Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 36 kg — The mix is 3 + 5 = 8 equal shares, so the cement is 3/8 of the mass. One share is 96 ÷ 8 = 12 kg, and the cement is 3 shares: 3 × 12 = 36 kg. Working out 3/5 of 96 gives 57.6 kg, which uses the sand as the denominator instead of the whole mix; 60 kg is the mass of the sand; 12 kg is one share only.
- (d) x = (y + 3)/4 — Two operations have been applied to x: it has been multiplied by 4 and then 3 has been subtracted. Undo them in the opposite order. Adding 3 to both sides gives y + 3 = 4x. Dividing both sides by 4 then gives (y + 3)/4 = x, so x = (y + 3)/4. The bracket matters: writing y/4 + 3 divides only the y by 4 and leaves the 3 untouched. Writing (y − 3)/4 subtracts the 3 instead of adding it, and writing 4(y + 3) multiplies by 4 rather than dividing.
- (d) 4/7 — Put the tomato plant's height over the sunflower's height: 80/140. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 20: 80÷20 = 4, 140÷20 = 7, giving 4/7. (7/4 comes from writing the heights the wrong way round. 3/7 comes from finding the difference in the heights, 140 − 80 = 60 cm, and writing it as a fraction of the sunflower's height, 60/140. 4/11 comes from comparing the tomato plant's height to the total height of both plants, 80/220.)
- (c) The midpoint of AB — M is a single point lying exactly halfway along the straight line AB, so 'the midpoint of AB' correctly describes it. 'The vertex of AB' is wrong because a vertex is a corner point where two edges or lines meet, which does not apply to a point on a single straight line. 'A perpendicular of AB' is wrong because perpendicular describes two lines meeting at right angles, not a single point. 'A plane of AB' is wrong because a plane is a flat two-dimensional surface, not a point.
- (a) 1/5 — Method: find the probability that the counter is black, then use the fact that an event and its complement add to 1. Working: there are 2 + 8 = 10 counters, so P(black) = 8/10 = 4/5; the complement is 1 − 4/5, and writing 1 as 5/5 gives 5/5 − 4/5. Answer: 1/5. The distractors: 4/5 comes from giving the probability that the counter is black instead of its complement; 1/2 comes from assuming the two colours are equally likely because there are only two of them; 1/4 comes from writing the 2 white counters over the 8 black counters rather than over all 10 counters.
- (b) Positive correlation — Method: the type of correlation is named from the direction the points take as the scatter graph is read from left to right. Working: the points rise from left to right, so as the arm span read on the horizontal axis increases, the height read on the vertical axis increases as well; two quantities that increase together show positive correlation. Answer: positive correlation. The distractors: negative correlation comes from naming the direction the wrong way round, since a negative correlation needs the points to fall as the graph is read from left to right; no correlation comes from treating points that are spread out rather than sitting exactly on a line as though they showed no relationship; direct proportion comes from confusing a rising trend with proportion, which would additionally need the line through the points to pass through the origin and would mean doubling one quantity doubles the other.
- (a) 1/3 — Method: find the total fraction eaten, then subtract it from the whole pizza. Working: together they eat 5/12 + 3/12 = 8/12, so the fraction left is 12/12 − 8/12 = 4/12 = 1/3. Answer: 1/3. 2/3 comes from giving the fraction eaten instead of the fraction left. 7/12 comes from only subtracting Ben's slices and forgetting Mia's. 1/2 comes from comparing the 4 slices left with the 8 slices eaten, 4/8, a part-to-part comparison instead of comparing with the whole pizza of 12 slices.
- (a) 16 — k = 8m ÷ 5 = (8 × 10) ÷ 5 = 80 ÷ 5 = 16. A candidate who multiplies 8 by 10 but forgets to divide by 5 gets 80. A candidate who divides 10 by 8 and multiplies by 5, using the fraction upside down, gets 10 × 5 ÷ 8 = 6.25. A candidate who adds instead of substituting into the formula gets 8 + 10 = 18.
- (b) 1.5 km — Multiply the map length by the scale factor: 6 × 25000 = 150000 cm. Convert to kilometres, using 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 m = 1 km, so 100000 cm = 1 km: 150000 ÷ 100000 = 1.5 km. (1500 km comes from converting only as far as metres, 150000 ÷ 100 = 1500 m, and then writing kilometres on the end. 15 km comes from dividing by 10000 instead of 100000. 0.15 km comes from dividing by 1000000 instead of 100000.)
- (c) 18 — Method: divide the real length by 5 to find how many 'units' of 5 m it contains, then multiply by 2 cm for each unit. Working: 45 ÷ 5 = 9, so the real bridge is 9 lots of 5 m; each lot is represented by 2 cm on the model, so the model length is 9 × 2 = 18 cm. Options: 9 comes from stopping after the division, without multiplying by the 2 cm per unit; 90 comes from multiplying the real length by 2 directly, without dividing by 5 first; 4.5 comes from dividing by 5 and then dividing by 2 again, instead of multiplying by 2. Answer: 18.
- (b) 70 — Saloon, estate and hatchback are exhaustive, so their probabilities sum to 1: the probability of a hatchback is 1 − 0.28 − 0.37 = 0.35. The number of hatchbacks is 0.35 × 200 = 70. Treating the SUM of the other two probabilities, 0.28 + 0.37 = 0.65, as the probability of a hatchback instead of its complement gives 0.65 × 200 = 130. Multiplying the correct probability, 0.35, by 100 instead of the 200 cars actually surveyed gives 35. Averaging the two given probabilities, (0.28 + 0.37) ÷ 2 = 0.325, instead of subtracting them from 1, and then multiplying by 200 gives 65.
- (a) 23 — Division undoes multiplication, so the missing number is 391 ÷ 17 = 23. Writing down 17 repeats the number already given instead of solving for the missing one. Subtracting instead of dividing gives 391 − 17 = 374. Multiplying instead of dividing gives 391 × 17 = 6647.
- (c) x = 0 or x = −7 — Factorising: x² + 7x = x(x + 7) = 0, so x = 0 or x + 7 = 0, giving x = 0 or x = −7. A candidate who divides both sides of the original equation by x, which loses the solution x = 0, gets only x = −7. A candidate who makes a sign error solving x + 7 = 0 gets x = 0 or x = 7. A candidate who misreads the coefficient and doubles it gets x = 0 or x = −14.
- (c) m = 6c — Method: the whole is the sum of the parts in the ratio, and the cement is 1 part, so one part weighs c kg. Working: the mix has 5 + 1 = 6 parts, each of mass c kg, so the total mass is 6 × c, giving m = 6c. Answer: m = 6c. The distractors: m = 5c uses the 5 gravel parts as the multiplier and forgets that the cement is in the mix too, so it gives the mass of the gravel and not the total; m = c + 5 comes from reading the ratio as '5 more than' and adding, which treats a number of parts as a mass in kilograms; m = c/6 turns the relationship upside down, as though the total were shared into the cement rather than the cement multiplied up to the total.
- (a) (5, 2) — Reflecting in the x-axis keeps the x-coordinate the same and changes the sign of the y-coordinate, so (5, −2) maps to (5, 2). (−5, −2) changes the sign of the x-coordinate instead, which is what happens when reflecting in the y-axis. (−5, 2) changes the sign of both coordinates, which is the result of a rotation of 180° about the origin, not a reflection in the x-axis. (2, 5) comes from dropping the minus sign and then swapping the two numbers round, so neither coordinate has actually been reflected.
- (b) 5/27 — Method: multiply the numerators together and the denominators together, then simplify. Working: (5 × 2)/(6 × 9) = 10/54 = 5/27. Answer: 5/27. 7/15 comes from adding the fractions instead of multiplying: (5+2)/(6+9) = 7/15. 15/4 comes from flipping the second fraction, as if dividing: (5 × 9)/(6 × 2) = 45/12 = 15/4. 5/3 comes from cancelling the two denominators against each other, dividing both 6 and 9 by 3 to leave 5/2 × 2/3 = 10/6 = 5/3; cancelling is only valid between a numerator and a denominator, never between two denominators.
- (d) 4 — Subtracting the second equation from the first: the y-terms cancel, and the x-terms combine as 3x − x = 2x; the right-hand sides give 14 − 6 = 8. This gives 2x = 8, so x = 4. A candidate who subtracts in the wrong order would get 2x = 6 − 14 = −8, so x = −4. A candidate who uses only the first equation, dividing 14 by 3 as if y were 0, would get x ≈ 4.67. A candidate who reports the value of y instead of x would get y = 6 − 4 = 2.
- (a) 20% — Method: a percentage concentration compares the sugar with the whole solution, so add the two masses to get the mass of solution and then scale the ratio of sugar to solution to a denominator of 100. Working: the solution has a mass of 200 + 50 = 250 g; sugar:solution = 50:250, and scaling to per 100 gives 50 ÷ 250 × 100 = 20, so the ratio is 20:100. Answer: 20%. The distractors: 25% comes from comparing the sugar with the 200 g of water, 50:200, rather than with the whole solution; 80% is the percentage of the solution that is water, 200:250, which answers for the wrong part of the mixture; 0.2% comes from working out 50 ÷ 250 = 0.2 and writing that decimal down as a percentage without multiplying by 100.
- (b) 2.1 m — The three pieces use 3 × 0.9 = 2.7 m of wood. Remaining wood = 4.8 − 2.7 = 2.1 m. A candidate who miscounts and only subtracts 2 pieces instead of 3 gets 4.8 − 1.8 = 3.0 m. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting gets 4.8 + 2.7 = 7.5 m. A candidate who gives the length used instead of the length remaining gets 2.7 m.
- (c) 448.00 US dollars — Method: multiply the amount in pounds by the exchange rate. Working: £350 × 1.28 = 448.00 US dollars. Wrong options: 273.44 US dollars comes from dividing by the rate instead of multiplying (350 ÷ 1.28); 351.28 US dollars comes from adding the rate to the amount instead of multiplying; 4,480.00 US dollars comes from a decimal-point slip, using 12.8 instead of 1.28.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.