Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 8 × 10³ — Method: divide the capacity of the card by the size of one photograph, dividing the coefficients and subtracting the indices, then bring the coefficient back into the range 1 to 10. Working: 3.2 ÷ 4 = 0.8 and 10 − 6 = 4, which gives 0.8 × 10⁴; a coefficient of 0.8 is smaller than 1, so the decimal point moves one place to the right and the index falls by 1. Answer: 8 × 10³. The distractors: 8 × 10⁴ comes from correcting 0.8 to 8 without reducing the index, which makes the answer ten times too large; 1.28 × 10¹⁷ comes from multiplying the two numbers instead of dividing them, since 3.2 × 4 = 12.8 and 10 + 6 = 16; 8 × 10¹⁵ comes from dividing the coefficients but adding the indices instead of subtracting them.
- (b) 3w − 5 ≥ 16 — "Three times w, minus 5" translates to 3w − 5, and "is at least 16" means it must be 16 or more, giving 3w − 5 ≥ 16. A candidate who reads "at least" as a strict inequality writes 3w − 5 > 16. A candidate who misreads the wording and applies the subtraction before the multiplication writes 3(w − 5) ≥ 16. A candidate who reverses the direction of the inequality writes 3w − 5 ≤ 16.
- (b) −1% — Method: write each change as a multiplier and multiply them. A 10% fall is × 0.9 and a 10% rise is × 1.1. Working: 0.9 × 1.1 = 0.99, so the final price is 99% of the original, which is 1% less. Answer: an overall change of −1%. The distractors: 0% comes from assuming a 10% fall and a 10% rise cancel — they do not, because the rise is 10% of a smaller amount; +1% has the size right but the sign wrong, from reading the multiplier 0.99 as 1% above 1 instead of 1% below it; −2% comes from finding the 1% fall and then counting it once for each of the two changes.
- (c) (−2, 10) — To translate M(3, 8) by $\binom{−5}{2}$, add −5 to the x-coordinate and 2 to the y-coordinate: (3 + (−5), 8 + 2) = (−2, 10). (5, 3) comes from swapping the two components of the vector before applying them. (−2, 8) applies only the x-component and forgets to add the y-component. (3, 10) applies only the y-component and forgets to add the x-component.
- (c) 0.5 — Method: count the favourable outcomes, write them over the total number of equally likely outcomes and then divide to turn the fraction into a decimal. Working: the odd scores are 1, 3 and 5, which is 3 of the 6 equally likely scores, so the probability is 3/6, and 3 ÷ 6 = 0.5. Answer: 0.5, the middle of the 0 to 1 probability scale. The distractors: 0.33 comes from listing only 3 and 5 as odd and working out 2 ÷ 6; 0.17 comes from giving the probability of one particular odd score, 1 ÷ 6; 0.3 comes from writing '3 out of 6' as 0.3, reading the 3 straight off as tenths instead of dividing.
- (a) 35 minutes — Chloe arrives at 09:30, so she needs the first departure time that is at or after 09:30. The bus at 09:25 has already left five minutes before she arrives, so it is missed, not caught; the next one on the timetable is 10:05. From 09:30 to 10:00 is 30 minutes, then a further 5 minutes to 10:05, so the wait is 35 minutes. Giving 40 minutes measures the gap from the missed 09:25 bus to the 10:05 bus, counting from the bus Chloe missed instead of from the time she arrived. Giving 5 minutes uses the missed 09:25 bus, working out 09:30 − 09:25 the wrong way round. Giving 45 minutes comes from treating the times as decimals — 10.05 − 9.30 = 0.75, then × 60 = 45 — instead of working in hours and minutes, where 05 minutes past the hour is not 0.05 of an hour.
- (d) 340,000 — 3.4 × 10⁵ means moving the decimal point in 3.4 five places to the right, giving 340,000. Moving it only four places gives 34,000, one place short. Moving it six places gives 3,400,000, one place too many. Treating the exponent as negative instead of positive moves the point the wrong way, giving 0.000034.
- (b) 64 — Method: a position-to-term rule is applied straight to the position number, so a term far along the sequence can be found without writing out the terms in between. Working: the rule multiplies the position by itself and the position asked for is 8, so the term is 8 × 8. Answer: 64. The distractors: 16 comes from multiplying the position by 2 instead of by itself; 81 comes from working out 9 × 9, one position too far along; 8 comes from writing down the position number itself as the term.
- (a) 3/8 — The whole prize fund is split into 3 + 5 = 8 equal parts. The smaller winner receives 3 of these parts, so their share is 3/8 of the whole fund. Taking the larger number of parts, 5, as the numerator instead gives 5/8, the larger winner's share. Writing the ratio numbers directly as a fraction without adding them, 3/5, treats the ratio as a fraction of the OTHER share rather than of the whole. Inverting the ratio gives 5/3, which is not even a valid fraction of a whole, since it is greater than 1.
- (c) SSA — Method: recall the four basic congruence criteria for triangles and compare them with each option. Working: the four basic conditions are SSS, SAS, ASA and RHS. SSA (two sides and a non-included angle) is not one of them, because knowing two sides and an angle that is not between them does not always fix a unique triangle. Options: SSS, ASA and RHS are each genuine congruence conditions, so none of them is the correct answer to 'which is NOT'. Answer: SSA.
- (c) 45 — Three of the ten numbers (8, 9 and 10) are greater than 7, so the probability is 3/10, and 150 × 3/10 = 45. Writing 105 is wrong because 150 × 7/10 = 105 uses the seven numbers that are NOT greater than 7 (1 to 7), the opposite of what is asked. Writing 60 is wrong because it counts 7, 8, 9 and 10 as four numbers greater than 7, wrongly including 7 itself: 150 × 4/10 = 60. Writing 50 is wrong because 150 ÷ 3 = 50 divides by the count of favourable numbers instead of multiplying by the correct fraction of the spinner. The expected number of spins landing on a number greater than 7 is 45.
- (a) They cannot both be describing the same path — Jon's measurement means the true length, l, satisfies 11.5 m ≤ l < 12.5 m. Mia's measurement means the true length satisfies 12.55 m ≤ l < 12.65 m. These two ranges do not overlap, so the two measurements cannot both be describing the same path. 'They must both be describing the same path' ignores that the two ranges do not overlap at all. 'Jon's measurement must be wrong' wrongly assumes Jon is the one at fault, when the mismatch does not show which measurement, if either, is wrong. 'Mia's measurement must be wrong' makes the same unjustified assumption in the other direction.
- (d) It is n-shaped, since the x² coefficient is negative. — The coefficient of x² is −2, which is negative, so the quadratic curve opens downward — shaped like an n, with a maximum turning point. Saying it is U-shaped focuses only on x² being non-negative and ignores that the −2 in front of it flips the whole curve to open downward. Saying it is a straight line confuses having a constant term with being linear — any equation with an x² term is a curve, not a line. Saying it repeatedly rises and falls like a wave describes a trigonometric graph such as y = sin x, not a quadratic.
- (d) 50 g — Method: the milk is 4 parts of the ratio, so use the milk to find the value of one part, then read off the chocolate, which is 1 part. Working: one part = 200 ÷ 4 = 50, and the chocolate is one part. Answer: 50 g. The distractors: 40 g comes from treating the 200 g as the total mass of the mixture and splitting it into 1 + 4 = 5 parts; 250 g is the total mass of the finished mixture, the 200 g of milk plus the chocolate, rather than the chocolate on its own; 800 g comes from multiplying 200 by 4 instead of dividing, which scales the milk up rather than down to the chocolate.
- (a) 12 — A cube has 6 square faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices. The edges are the straight lines where two faces meet: 4 edges around the top face, 4 edges around the bottom face, and 4 vertical edges joining them, giving 4 + 4 + 4 = 12. A candidate who counts the vertices instead of the edges answers 8. A candidate who counts the faces instead answers 6. A candidate who counts only the edges around the top face, forgetting the bottom face and the vertical edges, answers 4. The correct number of edges is 12.
- (c) £7.05 — Tom is correct — Method: multiply the cost of one jar by the number of jars, then compare the total to £7. Working: 3 × £2.35 = £7.05, and since £7.05 is more than £7, Tom's claim is correct. Answer: £7.05 — Tom is correct. "£7.05 — Tom is incorrect" comes from reaching the right total but reading the 05 after the point as making the amount less than £7. "£6.95 — Tom is incorrect" comes from working out 3 × 35p as 3 × 30p + 5p = 95p, multiplying only the tens digit, and adding it to 3 × £2 = £6. "£7.20 — Tom is correct" comes from rounding £2.35 up to £2.40 before multiplying: 3 × £2.40 = £7.20.
- (d) 36 — (2n)² means the whole of 2n is squared, so with n = 3: (2n)² = (2 × 3)² = 6² = 36. Answering 18 instead works out 2n² — squaring only the n and then multiplying by 2 — which is a different expression because the brackets around 2n are missing. Answering 12 squares only the coefficient, treating (2n)² as 2² × n = 4 × 3 = 12, and forgets to square the n as well. Answering 9 ignores the coefficient of 2 altogether and works out n² on its own. The value of (2n)² when n = 3 is 36.
- (d) 3200 × 0.88³ — A fall of 12% leaves 88% of the value, because 100 − 12 = 88, and 88% written as a decimal multiplier is 0.88. Decay repeats that multiplier once for each year, so over 3 years it is applied three times: 0.88 × 0.88 × 0.88, which is written 0.88³. The calculation is therefore 3200 × 0.88³. Adding the percentages to make a single fall of 36% would be wrong, because each year's fall is taken from a smaller value than the year before.
- (d) 60 — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure and multiply; the estimate then shows whether the calculator answer is sensible. Working: 3.1 rounds to 3 and 19.6 rounds to 20, so the estimate is 3 × 20 = 60. Answer: 60. Hannah's 6.076 is about ten times too small, which is what happens when 19.6 is keyed in as 1.96. The distractors: 62 comes from rounding 19.6 only and leaving 3.1 as it stands, giving 3.1 × 20 = 62; 6 comes from trusting the calculator display rather than checking it against an estimate; 600 comes from rounding 19.6 to 200 instead of to 20, a place-value slip, giving 3 × 200 = 600.
- (c) They are in direct proportion, because y ÷ x = 2.5 for both pairs. — Testing direct proportion means checking that y ÷ x is the same for every pair: 15 ÷ 6 = 2.5 and 25 ÷ 10 = 2.5, so the quantities are in direct proportion. Saying they are not in proportion because x + y differs uses addition, which is not the correct test for proportion. Saying they are not in proportion because y − x differs also uses the wrong test — subtraction, not division. Saying they are in proportion because x × y is 90 and 250 uses multiplication, which is the test for inverse proportion, and the two products are not even equal to each other, so this option also contradicts itself.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.