Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 1/2 — Method: since the fractions already share a denominator, add only the numerators and keep the denominator the same. Working: 3/8 + 1/8 = 4/8 = 1/2. Answer: 1/2. Zoe's method, adding the denominators too, gives 4/16 = 1/4. 4/9 comes from adding the numerators correctly to get 4, but then building the denominator by adding the 8 of the first fraction to the 1 of the second (8 + 1 = 9), mixing a denominator with a numerator. 3/8 comes from ignoring the second fraction and simply restating the first one.
- (d) 8 — Method: compare the equation with y = mx + c, where c is the y-intercept. Working: in y = 3x + 8, the constant term is 8. Answer: the y-intercept is 8. 3 comes from confusing the y-intercept with the gradient. −8 comes from a sign error, treating the constant term as negative. 11 comes from wrongly adding the gradient and the constant term together.
- (d) 132 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio, use it to find Leo's pages, then add both amounts together. Working: 84 ÷ 7 = 12 (value of one part). Leo's pages = 12 × 4 = 48. Total = 84 + 48 = 132. Wrong options: 48 gives only Leo's pages and forgets to add Mia's; 147 comes from reversing the ratio parts (84 ÷ 4 × 7 = 147) and stopping there; 231 comes from reversing the ratio parts and then adding Mia's pages (84 + 147).
- (d) The angle between a tangent and a radius is 90° — OP is the radius drawn to the point of contact P, and a circle theorem states that a tangent always meets that radius at a right angle, so angle OPQ = 90°. A tangent is not parallel to the radius it touches — at the point of contact it is perpendicular to that radius, not parallel to it. A tangent does not pass through the centre — a straight line through the centre that also touches the circle at one point would have to be a diameter, which is a different line entirely. The angle-in-a-semicircle theorem needs a triangle drawn inside the circle with a diameter as its longest side; there is no such triangle here, just a tangent and a radius.
- (c) 39.5% — Win, draw and lose are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, so their probabilities sum to 100%: 42% + 18.5% = 60.5% is the percentage that wins or draws. 100% − 60.5% = 39.5% is the percentage that neither wins nor draws. Adding 42% and 18.5% and stopping there, 60.5%, is the probability of winning or drawing, not of neither. Subtracting only the 42% from 100% gives 58.0%, ignoring the draw percentage. Subtracting only the 18.5% from 100% gives 81.5%, ignoring the win percentage.
- (a) Priya — A line of best fit should be drawn so that the plotted points are roughly balanced above and below it. Work out the difference between the two counts for each pupil: Amir 10 − 2 = 8; Kofi 10 − 2 = 8 (10 below and 2 above); Leah 12 − 0 = 12; Priya 6 − 6 = 0. Priya's line has the smallest difference, an exact balance of 6 above and 6 below, so her line is drawn correctly. Amir's line has 10 of the 12 points above it, so it is drawn too low. Kofi's line has 10 of the 12 points below it, so it is drawn too high. Leah's line has every single point below it, so it is not a line of best fit at all.
- (b) £1,000, so £900 is not enough — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, multiply to estimate the total cost, then compare the estimate with the money available. Working: 187 rounds to 200 and £4.85 rounds to £5, so the estimate is 200 × 5 = 1,000, and £1,000 is more than the £900 the school has. Answer: £1,000, so £900 is not enough. The distractors: £800 comes from cutting £4.85 down to £4 instead of rounding it up to £5, giving 200 × 4 = 800, and that estimate wrongly suggests the money stretches; £935 comes from rounding the price only and keeping 187 lunches, giving 187 × 5 = 935; £950 comes from rounding 187 to the nearest 10 rather than to 1 significant figure, giving 190 × 5 = 950.
- (d) 128 — In 2p³ the index belongs to p only, so cube p first and multiply by the coefficient afterwards. Cubing gives 4 × 4 × 4 = 64, and then 2 × 64 = 128. Cubing the coefficient as well would mean working out (2 × 4)³, which is 512. Reading the index as an instruction to multiply by 3 gives 2 × 4 × 3 = 24, and ignoring the coefficient altogether leaves 64.
- (a) 180 g flour and 120 g butter — The ratio 3 : 2 means flour and butter must scale by the same factor. Scaling both parts by 60 gives 180 g flour and 120 g butter, since 3 × 60 = 180 and 2 × 60 = 120, which is the correct pair. Swapping the amounts gives 120 g flour and 180 g butter, which is in the ratio 2 : 3 — butter to flour, not flour to butter. Scaling the flour by 60 but the butter by only 45 gives 180 g flour and 90 g butter, using two different scale factors on the two parts of the ratio. Scaling the flour by 60 but the butter by 70 gives 180 g flour and 140 g butter, the opposite inconsistency.
- (a) 10.4 cm — The scale factor from the smaller triangle to the larger triangle is 8 ÷ 5 = 1.6, so the larger side is 6.5 × 1.6 = 10.4 cm. The distractor 4.0625 cm comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 6.5 × 5 ÷ 8 = 4.0625. The distractor 9.5 cm comes from adding the difference between the ratio numbers (8 − 5 = 3) to the given length, 6.5 + 3 = 9.5. The distractor 13 cm comes from doubling the given length, treating the scale factor as 2 instead of 1.6.
- (b) 0.15 — Method: success and failure are the only two outcomes of the task, so they form an exhaustive set and their probabilities add to 1; subtract the given probability from 1. Working: writing 1 as 1.00 so that both numbers have two decimal places gives 1.00 − 0.85; exchanging once, the hundredths give 10 − 5 = 5 and the tenths, now 9, give 9 − 8 = 1. Answer: 0.15, close to the left-hand end of the 0 to 1 scale because the machine nearly always succeeds. The distractors: 0.85 comes from giving back the probability of success instead of the probability of failure; 0.25 comes from taking each decimal column from 10 on its own in 1.00 − 0.85, writing 10 − 5 = 5 in the hundredths and 10 − 8 = 2 in the tenths instead of reducing the tenths to 9 after the exchange; 0.5 comes from assuming that success and failure must be equally likely because there are only two outcomes.
- (c) 590 — To round to the nearest 10, decide which multiple of 10 the number is nearer to. 592.5 lies between 590 and 600. It is 592.5 − 590 = 2.5 above 590, but 600 − 592.5 = 7.5 below 600, so it is much nearer to 590. Equivalently, the units digit is 2, and 2 is less than 5, so round down: 592.5 rounds to 590. A candidate who wrote 600 rounded up because of the 5 in the tenths place, but that digit decides rounding to the nearest whole number, not to the nearest 10 — the units digit is what matters here. A candidate who wrote 595 rounded to the nearest 5 instead of the nearest 10. A candidate who wrote 500 cut the number down to its hundreds digit instead of rounding to the nearest 10.
- (d) x = 3 or x = −3 — Method: get x² on its own with a coefficient of 1, then take the square root of both sides and keep both the positive and the negative root. Working: dividing 2x² = 18 by 2 gives x² = 9, and the square root of 9 is 3, so x = 3 or x = −3; both check, because 2 × 9 = 18 either way. Answer: x = 3 or x = −3. The distractors: x = 9 or x = −9 comes from dividing by 2 and then forgetting to take the square root; x = 4 or x = −4 comes from subtracting 2 from 18 instead of dividing by it, giving x² = 16; x = 6 or x = −6 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing, giving x² = 36.
- (a) 3/8, 41%, 0.43 — Method: convert every value to a decimal so they can be compared on the same scale, then order them. Working: 3/8 = 0.375, 41% = 0.41, and 0.43 stays as 0.43, so from smallest to largest the decimals are 0.375, 0.41, 0.43, giving the order 3/8, 41%, 0.43. Answer: 3/8, 41%, 0.43. The order 3/8, 0.43, 41% comes from comparing 0.43 and 41% as raw digits (43 versus 41) without converting 41% into the decimal 0.41 first, wrongly placing 0.43 before 41%. The order 0.43, 41%, 3/8 comes from placing the values in completely reversed order, from largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest. The order 41%, 0.43, 3/8 comes from ordering the values by their TYPE (percentage, then decimal, then fraction) rather than by their actual size.
- (c) 1 — Method: a right angle measures 90°, the three angles of any triangle add up to 180°, and a right-angled triangle is defined as a triangle that contains a right angle. Working: taking one right angle out of the total leaves 180° − 90° = 90° to be shared between the other two angles, so both of those must be acute; a second right angle would use the whole of that remaining 90° and leave nothing at all for the third angle, which is impossible. The definition therefore fixes the count at exactly one. Answer: 1. The distractors: 2 comes from counting the two sides that form the right angle instead of counting the angles themselves; 3 comes from reading the name as a description of the whole triangle, so that all three of its angles are taken to be right angles, which would need an angle sum of 3 × 90° = 270°; 0 comes from over-applying the angle sum — a candidate who works out that 90° + 90° = 180° leaves nothing for a third angle can conclude from that alone that no triangle may contain a right angle at all.
- (a) 23 — Division undoes multiplication, so the missing number is 391 ÷ 17 = 23. Writing down 17 repeats the number already given instead of solving for the missing one. Subtracting instead of dividing gives 391 − 17 = 374. Multiplying instead of dividing gives 391 × 17 = 6647.
- (d) 110 — Method: form the equation 15 + 0.08m = 23.80, where m is the number of minutes, then solve for m. Working: subtract the fixed fee: 0.08m = 23.80 − 15 = 8.80. Divide by the cost per minute: m = 8.80 ÷ 0.08 = 110. Answer: 110 minutes. 1.1 comes from using 8 instead of 0.08 as the cost per minute, forgetting to convert pence to pounds. 297.5 comes from dividing the whole bill by the cost per minute without subtracting the fixed fee first, 23.80 ÷ 0.08. 485 comes from adding the fixed fee to the bill instead of subtracting it, before dividing by the cost per minute, (23.80 + 15) ÷ 0.08.
- (d) 25% — Method: to convert a decimal to a percentage, multiply by 100. Working: 0.25 × 100 = 25. Answer: 25%. The distractors: 0.25% comes from writing a percent sign after the decimal without multiplying; 2.5% comes from multiplying by 10 instead of 100; 250% comes from multiplying by 1000.
- (b) 2.1 m — The three pieces use 3 × 0.9 = 2.7 m of wood. Remaining wood = 4.8 − 2.7 = 2.1 m. A candidate who miscounts and only subtracts 2 pieces instead of 3 gets 4.8 − 1.8 = 3.0 m. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting gets 4.8 + 2.7 = 7.5 m. A candidate who gives the length used instead of the length remaining gets 2.7 m.
- (b) Car A, 50 km/h — Method: speed = distance ÷ time for each car, then compare. Working: Car A = 150 ÷ 3 = 50 km/h. Car B = 180 ÷ 4 = 45 km/h. Since 50 > 45, Car A is faster, travelling at 50 km/h. Wrong options: Car B, 45 km/h correctly finds Car B's speed but wrongly names the slower car as faster; Car A, 45 km/h picks the correct car but uses Car B's speed by mistake; Car B, 50 km/h picks the wrong car but uses Car A's correct speed value.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.