.4, −7). '$\binom{-2}{-2}$' comes from subtracting the second vector from the first instead of adding them. '$\binom{-0.4}{7}$' gets the top number right but drops the negative sign on the bottom number. '$\binom{2}{-7}$' comes from treating −1.2 + 0.8 as if the signs did not matter, giving +2 instead of −0.4.
- (b) 28 — The width of the rectangle is the difference in x-coordinates, 9 − 2 = 7, and the height is the difference in y-coordinates, 5 − 1 = 4. The area is width × height = 7 × 4 = 28. 22 comes from using the perimeter formula, 2 × (7 + 4), instead of the area formula. 35 comes from multiplying 7 by 5 instead of 4, misreading one of the y-coordinates. 63 comes from multiplying 9 by 7, using an x-coordinate instead of the height.
- (b) Yes — OA = OC (radii), so the base angles are equal. — Method: check the definition of a radius and the isosceles triangle property the step relies on. Working: every radius of a circle has the same length, so OA = OC regardless of where A and C sit on the circle — this alone makes triangle OAC isosceles, and the base angles opposite the two equal sides, angle OAC and angle OCA, must be equal. The verdict is Yes, for exactly that reason. Claiming OA and OC are only equal if they are drawn to 'the very same point' misunderstands what a radius is — A and C can be any two points on the circle and OA still equals OC. Claiming the triangle is isosceles because angle AOC is 90° reverses the logic: nothing in the step has fixed angle AOC at 90°, and even if it had, that alone would not explain why OA = OC. Claiming the triangle would need to be equilateral confuses isosceles (two equal sides) with equilateral (three equal sides) — only two sides, OA and OC, are being compared here.
- (a) (−1, 1) — Translating by $\binom{−2}{3}$ subtracts 2 from every x-coordinate and adds 3 to every y-coordinate. This gives image vertices (−1, 4), (3, 4), (3, 7) and (−1, 7). The point (−1, 1) is not one of these: it has the correct new x-coordinate (1 − 2 = −1) but keeps the original y-coordinate (1) instead of adding 3, as if only the horizontal part of the vector had been applied.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.