Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5 hours — The distance from the origin to (7, 24) is √(7² + 24²) = √(49 + 576) = √625 = 25 km. Travelling at 5 km per hour, the time taken is 25 ÷ 5 = 5 hours. 25 hours mistakes the distance itself for the time, forgetting to divide by the speed. 125 hours comes from multiplying the distance by the speed, 25 × 5, instead of dividing. 0.2 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 5 ÷ 25, the wrong way round.
- (d) Two angles and a side: sine rule finds other sides. — Method: match the data you are given to the rule that needs it. Working: the sine rule a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C needs a complete angle-side pair to set up its ratio, so the statement that two angles and a side (AAS or ASA) let the sine rule find the other sides is the correct one — the third angle comes from the angle sum, and each unknown side is then opposite a known angle. The statement that two sides and the angle between them (SAS) call for the sine rule is wrong: no angle-side pair is complete, so the cosine rule is what works there. The statement that the sine rule finds any angle from three sides (SSS) is wrong for the same reason in reverse — no angle is known at all, so the cosine rule must find the first one. The statement that the cosine rule finds a missing angle directly from two sides and a non-included angle (SSA) is wrong: the cosine rule reports the angle enclosed by the two sides it uses, so with SSA it is the sine rule that reaches the missing angle, and the ambiguous case is then settled from the wording of the question.
- (a) 32.2° — Method: all three sides are known, so rearrange the cosine rule as cos A = (b² + c² − a²) ÷ 2bc, where a is the side facing the angle you want. Working: angle ABC sits between AB = 8 cm and BC = 11 cm and faces AC = 6 cm, so cos ABC = (8² + 11² − 6²) ÷ (2 × 8 × 11) = (64 + 121 − 36) ÷ 176 = 149 ÷ 176 = 0.84659, and the inverse cosine of 0.84659 is 32.157°. Answer: angle ABC = 32.2° to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 102.6° comes from subtracting the square of the longest side, 11, rather than the square of the side the angle actually faces, giving (64 + 36 − 121) ÷ 96; 57.8° comes from taking the inverse sine of 0.84659 instead of the inverse cosine; 147.8° comes from rearranging with the subtraction the wrong way round, (36 − 64 − 121) ÷ 176 = −0.84659, which turns an acute angle into its supplement.
- (d) 18.8 cm — Arc length is a fraction of the full circumference. Here 120 ÷ 360 = 1/3, and the full circumference is 2 × 3.14 × 9 = 56.52 cm, so the arc is 56.52 ÷ 3 = 18.84 cm, which rounds to 18.8 cm. Forgetting the fraction and giving the full circumference rounds to 56.5 cm. Using 9 cm as a diameter instead of a radius gives an arc of 9.4 cm. Using 120 ÷ 180 instead of 120 ÷ 360 for the fraction gives an arc of 37.7 cm.
- (b) 2 500 000 cm³ — Method: a volume conversion uses the length factor three times, once for each dimension. Working: 1 m = 100 cm, so a cube of side 1 m is a cube of side 100 cm, and 100 × 100 × 100 = 1 000 000, giving 1 m³ = 1 000 000 cm³. Then 2.5 × 1 000 000 = 2 500 000. Answer: 2 500 000 cm³. Using the plain length factor 100 gives 250 cm³. Using 1000, which is the factor that turns cubic metres into litres, gives 2500 cm³. Using 10 000, which is the factor that belongs to square metres and square centimetres, gives 25 000 cm³.
- (b) 360 cm² — Method: the total surface area is the square base plus the four triangular faces, and the height used for a triangular face is the slant height of 13 cm, not the vertical height of 12 cm. Working: the base is 10 × 10 = 100 cm²; one triangular face is (10 × 13) ÷ 2 = 65 cm², so four faces give 4 × 65 = 260 cm²; the total is 100 + 260 = 360. Answer: 360 cm². The distractors: 260 cm² comes from adding the four triangular faces and leaving out the base; 340 cm² comes from using the vertical height of 12 cm as the height of each triangle, 100 + 4 × 60; 620 cm² comes from working out each face as 10 × 13 without halving, 100 + 4 × 130.
- (b) It is the longest of the three chords — Method: in any circle the length of a chord is decided by how far the chord lies from the centre, because a chord passing nearer the centre cuts further across the circle. Working: the chord through O lies at a distance of zero from the centre, and no chord can lie closer than that, so no chord of the circle can be longer than it; a chord through the centre is a diameter. The other two chords lie at some distance greater than zero, so each of them falls short of that maximum. Answer: It is the longest of the three chords. The distractors: It is the shortest of the three chords comes from reversing the rule and picturing a chord near the centre as a short line tucked inside; It is the same length as the other two chords comes from carrying the fact that all radii of a circle are equal across to chords, which are not all equal; It is half the length of each of the other two chords comes from confusing a chord through the centre with a radius, which really is half a diameter.
- (d) Triangle 2, by 3.6 cm² — Method: find both areas with 1/2ab sin C, then compare them. Working: area of triangle 1 = 1/2 × 10 × 13 × sin 64° = 58.4 cm²; area of triangle 2 = 1/2 × 11 × 12 × sin 70° = 62.0 cm²; triangle 2 is larger, by 62.0 − 58.4 = 3.6 cm². Getting the right difference but naming triangle 1 as the larger one, the subtraction done the wrong way round, gives 'Triangle 1, by 3.6 cm²'; leaving out the 1/2 when finding triangle 1's area (giving 116.8 cm² instead of 58.4 cm²) and then subtracting gives 'Triangle 1, by 54.8 cm²'; and using cos 64° instead of sin 64° for triangle 1 (giving 28.5 cm² instead of 58.4 cm²) gives 'Triangle 2, by 33.5 cm²'. Work out both areas fully and correctly before comparing which is bigger.
- (d) 600 cm² — Enlarging by scale factor 2 makes the new dimensions 10 × 2 = 20 cm and 15 × 2 = 30 cm, so the poster's area = 20 × 30 = 600 cm². A pupil who scales the original area, 150 cm², by the scale factor itself instead of by its square gets 150 × 2 = 300 cm². A pupil who adds the scale factor to each dimension instead of multiplying gets (10 + 2) × (15 + 2) = 204 cm². A pupil who forgets to enlarge the postcard at all just uses the original area, 150 cm². The correct area of the poster is 600 cm².
- (b) 13.3 cm — The apex is directly above the centre of the square base, so the height, half the base diagonal, and a slant edge form a right-angled triangle with the slant edge as the hypotenuse. Half the base diagonal is 14 ÷ 2 = 7 cm. Using Pythagoras' theorem, height = √(15² − 7²) = √(225 − 49) = √176 = 13.3 cm (1 d.p.). Using the slant edge itself as the height, without applying Pythagoras' theorem at all, gives 15 cm. Using the full base diagonal (14 cm) instead of half of it gives √(15² − 14²) = √(225 − 196) = √29 = 5.4 cm (1 d.p.), far too short for a pyramid this size. Adding the two squares instead of subtracting them, √(15² + 7²) = √(225 + 49) = √274 = 16.6 cm (1 d.p.), gives a length longer than the slant edge itself, which cannot be the height.
- (d) 6.4 cm — The scale factor from the larger sign to the smaller sign is 4 ÷ 9, so the smaller side is 14.4 × 4 ÷ 9 = 6.4 cm. The distractor 32.4 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 14.4 × 9 ÷ 4 = 32.4. The distractor 9.4 cm comes from subtracting the difference between the ratio numbers (9 − 4 = 5) from the given length, 14.4 − 5 = 9.4. The distractor 3.6 cm comes from dividing the given length by 4 only, 14.4 ÷ 4 = 3.6, without also using the other ratio number.
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (a) 104° — Method: find each inscribed angle separately using the angle-at-the-centre theorem: for a point on the arc NOT cut off by the given central angle, halve that central angle; for a point on the OTHER arc, halve the REFLEX central angle instead; then subtract the smaller from the larger. Working: for C on the major arc, angle ACB = 76 ÷ 2 = 38 degrees. For D on the minor arc, D sees the reflex angle at the centre, 360 − 76 = 284 degrees, so angle ADB = 284 ÷ 2 = 142 degrees. The difference is 142 − 38 = 104 degrees. Answer: 104°. Both inscribed angles need the theorem applied separately, using the correct arc's central angle each time (the reflex angle for D), and the question asks for the DIFFERENCE between the two, not either angle on its own and not their sum, 180°, which is simply the opposite-angle total for the cyclic quadrilateral ACBD.
- (b) 8.4 cm — Two sides and the angle between them are known, so use the cosine rule: BC² = AB² + AC² − 2 × AB × AC × cos(BAC). Substituting, BC² = 81 + 36 − 45.64 = 71.36. Taking the square root: BC = √71.36 = 8.4 cm (1 d.p.). Leaving out the factor of 2 in the formula gives BC² = 81 + 36 − 22.82 = 94.18, so BC = 9.7 cm. Adding the cosine term instead of subtracting it gives BC² = 81 + 36 + 45.64 = 162.64, so BC = 12.8 cm. Using sin65° in place of cos65° gives BC² = 81 + 36 − 97.88 = 19.12, so BC = 4.4 cm. Keep the factor of 2, subtract the cosine term, and the correct length is 8.4 cm.
- (a) Translation by the vector (0, 6) — Method: reflecting twice in two parallel horizontal lines is always equivalent to a single translation, at right angles to the lines, of twice the distance between them. Working: the two lines are 4 − 1 = 3 units apart, so the translation is 2 × 3 = 6 units in the positive y-direction. Answer: translation by the vector (0, 6). Using just the gap itself, without doubling it, gives (0, 3); translating in the negative y-direction, from the second line back towards the first, gives (0, −6); and describing the combination as a single reflection in the line halfway between them, y = 2.5, confuses this combination with the effect of a single reflection — two reflections in parallel lines are always equivalent to a translation, never to another reflection. Always double the gap between the lines, and translate in the direction from the first line towards the second.
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.