Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) < — Compare the two decimals by their value, not by how many digits they have: 0.45 is worth less than half, while 0.5 is exactly half, so 0.45 is smaller. The correct symbol is <, since 0.45 is less than 0.5. Choosing > treats 0.45 as bigger because it has more digits after the decimal point than 0.5 — extra decimal digits do not make a number bigger. Choosing = comes from rounding 0.45 to 1 decimal place, 0.5, and then treating the rounded value as if it were the original number. Choosing ≥ would mean 0.45 is greater than or equal to 0.5, which is false in both parts, since 0.45 is neither equal to nor bigger than 0.5. So 0.45 < 0.5.
- (d) 5n − 1 — The common difference is 5 (9−4=5), so the expression starts 5n. To match the first term when n=1, 5×1+c=4, so c=−1: the nth term is 5n−1. A candidate who uses the first term itself as the constant, instead of first term minus the common difference, would write 5n+4 (giving 9, 14, 19, 24 — one term too high throughout). A candidate who omits the constant term altogether would write just 5n (giving 5, 10, 15, 20, not matching the sequence). A candidate who adds the common difference to n instead of multiplying would write n+5 (giving 6, 7, 8, 9, far too small).
- (b) 12 — The difference between the parts of the ratio is 5 − 2 = 3 parts, and this is worth 18. Divide to find one part: 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Cats have 2 parts: 2 × 6 = 12. (30 is the number of dogs, using 5 parts instead of 2. 6 is the value of one part — the number of cats is 2 lots of this, not just one. 9 comes from dividing 18 by 2 and stopping there, instead of dividing by the difference in parts, 3, and then multiplying by 2.)
- (b) 4 m — The two triangles are similar, so height ÷ shadow is the same for both objects. For the post, height ÷ shadow = 1.2 ÷ 1.8. Flagpole height = 6 × (1.2 ÷ 1.8) = 4 m. A student who multiplies the flagpole's shadow by the post's height without applying the ratio gets 6 × 1.2 = 7.2 m. A student who assumes a constant DIFFERENCE between shadow and height instead of a constant ratio finds the post's shadow minus height, 1.8 − 1.2 = 0.6 m, then subtracts that from the flagpole's shadow to get 6 − 0.6 = 5.4 m.
- (c) 3/8 — Method: write out every result of the three coins as a string of three letters, H for heads and T for tails, count the results that match the description and divide by how many results the list holds. Working: each coin lands two ways and no coin affects another, so the list holds 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 equally likely results. Exactly two heads means one coin lands on tails and the other two on heads, so the results are HHT, HTH and THH — 3 of the 8. Answer: the probability is 3/8. The distractors: 4/8 comes from reading 'exactly two heads' as 'at least two heads' and counting HHH as well; 2/8 comes from a list made without a system, in which HHT and THH are written down and HTH, the result with the tail between the two heads, is missed; 6/8 comes from counting 3 × 2 = 6 ways of picking which two of the three coins show heads, which counts every pair of coins twice, once in each order.
- (b) At 0 guests, the model predicts 2 m of table — The y-intercept of a line of best fit y = mx + c is the value of y when x = 0. Here y = 0.5 × 0 + 2 = 2, so the line predicts a table length of 2 m when there are 0 guests. The 2 m does not grow as more guests arrive — that role belongs to the gradient, 0.5 — so an option saying each extra guest adds 2 m has swapped the two numbers around. The 2 is a length in metres, not a number of guests, so an option requiring 2 guests before set-up has misread its units. And the table length does change with x, since it is 0.5x + 2 and not a fixed value, so an option claiming the table is always 2 m ignores the 0.5x term completely.
- (b) 30 — Method: 12% of an amount is 12/100 of it, so find 1% by dividing by 100 and then multiply by 12. Working: 1% of 250 is 250 ÷ 100 = 2.5, and 12% is 2.5 × 12 = 30. Answer: 30 seats. The distractors: 3 comes from writing 12% as 0.012 instead of 0.12, giving 0.012 × 250 = 3; 25 comes from finding 10% of the seats and stopping there; 24 comes from counting 12 seats for each whole hundred, 12 + 12 = 24, and ignoring the remaining 50 seats.
- (c) r = √(A/π) — A = πr² means r has been squared and then multiplied by π. To make r the subject, first divide both sides by π to get A/π = r², then take the square root of both sides: r = √(A/π). Writing r = A/π stops after dividing by π and forgets that r is still squared — it never undoes the square. Writing r = √A/π takes the square root before dividing by π, which square-roots only the A and not the whole of A/π. Writing r = (A/π)² squares A/π instead of taking its square root — the opposite of what is needed to undo r². The correct rearrangement is r = √(A/π).
- (c) 5 hours — Method: measure the job in decorator-hours, which is in the same ratio as the number of rooms, then share the decorator-hours between the decorators available. Working: 5 decorators × 6 hours = 30 decorator-hours for 3 rooms, so one room takes 30 ÷ 3 = 10 decorator-hours; 5 rooms take 5 × 10 = 50 decorator-hours; shared between 10 decorators that is 50 ÷ 10 = 5 hours. Answer: 5 hours. The distractors: 3 hours comes from halving the 6 hours because the number of decorators doubles, while forgetting that there are also more rooms to paint; 10 hours comes from scaling the 6 hours up for the rooms only, 6 × 5 ÷ 3, and leaving the workforce at 5 decorators; 6 hours comes from assuming that doubling the decorators and increasing the rooms cancel each other out, which they do not, because the rooms rise by a factor of 5/3 and the workforce by a factor of 2.
- (b) £157 — Method: round the hours worked up to the next whole hour, multiply by the hourly rate, then add the call-out fee. Working: 3 hours 30 minutes rounds up to 4 hours; 28 × 4 = 112; 112 + 45 = 157. Answer: £157. A candidate who uses the unrounded time of 3.5 hours, working out 28 × 3.5 = 98 and adding 45, gets £143. A candidate who forgets the call-out fee, giving only 28 × 4, gets £112. A candidate who rounds down to 3 hours instead of up, working out 28 × 3 = 84 and adding 45, gets £129.
- (b) 0.225 — The relative frequency of rain is the number of rainy days out of all days recorded: 9 ÷ 40 = 0.225, which is noticeably less than the forecaster's claimed 0.3. Using the number of dry days, 40 − 9 = 31, as the denominator instead of the total of 40 gives 9 ÷ 31 = 0.29 (2 d.p.). Simply reporting the forecaster's claimed value, 0.3, without calculating anything from the data at all, ignores the recorded results completely. Misplacing the decimal point, treating 9 out of 40 as 9%, gives 0.09 instead of 0.225.
- (a) 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 5/6 — Convert all four fractions to a common denominator of 30: 2/3 is 20/30, 3/5 is 18/30, 5/6 is 25/30, and 1/2 is 15/30. Ordering by these numerators, smallest to largest, gives 15/30, 18/30, 20/30, 25/30, which is 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 5/6. Ordering by the size of the numerator in the original fractions, 1, 2, 3, 5, rather than converting to a common denominator, gives the wrong order 1/2, 2/3, 3/5, 5/6, because it ignores that the denominators are different. Ordering largest to smallest instead of smallest to largest, as the question asks, gives 5/6, 2/3, 3/5, 1/2. Using the rule "the bigger the denominator, the smaller the fraction" to place the last two, so that 5/6 is put below 2/3 because 6 is bigger than 3, gives 1/2, 3/5, 5/6, 2/3 — that rule only holds when the numerators are the same, and here 20/30 really is smaller than 25/30. So the correct order, smallest to largest, is 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 5/6.
- (d) 30 — Method: give each group a letter, turn each sentence of the stem into an equation in those letters, then eliminate one letter by adding the two equations. Working: let m be the number of men and w the number of women. The 50 adults give m + w = 50, and 10 more men than women gives m − w = 10. Adding the two equations term by term cancels w: (m + w) + (m − w) = 50 + 10, so 2m = 60 and m = 30. Substituting back into m + w = 50 gives w = 20, and 30 − 20 = 10 as required. Answer: 30. The distractors: 20 comes from subtracting the equations instead of adding them, which cancels m and gives 2w = 40, so w = 20 — the other unknown, not the one asked for; 40 comes from forming the second equation as w = 10, reading '10 more men than women' as '10 women', and then getting m = 50 − 10 from the first equation; 35 comes from using m + w = 50 alone with m = w, giving 25 each, and then adding the whole difference of 10 to the men instead of splitting it between the two groups, which leaves a difference of 20 rather than 10.
- (c) 2 : 5 — A ratio is written in the order the question names the two shapes, so triangle A's length comes first: 4 : 10. Both parts divide by 2: 4 ÷ 2 = 2 and 10 ÷ 2 = 5, giving 2 : 5. Lengths are compared using the lengths themselves, so nothing is squared here; squaring both parts would give the ratio of the areas instead.
- (c) 115 — Method: use corresponding angles to carry the 65° angle from the lower rafter up to the upper rafter, then use angles on a straight line to move to the other side of the strut. Working: the angle above the upper rafter and to the left of the strut corresponds to the given angle, so it is 65°; the angle above the upper rafter and to the right of the strut lies on a straight line with it, so it is 180 − 65 = 115. Answer: 115°. A candidate who assumes the angle stays 65° without allowing for the move from the left of the strut to the right of it gives 65. A candidate who uses 90° instead of 180°, working out 90 − 65, gets 25. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting, working out 180 + 65, gets 245.
- (b) £72 — One fifth of £60 = £12. New price = £60 + £12 = £72. A candidate who gives the increase instead of the new price gets £12. A candidate who subtracts the increase instead of adding it gets £60 − £12 = £48. A candidate who uses 1/4 instead of 1/5 gets £60 + £15 = £75.
- (d) (0, −7) — At the y-axis, x = 0, so y = 2(0) − 7 = −7, giving the point (0, −7). A candidate who drops the negative sign on the constant term would write (0, 7). A candidate who swaps the coordinates, confusing the y-intercept with an x-intercept, would write (−7, 0). A candidate who uses the gradient, 2, as the x-coordinate instead of 0 would write (2, −7).
- (c) 2 hours — Method: time = distance ÷ speed, and the units of the speed fix the unit of the time. Working: 120 ÷ 60 = 2, and because the speed is in kilometres per hour the time is in hours. Answer: 2 hours. The distractors: 0.5 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 60 ÷ 120, the division the wrong way round; 2 minutes comes from the correct division but the wrong unit, reading kilometres per hour as kilometres per minute; 180 minutes comes from adding 120 and 60 instead of dividing.
- (b) 400 — Method: round each number to the nearest 100, then subtract the rounded values. Working: 812 rounds to 800 (nearest 100) and 397 rounds to 400 (nearest 100). 800 − 400 = 400. Answer: 400. 500 comes from rounding 397 down to 300 instead of up to the nearest 100, 400. 300 comes from rounding 812 down to 700 instead of up to the nearest 100, 800. 415 is the exact value of 812 − 397, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate — the spreadsheet's answer of 315 is too far from the estimate of 400 to be correct.
- (d) The 750 g box, at 36p per 100 g — Work out the cost per 100 g of each box. 750 g box: 270p ÷ 7.5 = 36p per 100 g. 500 g box: 195p ÷ 5 = 39p per 100 g. The lower cost per 100 g is the better value, so the 750 g box at 36p per 100 g is the answer. Choosing the 500 g box at 39p per 100 g gets the maths right but picks the higher unit price, not realising a smaller cost per 100 g is the better deal. Choosing the 500 g box because £1.95 is lower than £2.70 compares the total prices without allowing for the different pack sizes at all. Working out 270 ÷ 5 = 54p divides the 750 g box's price by the wrong number of hundred-grams (the 500 g box's), giving a rate that belongs to neither box. The 750 g box, at 36p per 100 g, is the better value.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.