Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 280 — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, then multiply the rounded numbers. Working: 6.8 rounds to 7 because the next digit is 8, and 41 rounds to 40 because its next digit is 1, so the estimate is 7 × 40 = 280. Answer: 280. The distractors: 240 comes from cutting 6.8 down to 6 instead of rounding it up to 7, giving 6 × 40 = 240; 350 comes from rounding 41 up to 50 when the digit after its first significant figure is less than 5, giving 7 × 50 = 350; 28 comes from multiplying the leading digits only and losing the place value of the 40, which makes the estimate ten times too small.
- (a) 5 — The symbol ≤ means n can equal 5 or any number less than 5, so 5 is included and is the largest integer value. A candidate who treats the inequality as strict, as if it were n < 5, answers 4. A candidate who confuses ≤ with ≥ and looks for a value just above the boundary answers 6. A candidate who makes a sign error and reads the inequality as n ≤ −5 answers −5.
- (c) £0.90 — Cost per kilogram = total cost ÷ mass. £4.50 ÷ 5 = £0.90. £1.11 comes from dividing the mass by the cost instead of the cost by the mass (5 ÷ 4.50). £22.50 comes from multiplying the cost by the mass instead of dividing (£4.50 × 5). £0.50 comes from subtracting the two numbers (5 − 4.50) instead of dividing.
- (a) 10 cm — Sector area is (angle ÷ 360) × π × radius². Here 90 ÷ 360 = 1/4, and 1/4 × 3.14 = 0.785, so radius² is 78.5 ÷ 0.785 = 100, and the radius is √100 = 10 cm. Stopping after finding radius² and not taking the square root gives 100 cm. Treating 78.5 as the area of the WHOLE circle, ignoring the 90° fraction, gives radius² = 78.5 ÷ 3.14 = 25, so a radius of 5 cm. Correctly finding a radius of 10 cm but then doubling it, mistaking the question for asking the diameter, gives 20 cm.
- (b) 120 — Purple's probability is its angle out of the full circle: 144° ÷ 360° = 2/5. Expected number on purple = 2/5 × 300 = 120. Assuming the three colours are equally likely, ignoring their different angles, gives 300 ÷ 3 = 100. Using orange's angle, 90°, instead of purple's 144° gives a probability of 1/4, so 300 × 1/4 = 75. Treating 144 as a percentage instead of finding its fraction of 360° gives 300 × 0.144 = 43.2, which rounds to 43.
- (c) Yes — with an estimate of 320, above the 250 limit. — Method: scale the sample proportion up to the whole batch to get an estimate, then compare that estimate with the 250 limit to reach a decision. Working: in the sample, 4 out of 50 boards are faulty, a proportion of 4 ÷ 50 = 0.08. Applying that proportion to the batch of 4,000 gives an estimate of 0.08 × 4000 = 320 faulty boards. Since 320 is more than 250, the factory should scrap the batch. Inverting the proportion, 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, and treating that as a percentage of the batch, 12.5% × 4000 = 500, still gives 'yes' but from the wrong fraction, so it overstates the estimate. Comparing the raw number of faulty boards found in the sample, 4, directly with the 250 limit skips the scaling up to the batch altogether, and 4 is nowhere near 250, so that route wrongly says 'no'. Dividing the batch by the sample size, 4000 ÷ 50 = 80, finds how many samples of 50 fit into the batch but stops before multiplying by the 4 faulty boards found, so it also wrongly says 'no'. Always find the proportion in the sample first, scale it up to the whole batch, and only then compare the estimate with the limit given.
- (b) 0 > −1 — Method: test each statement by placing both of its numbers on a number line; the greater number is the one further to the right. Working: every negative number lies to the left of zero, so zero is greater than −1. Among the negatives, −3 lies to the right of −5, so −5 is not greater than −3. Answer: 0 > −1. The distractors: −5 > −3 comes from ordering the negatives by the size of their digits, so that 5 makes −5 look the larger; −3 > 0 comes from ignoring the minus sign and comparing 3 with 0; 0 < −1 comes from the belief that zero is the smallest number there is, so that even a negative number is above it.
- (c) y = 200 − 8x — Method: in a linear model the amount present at the start is the constant term and the steady rate of change is the gradient, which is negative because the amount is falling. Working: at x = 0 minutes there are 200 litres, so the constant term is 200; 8 litres are lost every minute, so after x minutes 8x litres have gone and the amount left is y = 200 − 8x. Answer: y = 200 − 8x. The distractors: y = 8x + 200 treats the draining as filling, so the butt would gain 8 litres a minute; y = 200x − 8 swaps the two numbers over, using the starting 200 litres as the rate per minute and the 8 litres per minute as the starting amount; y = −8x − 200 makes the starting amount negative as well as the rate, so the butt would begin 200 litres in deficit.
- (b) 1 : 1.875 — To write a ratio in the form 1 : n, divide both parts by the first part, 8: 8 ÷ 8 = 1 and 15 ÷ 8 = 1.875, giving 1 : 1.875. Giving 1 : 0.53 divides the wrong way round, computing 8 ÷ 15 instead of 15 ÷ 8. Giving 1.875 : 1 has the two parts of the answer swapped, which is the form n : 1, not 1 : n. Giving 8 : 1.875 divides only the second part by 8, so the first part is still 8, not 1.
- (c) cos 45° — cos 45° = √2/2, and √2 cannot be written as an exact fraction, so this value is irrational. tan 0° = 0, sin 90° = 1 and sin 30° = 1/2 are all rational, since each can be written as an exact whole number or fraction.
- (c) 0.37 — Method: pool the two runs into one combined set of results, then find the relative frequency of red across all of the spins together. Working: total reds = 16 + 21 = 37. Total spins = 40 + 60 = 100. Relative frequency = 37 ÷ 100 = 0.37. Answer: 0.37. Watch out: writing down 0.40 uses only the first run, 16 ÷ 40, and throws away the extra evidence from the second 60 spins. Writing down 0.35 uses only the second run, 21 ÷ 60, and throws away the first run instead. And writing down 0.375 averages the two runs' separate rates, (0.40 + 0.35) ÷ 2, which treats a run of 40 spins and a run of 60 spins as equally weighted, when pooling the actual counts gives the larger run its fair share of influence.
- (a) 24 — Method: rearrange the relationship so that the lowest common multiple stands alone; it is the product of the two numbers divided by their highest common factor. Working: 48 = 2 × the lowest common multiple, so the lowest common multiple is 48 ÷ 2 = 24. Checking, 24 is in the 6 times table and in the 8 times table. Answer: 24. The distractors: 48 comes from giving the product of the two numbers and never dividing by the highest common factor; 96 comes from multiplying by the highest common factor instead of dividing by it; 12 comes from dividing by the highest common factor twice, once for each of the two numbers.
- (a) (−6, −3) — Reflecting in the y-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate and keeps the y-coordinate the same: (−6, −3). (6, 3) comes from reflecting in the x-axis instead, which changes the sign of the y-coordinate. (−6, 3) comes from reflecting in both axes. (6, −3) comes from not applying the reflection at all.
- (c) 2:3 — Divide both parts of the ratio by their highest common factor, 2x: 4x ÷ 2x = 2 and 6x ÷ 2x = 3, giving 2 : 3. Writing 4 : 6 has not been simplified at all. Writing 2x : 3x has cancelled the common factor of 2 but left the x in, so it is not written as a ratio of whole numbers. Writing 3 : 2 has the two parts the wrong way round.
- (a) 18 — PQ lies along the x-axis with length 9, and PR lies along the y-axis with length 4, and these two sides meet at right angles at P, so they can be used as the base and height of the triangle. Area = 1/2 × base × height = 1/2 × 9 × 4 = 18. 36 comes from multiplying the base and height but forgetting to halve the result. 13 comes from adding the two lengths, 9 + 4, instead of multiplying them. 26 comes from the perimeter-style calculation 2 × (9 + 4) instead of the triangle area formula.
- (c) 10 — Method: the multiplication is carried out before the subtraction. Working: 4 × 2 = 8, so the calculation becomes 18 − 8 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 28 comes from working from left to right, giving (18 − 4) × 2 = 14 × 2 = 28; −10 comes from subtracting the 18 from the 8 rather than the 8 from the 18, giving 8 − 18 = −10; 12 comes from reading 4 × 2 as 4 + 2 = 6 and then working out 18 − 6 = 12.
- (b) 5 — Method: add 9 to both sides, then divide by 5. Working: 5x = 16 + 9 = 25, so x = 25 ÷ 5 = 5. Answer: 5. 3.2 comes from dividing 16 by 5 directly, without adding 9 first. 1.4 comes from a sign error, subtracting 9 from 16 instead of adding it, then dividing by 5. 25 comes from correctly working out 5x = 25 but stopping there, without dividing by 5 to find x.
- (b) €230.00 — Multiply the amount in pounds by the exchange rate: 200 × 1.15 = 230, so £200 = €230.00. Working out 200 + 1.15 = 201.15 treats the exchange rate as an amount to add rather than a multiplier. Working out 200 × 0.15 = 30 finds only the extra amount earned for every pound and forgets to add it back to the original £200. Working out 200 × 11.5 = 2300.00 misplaces the decimal point in the exchange rate, multiplying by 11.5 instead of 1.15. £200 converts to €230.00.
- (a) Kilograms — A small car has a mass of roughly 1000–1500 kilograms, so kilograms gives a sensible number to work with — neither too small nor too large. Grams would give an enormous number, over a million, since grams suit much lighter objects. Litres measures capacity, not mass, so it is the wrong type of unit for a car's mass entirely. Metres measures length, not mass, so it is also the wrong type of unit.
- (c) Firm B — £3 per mile against Firm A's £2 per mile — Firm A's gradient is (14 − 4) ÷ 5 = 2, so it charges £2 per mile. Firm B's gradient is (21 − 6) ÷ 5 = 3, so it charges £3 per mile. £3 is more than £2, so Firm B charges more per mile. Swapping the two firms' gradients gives the answer with Firm A at £3 and Firm B at £2, which has the labels the wrong way round. Dividing the change in miles by the change in cost, instead of the other way round, gives 5 ÷ 10 = £0.50 for Firm A and 5 ÷ 15 = £0.33 for Firm B and so names Firm A — that is the gradient upside down. And a positive fixed charge does not mean two firms charge the same rate: the rate is found from the gradient, not from whether the intercept is positive.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.