Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 90 — Multiply the number of choices for each course: 5 × 6 × 3 = 90. 14 comes from adding the three numbers instead of multiplying them. 30 comes from multiplying only the starters and mains, 5 × 6, and forgetting the dessert. 18 comes from multiplying only the mains and desserts, 6 × 3, and forgetting the starter.
- (d) 12 — Method: write the nth term of the sequence, 18 + 4(n − 1), set it equal to 62, and solve for n. Working: 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, so 4(n − 1) = 44, giving n − 1 = 11, so n = 12. Answer: row 12. 11 comes from using 18 + 4n = 62 instead of 18 + 4(n − 1) = 62, an off-by-one error, giving n = 11. 48 comes from correctly simplifying to 4n = 48 but stopping there, without dividing by 4 to find n. 15.5 comes from dividing 62 by 4 directly, ignoring the 18 seats already in the front row.
- (c) 2/7 — Method: each number in a ratio counts parts, so the whole is all the parts added together, and the fraction wanted is the cement parts over that total. Working: the mix has 5 + 2 = 7 parts altogether, and 2 of those parts are cement, so the cement is 2/7 of the mix. Answer: 2/7. The distractors: 2/5 comes from writing the cement parts over the sand parts, comparing one part with the other part instead of with the whole; 5/7 comes from writing the sand parts over the total, which answers about the wrong material; 7/2 comes from writing the total over the cement parts, turning the fraction upside down.
- (d) A rectangle — Method: to find the plan view, work out the outline traced when looking straight down onto the solid from directly above, not the outline shown in the angled sketch. Working: this solid has two identical flat round ends joined by one curved surface, and it is lying on its side rather than standing upright; viewed from above, the curved surface gives two straight edges running the full length of the solid, the width of the round ends apart, and each flat round end — seen edge-on from directly above — also becomes a straight edge of that same width, with no curve remaining. Four straight edges, with opposite sides equal and meeting at right angles, form a rectangle. Answer: a rectangle. The distractors: a circle comes from picturing the solid as if it were standing upright on one of its flat ends, giving the plan of an upright version instead of working out the plan of the solid as it actually lies. An oval comes from copying the foreshortened shape of a round end as it is drawn in the angled sketch, instead of working out the true shape seen from directly above, which has no such foreshortening. A rectangle with rounded ends comes from carrying the curve of the round ends over into the plan view, when in fact a flat round end viewed edge-on from directly above shows no curve at all, only a straight edge.
- (c) Red — Theoretical probability is 1/3 ≈ 0.333 for each colour. Red's relative frequency is 38/90 ≈ 0.422, above 1/3, so red is over-represented. Blue's relative frequency is 26/90 ≈ 0.289, below 1/3, so blue is under-represented, not over. Green's relative frequency is also 26/90 ≈ 0.289, below 1/3 for the same reason. Since red's relative frequency clearly exceeds 1/3, it is not true that none of the colours are over-represented.
- (b) Treat them as outliers and check them before deciding — Method: a point lying a long way from the pattern the rest of the data make is called an outlier, and an outlier is investigated before anything is done with it, because it may be an error in the data or it may be a genuine but unusual case. Working: 48 of the 50 points lie close to the rising line of best fit, so the trend is set by those 48; the two remaining points do not follow it, so they are identified as outliers and checked — a mistake in measuring or recording would be corrected, while a genuine reading would be kept and reported. Answer: treat them as outliers and check them before deciding what to do with them. The distractors: deleting them at once assumes that every point far from the line must be an error, which throws away real data; moving the line so that it passes through them assumes a line of best fit must touch particular points, when it is drawn to follow all 50; taking them as proof that there is no correlation lets two points overturn the pattern that the other 48 agree on.
- (c) 8,000,000,000 — Method: a power of ten is 1 followed by that many zeros, so 8 × 10⁹ is 8 multiplied by 1 followed by nine zeros. Working: 10⁹ = 1,000,000,000, and 8 × 1,000,000,000 puts an 8 in front of those nine zeros. Answer: 8,000,000,000. The distractors: 800,000,000 comes from writing nine digits altogether instead of nine zeros after the 8; 720 comes from reading 10⁹ as 10 × 9 = 90 and then working out 8 × 90; 0.000000008 comes from treating the index as negative and carrying the decimal point nine places to the left.
- (c) 5 hours — Substitute s = 48 into the relationship: t = 240 ÷ 48 = 5 hours. Inverting the relationship, s ÷ 240 = 48 ÷ 240 = 0.2, gives 0.2 hours. Misplacing the decimal point in the division, 240 ÷ 48 read as 4.8, gives 4.8 hours. Halving the speed to 24 mph by mistake before dividing, 240 ÷ 24 = 10, gives 10 hours.
- (c) 3 : 7 — Method: a ratio 'of A to B' is written with A first, and it is simplified by dividing both parts by their highest common factor. Working: vans are named first, so the ratio starts as 15 : 35; the highest common factor of 15 and 35 is 5, and 15 ÷ 5 = 3 while 35 ÷ 5 = 7. Answer: 3 : 7. The distractors: 7 : 3 comes from writing the two numbers in the order they appear in the question, cars before vans, instead of the order asked for; 3 : 10 comes from comparing the vans with the total number of vehicles, 15 : 50, a part-to-whole ratio in place of the part-to-part ratio asked for; 15 : 35 is the right comparison left unsimplified, and the question asks for the simplest form.
- (a) 110° — Method: in a parallelogram the two angles at the ends of one side are co-interior angles between a pair of parallel sides, so they add up to 180°. Working: angle A + angle B = 180°, so angle B = 180° − 70° = 110°. Answer: 110°. The distractors: 70° comes from applying the rule for opposite angles of a parallelogram, which are equal, to two angles that are next to each other instead; 20° comes from treating the two angles as complementary and working out 90° − 70°; 290° comes from using the 360° angle sum of a quadrilateral and taking away only the one angle that is given, 360° − 70°.
- (a) 0.2 — Method: for independent events, the probability that both happen is the product of the two probabilities. Working: the first set is green with probability 0.4 and the second with probability 0.5, so the calculation is 0.4 × 0.5. Since 4 × 5 = 20 and the two factors carry one decimal place each, the product carries two. Answer: the probability is 0.2. The distractors: 0.9 comes from adding 0.4 and 0.5 instead of multiplying them; 0.45 comes from averaging the two probabilities; 0.1 comes from subtracting 0.4 from 0.5, treating the question as a difference.
- (b) £72 — One fifth of £60 = £12. New price = £60 + £12 = £72. A candidate who gives the increase instead of the new price gets £12. A candidate who subtracts the increase instead of adding it gets £60 − £12 = £48. A candidate who uses 1/4 instead of 1/5 gets £60 + £15 = £75.
- (b) 27 — 27 = 3³ (3 × 3 × 3), so it is a cube number. The other three, 9 = 3², 16 = 4² and 25 = 5², are all square numbers, not cube numbers — each is reached by multiplying a whole number by itself only twice, not three times.
- (a) 1 : 2 000 000 — Method: a scale is a ratio between two lengths written in the same unit, reduced so that the map distance is 1. Working: 120 km = 120 × 1000 × 100 = 12 000 000 cm, so the ratio is 6 : 12 000 000, and dividing both parts by 6 gives 1 : 2 000 000. Answer: 1 : 2 000 000. The distractors: 1 : 12 000 000 comes from writing the real length in centimetres without dividing by the 6 cm on the map; 1 : 200 000 comes from taking 120 km as 1 200 000 cm, one conversion step short, before dividing by 6; 1 : 20 000 comes from converting 120 km to 120 000 m and treating those metres as centimetres.
- (a) 180 cm³ — Method: the volume of a right prism is the area of its cross-section multiplied by its length, and the area of a triangle is half the base multiplied by the perpendicular height. Working: the cross-section has area (6 × 5) ÷ 2 = 15 cm², and 15 × 12 = 180. Answer: 180 cm³. The distractors: 360 cm³ comes from taking the cross-section as 6 × 5 = 30 and never halving it, which measures the rectangle around the triangular face rather than the face itself; 66 cm³ comes from adding the base and the perpendicular height and halving, (6 + 5) ÷ 2 = 5.5, which is the trapezium rule used where the triangle rule is needed, and then multiplying by the 12 cm length; 15 cm³ comes from working out the triangular cross-section correctly and stopping there, so the 12 cm length is never used and an area is handed in as a volume.
- (a) 125 — Method: a power tells you how many times to multiply the base by itself. Working: 5³ = 5 × 5 × 5 = 125. Answer: 125. (15 comes from multiplying the base by the power, 5 × 3, instead of using repeated multiplication. 53 comes from reading the power as if it were a two-digit number rather than an operation. 25 comes from using one fewer 5, effectively working out 5² instead of 5³.)
- (d) 3x² + 4x − 7 — Method: the minus sign in front of the second bracket changes the sign of every term inside it; then collect like terms. Working: removing the brackets gives 5x² + 3x − 2 − 2x² + x − 5; the squared terms give 5x² − 2x² = 3x², the x terms give 3x + x = 4x, and the number terms give −2 − 5 = −7. Answer: 3x² + 4x − 7. The distractors: 7x² + 2x + 3 comes from adding the two brackets instead of subtracting, giving 5x² + 2x², 3x − x and −2 + 5; 3x² + 2x + 3 comes from applying the minus sign to 2x² only, leaving −x and +5 unchanged so that 3x − x = 2x and −2 + 5 = 3; 3x² + 4x + 3 comes from changing the signs of the terms with letters but leaving +5 as it stood, so the number terms give −2 + 5 = 3.
- (b) 13/2 — Put the number of pages in the novel over the number of pages in the comic: 312/48. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 24: 312÷24 = 13, 48÷24 = 2, giving 13/2. (2/13 comes from writing the page counts the wrong way round. 11/2 comes from finding the difference in the page counts, 312 − 48 = 264, and writing it as a fraction of the comic's page count, 264/48. 13/15 comes from comparing the novel's page count to the total number of pages in both books, 312/360.)
- (b) 6.2 ≤ x < 6.3 — Truncating simply cuts off the digits after the required decimal place instead of rounding them, so every value from 6.2 up to (but not reaching) 6.3 truncates to 6.2. This gives the error interval 6.2 ≤ x < 6.3, with no allowance made on the lower side because truncation never rounds a smaller value up into this interval. Using 6.15 ≤ x < 6.25 applies the rounding rule of going half a unit either side, which does not apply to truncation. Writing 6.1 < x ≤ 6.2 puts the interval below 6.2 instead of above it. Writing 6.2 ≤ x ≤ 6.3 wrongly includes 6.3, which truncates down to itself, not to 6.2.
- (c) 8 m — Method: in the same sunlight every object has its height and its shadow in the same ratio, so write 2:3 = h:12, find the multiplier that takes 3 to 12 and apply it to the height. Working: 12 ÷ 3 = 4, so the tree's shadow is 4 times the post's shadow; the height must be scaled by the same 4, giving 4 × 2 = 8 m. Answer: 8 m. The distractors: 18 m comes from setting up the proportion upside down, 12 ÷ 2 × 3, which scales by shadow over height instead of height over shadow; 24 m comes from multiplying the 12 m shadow by the post's height of 2 m and never dividing by the post's shadow of 3 m; 4 m is the scale factor 12 ÷ 3, given as a length instead of being used to scale the 2 m post.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.