Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) (6, 2) — Applying the first vector: (2, 1) + (5, −3) = (7, −2), which is the warehouse. Applying the second vector: (7, −2) + (−1, 4) = (6, 2), the delivery address. '(7, −2)' stops at the warehouse and forgets the second flight. '(8, −6)' comes from adding (1, −4) instead of (−1, 4) for the second vector, getting both signs wrong. '(11, −3)' comes from swapping the components of the second vector to (4, −1) before adding.
- (b) 9π cm² — Sector area is the fraction θ/360 of the full circle's area, πr². Substitute θ = 40 and r = 9: 40 out of 360 is one ninth, and the full circle's area is π × 9² = 81π. One ninth of 81π is 9π, so the sector area is 9π cm². Choosing 2π cm² is this sector's ARC LENGTH, not its area — a different formula and a different quantity. Choosing 81π cm² is the area of the WHOLE circle, forgetting to scale down by the sector's angle. Choosing 18π cm² is the CIRCUMFERENCE of the whole circle, 2π × 9, mixed up with an area.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (a) 3 — Method: find the sail's area with Area = (1/2)ab sin C, then divide by how much one litre covers, and round up to a whole number of tins since paint can only be bought by the tin. Working: Area = 1/2 × 4.2 × 3.6 × sin 115° = 6.85 m² (2 d.p.); 6.85 ÷ 3 = 2.28 tins, which rounds up to 3 tins. Answer: 3. Rounding 2.28 to the nearest whole number instead of rounding up gives 2, which is not enough paint to finish the sail; forgetting the 1/2 in the area formula gives an area of 13.7 m², needing 5 tins; and assuming one litre covers exactly 1 m² of sail, ignoring the coverage rate given, rounds the area itself up to 7 tins. Whenever a quantity can only be bought in whole units, round up even when the decimal part is small — 2.28 tins means you need a third tin.
- (b) SAS (two sides and the included angle) — PQ = ST and QR = TU are two pairs of matching sides, and the angle between them (angle Q and angle T) is 90° in both triangles — two sides and the angle between them are equal, so the triangles are congruent by SAS, using only the measurements given. RHS needs the hypotenuses to be known equal; here only the two legs are given, so you would first have to work out each hypotenuse by Pythagoras' theorem — extra working the question rules out. SSS has the same problem: the third side of each triangle is not given, only calculable. ASA needs two angles and the side between them, but here it is two sides and the angle between them that are given, not two angles.
- (d) 310 — Method: since both turns are clockwise, add both angles to the starting bearing. Working: 245° + 50° = 295°; 295° + 15° = 310°. A student who answers 295 has only added the first turn and forgotten the second one. A student who answers 180 has subtracted both turns instead of adding them. A student who answers 320 has added the two turns as 75° instead of 65° by misreading the second turn. Answer: 310°.
- (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
- (d) 6 cm — Method: CH cuts the triangle into two smaller right-angled triangles, so Pythagoras' theorem can be written in each of the three right-angled triangles and the results combined. Working: HB = 12 − 3 = 9 cm. In triangle ACH, CH² = AC² − 3² = AC² − 9; in triangle CHB, CH² = CB² − 9² = CB² − 81. Setting those equal gives AC² − 9 = CB² − 81. In triangle ABC, AC² + CB² = 12² = 144, so CB² = 144 − AC². Substituting gives AC² − 9 = 144 − AC² − 81, so 2 × AC² = 72 and AC² = 36, giving AC = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 36 cm comes from stopping at AC² = 36 and never taking the square root; 9 cm is HB, the other part of the hypotenuse, written down in place of AC; 4 cm comes from working out 12 ÷ 3, treating AH as a scale factor between the two triangles rather than as a length.
- (d) SSS, using shared side QS — PQ equals RQ and PS equals RS are two given pairs of equal sides, and QS is common to both triangles, so QS equals itself and gives a third pair of equal sides. Three pairs of equal sides is exactly the SSS condition, so 'SSS, using shared side QS' is correct. 'SAS, using the angle at Q' is wrong because no angle is given anywhere in this question; angle PQS and angle RQS are not stated to be equal, and assuming they are would be assuming the very thing being proved. 'Only two pairs of sides — not enough' is wrong because it forgets that the shared side QS is itself a third pair of equal sides. 'Cannot prove — no angle given' is wrong because SSS is one of the four basic congruence conditions and specifically requires no angle at all.
- (c) 1 : 300 — First convert both lengths to the same unit: 15 m = 1500 cm. The scale compares 5 cm on the drawing to 1500 cm in real life, so dividing both parts by 5 gives a scale of 1 : 300. A candidate who compares 5 to 15 without converting units gets 1 : 3. A candidate who converts 15 m to 150 cm, using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 30. A candidate who converts 15 m to 15000 cm, again using the wrong conversion factor, gets 1 : 3000. The scale of the drawing is 1 : 300.
- (d) No — angles must be equal too — A regular polygon must have both all sides equal and all angles equal. This tile has all six sides equal, but its interior angles are not all equal, so it fails the angle condition and is not regular — 'No — angles must be equal too' is correct. 'Yes — all sides are equal' is wrong because equal sides alone are not enough; a shape can have equal sides but unequal angles, as here. 'Yes — six equal sides means regular' is wrong for the same reason: equal sides do not automatically guarantee equal angles. 'No — hexagons can't be regular' is wrong because regular hexagons certainly exist (six equal sides and six equal 120° angles); it is this particular tile that fails to be regular, not hexagons in general.
- (c) 72° — Method: opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral always sum to 180°. Working: angle DAB and angle BCD are opposite angles of the cyclic quadrilateral ABCD, so angle BCD = 180 − 108 = 72 degrees. Answer: 72°. Opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral are SUPPLEMENTARY, not equal, so do not simply copy the given angle; and do not subtract from 360°, which is the rule for angles round a point, or confuse this with the angle-in-a-semicircle theorem, which gives a fixed 90° that has nothing to do with this quadrilateral.
- (b) 61° — Triangle OAT is isosceles because OA = OT, both radii, so its base angles are equal: angle OTA = angle OAT = (180° − 122°) ÷ 2 = 29°. The tangent PT meets the radius OT at 90°, by the tangent–radius theorem, so angle OTP = 90°. Since TA lies between TO and TP, angle OTP splits into angle OTA and angle ATP: angle ATP = 90° − 29° = 61°. Stopping after the isosceles step and reporting the base angle itself gives 29°. Finding the base angles as 180° − 122° without halving, then subtracting from 90°, gives 90° − 58° = 32°. Adding the base angle to 90° instead of subtracting it gives 90° + 29° = 119°. Subtract the base angle from the right angle, and 61° is what's left.
- (c) No — 50° is angle P, not between PQ and QR. — Method: 1/2ab sin C only gives the area when C is the angle between the two named sides. Working: PQ and QR meet at vertex Q, so the angle between them is angle PQR, not angle QPR (which is the angle at vertex P, between sides PQ and PR). Since angle QPR is not included between PQ and QR, the student's calculation 1/2 × 8 × 11 × sin 50° does not give the area of the triangle — the verdict is No. Claiming that any angle works with any two sides ignores that the formula is only true for the INCLUDED angle. Claiming the formula needs all three sides is a different, incorrect statement about the formula itself — Area = 1/2ab sin C is valid with exactly two sides and their included angle, when that angle is actually known.
- (a) Triangular-based pyramid (tetrahedron) — A solid with 4 triangular faces, 4 vertices and 6 edges is a triangular-based pyramid, also called a tetrahedron. A triangular prism also has triangular faces, but it has 2 triangular faces plus 3 rectangular faces, 6 vertices and 9 edges — the extra rectangular faces and edges rule it out here. A square-based pyramid has 5 faces (one square, four triangles), 5 vertices and 8 edges, which does not match. A cube has 6 faces, 8 vertices and 12 edges, all much higher than the numbers given. The solid described is a triangular-based pyramid.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.