Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 225 — Method: brackets are worked out before powers, so multiply the two numbers first and then square the result. Working: 3 × 5 = 15, and 15² = 15 × 15 = 225. Answer: 225. The distractors: 30 comes from doubling 15 instead of squaring it; 75 comes from squaring only the 5 and then working out 3 × 25; 34 comes from squaring each number separately and adding, 9 + 25, instead of multiplying inside the brackets first.
- (b) 20 — F = 4s, so when s = 5, F = 4 × 5 = 20. 9 comes from adding 4 and 5 instead of multiplying, the mistake described in the question. 25 comes from squaring s (5²) instead of multiplying by 4. 45 comes from writing the digits 4 and 5 next to each other instead of carrying out the multiplication.
- (a) £20,000 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the profit by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts belonging to the partner asked about. Working: 3 + 5 + 4 = 12 parts, £48,000 ÷ 12 = £4,000 for one part, and that partner has 5 parts, so 5 × £4,000 = £20,000. Answer: £20,000. The distractors: £4,000 is the value of one part; £12,000 is the 3-part share; £16,000 is the 4-part share, which is what a candidate reaches by assuming the biggest share must go with the number written last in the ratio.
- (a) 106° — Angle AOC and angle AOD share the arm OA and together they make up the straight line CD, so they add up to 180°: angle AOD = 180° − 74° = 106°. 74° comes from treating AOC and AOD as vertically opposite angles, which are equal — but they are adjacent angles on a straight line, not vertically opposite. 16° comes from subtracting 74° from 90°, treating the angles as complementary. 148° comes from doubling 74° instead of subtracting it from 180°.
- (a) 1/3 — Method: for two independent spinners, multiply the probability of each separate outcome, but first work out each spinner's own probability correctly, using how many of its equal sections actually carry that result. Working: Spinner A has 2 even numbers, 2 and 4, out of 4 sections, so P(even) = 2/4 = 1/2. Spinner B has 2 red sections out of 3, so P(red) = 2/3. Multiplying gives 1/2 × 2/3, which cancels down to 1/3. Answer: 1/3. Watch out: writing down 1/4 treats Spinner B's two colours as equally likely and uses 1/2 for red, when in fact 2 of its 3 sections are red — the sections are not split evenly between the two colours. Writing down 1/6 undercounts Spinner A's even numbers as just one out of four instead of two. And writing down 5/6 applies the 'at least one' formula, P(A) + P(B) − P(A)×P(B), which answers a different question about EITHER spinner landing the right way, not both together.
- (d) It asks two things at once and invites agreement — Method: a survey question is faulty when a reply to it cannot be read as evidence about one single thing, so check how many claims it contains and whether its wording pushes the reader one way. Working: the question joins two separate claims, that learning matters and that more homework should be set, so a reply of yes could mean either of them or both and cannot be counted as evidence about homework; the opening words “Do you agree” also invite agreement instead of leaving the reader free to say no. Answer: it asks two things at once and invites agreement. The distractors: the reply calling it too short mistakes length for clarity, when the fault is that too much has been packed in rather than too little; the reply about long words is false, since every word in the question is an everyday one and the fault lies in what is being asked rather than in the vocabulary used to ask it; the reply that the question is fine takes a yes or no answer as proof that the question works, which is exactly what a double question defeats.
- (c) > — Method: fractions with the same denominator are made of parts of the same size, so compare how many of those parts each fraction has. Working: both fractions are elevenths, and 6 elevenths is 2 more elevenths than 4 elevenths, so the fraction on the left is the larger one. The symbol must have its point facing the smaller side. Answer: >. The distractors: < comes from comparing the numerators the wrong way round, as though a larger numerator gave a smaller fraction; = comes from seeing the same denominator in both fractions and concluding that the fractions themselves are the same size; ≤ comes from working out the direction correctly but then picking the wrong symbol for it, reading it as though it meant 'is greater than or equal to'; ≤ means 'is less than or equal to', and 6 elevenths is neither less than nor equal to 4 elevenths.
- (d) 6 — Method: a value satisfies x ≥ 7 when it is greater than 7 or exactly equal to 7, so test each value against the boundary. Working: 8 is greater than 7 and 100 is greater than 7, so both satisfy the inequality; 7 is equal to the boundary and ≥ includes equality, so 7 satisfies it as well; 6 is less than 7, so 6 is the one value that fails. Answer: 6. The distractors: 7 is chosen by candidates who read ≥ as a strict 'greater than' and so shut the boundary value out of the solution set; 8 is chosen by reading the question as asking which value DOES satisfy the inequality and taking the smallest such value; 100 is chosen by the same misreading, taking instead the value furthest above the boundary.
- (d) 30 — Method: 50% is one half, so 50% of a quantity is the quantity divided by 2. Working: 60 ÷ 2 = 30. Answer: 30. The distractors: 120 comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing; 3000 comes from multiplying by 50 without dividing by 100; 6 comes from finding 10% instead of 50%.
- (d) A prism — A prism has two identical, parallel polygon faces (its cross-section) joined by flat rectangular side faces, so the same cross-sectional shape runs all the way along its length — this description matches a prism. A pyramid instead narrows from one polygon base up to a single point (the apex), so it does not have two identical parallel faces. A cone has one curved surface and a single circular base narrowing to a point — no flat rectangular sides at all. A cylinder has two identical circular faces, but they are joined by a curved surface, not by flat rectangles.
- (d) 15 — Method: each of Spinner A's outcomes can be paired with each of Spinner B's outcomes, so the two counts are combined by multiplying, not adding. Working: Spinner A has 3 outcomes and Spinner B has 5, so there are 3 × 5 = 15 equally likely outcomes in total. Answer: 15. Watch out: adding the two counts, 3 + 5 = 8, undercounts drastically — every one of Spinner A's 3 outcomes pairs with all 5 of Spinner B's outcomes, not just one each. Writing down 3 counts Spinner A alone and leaves Spinner B out completely. And writing down 25 comes from squaring Spinner B's own outcome count, 5 × 5, and forgetting Spinner A altogether.
- (b) 245 ≤ m < 255 — Method: a mass given to the nearest 10 g lies within half of 10 g, that is 5 g, of the figure written down. The lower limit is included because it rounds up to that figure, and the upper limit is excluded because it rounds up to the next multiple of 10. Working: 250 − 5 = 245 and 250 + 5 = 255, and a mass of 245 g rounds to 250 g while a mass of 255 g rounds to 260 g. Answer: 245 ≤ m < 255. The distractors: 240 ≤ m < 260 goes a whole 10 g either side instead of half of it; 245 < m ≤ 255 has the two limits the wrong way round; 240 ≤ m < 250 treats the stated 250 g as the largest mass possible, as though rounding were always upwards.
- (d) 4 — Method: compare the equation with the general form y = mx + c after writing the x term first, then read off the coefficient of x. Working: y = 6 + 4x can be written as y = 4x + 6, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = 4. Answer: the gradient is 4. The value 6 comes from reading off the constant, written first in the equation, and treating it as the gradient because it comes before the x term. The value 10 comes from adding the two numbers in the equation, 6 + 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x. The value 24 comes from multiplying the two numbers in the equation, 6 × 4, instead of reading off the coefficient of x.
- (c) 9% — Method: a percentage concentration is the ratio of salt to solution written per 100 g, so scale each concentration to the mass it belongs to, add the two masses of salt, then scale the ratio of salt to mixture back to a denominator of 100. Working: 5:100 = x:400 gives 5 ÷ 100 × 400 = 20 g of salt, and 25:100 = y:100 gives 25 g of salt; the mixture holds 20 + 25 = 45 g of salt in 400 + 100 = 500 g of solution; 45:500 = 9:100. Answer: 9%. The distractors: 15% is the mean of 5% and 25%, which would only be right if the two masses were equal, and here one is four times the other; 21% comes from attaching the concentrations to the wrong masses, working out (400 × 25% + 100 × 5%) ÷ 500; 0.9% comes from working out 45 ÷ 500 = 0.09 and then moving the decimal point one place instead of two when writing the decimal as a percentage.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (a) 5 — Method: each index is worked out first, and subtracting a negative number is the same as adding the positive. Working: (−2)³ = (−2) × (−2) × (−2) = −8 and (−3)² = (−3) × (−3) = 9, while − (−4) becomes + 4, so the calculation becomes −8 + 9 + 4 = 5. Answer: 5. The distractors: −13 comes from taking (−3)² as −9, giving −8 − 9 + 4 = −13; −3 comes from reading − (−4) as − 4, giving −8 + 9 − 4 = −3; 21 comes from treating every power of a negative number as positive, so that (−2)³ is taken as 8 and the calculation becomes 8 + 9 + 4 = 21.
- (d) 1 hour 32 minutes — T = 40 × 1.8 + 20 = 72 + 20 = 92 minutes. Since 92 = 60 + 32, the cooking time is 1 hour 32 minutes. A candidate who rounds the mass to 2 kg before substituting gets 40 × 2 + 20 = 100 minutes = 1 hour 40 minutes. A candidate who forgets to add the 20 minutes gets 40 × 1.8 = 72 minutes = 1 hour 12 minutes. A candidate who multiplies the mass by (40 + 20) = 60 instead of substituting into the formula gets 1.8 × 60 = 108 minutes = 1 hour 48 minutes.
- (c) 25 — Method: divide the larger number by its ratio part to find the value of one part, then multiply by the smaller number's ratio part. Working: 40 ÷ 8 = 5 (value of one part). Smaller number = 5 × 5 = 25. Wrong options: 64 comes from dividing by the smaller ratio part instead of the larger (40 ÷ 5 × 8); 45 comes from adding the value of one part onto 40 instead of scaling down (40 + 5); 35 comes from subtracting the value of one part from 40 (40 − 5) instead of multiplying it by the smaller ratio part.
- (c) 0.94 — Method: a fraction is written as a decimal by making the denominator a power of ten, because the decimal places record tenths, hundredths and thousandths. Working: 50 × 2 = 100, so the numerator must also be multiplied by 2, giving 47 × 2 = 94 and the equivalent fraction 94/100; 94 hundredths is written with two digits after the decimal point. Answer: 0.94. The distractors: 0.47 comes from treating the denominator as though it were already 100 and writing the digits of the numerator straight after the point; 4.7 comes from dividing 47 by 10 instead of by 50; 0.094 comes from multiplying the denominator by 20 to reach 1000 but the numerator by only 2, giving 94/1000.
- (a) 3/8 — The whole prize fund is split into 3 + 5 = 8 equal parts. The smaller winner receives 3 of these parts, so their share is 3/8 of the whole fund. Taking the larger number of parts, 5, as the numerator instead gives 5/8, the larger winner's share. Writing the ratio numbers directly as a fraction without adding them, 3/5, treats the ratio as a fraction of the OTHER share rather than of the whole. Inverting the ratio gives 5/3, which is not even a valid fraction of a whole, since it is greater than 1.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.