Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 3 — Method: the index counts how many times the coefficient has been multiplied by 10, which is the number of places the decimal point moves from the end of the number to just after the first significant digit. Working: 2,000 = 2 × 1,000, and 1,000 = 10 × 10 × 10, which is three tens. Answer: 3. The distractors: 4 comes from counting the four digits of 2,000 rather than the three places the decimal point moves; 2 comes from copying the coefficient 2 into the index; −3 comes from making the index negative, which would describe a number smaller than 1 rather than two thousand.
- (d) $y = 2x - 1$ — Method: pick two points the line passes through, work out the gradient as vertical change ÷ horizontal change, and read the y-intercept from where the line crosses the y-axis. Working: the line passes through (0, −1) and (1, 1), so the gradient is (1 − (−1)) ÷ (1 − 0) = 2, and it crosses the y-axis at −1. Answer: y = 2x − 1. Distractor refutation: y = 2x + 1 comes from reading the y-intercept as +1 instead of −1, misreading which side of the origin the line crosses. y = x − 1 comes from taking the gradient as 1, counting the same number of squares across and up instead of checking the rise is twice the run. y = −2x − 1 comes from a sign error on the gradient, treating the line as sloping downward from left to right when it actually rises.
- (b) 8:12 — Method: two ratios are equivalent when one is obtained from the other by multiplying, or dividing, both parts by the same number. Working: multiplying both parts of 2:3 by 4 gives 2 × 4 = 8 and 3 × 4 = 12, and the check runs the other way too, since the highest common factor of 8 and 12 is 4 and dividing both parts by 4 returns 2:3. Answer: 8:12. The distractors: 8:3 comes from multiplying only the first part by 4 and leaving the second part alone; 12:8 comes from multiplying both parts by 4 correctly but then writing the two parts the wrong way round; 4:5 comes from adding 2 to each part instead of multiplying, and adding the same amount to both parts changes the ratio.
- (b) 2 — A rhombus is a special parallelogram, so opposite sides are parallel — that is two pairs of parallel sides. A quadrilateral with only one pair of parallel sides is a trapezium, not a rhombus, so 1 is wrong. A kite has 0 pairs of parallel sides, not a rhombus. There are only two pairs of opposite sides in a quadrilateral altogether, so 4 is not possible. The correct answer is 2.
- (d) 124/125 — The probability that a seed germinates is 1 − 1/5 = 4/5, so the probability that all three seeds fail to germinate is 1/5 × 1/5 × 1/5 = 1/125. The probability that at least one germinates is 1 − 1/125 = 124/125. Choosing 4/5 comes from giving the probability that a single seed germinates, forgetting to combine all three seeds. Choosing 64/125 comes from working out the probability that ALL three seeds germinate, 4/5 × 4/5 × 4/5 = 64/125, instead of at least one. Choosing 12/125 comes from working out the probability that EXACTLY one seed germinates, 3 × 4/5 × 1/5 × 1/5 = 12/125, instead of at least one.
- (a) 1,400 and 1,240, so combine the samples for one estimate — Method: scale each sample up to the whole stock, then use the fact that a larger sample gives a more reliable estimate than a smaller one. Working: the first sample gives 35 ÷ 50 = 0.7 and 0.7 × 2,000 = 1,400 paperbacks; the second gives 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62 and 0.62 × 2,000 = 1,240 paperbacks. Two random samples of the same size are expected to differ a little, so neither estimate is wrong. Putting the two together gives 35 + 31 = 66 paperbacks in 100 books, and 66 ÷ 100 = 0.66 with 0.66 × 2,000 = 1,320, an estimate resting on twice as many books as either volunteer checked. Answer: 1,400 and 1,240, so combine the samples for one estimate. The distractors: keeping 1,400 because it is larger picks an estimate by its size, when both samples held 50 books and neither has a stronger claim; saying a volunteer must have miscounted assumes two random samples ought to agree exactly, which is precisely what random sampling does not promise; 1,750 and 1,550 come from 35 × 50 = 1,750 and 31 × 50 = 1,550, multiplying each count by the size of the sample instead of scaling by 2,000 ÷ 50.
- (c) 8 — Each of the 4 spinner outcomes can be paired with each of the 2 coin outcomes, so multiply: 4 × 2 = 8. 6 comes from adding the two numbers instead of multiplying them. 4 comes from using only the spinner outcomes and ignoring the coin. 2 comes from using only the coin outcomes and ignoring the spinner.
- (d) 3 — Method: add the constant term to both sides first, then divide by the coefficient of x. Working: 3x = 4 + 5 = 9; x = 9 ÷ 3 = 3. Answer: x = 3. −1/3 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 4 − 5 = −1, then x = −1/3. 6 comes from subtracting the coefficient 3 instead of dividing by it: 9 − 3 = 6. 9 comes from correctly finding 3x = 9 but forgetting to divide by 3.
- (c) 135 g — Find the ratio of butter to sugar in the first batch: 240:160, which simplifies to 3:2. For the second batch, sugar = 90 g, so butter = 90 × 3/2 = 135 g. (60 g comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 2/3. 170 g comes from subtracting the drop in sugar, 160 − 90 = 70 g, from the original butter amount, 240 − 70, instead of scaling. 240 g comes from not scaling the butter amount at all.)
- (d) 20 — Alternate angles between parallel lines are equal, so 3x + 10 = 5x − 30. Rearranging, 10 + 30 = 5x − 3x, so 40 = 2x, and x = 20. −10 comes from a sign error when rearranging, moving a term to the wrong side and getting −20 = 2x instead. 25 comes from wrongly treating the two angles as co-interior and adding them to 180°: (3x + 10) + (5x − 30) = 180 gives 8x − 20 = 180, so x = 25. 47.5 makes the same co-interior mistake but sets the sum equal to 360° instead of 180°, giving 8x − 20 = 360 and x = 47.5.
- (b) likely — On the probability scale, 'certain' is reserved for a probability of exactly 1, and 'evens' describes a probability of exactly 0.5. A probability of 0.9 is high but not equal to 1, so the correct word is 'likely'. Choosing 'certain' treats a probability close to 1 as if it were exactly 1, which it is not. Choosing 'evens' misjudges 0.9 as being close to the midpoint of the scale, when it is close to the 'certain' end instead. Choosing 'unlikely' reads the scale the wrong way round, as if a high probability meant a low chance of happening.
- (d) 9 — List all the factors of 36 in pairs that multiply to give 36: 1 × 36, 2 × 18, 3 × 12, 4 × 9, and 6 × 6. This gives the factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 36 — nine factors in total, with 6 counted only once even though it appears in a pair with itself. Forgetting that 36 is itself a factor of 36 and leaving it off the list gives 8. Counting the number of factor pairs, five of them, rather than the number of individual factors gives 5. Treating the repeated pair 6 × 6 as two separate factors, 6 and 6 again, gives 10 instead of 9. So 36 has 9 factors.
- (b) £14 — Method: read the fixed charge (the cost at 0 miles) and the rate (the cost per extra mile) from the graph, then use them to work out the cost for a distance beyond the part that is plotted. Working: the graph shows a fixed charge of £2 at 0 miles, and the cost rises by £2 for every extra mile, so for 6 miles the cost is £2 + (£2 × 6) = £2 + £12 = £14. Answer: £14. Distractor refutation: £12 comes from multiplying the rate by the distance and leaving out the £2 fixed charge. £8 comes from misreading the rate as £1 per mile instead of £2 per mile. £24 comes from adding the fixed charge to the rate first and then multiplying the total by the distance, instead of multiplying the rate by the distance and then adding the fixed charge.
- (d) 13/10 — First find the selling price: £150 + £45 = £195. Put the selling price over the cost price: 195/150. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 15: 195÷15 = 13, 150÷15 = 10, giving 13/10. (10/13 comes from writing the prices the wrong way round. 3/10 is just the profit written as a fraction of the cost price, 45/150, not the selling price. 13/23 comes from comparing the selling price to the combined total of the cost price and the selling price, 195/345.)
- (b) 22 — Method: add the two drawn lengths together first, then apply the scale to the total. Working: 3 cm + 2.5 cm = 5.5 cm; 5.5 cm × 4 = 22 m. A student who answers 10 has only converted one of the two sections (2.5 cm × 4) and forgotten the other. A student who answers 5.5 has added the two drawn lengths but forgotten to apply the scale at all. A student who answers 44 has doubled the correct answer, effectively applying the scale twice. Answer: 22 m.
- (b) 63 — 5 + 2 = 7, then 3² = 9, then 7 × 9 = 63. Ignoring the brackets and applying BIDMAS as if the expression were unbracketed gives 3² = 9, then 2 × 9 = 18, then 5 + 18 = 23. Squaring the bracket instead of the 3 gives 7² = 49, then 49 × 3 = 147 — the power belongs to the 3 alone. Multiplying by 3 before squaring the whole product gives 7 × 3 = 21, then 21² = 441.
- (c) x = −2 or x = 4 — The solutions of x² − 2x − 8 = 0 are the x-values where y = 0. From the table, y = 0 when x = −2 and when x = 4, so those are the two solutions. Distractor origins: x = −1 or x = 3 picks the pair of x-values that give equal (but non-zero) y-values instead of y = 0; x = 0 or x = −8 mixes up an x-value with its corresponding y-value; x = −2 only reads off one of the two roots and misses the other.
- (a) 0.62 miles — The gradient of the line is the change in miles divided by the change in kilometres: 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62, so 1 kilometre converts to 0.62 miles. Dividing the wrong way round, 50 ÷ 31 = 1.612..., rounds to 1.61 miles — that finds how many kilometres are in 1 mile, not the reverse. Doubling the gradient, 1.24 miles, comes from using 62 ÷ 50 instead of 31 ÷ 50. Reading off the y-coordinate of the given point without dividing by the x-coordinate gives 31.00 miles, which is the number of miles for 50 kilometres, not for 1 kilometre.
- (b) 0.6 — Method: convert the fraction to an equivalent fraction with denominator 10, then read off the decimal. Working: 3/5 = 6/10 (multiplying numerator and denominator by 2) = 0.6. Answer: 0.6. 0.35 comes from combining the digits 3 and 5 directly after the decimal point instead of converting the fraction. 0.53 comes from writing the numerator and denominator digits in the wrong order. 1.67 comes from flipping the fraction to 5/3 before converting to a decimal.
- (a) 0.6 litres — The ratio 1 : 9 means the solution has 1 + 9 = 10 equal parts in total. Each part is 6 ÷ 10 = 0.6 litres, and disinfectant is 1 part, so Priti needs 0.6 litres of disinfectant. Giving 0.667 litres divides by 9, the number of parts of water, instead of the total number of parts, 10 (6 ÷ 9 ≈ 0.667). Giving 6 litres is the total amount of solution, not just the disinfectant's share of it. Giving 5.4 litres works out the water's share (6 × 9 ÷ 10 = 5.4), not the disinfectant's.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.