Printable · GCSE Higher · ages 14-16
Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
Fifteen questions across the geometry and measures statements at Higher tier. Choose the non-calculator filter to rehearse Paper 1, which counts for a third of the marks.
Answer key: Geometry and measures worksheet — GCSE Higher
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) Statement 3 — a triangle's angles are said to sum to 360° — The angles of any triangle sum to 180°, not 360° — Statement 3 uses the wrong total, and that error is what sends its final line to the impossible claim that angle ACB = 180°. The correct working is angle OAC + angle OBC + angle ACB = 180°, and since angle ACB = angle OCA + angle OCB, this gives 2 × angle ACB = 180°, so angle ACB = 90°, which is the actual theorem. Statement 1 correctly identifies OA and OC as equal radii, making triangle OAC isosceles — nothing wrong there. Statement 2 correctly does the same for triangle OBC. Statement 4 correctly states that A, O and B are collinear, since a diameter passes through the centre — also nothing wrong there. Statement 3 is the one to flag: it is the angle sum it quotes that is wrong, not the diagram or the radii.
- (b) 3 — Method: the scale factor is a length of the second triangle divided by the corresponding length of the first, and corresponding means shortest paired with shortest. Working: the shortest side of the first triangle is 3 cm and the shortest side of the second is 9 cm, so the scale factor is 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: 3. The distractors: 1/3 comes from dividing 3 by 9, which is the scale factor from the second triangle back to the first; 6 comes from subtracting, 9 − 3, treating the scale factor as a difference rather than a multiplier; 1.8 comes from dividing 9 by 5, pairing the second triangle's shortest side with the first triangle's longest side.
- (a) 7.2 cm — The distance around the mat is the circumference, π × diameter = 3.14 × 20 = 62.8 cm. Yasmin started with 70 cm, so the ribbon left over is 70 − 62.8 = 7.2 cm. 62.8 cm is the circumference itself, the amount of ribbon used, not what is left over. 50 cm comes from subtracting the diameter instead of the circumference: 70 − 20 = 50. 20 cm is simply the diameter of the mat and involves no calculation with the ribbon length at all.
- (c) 100.5 m — The curved part of a semicircular bend is half of a full circle's circumference. The full circumference would be 2 × 3.14 × 32 = 200.96 m, and half of that is 200.96 ÷ 2 = 100.48 m, which rounds to 100.5 m. Choosing 201.0 m uses the FULL circumference, forgetting to halve it for a semicircle. Choosing 50.2 m halves the radius as well as taking a semicircle, using 3.14 × 16 = 50.24 m instead of the correct radius of 32 m. Choosing 64.0 m uses the diameter, 2 × 32 = 64, as if it were the curved length, ignoring π and the semicircle shape entirely.
- (a) (5, 7) — Method: a midpoint is the mean of the two end points, so for each coordinate (start + end) ÷ 2 = midpoint; rearranging that gives end = 2 × midpoint less the start. Working: for x, (1 + x) ÷ 2 = 3, so 1 + x = 6 and x = 5. For y, (3 + y) ÷ 2 = 5, so 3 + y = 10 and y = 7. B is therefore (5, 7). Answer: (5, 7). The distractors: (2, 2) comes from subtracting A from the midpoint, (3 − 1, 5 − 3), which gives the step from A to the midpoint and stops there instead of taking that same step a second time; (4, 8) comes from adding A to the midpoint, (3 + 1, 5 + 3), without doubling the midpoint first; (6, 10) comes from doubling the midpoint, (2 × 3, 2 × 5), and then forgetting to take A off.
- (c) 5 m — The horizontal distance is the side adjacent to the 60° angle, and the sloping side is the hypotenuse, so horizontal distance = hypotenuse × cos 60°. The exact value of cos 60° is 1/2, so horizontal distance = 10 × 1/2 = 5 m. Using the sloping side itself as the horizontal distance, without using any trigonometry at all, gives 10 m. Using sin 60° = √3/2 instead of cos 60° finds the vertical height of the tent rather than the horizontal distance: 10 × √3/2 = 5√3 = 8.7 m (1 d.p.). Dividing the sloping side by cos 60° instead of multiplying by it, 10 ÷ 0.5 = 20 m, treats the sloping side as though it were the adjacent side rather than the hypotenuse.
- (d) A rectangle — Method: to find the plan view, work out the outline traced when looking straight down onto the solid from directly above, not the outline shown in the angled sketch. Working: this solid has two identical flat round ends joined by one curved surface, and it is lying on its side rather than standing upright; viewed from above, the curved surface gives two straight edges running the full length of the solid, the width of the round ends apart, and each flat round end — seen edge-on from directly above — also becomes a straight edge of that same width, with no curve remaining. Four straight edges, with opposite sides equal and meeting at right angles, form a rectangle. Answer: a rectangle. The distractors: a circle comes from picturing the solid as if it were standing upright on one of its flat ends, giving the plan of an upright version instead of working out the plan of the solid as it actually lies. An oval comes from copying the foreshortened shape of a round end as it is drawn in the angled sketch, instead of working out the true shape seen from directly above, which has no such foreshortening. A rectangle with rounded ends comes from carrying the curve of the round ends over into the plan view, when in fact a flat round end viewed edge-on from directly above shows no curve at all, only a straight edge.
- (c) 9 : 16 — Method: in similar solids the ratio of the surface areas is the square of the ratio of corresponding lengths. Working: the radii are in the ratio 3 : 4, so the surface areas are in the ratio 3² : 4² = 9 : 16. Answer: 9 : 16. The distractors: 27 : 64 is 3³ : 4³, the ratio of the volumes, which cubes the length ratio instead of squaring it; 3 : 4 leaves the length ratio untouched, as though surface area scaled in the same way as a length; 81 : 256 comes from squaring a second time, applying the rule to the ratio 9 : 16 rather than to the radii.
- (a) Isosceles trapezium: base angles are equal — WX is parallel to ZY and the two non-parallel sides WZ and XY are equal in length, so WXYZ is an isosceles trapezium. In an isosceles trapezium the two angles at each of the parallel sides are equal, so angle W = angle X (and angle Z = angle Y). A student who answers with the parallelogram property has quoted a fact that is true of a parallelogram, but WZ and XY are given as non-parallel so WXYZ is not a parallelogram — and in a parallelogram "opposite angles" pairs W with Y, not W with X. A student who answers with the kite property has again taken a true fact about the wrong shape: a kite's equal sides are two pairs of adjacent sides, not the two non-parallel sides of a trapezium. A student who answers with the rhombus property has used something no rhombus has — a rhombus has two pairs of parallel sides and only two pairs of equal angles; all four angles are equal only in a square.
- (c) (1, 0) — To enlarge about a centre other than the origin, find the vector from the centre to the point, scale that vector, then add it back to the centre. The vector from (2, 2) to A(4, 6) is (2, 4). Scaling by −1/2 gives (−1, −2). Adding this to the centre (2, 2) gives the image point (1, 0). (3, 4) comes from using +1/2 instead of −1/2, so the image lands on the same side as A instead of the opposite side. (−2, −3) comes from scaling A's coordinates directly about the origin, ignoring that the centre is (2, 2). (−2, −6) comes from using a scale factor of −2 instead of −1/2.
- (a) £94.58 — Method: find the area with 1/2ab sin C, then multiply by the cost per square metre. Working: area = 1/2 × 1.8 × 1.3 × sin 72° = 1.11274 m², so cost = 1.11274 × £85 = £94.58. Leaving out the 1/2 gives an area of 2.22547 m² and a cost of £189.17; using cos 72° instead of sin 72° gives a cost of £30.73; and rounding the area to 1 decimal place (1.1 m²) before multiplying by the cost per square metre gives £93.50, which loses accuracy that the final answer needs. Even rounding to 1.113 m² is enough to shift the cost to £94.61 — keep the unrounded area in your calculator until the very last step.
- (b) £1.57 — Slice area = (90 ÷ 360) × 3.14 × 10² = 0.25 × 314 = 78.5 cm². Cost = 78.5 × £0.02 = £1.57. (£0.16 comes from forgetting to square the radius, using 0.25 × 3.14 × 10 for the area; £6.28 comes from finding the area of the whole cake and forgetting the angle fraction; £0.31 comes from using the arc length formula instead of the sector area formula.)
- (c) AB, AC and angle BAC: Area = 1/2 × AB × AC × sin(BAC) — Method: Area = 1/2ab sin C only works when the angle used is the one included between the two sides being multiplied. Working: AB and AC meet at A, and angle BAC is the angle at A between them, so the statement pairing AB, AC and angle BAC is the correct one. The statement that three sides with no angle can still go into 1/2 AB × AC × sin(BAC) is wrong: with no angle known, sin(BAC) cannot be evaluated, so a different method must find an angle first. The statement pairing AB and BC with sin(BAC) is wrong: AB and BC meet at B, so the angle between them is angle ABC, not angle BAC — it names the wrong angle for the sides it uses. The statement pairing AB and AC with sin(ABC) is wrong for the same reason: AB and AC meet at A, so their included angle is angle BAC, and angle ABC is not between them at all.
- (c) 14.7 cm — The scale factor from the smaller tile to the larger tile is 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75, so the larger side is 8.4 × 1.75 = 14.7 cm. '4.8 cm' comes from scaling by 4 ÷ 7 instead, using the ratio the wrong way round. '11.4 cm' comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers, 7 − 4 = 3, onto 8.4, instead of scaling. '58.8 cm' comes from multiplying by 7 on its own, using a ratio number as the scale factor instead of working out 7 ÷ 4 = 1.75 first.
- (b) (2, 3) — Applying A first: reflecting (2, 1) in the x-axis gives (2, −1). Applying B to that image: translating (2, −1) by (0, 4) gives (2, −1 + 4) = (2, 3). Applying the transformations in the opposite order — B first, then A — gives a different result: (2, 1) translates to (2, 5), which then reflects to (2, −5); this shows that the order genuinely matters here. Applying only A and stopping there, without the translation, gives (2, −1). Applying only B and stopping there, without the reflection, gives (2, 5). Do both transformations, in the order A then B, and the image of P is (2, 3).
Build your own mix at the worksheet builder.