Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 0.7, 0.72, 3/4 — Method: numbers written in different forms cannot be compared as they stand, so every fraction is turned into a decimal by dividing the numerator by the denominator, and the decimals are then compared place by place from the left. Working: 3/4 means 3 ÷ 4 = 0.75, so the three values to compare are 0.7, 0.75 and 0.72; written to two decimal places they are 0.70, 0.75 and 0.72, and the hundredths digits 0, 5 and 2 put 0.70 first, 0.72 next and 0.75 last; written again in the forms the question used, the order from smallest is 0.7, then 0.72, then 3/4. Answer: 0.7, 0.72, 3/4. The distractors: 3/4, 0.7, 0.72 comes from turning 3/4 into 0.34 by writing the numerator and the denominator as the two digits after the point, which makes the fraction the smallest of the three; 0.72, 3/4, 0.7 comes from the belief that the more digits a decimal has the smaller it must be, which puts both 0.72 and 0.75 below 0.7 and 0.72 below 0.75; 3/4, 0.72, 0.7 comes from comparing the three values correctly but listing them largest first, against an instruction to start with the smallest.
- (a) 20 — Method: the paper has run out when S = 0, so substitute S = 0 into the equation and solve for t. Working: 0 = 480 − 24t, so 24t = 480, and t = 480 / 24 = 20. Answer: it takes 20 minutes. The value 480 comes from giving the starting number of sheets, the intercept of the equation, instead of solving for t. The value 456 comes from working out 480 − 24 and stopping after one step instead of solving the equation fully. The value 0.05 comes from inverting the division, working out 24 / 480 instead of 480 / 24.
- (c) £4.00 — Find the cost of one pen: £6.40 ÷ 8 = £0.80. Then multiply by 5 pens: £0.80 × 5 = £4.00. Dividing £6.40 by 5 and multiplying by 8 gives £10.24 — that uses the ratio the wrong way round, scaling as if 5 pens were more expensive than 8. Stopping at £0.80 only gives the price of one pen. Multiplying the price of one pen by the difference in the number of pens, (8 − 5) × £0.80, gives £2.40 — the cost of the pens NOT bought, not the cost of the 5 pens bought. 5 pens cost £4.00.
- (c) 67° — Angles on a straight line add up to 180°. Add the two known angles: 48° + 65° = 113°. Subtract from 180°: 180° − 113° = 67°.
- (b) 1/2 — Method: for equally likely outcomes the probability is the number of favourable outcomes divided by the total number of outcomes, written in its simplest form. Working: the dice can show 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6, so there are 6 equally likely scores; the even scores are 2, 4 and 6, which is 3 of them, giving 3/6. Answer: 3/6 cancels to 1/2, which sits halfway along the 0 to 1 probability scale. The distractors: 1/3 comes from listing only 2 and 4 as the even scores and writing 2/6; 1/6 comes from giving the probability of one particular even score, such as the 2, rather than any even score; 2/3 comes from listing the even numbers as 0, 2, 4 and 6 and writing 4/6, forgetting that a dice has no 0 on it.
- (c) Yes — with an estimate of 320, above the 250 limit. — Method: scale the sample proportion up to the whole batch to get an estimate, then compare that estimate with the 250 limit to reach a decision. Working: in the sample, 4 out of 50 boards are faulty, a proportion of 4 ÷ 50 = 0.08. Applying that proportion to the batch of 4,000 gives an estimate of 0.08 × 4000 = 320 faulty boards. Since 320 is more than 250, the factory should scrap the batch. Inverting the proportion, 50 ÷ 4 = 12.5, and treating that as a percentage of the batch, 12.5% × 4000 = 500, still gives 'yes' but from the wrong fraction, so it overstates the estimate. Comparing the raw number of faulty boards found in the sample, 4, directly with the 250 limit skips the scaling up to the batch altogether, and 4 is nowhere near 250, so that route wrongly says 'no'. Dividing the batch by the sample size, 4000 ÷ 50 = 80, finds how many samples of 50 fit into the batch but stops before multiplying by the 4 faulty boards found, so it also wrongly says 'no'. Always find the proportion in the sample first, scale it up to the whole batch, and only then compare the estimate with the limit given.
- (b) 20 — Method: check a calculator answer by replacing the percentage with a simple fraction — 25% is one quarter, so the calculation becomes a division by 4. Working: 80 ÷ 4 = 20, and the calculator answer of 320 is 80 × 4, which is what happens when the amount is multiplied by 4 instead of divided by it; a quarter of an amount must be smaller than the amount. Answer: 20. The distractors: 25 comes from writing the percentage itself down as the answer; 16 comes from dividing by 5 instead of by 4, which finds 20% rather than 25%; 3.2 comes from working out 80 ÷ 25 instead of a quarter of 80.
- (d) 20 km/h — Method: total distance = 9 + 21 = 30 km. Total time = 15 + 45 + 30 = 90 minutes = 1.5 hours. Average speed = total distance ÷ total time = 30 ÷ 1.5 = 20 km/h. Distractor origins: 40 km/h ignores the 45-minute stop, dividing the total distance by the travel time only (30 km ÷ 45 minutes = 40 km/h); 39 km/h averages the two section speeds, 36 km/h and 42 km/h, instead of using total distance over total time; 36 km/h uses only the first section's speed (9 km in 15 minutes), ignoring the second section and the stop.
- (a) 3/2 — Put Sam's amount over Tom's amount: 24/16. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 8: 24÷8 = 3, 16÷8 = 2, giving 3/2. (2/3 comes from writing Tom's amount over Sam's amount, the wrong way round. 3/5 comes from comparing Sam's amount to the total amount of money, 24/40, instead of to Tom's amount. 1/2 comes from finding the difference between the amounts, £8, and writing it as a fraction of Tom's amount, 8/16.)
- (b) Acute — An acute angle is any angle less than 90°. Since 47° is less than 90°, it is acute. An obtuse angle is between 90° and 180°, which 47° is not. A reflex angle is greater than 180°, which is far too big for 47°. A right angle is exactly 90°, not 47°. The angle is acute.
- (a) 4/7 — Method: going away and not going away are the only two possibilities, so the two probabilities form an exhaustive set and add to 1; subtract the given probability from 1. Working: writing 1 as 7/7 gives 7/7 − 3/7, and 7 − 3 = 4 sevenths. Answer: 4/7. The distractors: 3/7 comes from giving back the probability that the family do go away; 1/7 comes from taking the 1 in '1 − 3/7' as a numerator and writing it over the denominator 7; 1/2 comes from assuming that going away and not going away must be equally likely because there are only two possibilities.
- (a) 6/11 — Method: add the parts of the ratio to find the total, then write the required part over the total. Working: 5 + 6 = 11 parts in total; lemons make up 6 of the 11 parts, so the fraction of lemons is 6/11, which is already in its simplest form. Answer: 6/11. 5/11 comes from finding the fraction of oranges instead of lemons. 5/6 comes from writing the ratio of oranges to lemons directly as a fraction instead of comparing lemons to the total. 6/5 comes from writing the ratio of lemons to oranges directly as a fraction instead of comparing lemons to the total.
- (d) w ≤ 630 — 'No more than 630 kg' means the weight can be exactly 630 kg or anything less, so the correct inequality is w ≤ 630, using 'less than or equal to' to include the limit itself. Writing w < 630 excludes 630 kg itself, as though the limit could not be reached exactly. Writing w ≥ 630 reverses the direction, describing a minimum weight rather than a maximum. Writing w > 630 both reverses the direction and excludes the boundary value. The inequality describing the lift's weight limit is w ≤ 630.
- (a) 24 N/m² — Pressure = force ÷ area. 68.4 ÷ 2.85 = 24 N/m². 194.94 N/m² comes from multiplying the force by the area instead of dividing (68.4 × 2.85). 65.55 N/m² comes from subtracting the area from the force (68.4 − 2.85) instead of dividing. 0.04 N/m² comes from dividing the area by the force instead of the force by the area (2.85 ÷ 68.4).
- (a) 3 m — Height = sloping length × sin 45° = 3√2 × √2/2 = (3 × 2)/2 = 3 m, since √2 × √2 = 2. 3√2 m comes from forgetting to multiply by sin 45° at all. 3√2/2 m comes from using sin 30° = 1/2 instead of sin 45° = √2/2. 6 m comes from using √2 instead of √2/2 for sin 45°, dropping the denominator of the exact value: 3√2 × √2 = 6.
- (a) Kilograms — A small car has a mass of roughly 1000–1500 kilograms, so kilograms gives a sensible number to work with — neither too small nor too large. Grams would give an enormous number, over a million, since grams suit much lighter objects. Litres measures capacity, not mass, so it is the wrong type of unit for a car's mass entirely. Metres measures length, not mass, so it is also the wrong type of unit.
- (c) 16 — Let a be the number of adult tickets and c the number of child tickets: a + c = 40 and a = c + 8. Substituting the second equation into the first: (c + 8) + c = 40, so 2c = 32, and c = 16. A candidate who reports the number of adult tickets instead of child tickets would get a = 24. A candidate who splits the 40 tickets evenly, ignoring the difference of 8, would get 20. A candidate who forgets to divide 2c = 32 by 2 would write c = 32.
- (b) 4 : 25 — For similar shapes, the ratio of areas is the ratio of lengths squared: 2² : 5² = 4 : 25. 2 : 5 comes from using the perimeter ratio itself as the area ratio, without squaring it at all. 8 : 125 comes from cubing each part instead of squaring (2³ : 5³) — cubing is the rule for volume, not area. 4 : 5 comes from squaring only the first part of the ratio (2² = 4), and leaving the second part unsquared.
- (d) 2/25 — Method: write the decimal over 100 using its two decimal places, then simplify. Working: 0.08 = 8/100 = 2/25 (dividing both numerator and denominator by 4). Answer: 2/25. The student's fraction, 8/10, comes from ignoring the zero in the tenths column and reading 0.08 as though it were 0.8; it simplifies to 4/5. 1/125 comes from writing the decimal over 1000 instead of 100, as if there were three decimal places. 25/2 comes from flipping the correct fraction upside down.
- (a) 180 g flour and 120 g butter — The ratio 3 : 2 means flour and butter must scale by the same factor. Scaling both parts by 60 gives 180 g flour and 120 g butter, since 3 × 60 = 180 and 2 × 60 = 120, which is the correct pair. Swapping the amounts gives 120 g flour and 180 g butter, which is in the ratio 2 : 3 — butter to flour, not flour to butter. Scaling the flour by 60 but the butter by only 45 gives 180 g flour and 90 g butter, using two different scale factors on the two parts of the ratio. Scaling the flour by 60 but the butter by 70 gives 180 g flour and 140 g butter, the opposite inconsistency.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.