Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5

GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)

The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.

Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation

VersionsA only A + B A + B + Csame questions, different order

AnswersQuestions only With answer key Key only

New sheet

Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)

Maths · GCSE Foundation · Paper 1 · Non-calculator · 20 questions

MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk

(b) 1.45 ≤ m < 1.55 — The flour's mass is labelled 1.5 kg, correct to the nearest 0.1 kg, so half of 0.1 kg is added to and subtracted from 1.5 kg to find the interval: 1.5 − 0.05 = 1.45 and 1.5 + 0.05 = 1.55, giving 1.45 ≤ m < 1.55. '1.4 ≤ m < 1.6' comes from taking the whole 0.1 kg as the margin either side, instead of half of it. '1.45 < m ≤ 1.55' comes from writing the inequality signs the wrong way round — the lower bound should be included and the upper bound excluded, not the other way round. '1.45 ≤ m ≤ 1.55' comes from including the upper bound, when the convention is that the upper bound is never actually reached.
(b) x ≤ −2 — Method: take the number term off both sides, then divide by the coefficient of x; the sign turns round only when you divide BY a negative number, and here you divide by 3. Working: subtracting 6 from both sides of 3x + 6 ≤ 0 gives 3x ≤ −6; dividing both sides by 3, which is positive, gives x ≤ −2. Answer: x ≤ −2. The distractors: x ≥ −2 comes from turning the sign round because the right-hand side has become negative, which is not the rule; it is the sign of the divisor that matters; x ≤ 2 comes from moving the 6 across without changing its sign, giving 3x ≤ 6; x ≤ −18 comes from multiplying both sides by 3 instead of dividing by it.
(d) 40 cm — Method: convert the real length to centimetres, then divide by the scale factor. Working: 10 m = 1000 cm. 1000 ÷ 25 = 40 cm. Wrong options: 0.4 cm comes from dividing 10 by 25 without converting metres to centimetres first; 25000 cm comes from multiplying instead of dividing (1000 × 25); 4 cm comes from converting 10 m to 100 cm (using ×10 instead of ×100) before dividing.
(a) 32 m — The scale factor from the larger pond to the smaller pond is 4 ÷ 11, so the smaller perimeter is 88 × 4 ÷ 11 = 32 m. The distractor 242 m comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 88 × 11 ÷ 4 = 242. The distractor 84 m comes from subtracting the smaller ratio number, 88 − 4 = 84, instead of scaling. The distractor 121 m comes from multiplying 11 × 11 = 121, ignoring the given perimeter altogether.
(a) unlikely — 3/8 = 3 ÷ 8 = 0.375, which is between 0 and 0.5, so the probability is best described as unlikely. Rounding 3/8 loosely to 'about a half' without converting it properly leads to evens, which is wrong since 0.375 is noticeably below 0.5. Reading 3/8 as the complement and using 1 − 3/8 = 5/8 = 0.625 instead gives likely, but the question asks about the probability of 3/8 itself, not its complement. Flipping the fraction to 8/3 ≈ 2.67, which is impossible for a probability, and rounding it towards the top of the scale gives certain.
(d) Only families with strong feelings bothered to reply. — Method: a survey has non-response bias when only some of the people asked actually reply, and those who do are not a typical cross-section of everyone who was asked. Working: only 30 of the 200 families sent back their questionnaire, and 27 of those 30 — the great majority — said they were unhappy. Families who feel strongly about an issue, particularly those with a complaint, are far more likely to make the effort to reply than families who are simply satisfied and see no need to say anything, so the 30 replies over-represent unhappy families. Saying the families who replied were picked at random by the school gets the sampling the wrong way round: nobody picked them — they picked themselves by deciding to reply, and that is precisely why they are not a typical cross-section of all 200. Saying postal surveys always have low response rates restates that the response was low without explaining why a low response rate, on its own, makes a result unrepresentative — it is the reason FOR the low response, not the low response itself, that causes the bias here. Saying that the 27 unhappy replies show most families are unhappy is exactly the mistake the question is warning against: it treats the loudest 30 replies as if they stood for the other 170 who never sent theirs back. A low response rate is a warning sign only because the people who bother to reply are rarely typical of everyone who was asked.
(b) 18 — Method: multiply the two numbers ignoring their signs, then apply the rule that a negative number multiplied by a negative number gives a positive answer. Working: 6 × 3 = 18; since both −6 and −3 are negative, the product is positive. Answer: 18. −18 comes from keeping the answer negative, as if only one of the two negative signs affects the sign of the product. −9 comes from adding the two numbers instead of multiplying them, −6 + (−3) = −9. 9 comes from adding 6 and 3 as if both numbers were positive, ignoring the negative signs entirely.
(c) 7n − 1 — Method: find the common difference, then find the constant that fits the first term. Working: 13 − 6 = 7, 20 − 13 = 7, 27 − 20 = 7, so the terms increase by 7 each time and the nth term has the form 7n + c. Substituting n = 1: 7(1) + c = 6, so c = −1. Answer: the nth term is 7n − 1. The value 7n comes from leaving out the constant altogether. The value 7n + 6 comes from using the first term as the constant directly, without subtracting the common difference first. The value 6n + 1 comes from using the first term, 6, as the coefficient of n instead of the common difference, and then attaching +1 with the sign of the constant flipped.
(c) 6.00 m — Method: the ratio of height to shadow length is the same for both objects. Working: road sign height ÷ shadow = 3 ÷ 5 = 0.6. Lamppost height = 0.6 × 10 = 6.00 m. Wrong options: 16.67 m comes from inverting the ratio, using shadow ÷ height instead of height ÷ shadow (10 × 5 ÷ 3); 8.00 m comes from adding the difference between the two shadow lengths to the road sign's height instead of scaling (3 + (10 − 5)); 1.50 m comes from multiplying by the ratio of the two shadow lengths the wrong way round (3 × 5 ÷ 10).
(c) It is a parallelogram but not a rectangle — Method: match the given properties to the definition of each named quadrilateral. Working: having both pairs of opposite sides parallel and equal in length is exactly the definition of a parallelogram; since none of the angles are right angles, it cannot also be a rectangle, which needs four right angles. Options: 'must be a rectangle' wrongly assumes every parallelogram has right angles; 'must be a rhombus' wrongly assumes equal opposite sides means all four sides are equal, but only the opposite pairs are stated as equal here; 'trapezium' is wrong because a trapezium has exactly one pair of parallel sides, while this shape has two pairs, so it is a parallelogram and not a trapezium. Answer: it is a parallelogram but not a rectangle.
(a) 1/29 — The probability that Priya's ticket wins is 6/30. Since her ticket is not returned, there are now only 5 winning tickets left out of 29 tickets in total, so the probability that Tom's ticket also wins is 5/29. Multiplying these, 6/30 × 5/29 = 30/870 = 1/29. A candidate who answers 1/25 has treated Priya's ticket as returned, using 6/30 twice. A candidate who answers 1/30 has correctly reduced the winning tickets to 5 for Tom but forgotten to reduce the total number of tickets, using 5/30 instead of 5/29. A candidate who answers 11/59 has added the numerators and added the denominators, (6+5)/(30+29), instead of multiplying.
(a) Fewer than 48,500 people attended — Method: a figure given to the nearest thousand lies within half of 1,000, that is 500, of the figure printed, so the attendance is at least 47,500 and below 48,500. Working: 48,000 − 500 = 47,500 and 48,000 + 500 = 48,500, and an attendance of 48,500 would have been reported as 49,000, so every possible attendance is below 48,500. Answer: Fewer than 48,500 people attended. The distractors: more than 48,500 turns the upper limit of the range into a minimum; fewer than 47,500 uses the lower limit as though it were the upper one; more than 48,000 assumes the printed figure was rounded down, when it could just as well have been rounded up from a smaller attendance.
(d) −5 — In y = mx + c, the y-intercept is c, the constant term, not the coefficient of x. Here c = −5, so the y-intercept is −5. 4 is Beth's value, the coefficient of x (the gradient), not the intercept. 5 comes from taking the constant term but dropping its negative sign. −4 comes from taking the gradient but giving it the sign of the intercept.
(d) 3/8 — The ratio 3 : 5 has 3 + 5 = 8 parts in total. The first part as a fraction of the whole is 3 out of 8, or 3/8. Writing 3/5 gives the first part compared to the second part, not to the whole. Writing 5/8 gives the second part as a fraction of the whole, not the first. Writing 8/3 has the fraction upside down — the whole must be on the bottom.
(a) 110° — The truss is isosceles, so its two base angles are equal; since the three angles of the triangle add up to 180° and the apex is 40°, each base angle is (180 − 40) ÷ 2 = 70°. The angle between the sloping edge and the joist, extended beyond the base of the truss, sits on a straight line with that 70° base angle, and angles on a straight line add up to 180°, so the required angle is 180 − 70 = 110°. "70°" comes from stopping after finding the base angle and giving it directly, without also using the straight-line fact to find the angle on the OUTSIDE of the truss. "140°" comes from doubling the base angle instead of using the straight-line fact. "20°" comes from taking half of the apex angle (40° ÷ 2), mistaking it for the required angle instead of properly using the triangle's angle sum.
(c) £7.05 — Tom is correct — Method: multiply the cost of one jar by the number of jars, then compare the total to £7. Working: 3 × £2.35 = £7.05, and since £7.05 is more than £7, Tom's claim is correct. Answer: £7.05 — Tom is correct. "£7.05 — Tom is incorrect" comes from reaching the right total but reading the 05 after the point as making the amount less than £7. "£6.95 — Tom is incorrect" comes from working out 3 × 35p as 3 × 30p + 5p = 95p, multiplying only the tens digit, and adding it to 3 × £2 = £6. "£7.20 — Tom is correct" comes from rounding £2.35 up to £2.40 before multiplying: 3 × £2.40 = £7.20.
(d) 3n + 2 — The common difference is 3 (8−5=3), so the expression starts 3n. To match the first term when n=1, 3×1+c=5, so c=2: the nth term is 3n+2. A candidate who uses the first term itself as the constant, instead of first term minus the common difference, would write 3n+5 (giving 8, 11, 14, 17 — one term too high throughout). A candidate who omits the constant term altogether would write just 3n (giving 3, 6, 9, 12, not matching the sequence at all). A candidate who adds the common difference to n instead of multiplying would write n+3 (giving 4, 5, 6, 7, far too small).
(c) £4.00 — Find the cost of one pen: £6.40 ÷ 8 = £0.80. Then multiply by 5 pens: £0.80 × 5 = £4.00. Dividing £6.40 by 5 and multiplying by 8 gives £10.24 — that uses the ratio the wrong way round, scaling as if 5 pens were more expensive than 8. Stopping at £0.80 only gives the price of one pen. Multiplying the price of one pen by the difference in the number of pens, (8 − 5) × £0.80, gives £2.40 — the cost of the pens NOT bought, not the cost of the 5 pens bought. 5 pens cost £4.00.
(c) 16:25 — Add the whole hour first: 14:35 plus 1 hour is 15:35. Then add the 50 minutes. From 15:35, 25 minutes reaches 16:00 and the remaining 25 minutes gives 16:25. 15:85 adds 35 and 50 to get 85 minutes and never exchanges 60 of them for an hour, 16:05 treats 1 hour 50 minutes as 1.5 hours, and 12:45 subtracts the journey time instead of adding it.
(a) 135 km — Method: find the distance travelled on one litre, then scale up to 9 litres. Working: 90 ÷ 6 = 15 km per litre, so 15 × 9 = 135 km. Answer: 135 km. 45 km comes from working out the extra distance for the extra 3 litres (15 × 3) but forgetting to add the original 90 km. 60 km comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 6 ÷ 9, instead of finding the rate per litre first. 99 km comes from simply adding the number of litres, 9, onto the original distance, 90, instead of scaling the whole journey.

How the 20 questions are shared out

Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)

Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.