Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 10.5 m² — The area of a trapezium is half of the sum of the parallel sides, multiplied by the width. Add the parallel sides: 2.5 + 4.5 = 7. Multiply by the width: 7 × 3 = 21. Half of 21 is 10.5 m². 21 m² forgets to halve, using the full (2.5+4.5)×3. 3.5 m² averages the two parallel sides, (2.5+4.5)÷2 = 3.5, but forgets to multiply by the width. 6.75 m² treats the bed as a triangle, using only the longer parallel side: half of 4.5 × 3.
- (b) 23 — If every position were filled to the full height of 3, the total would be 2 × 4 × 3 = 24 crates. One corner position has only 2 crates instead of 3, one crate short of full height there, so the actual total is 24 − 1 = 23. "24" comes from using the full height everywhere and forgetting the one incomplete corner. "22" comes from removing 2 crates for the incomplete corner instead of the 1 that is actually missing (3 − 2 = 1, not 2). "21" comes from removing all 3 crates at that corner, as though the position were completely empty rather than 2 crates short.
- (d) Concentric circles — Method: focus on what the two circles have in common — their centre, not their size. Working: both circles share exactly the same centre point but have different radii, which is the defining feature of this pair of circles. A student who answers congruent circles has confused 'same centre' with 'same size', but congruent circles simply have equal radii and need not share a centre. A student who answers tangential circles has confused circles that touch each other at one point with ones that share a centre. A student who answers similar circles has used the general term for the same shape at different sizes, missing the specific 'same centre' fact. Answer: concentric circles.
- (b) Parallel, since AB and DC are both horizontal lines — A and B both have y-coordinate 1, so AB is horizontal; D and C both have y-coordinate 4, so DC is horizontal too. Two horizontal lines are always parallel, so AB and DC are parallel. "Not parallel, since AB and DC have different lengths" is wrong twice over: AB runs from x = 1 to x = 5 and DC from x = 2 to x = 6, so both are in fact 4 units long, and in any case length has no bearing on whether two lines are parallel — only direction does. "Not parallel, since AB is horizontal and DC is vertical" misreads the coordinates of D and C, which share the y-coordinate 4 and so give a horizontal line, not a vertical one. "Parallel, since A and D have the same x-coordinate" rests on a false claim: A has x-coordinate 1 and D has x-coordinate 2, so they do not share an x-coordinate — and even if they did, it would say nothing about whether AB is parallel to DC.
- (b) (7, 3) — Reflecting in the line y = x swaps the x- and y-coordinates: (3, 7) → (7, 3). A pupil who reflects in the x-axis instead gets (3, −7). A pupil who reflects in the y-axis instead gets (−3, 7). A pupil who confuses y = x with y = −x, swapping the coordinates and changing both signs, gets (−7, −3). The correct image is (7, 3).
- (b) Minor segment — Method: compare the sizes of the two regions cut off by the chord, and recall the term used for the smaller one. Working: the chord creates two segments; the smaller region is called the minor segment and the larger one the major segment. A student who answers major segment has picked the larger region by mistake instead of the smaller one. A student who answers minor arc has named the curved boundary rather than the two-dimensional region it encloses. A student who answers semicircle has wrongly assumed the chord must pass through the centre. Answer: minor segment.
- (b) No — the angle given is not the included angle — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides, since SAS requires the included angle. Working: sides AB and BC meet at vertex B, so the angle between them is angle B — but the angle given is angle A, which is not between the two given sides, and the same mismatch happens in triangle DEF. Options: 'two sides and one angle match' restates SAS's ingredients without checking their positions, which is exactly Meera's mistake; 'SSS needs three equal sides' is a true fact about a different condition, but it is not the reason Meera is wrong here; 'SAS allows any equal angle' states a rule that is not how SAS works, since the angle must be the included one. Answer: no, the angle given is not the included angle.
- (d) Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral sum to 180° — ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, and angle ABC and angle ADC are a pair of opposite angles in it — they don't sit next to each other around the quadrilateral. The theorem that fixes the sum of a cyclic quadrilateral's opposite angles at 180° is exactly the one needed here. The other three theorems don't apply to this figure at all: the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem gives a 90° angle only when one side is a diameter, and no diameter is mentioned; the angle-at-the-centre theorem needs a centre point and an inscribed angle on the same arc, and no centre is given here; the tangent–radius theorem gives a 90° angle only where a tangent line touches the circle, and there is no tangent in this figure. Only the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem fits what is actually drawn.
- (b) 115° — Angle APE and angle BPQ are vertically opposite, so angle BPQ = 65°, equal to angle APE. Angle BPQ and angle PQD are co-interior (allied) angles between the parallel lines, and co-interior angles always add up to 180°, so angle PQD = 180 − 65 = 115°. "65°" comes from treating co-interior angles as equal to each other, the way alternate angles are, instead of adding to 180°. "295°" comes from applying the angles-round-a-point fact (360° − 65°) directly to the original 65°, skipping the correct co-interior step. "25°" comes from misremembering co-interior angles as adding to 90° instead of 180° (90 − 65 = 25).
- (b) 61° — Triangle OAT is isosceles because OA = OT, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OTA = angle OAT = (180° − 122°) ÷ 2 = 29°. The tangent PT meets the radius OT at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem, so angle OTP = 90°. Since TA lies between TO and TP, angle OTP splits into angle OTA and angle ATP: angle ATP = 90° − 29° = 61°. Stopping after the isosceles step and reporting the base angle itself gives 29°. Finding the base angles as 180° − 122° without halving, then subtracting from 90°, gives 90° − 58° = 32°. Adding the base angle to 90° instead of subtracting it gives 90° + 29° = 119°. Subtract the base angle from the right angle, and 61° is what's left.
- (d) XP is the shortest distance from X to the line — The perpendicular from a point to a line always gives the shortest possible distance to that line — joining X to any other point on the line forms the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle with XP as one of the shorter sides, and a hypotenuse is always longer than either of the other two sides. So XP is shorter than the distance to every other point on the line. "XP is the longest distance from X to the line" reverses this relationship. "XP equals every other distance from X to the line" would only be true if X were equidistant from every point on the line, which is impossible for a point and a straight line. "XP cannot be compared without knowing the line's length" is false — the shortest-distance fact holds whatever the line's length, since only the local right angle matters.
- (c) 56.52 cm² — Sector area = (45 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 12² = 0.125 × 3.14 × 144 = 56.52 cm². (4.71 cm² comes from forgetting to square the radius; 452.16 cm² comes from finding the area of the whole circle and forgetting the angle fraction; 9.42 cm² comes from using the arc length formula instead of the sector area formula.)
- (d) 7.7 m — The horizontal distance is adjacent to the 50° angle and the zip wire is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = 12 × cos 50° = 12 × 0.6428... = 7.71...≈ 7.7 m. "9.2 m" uses the sine ratio instead of cosine, 12 × sin 50° = 9.19...≈ 9.2 m, which actually finds the vertical drop of the zip wire, not the horizontal distance. "15.7 m" comes from dividing by the sine ratio instead of multiplying by the cosine ratio, 12 ÷ sin 50° = 15.66...≈ 15.7 m, both the wrong operation and the wrong ratio. "12.0 m" simply uses the length of the zip wire itself as the horizontal distance, ignoring the angle of 50° altogether.
- (b) 7.4 — Method: AB is opposite angle ACB and AC is opposite angle ABC, so the sine rule gives AB/sin(ACB) = AC/sin(ABC). Working: (2x + 1)/sin 48° = (3x − 2)/sin 72°; cross-multiplying and collecting the x terms gives x = 7.4. Using angle BAC = 180° − 72° − 48° = 60° in place of angle ABC in the ratio gives x = 4.7; ignoring the sine rule altogether and solving 2x + 1 = 3x − 2 as if the two sides were simply equal gives x = 3.0; and pairing each side with the wrong angle — AB with sin 72° and AC with sin 48° — gives x = 1.9. Each side in the sine rule must be paired with the sine of the angle directly opposite it.
- (c) 14.7 cm — The scale factor from the smaller tile to the larger tile is 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75, so the larger side is 8.4 × 1.75 = 14.7 cm. '4.8 cm' comes from scaling by 4 ÷ 7 instead, using the ratio the wrong way round. '11.4 cm' comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 4 = 3, onto 8.4, instead of scaling. '58.8 cm' comes from multiplying by 7 on its own, using a ratio number as the scale factor instead of working out 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75 first.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.