Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) (12 + 3π) cm — The perimeter of a quarter-circle is made up of two straight radii plus a quarter of the circumference. The two radii give 2 × 6 = 12 cm, and a quarter of the circumference is (1/4) × 2 × π × 6 = 3π cm, so the total perimeter is (12 + 3π) cm. Giving only the curved part, 3π cm, forgets the two straight edges entirely. Using the full circumference, 2 × π × 6 = 12π, instead of a quarter of it gives (12 + 12π) cm. Including only one radius instead of two gives (6 + 3π) cm.
- (a) 3y² — 'y squared, multiplied by 3' means the square is applied to y only, and the result is then multiplied by 3, written as 3y². Writing y³ mistakes the multiplication by 3 for an extra factor of y, adding to the power instead of using a coefficient. Writing (3y)² squares the whole of 3y, including the 3, which gives 9y² rather than 3y² — the square should apply to y alone. Writing 3 + y² adds the 3 instead of multiplying by it. The expression for 'y squared, multiplied by 3' is 3y².
- (c) 16 cm — Corresponding sides of similar triangles are all in the same ratio. Use the pair whose lengths are both known: the scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is 12 ÷ 6 = 2. Since QR corresponds to BC, multiply BC by that scale factor: 8 × 2 = 16, so QR = 16 cm.
- (d) (6, 3) — For an enlargement centred at the origin, each coordinate is multiplied by the scale factor: (2, 1) → (2 × 3, 1 × 3) = (6, 3). ((5, 4) comes from adding the scale factor to each coordinate instead of multiplying; (6, 1) comes from multiplying only the x-coordinate by 3 and leaving the y-coordinate unchanged; (2, 3) comes from multiplying only the y-coordinate by 3 and leaving the x-coordinate unchanged.)
- (d) 1/8 — The multiples of 3 from 1 to 8 are 3 and 6, so the probability of that event is 2/8, which simplifies to 1/4. The probability of the coin landing on heads is 1/2. Since the spin and the toss are independent, multiply the two probabilities: 1/4 × 1/2 = 1/8. A candidate who answers 1/4 has considered only the spinner and forgotten to combine it with the coin toss. A candidate who answers 1/2 has considered only the coin and forgotten the spinner condition entirely. A candidate who answers 1/16 has counted only one number, 6, as a multiple of 3 instead of two, giving 1/8 × 1/2.
- (a) No, the size of the fire affects both of the quantities — Method: correlation says that two quantities change together; a claim that one of them produces the other is a further claim, and it needs evidence that a scatter graph on its own cannot give. Working: the graph does show strong positive correlation, so more engines did go with greater damage. But neither quantity was set by the researchers: both were decided by how large the fire was. A large blaze brings many appliances and also destroys a great deal, while a small one brings few and destroys little, so a third quantity is driving both of the recorded ones. Answer: no, because the size of the fire affects both of the quantities. The distractors: saying the correlation is negative contradicts the graph, which shows the two quantities rising together, and reaching the right verdict from a false reading of the data is not the reason the mark is for; saying that strong positive correlation shows one quantity causes the other is the assumption the question exists to test, and no strength of correlation can establish cause; saying the points lie close to the line of best fit describes how strong the correlation is, and strength and cause are different matters entirely.
- (b) 1/2 — To multiply fractions, multiply the numerators together and multiply the denominators together: 2 × 3 = 6 and 3 × 4 = 12, giving 6/12, which simplifies to 1/2. Adding the fractions instead of multiplying them, using a common denominator of 12, gives 8/12 + 9/12 = 17/12. Dividing by 3/4 instead of multiplying by it, so multiplying by its reciprocal 4/3, gives 2/3 × 4/3 = 8/9. Multiplying only the numerators, 2 × 3 = 6, and keeping the first denominator, 3, unchanged gives 6/3 = 2.
- (c) 4(n + 3) — 'Add 3 to n' must happen before 'multiply the result by 4', so the addition needs brackets to show it happens first: 4(n + 3). Writing 4n + 3 multiplies n by 4 immediately and only adds the 3 afterwards, which reverses the order the words describe. Writing n + 3 × 4 only multiplies the 3 by 4, and adds n as a separate, unmultiplied term — it treats 'the result' as just the 3, not the whole of n + 3. Writing 3(n + 4) keeps the correct structure but swaps which number is added and which is multiplied. The expression for 'add 3 to n, then multiply the result by 4' is 4(n + 3).
- (a) 4 — The length scale factor, cubed, gives the volume scale factor: L³ = 64, so L = the cube root of 64 = 4, since 4 × 4 × 4 = 64. 64 comes from using the volume scale factor itself as the length scale factor, without taking a root at all. 8 comes from taking the square root of 64 instead of the cube root — that would be the correct root for an area scale factor, not a volume one. 32 comes from halving the volume scale factor (64 ÷ 2), instead of cube-rooting it.
- (d) No — angles must be equal too — A regular polygon must have both all sides equal and all angles equal. This tile has all six sides equal, but its interior angles are not all equal, so it fails the angle condition and is not regular — 'No — angles must be equal too' is correct. 'Yes — all sides are equal' is wrong because equal sides alone are not enough; a shape can have equal sides but unequal angles, as here. 'Yes — six equal sides means regular' is wrong for the same reason: equal sides do not automatically guarantee equal angles. 'No — hexagons can't be regular' is wrong because regular hexagons certainly exist (six equal sides and six equal 120° angles); it is this particular tile that fails to be regular, not hexagons in general.
- (c) 0.65 — Overrunning and not overrunning are exhaustive: between them they cover every outcome, so their probabilities sum to 1. Work out 1 − 0.35 = 0.65. Writing 0.35 again is the probability that the appointment overruns, not its complement — the subtraction was never done. Adding instead of subtracting gives 1 + 0.35 = 1.35, which cannot be a probability at all. Subtracting each digit from 10 instead of borrowing from the 1, so 10 − 3 = 7 tenths and 10 − 5 = 5 hundredths, gives 0.75.
- (a) 6 × 10² metres — Method: distance = speed × time, so multiply the coefficients and add the indices. Working: 3 × 2 = 6 for the coefficients, and 8 + (−6) = 2 for the indices; 6 lies between 1 and 10, so the coefficient needs no adjustment. Answer: 6 × 10² metres, which is 600 metres. The distractors: 5 × 10² metres comes from adding the coefficients, 3 + 2, instead of multiplying them; 6 × 10¹⁴ metres comes from subtracting the indices, 8 − (−6), which is the rule for dividing rather than for multiplying; 6 × 10⁻⁴⁸ metres comes from multiplying the indices, 8 × (−6), instead of adding them.
- (a) Tuesday, by 2 km/h — Monday's speed is 15 ÷ 2.5 = 6 km/h and Tuesday's speed is 12 ÷ 1.5 = 8 km/h, so Tuesday was faster, by 8 − 6 = 2 km/h. A candidate who works out the correct speeds but mislabels which day is faster gets Monday, by 2 km/h. A candidate who divides 15 ÷ 2.5 incorrectly as 5 instead of 6 gets a difference of 8 − 5 = 3 km/h, still crediting Tuesday. A candidate who forgets to find Monday's speed and gives Tuesday's speed itself as the difference states Tuesday, by 8 km/h.
- (d) 30 cm — Convert 300 m to centimetres: 300 m = 30 000 cm. The scale 1 : 1000 means the map length is the real length divided by 1000: 30 000 ÷ 1000 = 30, giving 30 cm. Dividing the unconverted 300 (metres, not centimetres) by 1000 gives 0.3 cm, far too small to be a real map measurement. Dividing by 10 000 instead of 1 000 gives 3 cm, ten times too small. Multiplying instead of dividing, 300 × 1000 = 300 000, gives 300 000 cm — using the scale the wrong way round, as if the map were bigger than real life.
- (c) A line has no endpoints; a segment has two — A line extends without end in both directions, whereas a line segment is the part of a line between two specific fixed endpoints, so 'a line has no endpoints; a segment has two' is correct. 'A line has two endpoints; a segment has none' reverses these two definitions, so it is wrong. 'A line segment is always curved' is wrong because a line segment is straight, not curved, and does not extend infinitely. 'A line segment is a closed shape' is wrong because a line segment is a straight length between two points, not a polygon.
- (b) 31 — Method: a prime number has exactly two factors, 1 and itself, so check each number between 30 and 40 for other factors. Working: 3 × 11 = 33, so 33 is not prime. 2 × 17 = 34, so 34 is not prime. 4 × 9 = 36, so 36 is not prime. 31 has no factors other than 1 and 31, so it is prime. Answer: 31.
- (b) x = (y − 3)/5 — To make x the subject of y = 5x + 3, first subtract 3 from both sides to get y − 3 = 5x, then divide both sides by 5: x = (y − 3)/5. Writing x = (y + 3)/5 keeps the division correct but does not change the sign of the 3 when moving it across. Writing x = y/5 − 3 divides only the y term by 5 and leaves the 3 as a separate subtraction, instead of subtracting first and dividing the whole expression. Writing x = 5(y − 3) applies the correct order of subtracting 3 first, but then multiplies by 5 instead of dividing — the inverse of 5x is division, not multiplication. The correct rearrangement is x = (y − 3)/5.
- (c) 36 — Add the parts of the ratio: 3 + 4 = 7. Divide the total by the number of parts: 84 ÷ 7 = 12, so one part is worth 12. The smaller share has 3 parts: 3 × 12 = 36. (48 is the larger share, using 4 parts instead of 3. 42 comes from splitting 84 in half, treating the ratio as if it were 1:1. 28 comes from dividing 84 by 3 — one of the ratio numbers — instead of dividing by the total number of parts, 7.)
- (a) 4/9 — Method: write the number of parts for the photos being compared over the number of parts for the photos they are being compared to. Working: black-and-white photos are 4 parts and colour photos are 9 parts, so black-and-white photos as a fraction of colour photos is 4/9. Answer: 4/9. 9/4 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, comparing colour to black-and-white instead of black-and-white to colour. 4/13 comes from comparing black-and-white photos to the total number of photos (4+9=13) instead of to the colour photos. 9/13 comes from comparing colour photos to the total number of photos instead of black-and-white to colour.
- (d) 7:15 — Method: write the two parts in the order asked for, red first, then divide both parts by their highest common factor. Working: the factors of 7 are 1 and 7, and the factors of 15 are 1, 3, 5 and 15, so the only common factor is 1; dividing both parts by 1 leaves both counts unchanged. Answer: 7:15, which is already in its simplest form. The distractors: 15:7 is the ratio of blue to red, the reverse of the order the question asks for; 7:5 comes from cancelling the digit 1 out of 15, which is not a division by a common factor; 1:2 comes from dividing 15 by 7, rounding the result to 2 and writing the ratio as 1 to 2, but 7 is not a factor of 15 so that division is not exact.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.