Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) £70 — Method: 20% of an amount is 20/100 of it; a reliable route is to find 10% by dividing by 10 and then double it. Working: 10% of £350 is £350 ÷ 10 = £35, and 20% is twice as much, £35 × 2 = £70. Answer: £70. The distractors: £35 comes from finding 10% and stopping there; £17.50 comes from reading 20% as one twentieth and working out £350 ÷ 20 = £17.50; £280 comes from taking 20% off the money raised rather than finding 20% of it, giving £350 ÷ 5 = £70 and then £350 − £70 = £280.
- (c) 8n + 7 — Method: find the weekly increase, then find the constant by adjusting the week 1 total. Working: the total goes up by £8 each week (23 − 15 = 8), so the coefficient of n is 8. The constant is the week 1 total minus the common difference: 15 − 8 = 7. Answer: the nth term is 8n + 7. 8n + 15 comes from using the week 1 total, 15, as the constant without subtracting the common difference. 8n − 1 comes from a slip in working out the constant, subtracting the common difference twice (15 − 8 − 8 = −1) instead of once. 7n + 8 comes from swapping the weekly increase and the constant.
- (c) 20% — Method: percentage increase = (increase ÷ original) × 100. Working: the increase is 54 − 45 = 9, and 9 ÷ 45 = 0.2, so the percentage increase is 0.2 × 100 = 20. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 9% comes from writing the actual increase as a percentage; 16.7% comes from dividing by the new value 54 instead of the original 45; 120% is the multiplier 1.2 written as a change rather than the change itself.
- (a) 106° — Angle AOC and angle AOD share the arm OA and together they make up the straight line CD, so they add up to 180°: angle AOD = 180° − 74° = 106°. 74° comes from treating AOC and AOD as vertically opposite angles, which are equal — but they are adjacent angles on a straight line, not vertically opposite. 16° comes from subtracting 74° from 90°, treating the angles as complementary. 148° comes from doubling 74° instead of subtracting it from 180°.
- (a) 1/3 — Method: for two independent spinners, multiply the probability of each separate outcome, but first work out each spinner's own probability correctly, using how many of its equal sections actually carry that result. Working: Spinner A has 2 even numbers, 2 and 4, out of 4 sections, so P(even) = 2/4 = 1/2. Spinner B has 2 red sections out of 3, so P(red) = 2/3. Multiplying gives 1/2 × 2/3, which cancels down to 1/3. Answer: 1/3. Watch out: writing down 1/4 treats Spinner B's two colours as equally likely and uses 1/2 for red, when in fact 2 of its 3 sections are red — the sections are not split evenly between the two colours. Writing down 1/6 undercounts Spinner A's even numbers as just one out of four instead of two. And writing down 5/6 applies the 'at least one' formula, P(A) + P(B) − P(A)×P(B), which answers a different question about EITHER spinner landing the right way, not both together.
- (d) An outlier from the damaged wing, not the trend. — That bird's point lies a long way from the rising trend followed by every other bird, and its low wingspan is explained by the damaged wing rather than by its age — it is an outlier caused by an unusual factor, not part of the general relationship between age and wingspan, so it should not be used when drawing the line of best fit. Saying every point must be used ignores that an outlier caused by a separate, identifiable factor can rightly be set aside. Saying it shows no correlation ignores that the other 19 points do show a clear rising trend; one outlier does not remove that. Saying it proves the line is inaccurate confuses one unusual bird with a fault in the line itself, when the line correctly describes the trend followed by the rest of the data.
- (d) 25,000 — Method: to round to the nearest 1,000, look at the hundreds digit; 5 or more sends the thousands digit up, less than 5 leaves it where it is, and every digit below the thousands becomes zero. Working: 24,681 has 4 in the thousands place and 6 in the hundreds place. As 6 is 5 or more, the 4 thousands go up to 5 thousands and the hundreds, tens and units are replaced by zeros. Answer: 25,000. The distractors: 24,000 comes from cutting the last three digits off instead of rounding, which leaves the thousands digit untouched; 24,700 is 24,681 rounded to the nearest 100, a finer degree of accuracy than the question asks for; 20,000 is 24,681 rounded to the nearest 10,000, a coarser degree of accuracy.
- (d) −5 — In y = mx + c, the y-intercept is c, the constant term, not the coefficient of x. Here c = −5, so the y-intercept is −5. 4 is Beth's value, the coefficient of x (the gradient), not the intercept. 5 comes from taking the constant term but dropping its negative sign. −4 comes from taking the gradient but giving it the sign of the intercept.
- (b) 2/5 — Method: a fraction taken 'of the total' has the whole batch as its denominator, so add the two masses first and then write the butter over that total. Working: the total mass is 450 g + 300 g = 750 g, so the fraction is 300/750; the highest common factor of 300 and 750 is 150, and 300 ÷ 150 = 2 while 750 ÷ 150 = 5. Answer: 2/5 of the batch. The distractors: 2/3 comes from comparing the butter with the flour, 300/450, a part-to-part fraction when the question asks for a part compared with the whole; 3/5 comes from writing the flour over the total, 450/750, which answers about the wrong ingredient; 3/2 comes from writing the flour over the butter, 450/300, which both uses the wrong denominator and reverses the order.
- (c) 20 cm² — The area of a triangle is half of base × height. First, base × height = 8 × 5 = 40. Half of 40 is 20 cm². 40 cm² forgets to halve and just gives base × height. 13 cm² adds the base and height together instead of multiplying them. 80 cm² doubles base × height instead of halving it.
- (d) 5/18 — Method: list every ordered pair of dice scores whose difference is 1, then divide by the 36 equally likely pairs. Working: the pairs with a difference of 1 are (1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 3), (3, 2), (3, 4), (4, 3), (4, 5), (5, 4), (5, 6) and (6, 5), which is 10 pairs out of 36, cancelling down to 5/18. Answer: 5/18. Watch out: writing down 5/36 lists only the 5 pairs going up, (1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 4), (4, 5) and (5, 6), and misses that each one has a matching pair the other way round, such as (2, 1) — the two dice are different objects, and order matters, so each of those 5 gaps counts twice. Writing down 1/6 treats the six possible differences, 0 to 5, as equally likely and picks 1 out of 6 of them, but a difference of 1 is reached by far more pairs of scores than a difference of 5 is, so the six differences are not equally likely. And writing down 1/4 comes from adding the two dice's outcome counts instead of multiplying them, 6 + 6 = 12, and grouping the six scores into just three non-overlapping pairs one apart, {1, 2}, {3, 4} and {5, 6}, giving 3 out of that wrong pool of 12.
- (d) 360 km — Method: first find the kilometres per litre by dividing distance by fuel used, then multiply this rate by the new tank size. Working: 180 ÷ 6 = 30 km per litre; 30 × 12 = 360 km. Answer: 360 km. 30 km comes from finding the correct fuel consumption but stopping there, without scaling it up to the full tank. 2160 km comes from multiplying the original distance (180) by the tank size (12) directly, skipping the unit rate. 90 km comes from pairing the numbers the wrong way round: dividing the distance by the new tank size, 180 ÷ 12 = 15, and then multiplying by the original 6 litres, 15 × 6 = 90.
- (d) 128 — In 2p³ the index belongs to p only, so cube p first and multiply by the coefficient afterwards. Cubing gives 4 × 4 × 4 = 64, and then 2 × 64 = 128. Cubing the coefficient as well would mean working out (2 × 4)³, which is 512. Reading the index as an instruction to multiply by 3 gives 2 × 4 × 3 = 24, and ignoring the coefficient altogether leaves 64.
- (b) £10 — Method: find the cost of 1 kg by dividing, then multiply by the mass wanted — the unitary method for direct proportion. Working: £6 ÷ 3 = £2 per kg, and £2 × 5 = £10. Answer: £10. The distractors: £11 comes from adding 5 to the £6 instead of scaling; £30 comes from multiplying £6 by 5 without first dividing by 3; £3.60 comes from turning the proportion upside down, dividing by 5 and multiplying by 3.
- (b) Acute — An acute angle is any angle less than 90°. Since 47° is less than 90°, it is acute. An obtuse angle is between 90° and 180°, which 47° is not. A reflex angle is greater than 180°, which is far too big for 47°. A right angle is exactly 90°, not 47°. The angle is acute.
- (b) No — their possible jump lengths do not overlap — Method: each recorded jump stands for the lengths within half of 0.1 m, that is 0.05 m, of the figure recorded, and Priya is right only if the two ranges overlap. Working: Priya's jump is at least 3.8 − 0.05 = 3.75 m and below 3.85 m, because a jump of 3.85 m would have been recorded as 3.9 m; Nadia's jump is at least 3.85 m and below 3.9 + 0.05 = 3.95 m. Every length Priya could have jumped is below 3.85 m and every length Nadia could have jumped is at least 3.85 m, so Nadia jumped further whatever the exact lengths were. Answer: No — their possible jump lengths do not overlap. The distractors: the reason that a recorded jump is exactly the length jumped reaches the same verdict by treating a rounded record as exact, which is the idea this question tests; both jumps being 3.85 m would put 3.85 m inside Priya's range, when a jump of that length is recorded as 3.9 m; Priya jumping up to 3.9 m goes a whole 0.1 m above her record instead of half of it.
- (d) the y-axis, and 12 — Method: coordinates are written (x, y), so the first number is the distance across and the second the distance up; a point whose first coordinate is 0 has not moved across from the origin and therefore lies on the vertical axis. Working: in (0, 12) the first number is 0, so P is on the y-axis, and the second number, 12, is the y-coordinate of P. Answer: the y-axis, and 12. The distractors: 'the x-axis, and 12' comes from mixing up which axis the condition 'the first coordinate is 0' describes; 'the y-axis, and 0' comes from placing P correctly but reading the pair the wrong way round, so that the first number is quoted as the y-coordinate; 'the x-axis, and 0' comes from making both of those mistakes at once.
- (b) 12 — Method: in an equation of direct proportion the value of x is substituted and multiplied by the constant. Working: y = 3x with x = 4 gives y = 3 × 4 = 12. Answer: 12. The distractors: 7 comes from adding the 3 and the 4 instead of multiplying them, reading 3x as 3 + x; 34 comes from writing the 3 and the 4 side by side, treating 3x as the digits of a two-digit number rather than as a product; 1 comes from working out 4 − 3, which turns the constant into an amount to be taken away.
- (c) £7.05 — Tom is correct — Method: multiply the cost of one jar by the number of jars, then compare the total to £7. Working: 3 × £2.35 = £7.05, and since £7.05 is more than £7, Tom's claim is correct. Answer: £7.05 — Tom is correct. "£7.05 — Tom is incorrect" comes from reaching the right total but reading the 05 after the point as making the amount less than £7. "£6.95 — Tom is incorrect" comes from working out 3 × 35p as 3 × 30p + 5p = 95p, multiplying only the tens digit, and adding it to 3 × £2 = £6. "£7.20 — Tom is correct" comes from rounding £2.35 up to £2.40 before multiplying: 3 × £2.40 = £7.20.
- (c) 8 m — Method: in the same sunlight every object has its height and its shadow in the same ratio, so write 2:3 = h:12, find the multiplier that takes 3 to 12 and apply it to the height. Working: 12 ÷ 3 = 4, so the tree's shadow is 4 times the post's shadow; the height must be scaled by the same 4, giving 4 × 2 = 8 m. Answer: 8 m. The distractors: 18 m comes from setting up the proportion upside down, 12 ÷ 2 × 3, which scales by shadow over height instead of height over shadow; 24 m comes from multiplying the 12 m shadow by the post's height of 2 m and never dividing by the post's shadow of 3 m; 4 m is the scale factor 12 ÷ 3, given as a length instead of being used to scale the 2 m post.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.