Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 1/3 — Method: find non-fiction's fraction of the whole, then multiply by the fraction of non-fiction that is history. Working: total parts = 4 + 5 = 9, so non-fiction is 5/9 of all books. History books are 3/5 of the non-fiction books: 3/5 × 5/9 = 15/45 = 1/3. Answer: 1/3. 3/5 comes from giving the fraction of non-fiction books that are history, without relating it to all the books at the fair. 5/9 comes from stopping after finding the fraction of all books that are non-fiction, without finding the history books within that. 4/15 comes from multiplying 3/5 by the fraction that is fiction (4/9) instead of the fraction that is non-fiction (5/9).
- (d) 28 cm — Method: rate = 12 cm ÷ 3 min = 4 cm per minute. Depth after 7 minutes = 4 × 7 = 28 cm. Distractor origins: 84 cm multiplies the given depth by 7 directly, without first finding the rate per minute (12 × 7 = 84); 24 cm simply doubles the given depth instead of scaling correctly by the ratio of times; 16 cm combines the numbers with subtraction and addition (12 − 3 + 7 = 16) instead of finding a rate.
- (d) 3 : 5 — Simplify the area ratio: 18 : 50 divides by 2 to give 9 : 25. Areas scale with the square of the length ratio, so take the square root of each part: the square root of 9 is 3, and the square root of 25 is 5, giving a side length ratio of 3 : 5. Giving 5 : 3 has the ratio the right way round for larger to smaller, not smaller to larger. Giving 9 : 25 is the simplified area ratio, without square-rooting it. Giving 18 : 50 is the area ratio before it has even been simplified.
- (a) Triangular-based pyramid (tetrahedron) — A solid with 4 triangular faces, 4 vertices and 6 edges is a triangular-based pyramid, also called a tetrahedron. A triangular prism also has triangular faces, but it has 2 triangular faces plus 3 rectangular faces, 6 vertices and 9 edges — the extra rectangular faces and edges rule it out here. A square-based pyramid has 5 faces (one square, four triangles), 5 vertices and 8 edges, which does not match. A cube has 6 faces, 8 vertices and 12 edges, all much higher than the numbers given. The solid described is a triangular-based pyramid.
- (a) 20 — Dice A is fair, so its expected number of sixes is 150 × 1/6 = 25. Dice B has P(6) = 0.3, so its expected number of sixes is 150 × 0.3 = 45. The difference is 45 − 25 = 20. Adding the two expected values instead of subtracting them gives 25 + 45 = 70. Reporting Dice B's expected sixes on their own, without comparing to Dice A, gives 45. Using the fair probability 1/6 for Dice B as well as Dice A ignores the bias altogether, giving 150 × 1/6 = 25 for both dice and a difference of 0.
- (d) Only families with strong feelings bothered to reply. — Method: a survey has non-response bias when only some of the people asked actually reply, and those who do are not a typical cross-section of everyone who was asked. Working: only 30 of the 200 families sent back their questionnaire, and 27 of those 30 — the great majority — said they were unhappy. Families who feel strongly about an issue, particularly those with a complaint, are far more likely to make the effort to reply than families who are simply satisfied and see no need to say anything, so the 30 replies over-represent unhappy families. Saying the families who replied were picked at random by the school gets the sampling the wrong way round: nobody picked them — they picked themselves by deciding to reply, and that is precisely why they are not a typical cross-section of all 200. Saying postal surveys always have low response rates restates that the response was low without explaining why a low response rate, on its own, makes a result unrepresentative — it is the reason FOR the low response, not the low response itself, that causes the bias here. Saying that the 27 unhappy replies show most families are unhappy is exactly the mistake the question is warning against: it treats the loudest 30 replies as if they stood for the other 170 who never sent theirs back. A low response rate is a warning sign only because the people who bother to reply are rarely typical of everyone who was asked.
- (c) 9/5 — Method: the area of a rectangle is its length multiplied by its width; the decimal product is then written over a power of ten and cancelled. Working: 24 × 75 = 1800, and 2.4 and 0.75 have three decimal places between them, so 2.4 × 0.75 = 1.8; the area of the panel is 1.8 square metres, which is eighteen tenths, so it can be written as 18/10, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 gives 9 over 5. Answer: 9/5. The distractors: 4/5 comes from converting only the digits after the decimal point and losing the whole one, turning 1.8 into eight tenths; 63/20 comes from adding the two sides instead of multiplying them, giving 3.15; 9/50 comes from misplacing the decimal point in the product and writing 0.18, which cancels to 9 over 50.
- (d) (−1, 4) — In parallelogram ABCD the side DC is parallel and equal to the side AB, so D = C − AB. The vector from A to B is (2 − (−3), 1 − 1) = (5, 0), so D = (4 − 5, 4 − 0) = (−1, 4). A candidate who adds this vector to C instead of subtracting it gets (4 + 5, 4 + 0) = (9, 4). A candidate who subtracts A's coordinates from C's rather than the vector AB, and drops the minus sign on −3 while doing so, works out (4 − 3, 4 − 1) and gets (1, 3). A candidate who makes only the y-part of that slip, working out 4 − 1 instead of 4 − 0, gets (−1, 3).
- (d) 15 cm — An enlargement by scale factor 3 means every length is multiplied by 3: 5 × 3 = 15 cm. Dividing by the scale factor instead, 5 ÷ 3 = 1.7 (to 1 d.p.), gives 1.7 cm — dividing shrinks the plan rather than enlarging it. Adding the scale factor instead of multiplying, 5 + 3 = 8, gives 8 cm. Squaring the scale factor, as you would for an area, 5 × 3² = 45, gives 45 cm — length scales by the factor itself, not its square.
- (d) (−4, −3) — The combined translation is the sum of the two column vectors, added component by component: top numbers 3 + (−7) = −4, bottom numbers −5 + 2 = −3, giving (−4, −3). (10, −7) subtracts the second vector from the first instead of adding them. (−4, 3) gets the top number right but makes a sign error on the bottom, treating −5 + 2 as +3. (4, −3) gets the bottom number right but makes a sign error on the top, treating 3 + (−7) as +4.
- (a) 195 — The relative frequency from the trial is 52 ÷ 80 = 0.65, and the expected number of point-up landings in 300 drops is 0.65 × 300 = 195. Giving 52 as the answer reuses the original count from the 80-drop trial without scaling it up to 300 drops at all. Misreading 52 out of 80 as 52% and finding 52% of 300 gives 156. Finding the expected number of point-DOWN landings instead of point-up, using the relative frequency 28 ÷ 80 = 0.35, gives 0.35 × 300 = 105.
- (d) 23,600 — 23,000 correct to the nearest thousand means the true attendance, a, satisfies 22,500 ≤ a < 23,500. 23,600 is outside this range, so it is not possible. 22,500 is the lower bound of the range, so it is possible. 23,499 is just below the upper bound, so it is possible. 23,000 is the given value itself, so it is possible.
- (a) 9 — Method: the gaps in this sequence are not constant, so work out each of the two terms named from the rule and then subtract the earlier from the later. Working: the 5th term is 5² + 1 = 25 + 1 = 26 and the 4th term is 4² + 1 = 16 + 1 = 17, so the difference is 26 − 17. Answer: 9. The distractors: 7 comes from using the 3rd and 4th terms, one position too early, 17 − 10; 11 comes from using the 5th and 6th terms, one position too late, 37 − 26; 1 comes from subtracting the position numbers, 5 − 4, instead of the terms themselves.
- (d) 4:1 — Write the ratio online : in-store using the numbers in the question: 180 : 45. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 45, to give 4 : 1. (1:4 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, in-store : online. 3:1 comes from subtracting the in-store orders from the online orders, 180 − 45 = 135, and comparing that to the in-store orders, 135:45, instead of dividing. 4:5 comes from comparing the online orders to the total number of orders, 180:225.)
- (d) 1.2 m² — Method: an area in square metres needs lengths in metres, so convert first and then multiply. Working: 100 cm = 1 m, so 150 cm = 1.5 m and 80 cm = 0.8 m, and the area = 1.5 × 0.8 = 1.2 m². Answer: 1.2 m². The same result comes from working in centimetres: 150 × 80 = 12 000 cm², and a square metre is a square of side 100 cm, so 100 × 100 = 10 000 cm² make one square metre and 12 000 ÷ 10 000 = 1.2. Dividing the 12 000 cm² by 100 instead, as though a square metre held only 100 square centimetres, gives 120 m²; dividing by 1000 gives 12 m². Working out the perimeter rather than the area gives 1.5 + 0.8 + 1.5 + 0.8 = 4.6, which is a length and not an area.
- (d) 19 — 2² = 4, then 4 × 4 = 16, then 3 + 16 = 19. Adding before multiplying gives 3 + 4 = 7, then 7 × 4 = 28 — multiplication comes before addition. Squaring the product instead of just the 2 gives 4 × 2 = 8, then 8² = 64, then 3 + 64 = 67. Working strictly left to right throughout gives 3 + 4 = 7, then 7 × 2 = 14, then 14² = 196.
- (d) 2.7 — The height after 3 years of 10% compound growth is 2 × 1.1³ = 2.662 m, which rounds to 2.7 m. A candidate who adds 10% of the original height (0.2 m) in each of the 3 years, instead of compounding on the new height each time, would reach 2 + 3×0.2 = 2.6 m. A candidate who compounds for only 2 years would reach 2 × 1.1² = 2.42 m, rounding to 2.4 m. A candidate who compounds for 4 years instead of 3 would reach 2 × 1.1⁴ = 2.928 m, rounding to 2.9 m.
- (a) 15 km/h — Speed = distance ÷ time, so 45 ÷ 3 = 15 km/h. Working out 45 × 3 = 135 multiplies distance and time together instead of dividing. Working out 45 + 3 = 48 and 45 − 3 = 42 both combine the two values by addition or subtraction, which does not give a speed at all. The cyclist's average speed is 15 km/h.
- (d) 3/10 — Total parts = 7 + 3 = 10. Gold beads are 3 of those 10 parts, so the fraction is 3/10. 7/10 comes from finding the fraction of red beads instead of gold beads. 7/3 comes from writing the ratio itself as a fraction, without adding the parts to find the total. 3/7 comes from comparing gold beads with red beads instead of with the total number of beads.
- (a) 3/8 — The whole prize fund is split into 3 + 5 = 8 equal parts. The smaller winner receives 3 of these parts, so their share is 3/8 of the whole fund. Taking the larger number of parts, 5, as the numerator instead gives 5/8, the larger winner's share. Writing the ratio numbers directly as a fraction without adding them, 3/5, treats the ratio as a fraction of the OTHER share rather than of the whole. Inverting the ratio gives 5/3, which is not even a valid fraction of a whole, since it is greater than 1.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.