Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 6π — 4π and 2π are like terms, both multiples of π, so they combine by adding their coefficients: 4 + 2 = 6, giving 6π. Multiplying the coefficients instead of adding them, 4 × 2 = 8, gives 8π. Treating the combination as if the two π's multiplied together as well as the coefficients gives 6π². Dropping the π altogether and adding only the coefficients gives 6.
- (a) 33 — Substitute n=4 into 2n²+1: 2×4²+1=2×16+1=33. A candidate who computes n² as 2×n instead of n×n would compute 2×(2×4)+1=2×8+1=17. A candidate who correctly finds 2×16 but forgets to add the constant 1 would stop at 32. A candidate who squares the whole term 2n, rather than squaring n before multiplying by 2, would compute (2×4)²+1=64+1=65.
- (b) 16 — Method: substitute x into each equation separately, then subtract the smaller value from the larger. Working: y = 3 × 4 = 12 and z = 7 × 4 = 28, so the difference is 28 − 12 = 16. Answer: 16. The distractors: 4 comes from subtracting the constants, 7 − 3, which is the difference between the two gradients rather than the difference between the values at x = 4; 40 comes from adding the two values, 12 + 28, instead of subtracting them; 28 is the value of z on its own, given instead of being compared with the value of y.
- (d) 1 — At 45° the right-angled isosceles triangle has both shorter sides equal, so tan 45° = opposite ÷ adjacent = 1 ÷ 1 = 1. 0 is the value of tan 0° (mixing up the two angles). √3 is the value of tan 60°. √3/3 (equivalent to 1/√3) is the value of tan 30°.
- (b) 100 — The sample shows a proportion of 8/60 = 2/15 faulty. Apply that proportion to the new batch of 750: 750 × 2/15 = 100. Flipping the ratio, calculating 8/750 × 60 instead of 8/60 × 750, gives 0.64, which rounds to about 1. Assuming the same number of faulty items applies to the new batch, without scaling for its larger size, just repeats the sample's count of 8. Rounding the proportion 8/60 = 0.1333... down to 0.1 before multiplying gives 750 × 0.1 = 75.
- (d) Both the mean and the range increase. — The original mean is 150 + 152 + 155 + 158 + 160 = 775, and 775 ÷ 5 = 155 cm; the original range is 160 − 150 = 10 cm. Including the new height of 170 cm gives a new total of 775 + 170 = 945, and 945 ÷ 6 = 157.5 cm, which is higher than 155 cm, and a new range of 170 − 150 = 20 cm, which is higher than 10 cm, so both the mean and the range increase. Saying the range stays the same ignores that 170 cm is a new, higher maximum than the old 160 cm. Saying the mean stays the same ignores that 170 cm is above the original mean of 155 cm, which pulls the average up. Saying both decrease is the opposite of what happens here.
- (d) 23,600 — 23,000 correct to the nearest thousand means the true attendance, a, satisfies 22,500 ≤ a < 23,500. 23,600 is outside this range, so it is not possible. 22,500 is the lower bound of the range, so it is possible. 23,499 is just below the upper bound, so it is possible. 23,000 is the given value itself, so it is possible.
- (c) y = −x + 30 — Method: in a linear model the value at the start is the constant term and the steady rate of change is the gradient, which is negative when the quantity is falling. Working: at x = 0 the candle is 30 cm tall, so the constant term is 30; it loses 1 cm every hour, so the gradient is −1 and the height after x hours is y = −x + 30. Answer: y = −x + 30. The distractors: y = x + 30 comes from taking the rate as +1 and making the candle grow rather than shrink; y = 30x − 1 comes from building the model correctly as 30 − 1x and then copying it into the form y = mx + c with the two numbers left where they stood, so the starting height 30 ends up multiplying x and the hourly 1 is left behind as the constant being taken away; y = −30x + 1 comes from reading the two numbers the other way round, taking 30 cm per hour as the rate and 1 cm as the starting height, which burns 30 cm an hour from a candle only 1 cm tall.
- (a) 4 — The length scale factor, cubed, gives the volume scale factor: L³ = 64, so L = the cube root of 64 = 4, since 4 × 4 × 4 = 64. 64 comes from using the volume scale factor itself as the length scale factor, without taking a root at all. 8 comes from taking the square root of 64 instead of the cube root — that would be the correct root for an area scale factor, not a volume one. 32 comes from halving the volume scale factor (64 ÷ 2), instead of cube-rooting it.
- (c) (5, 1) — Moving right increases the x-coordinate, and moving down decreases the y-coordinate, so (2, 5) becomes (2 + 3, 5 − 4) = (5, 1). (5, 9) comes from adding 4 to the y-coordinate instead of subtracting, as if the point moved up rather than down. (−1, 1) comes from subtracting 3 from the x-coordinate instead of adding, as if the point moved left rather than right. (2, 1) keeps the x-coordinate unchanged and only applies the vertical move, forgetting the horizontal move altogether.
- (b) 0.225 — The relative frequency of rain is the number of rainy days out of all days recorded: 9 ÷ 40 = 0.225, which is noticeably less than the forecaster's claimed 0.3. Using the number of dry days, 40 − 9 = 31, as the denominator instead of the total of 40 gives 9 ÷ 31 = 0.29 (2 d.p.). Simply reporting the forecaster's claimed value, 0.3, without calculating anything from the data at all, ignores the recorded results completely. Misplacing the decimal point, treating 9 out of 40 as 9%, gives 0.09 instead of 0.225.
- (a) 12 — Compare the powers of each prime that appears in both factorisations. In 2² × 3² and 2² × 3 × 7, the prime 2 appears with power 2 in both, and the prime 3 appears with power 2 in one and only power 1 in the other — take the lower power, 3¹. Multiplying the shared primes at their lower powers, 2² × 3, gives 12. Using power 1 for both primes instead of comparing the powers properly, 2 × 3, gives 6, which misses that 2 is common at power 2, not power 1. Multiplying the primes at their higher powers and including 7, which only appears in 84, gives 2² × 3² × 7, which comes to 252 — this is the lowest common multiple, not the highest common factor. Only spotting that 3 is a common prime and overlooking that 2 is common as well gives 3. So the highest common factor of 36 and 84 is 12.
- (d) 15 — Substituting x = 3 into y = 5x gives y = 5 × 3 = 15. A candidate who adds instead of multiplying would get 5 + 3 = 8. A candidate who ignores the coefficient 5 and just copies the value of x would write y = 3. A candidate who multiplies correctly but treats x as −3 by mistake would get y = 5 × (−3) = −15.
- (d) £200 — Method: add the parts of the ratio, divide the total paid by the number of parts to find the value of one part, then multiply by the parts in the most expensive item. Working: 2 + 3 + 5 = 10 parts, £400 ÷ 10 = £40 for one part, and the most expensive item is 5 parts, so 5 × £40 = £200. Answer: £200. The distractors: £40 is the value of one part; £80 is the 2-part item, the cheapest of the three; £120 is the 3-part item.
- (a) 225 — Method: find the interior angle of the regular octagon, then subtract it from 360° to find the reflex angle at the same vertex, since the interior angle and the reflex angle together make a full turn. Working: there are 8 − 2 = 6 triangles' worth of angle in the octagon, so the interior angle = 6 × 180 ÷ 8 = 135; reflex angle = 360 − 135 = 225. Answer: 225°. A candidate who stops after finding the interior angle gives 135. A candidate who works out the exterior angle instead, 360 ÷ 8 = 45, gives 45. A candidate who subtracts the exterior angle from 360° instead of the interior angle, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
- (b) 6.2 ≤ x < 6.3 — Truncating simply cuts off the digits after the required decimal place instead of rounding them, so every value from 6.2 up to (but not reaching) 6.3 truncates to 6.2. This gives the error interval 6.2 ≤ x < 6.3, with no allowance made on the lower side because truncation never rounds a smaller value up into this interval. Using 6.15 ≤ x < 6.25 applies the rounding rule of going half a unit either side, which does not apply to truncation. Writing 6.1 < x ≤ 6.2 puts the interval below 6.2 instead of above it. Writing 6.2 ≤ x ≤ 6.3 wrongly includes 6.3, which truncates down to itself, not to 6.2.
- (d) (4, 8) — The other endpoint is found from 2 × midpoint − known endpoint: x = 2 × (−1) − (−6) = −2 + 6 = 4, y = 2 × 5 − 2 = 10 − 2 = 8, giving (4, 8). (−3.5, 3.5) comes from averaging the given endpoint and the midpoint as if they were the two endpoints of a segment, instead of working backwards from the midpoint. (5, 3) comes from working out (−1 − (−6), 5 − 2) instead of doubling the midpoint before subtracting. (4, 5) comes from correctly finding the x-coordinate but copying the midpoint's y-coordinate of 5 instead of doubling it.
- (a) 40 m² — A scale of 1 : 10 is a length scale factor of 10 from model to real. Areas scale with the square of the length scale factor: 10² = 100. 0.4 × 100 = 40, so the real staircase covers 40 m². Giving 4 m² uses the length scale factor, 10, without squaring it (0.4 × 10 = 4). Giving 0.04 m² divides by the scale factor instead of multiplying by its square (0.4 ÷ 10 = 0.04). Giving 400 m² cubes the scale factor, 10³ = 1000, as if area scaled like a volume (0.4 × 1000 = 400).
- (a) 23 — Division undoes multiplication, so the missing number is 391 ÷ 17 = 23. Writing down 17 repeats the number already given instead of solving for the missing one. Subtracting instead of dividing gives 391 − 17 = 374. Multiplying instead of dividing gives 391 × 17 = 6647.
- (c) £21 — Method: the two amounts are in the same ratio as 5:3, so write 5:3 = 35:x, find the value of one part and then take the number of parts asked for. Working: Harry's £35 is 5 parts, so one part is £35 ÷ 5 = £7; Isla has 3 parts, so 3 × £7 = £21. Answer: £21. The distractors: £7 is the value of a single part, given as Isla's share instead of being multiplied by the 3 parts she has; £28 comes from finding one part correctly and then working out £35 − £7, subtracting one part from Harry's money instead of taking three parts; £33 comes from treating the ratio additively — the parts differ by 5 − 3 = 2, so £2 is taken off Harry's £35, but a ratio compares by multiplying, not by subtracting.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.