Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) £196.35 — Method: convert both prices to pounds, multiply each by its quantity, then add the two totals. Working: 340 rolls at £0.24 each = £81.60; 85 cakes at £1.35 each = £114.75; £81.60 + £114.75 = £196.35. Answer: £196.35. £81.60 comes from working out the cost of the rolls only and forgetting to add the cost of the cakes. £114.75 comes from working out the cost of the cakes only and forgetting to add the cost of the rolls. £122.91 comes from converting 24p to £0.024 instead of £0.24, a place value error of a factor of 10 in the price of the rolls, before adding the correctly worked out cost of the cakes.
- (c) the fourth quadrant — Method: read the sign of each coordinate in turn, then count round the regions, which are numbered anticlockwise from the one where both coordinates are positive. Working: the x-coordinate 5 is positive, so A is to the right of the y-axis; the y-coordinate −3 is negative, so A is below the x-axis; right of the y-axis and below the x-axis is the fourth of the four regions. Answer: the fourth quadrant. The distractors: 'the first quadrant' comes from ignoring the minus sign on the y-coordinate and treating the point as (5, 3); 'the second quadrant' comes from writing the pair the wrong way round and locating (−3, 5) instead; 'the third quadrant' comes from assuming that any point with a negative coordinate belongs to the region where the minus signs are, without checking the other coordinate.
- (b) 9 m/s — The gradient of line P is 21 ÷ 3 = 7, so P has a rate of 7 m/s. The gradient of line Q is 45 ÷ 5 = 9, so Q has a rate of 9 m/s. Because 9 is greater than 7, line Q is the steeper line, with gradient 9 m/s. Taking line P's gradient instead of Q's gives 7 m/s, the less steep line. Subtracting the two lines' coordinates directly, (45 − 21) ÷ (5 − 3) = 24 ÷ 2 = 12 m/s, mixes points from different lines rather than using one line's own two points. Adding the two gradients, 7 + 9 = 16 m/s, treats 'steeper' as a total rather than a comparison.
- (d) 4.44 m — The real van's length is 18.5 × 24 = 444 cm, which converts to 4.44 m. '0.77 m' comes from dividing by 24 instead of multiplying, using the ratio the wrong way round (18.5 ÷ 24 = 0.77 cm), and then writing that figure down as metres. '44.4 m' comes from converting 444 cm to metres with the decimal point in the wrong place. '444 m' comes from working out 444 cm correctly but forgetting to convert it into metres at all.
- (a) 1200 — Method: take the estimate from the larger sample, because an unbiased relative frequency tends towards the true probability as the sample grows, then multiply by the number of bulbs made in a week. Working: Inspector B tested 500 bulbs, far more than Inspector A's 40, so use B's relative frequency: 30 ÷ 500 = 0.06. A week's production is 4000 × 5 = 20000 bulbs. The expected number of faulty bulbs is 20000 × 0.06 = 1200. Answer: about 1200 faulty bulbs a week. The distractors: 2000 uses Inspector A's estimate, 4 ÷ 40 = 0.1, giving 20000 × 0.1 = 2000, and so rests on a sample of only 40 bulbs; 1600 comes from averaging the two estimates of 0.1 and 0.06 to get 0.08, and 20000 × 0.08 = 1600, which gives the small sample equal weight with the large one; 240 uses the right estimate but stops at a single day, 4000 × 0.06 = 240.
- (d) Correlation is a link; causation is one causing the other — Method: the two words describe different claims — one is about a pattern in the data, the other is about what produced that pattern. Working: correlation says only that two quantities tend to change together, which is something a scatter graph can display; causation says that a change in one quantity actually brings about the change in the other, which needs evidence a scatter graph cannot supply, because a third quantity may be driving both. Answer: correlation is a link between the quantities, while causation is one quantity causing the change in another. The distractors: the statement giving causation as the link and correlation as the cause simply swaps the two words over; the statement that the words mean the same thing is the classic error of reading a correlation as proof of cause; the statement that a scatter graph shows causation but not correlation reverses what a scatter graph can do, since the pattern it displays is exactly the correlation.
- (a) 6/11 — Method: add the parts of the ratio to find the total, then write the required part over the total. Working: 5 + 6 = 11 parts in total; lemons make up 6 of the 11 parts, so the fraction of lemons is 6/11, which is already in its simplest form. Answer: 6/11. 5/11 comes from finding the fraction of oranges instead of lemons. 5/6 comes from writing the ratio of oranges to lemons directly as a fraction instead of comparing lemons to the total. 6/5 comes from writing the ratio of lemons to oranges directly as a fraction instead of comparing lemons to the total.
- (a) Subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. — Method: try to solve the equation as normal and see what happens. Working: subtract 4x from both sides: 4x + 3 − 4x = 4x + 10 − 4x, giving 3 = 10. This statement is false for every value of x, so the equation has no solution. Answer: subtracting 4x gives 3 = 10, which is never true. "x would have to be negative" invents a constraint on x that the equation never states. "It's true for every x" confuses this equation with an identity, where both sides would simplify to the same expression. "x = 7" misreads the false statement 3 = 10 as something to solve for x, rather than recognising it means no solution exists.
- (b) 2.5 hours — Method: when two objects move in opposite directions the gap between them grows at the sum of their speeds, so divide the required gap by that combined rate. Working: 80 + 60 = 140 km of gap each hour, and 350 ÷ 140 = 2.5. Answer: 2.5 hours. The distractors: 17.5 hours comes from subtracting the speeds, 80 − 60 = 20, which is the rate for two cars travelling in the same direction; 5 hours comes from using the mean of the two speeds, 70 km/h, instead of their sum; 4.375 hours comes from dividing 350 by 80 and ignoring the second car altogether.
- (a) Square-based pyramid — A solid with one square base and four triangular faces meeting at a single apex above the base is a square-based pyramid. A triangular prism has two triangular faces and three rectangular faces, not a square base with four triangles, so that is a different solid. A cube has six square faces, and a cuboid has six rectangular faces — neither has any triangular faces at all. The solid described is a square-based pyramid.
- (d) 3/5 — 'Chosen from the boys' restricts the sample space to the 45 boys, of whom 27 walk. So the probability is 27/45 = 3/5. Using all 80 students as the denominator instead of just the boys gives 27/80, which is the probability that a student chosen from everyone is a boy who walks — not what was asked. Using the 18 boys who do NOT walk (45 − 27) as the numerator instead of the 27 who do gives 18/45 = 2/5. Dividing the 27 walking boys by the number of girls (80 − 45 = 35) instead of by the number of boys gives 27/35.
- (b) Yes — the actual mass could be as low as 995 g — Method: a mass shown to the nearest 10 g lies within half of 10 g, that is 5 g, of the figure on the display, so compare the smallest mass the bag can have with the checker's limit of 996 g. Working: 1,000 − 5 = 995, so the actual mass of the bag can be as low as 995 g, and 995 g is below the 996 g limit, so a bag showing 1,000 g on the machine can still be rejected. Answer: Yes — the actual mass could be as low as 995 g. The distractors: 990 g comes from going a whole 10 g below the display instead of half of it; 999.5 g comes from treating the display as being to the nearest gram, when it is to the nearest 10 g; the claim that the mass is exactly 1,000 g treats a rounded display as an exact measurement.
- (a) 17 — Substitute a = 3 into 5a + 2: 5 × 3 + 2 = 15 + 2 = 17. 10 comes from treating 5a as 5 + a instead of 5 × a, giving 5 + 3 + 2. 25 comes from adding the 2 to a before multiplying by 5, 5 × (3 + 2). 15 comes from working out 5 × 3 correctly but forgetting to add the 2.
- (c) 1.6 — The multiplier from tins to pounds is found by dividing the cost by the number of tins: £8 ÷ 5 = 1.6. 0.625 comes from dividing the wrong way round, tins ÷ cost (5 ÷ 8), which is the multiplier from pounds back to tins. 3 comes from subtracting the number of tins from the cost (8 − 5), instead of dividing. 40 comes from multiplying the cost by the number of tins (8 × 5), instead of dividing.
- (d) SSS, using shared side QS — PQ equals RQ and PS equals RS are two given pairs of equal sides, and QS is common to both triangles, so QS equals itself and gives a third pair of equal sides. Three pairs of equal sides is exactly the SSS condition, so 'SSS, using shared side QS' is correct. 'SAS, using the angle at Q' is wrong because no angle is given anywhere in this question; angle PQS and angle RQS are not stated to be equal, and assuming they are would be assuming the very thing being proved. 'Only two pairs of sides — not enough' is wrong because it forgets that the shared side QS is itself a third pair of equal sides. 'Cannot prove — no angle given' is wrong because SSS is one of the four basic congruence conditions and specifically requires no angle at all.
- (d) 11/12 — Convert both mixed numbers to improper fractions with a common denominator. 2 3/4 = 11/4, which is 33/12, and 1 5/6 = 11/6, which is 22/12. Subtracting, 33/12 − 22/12 gives 11/12, already in its simplest form. Forgetting to borrow, and instead subtracting the fraction parts the other way round to avoid a negative, 10/12 − 9/12 gives 1/12; adding that to the whole-number difference of 1 gives 13/12. Subtracting only the fraction parts, 9/12 − 10/12, and reporting just the size of that difference gives 1/12, which ignores the whole numbers altogether. Adding the two improper fractions instead of subtracting them, 33/12 + 22/12, gives 55/12. So 2 3/4 − 1 5/6 = 11/12.
- (c) 15 and 9 — Method: write the two facts as two equations in the same pair of letters and add them, because the letter with opposite signs cancels. Working: with x the larger number and y the smaller, x + y = 24 and x − y = 6; adding gives 2x = 30, so x = 15, and substituting into x + y = 24 gives y = 9. Answer: 15 and 9, which add to 24 and differ by 6. The distractors: 18 and 6 come from halving 24 to 12 and then adding and subtracting the whole difference of 6 instead of half of it, which leaves a difference of 12; 15 and 21 come from finding the larger number correctly and then adding 6 to it instead of subtracting; 15 and 6 come from finding the larger number and then taking the 6 in the question to be the smaller number itself.
- (d) b = k ÷ g — Inverse proportion means b × g stays constant (equal to k), so b = k ÷ g. 'b = kg' is the equation for direct proportion, not inverse. 'b = k + g' treats the relationship as additive, which is not proportion at all. 'b = g ÷ k' is direct proportion in disguise: rearranging it gives g = kb, so b still grows as g grows. For inverse proportion the g must be underneath the constant, not above it.
- (c) 6 — Method: the first significant figure is the first non-zero digit; round using the digit after it to decide whether to round up or down. Working: the first significant figure of 6.283 is the 6; the next digit is 2, which rounds down, so 6.283 rounds to 6. 6.3 comes from rounding to 2 significant figures instead of 1. 10 comes from rounding up to the nearest 10 instead of finding 1 significant figure of the number itself. 0.6 comes from misplacing the decimal point after rounding. Answer: 6.
- (d) 4:1 — Write the ratio online : in-store using the numbers in the question: 180 : 45. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 45, to give 4 : 1. (1:4 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, in-store : online. 3:1 comes from subtracting the in-store orders from the online orders, 180 − 45 = 135, and comparing that to the in-store orders, 135:45, instead of dividing. 4:5 comes from comparing the online orders to the total number of orders, 180:225.)
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.