Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) No, the true mass could be as high as 852.5 kg — Method: find the upper bound of the true mass and compare it with the weight limit. Working: the display is correct to the nearest 5 kg, so half of 5 kg is 2.5 kg, and the true mass, m kg, satisfies 847.5 ≤ m < 852.5. Part of that interval lies above 850 kg, so the parcels are not definitely within the limit. Answer: the true mass could be as high as 852.5 kg, which is above the limit. ("Yes, the display reads 850 kg, which is not above the limit" compares the limit with the displayed value instead of with the largest value the true mass could take. "Yes, the true mass is at least 847.5 kg and at most 850 kg" uses the correct half unit below but caps the interval at the limit instead of at 852.5 kg. "No, 850 kg on the display rounds up to 855 kg" wrongly treats the displayed value as if it rounds again.)
- (a) y = (x − 2)² + 3 — Since (x − 2)² is never negative, (x − 2)² + 3 is always at least 3, so y can never equal 0 and the graph never crosses the x-axis. The other three graphs are all given in a factorised or difference-of-squares form that shows two real roots: y = (x − 2)(x + 3) crosses at x = 2 and x = −3; y = x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3) crosses at x = 3 and x = −3; y = (x + 4)(x − 1) crosses at x = −4 and x = 1.
- (a) 4/5 — Method: find the June takings first, then write them over the May takings and cancel. Working: the takings fell by £900, so June is £4500 − £900 = £3600; the fraction is 3600/4500, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 900 gives 4/5. Answer: 4/5 of the May takings. The distractors: 1/5 comes from writing the fall over the May takings, 900/4500, which answers how far the takings dropped rather than what June's takings are compared with May's; 5/4 comes from writing May over June, 4500/3600, reversing the order the question asks for; 4/9 comes from writing June over the two months added together, 3600/8100, a part-to-whole fraction when the comparison asked for is with May alone.
- (b) x = 5 — Every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate, so the equation of a vertical line through (5, 2) is x = 5. "y = 5" mixes up the coordinates, using the x-value of 5 to write a y-equation. "y = 2" is the equation of the horizontal line through (5, 2), not the vertical one. "x = 2" uses the correct letter but the wrong coordinate, the y-value of 2 instead of the x-value of 5.
- (a) 1/6 — Method: for equally likely outcomes, write the number of favourable outcomes over the total number of outcomes. Working: the dice has one face showing 6, and there are 6 equally likely faces in total, so the probability is 1 over 6. Answer: 1/6, which is close to the left-hand end of the 0 to 1 scale because the outcome is unlikely. The distractors: 5/6 comes from giving the probability of not rolling a 6; 1/2 comes from treating 'a 6' and 'not a 6' as two equally likely outcomes; 1/5 comes from writing the one favourable face over the 5 faces that are not a 6 instead of over all 6 faces.
- (d) About 510 of the 600 bulbs are likely to have flowered — Method: the proportion found in a random sample is used as an estimate of the proportion in the whole population, and the conclusion is stated as an estimate, never as a fact about every member. Working: 17 of the 20 bulbs dug up had flowered, so the sample proportion is 17 ÷ 20 = 0.85, and applying that proportion to the whole planting gives 0.85 × 600 = 510 bulbs. A different random sample of 20 would very probably give a slightly different figure, so 510 is an estimate. Answer: about 510 of the 600 bulbs are likely to have flowered. The distractors: saying exactly 510 have flowered takes an estimate from a sample of 20 as a count of all 600, which no sample can deliver; saying exactly 17 of the 600 have flowered reports the sample count as though it were the population count, leaving the other 580 bulbs out of the answer altogether; saying about 20 have flowered uses the size of the sample as the estimate, when 20 is the number of bulbs she dug up rather than a number that flowered.
- (c) An under-estimate, by 8 — Method: work out the exact product, then compare it with the estimate; an estimate that is smaller than the exact value is an under-estimate, and the difference between them is the size of the error. Working: 48 × 21 = 48 × 20 + 48 = 960 + 48 = 1,008, and 1,008 − 1,000 = 8, so the estimate falls short. Answer: an under-estimate, by 8. The distractors: an over-estimate by 8 has the size of the error right but the direction wrong, and comes from assuming that rounding 48 up to 50 must push the estimate above the exact value, without allowing for 21 being rounded down; an over-estimate by 19 comes from working out 48 × 21 as 48 × 20 + 21 = 981, adding a 21 where another 48 belongs; the claim that the estimate is exactly right comes from arguing that one number was rounded up and the other down, so the two changes must cancel.
- (d) 8 — Method: write both present ages in terms of one letter, take four years off each of them, and form an equation from the comparison four years ago. Working: let Amelia be y, so her mother is 3y; four years ago they were y − 4 and 3y − 4, giving 3y − 4 = 5(y − 4); expanding gives 3y − 4 = 5y − 20; adding 20 and subtracting 3y from both sides gives 16 = 2y, and dividing by 2 gives y = 8. Checking: Amelia is 8 and her mother 24; four years ago they were 4 and 20, and 20 = 5 × 4. Answer: 8. The distractors: 4 comes from solving correctly but giving Amelia's age four years ago instead of her age now; 16 comes from stopping at 2y = 16 and giving 16 as her age; 2 comes from collecting the y terms by adding the 5y instead of subtracting it, giving 3y + 5y = 20 − 4 and so 8y = 16.
- (a) 12/5 — If A is 5/12 of B, then B is the reciprocal of that fraction times A: flip 5/12 to get 12/5, so B is 12/5 of A. 5/12 comes from keeping the same fraction without flipping it, treating the relationship as if it works the same way in both directions. 7/12 comes from computing 1 − 5/12 = 7/12, which is not how a fraction reverses. 12/7 comes from subtracting 5 from 12 to get 7, and writing 12 over that, instead of swapping the numerator and denominator of 5/12.
- (d) 10.3 m — By Pythagoras' theorem, the hypotenuse = √(5² + 9²) = √(25 + 81) = √106 = 10.29...≈ 10.3 m. "106 m" is the value under the square root sign, correct as far as it goes but with the final square root step left out. "14 m" comes from adding the two shorter sides, 5 + 9, instead of using Pythagoras' theorem at all. "10.2 m" comes from rounding 10.29...m down to 10.2 instead of correctly rounding it up to 10.3.
- (a) unlikely — 3/8 = 3 ÷ 8 = 0.375, which is between 0 and 0.5, so the probability is best described as unlikely. Rounding 3/8 loosely to 'about a half' without converting it properly leads to evens, which is wrong since 0.375 is noticeably below 0.5. Reading 3/8 as the complement and using 1 − 3/8 = 5/8 = 0.625 instead gives likely, but the question asks about the probability of 3/8 itself, not its complement. Flipping the fraction to 8/3 ≈ 2.67, which is impossible for a probability, and rounding it towards the top of the scale gives certain.
- (a) 7 — Dividing by 0.1 is the same as multiplying by 10, so 0.7 ÷ 0.1 = 7. Meera's answer of 0.07 comes from dividing 0.7 by 10 instead of by 0.1, the wrong way round. A candidate who confuses 0.1 with 0.01 multiplies by 100 instead of 10 and gets 70. A candidate who thinks dividing by a number less than 1 does not change the value gets 0.7.
- (d) −5 — In y = mx + c, the y-intercept is c, the constant term, not the coefficient of x. Here c = −5, so the y-intercept is −5. 4 is Beth's value, the coefficient of x (the gradient), not the intercept. 5 comes from taking the constant term but dropping its negative sign. −4 comes from taking the gradient but giving it the sign of the intercept.
- (d) 4.7 km — Multiply the map length by the scale factor: 9.4 × 50 000 = 470 000 cm. Convert to kilometres: 470 000 cm = 4700 m = 4.7 km. Converting only to metres and calling the answer 4700 kilometres mistakes metres for kilometres. Misreading the scale as 1 : 5000 instead of 1 : 50 000, 9.4 × 5000 = 47 000 cm = 0.47 km, is ten times too small. Misplacing the decimal point in 9.4 and effectively using 94, 94 × 50 000 = 4 700 000 cm = 47 km, is ten times too big.
- (c) 15 — The exterior angle is 180° − 156° = 24°, and the number of sides of a regular polygon is 360° divided by the exterior angle, so 360 ÷ 24 = 15. 24° is the exterior angle itself, stopping one step before the final division. 17 comes from finding 15 correctly and then adding 2, muddling the exterior angle rule with the (n − 2) that appears in the interior angle sum formula. 7.5 comes from dividing 180 by the exterior angle instead of 360, using the angles on a straight line rather than the total of the exterior angles of a polygon.
- (b) 4/9 — Method: double the butter part of the ratio, keeping flour the same, find the new total, then write butter's part over the new total. Working: the new ratio is flour : butter = 5 : 4, since butter doubles from 2 to 4. New total = 5 + 4 = 9. Fraction of butter = 4/9. Answer: 4/9. 2/9 comes from forgetting to double the butter part and using the original value 2 over the new total of 9. 4/7 comes from doubling the butter part correctly to 4 but keeping the old total of 7 instead of working out the new total. 2/5 comes from using the original ratio 5:2 directly as butter over flour without doubling anything.
- (d) x = 3 — Method: undo the operations on the left in reverse order — deal with the subtraction of 1 first, then with the multiplication by 3. Working: adding 1 to both sides gives 3x = 9, and dividing both sides by 3 gives x = 3. Answer: x = 3. The distractors: x = 9 comes from stopping at 3x = 9 and writing 9 as the value of x; x = 6 comes from subtracting 3 from 9 instead of dividing by 3; x = 27 comes from multiplying 9 by 3 instead of dividing by 3.
- (b) 250 g — Method: adding water changes the total mass but not the mass of salt, so find the salt, hold it fixed, use the new ratio to find the new total mass and subtract the mass already in the beaker. Working: 12:100 = x:500 gives 12 ÷ 100 × 500 = 60 g of salt; that 60 g must be 8% of the new mixture, so 8:100 = 60:y gives y = 60 ÷ 8 × 100 = 750 g; the water added is 750 − 500 = 250 g. Answer: 250 g. The distractors: 750 g is the mass of the diluted solution, given without taking away the 500 g that was in the beaker to start with; 60 g is the mass of salt, the quantity that stays the same, given instead of the mass of water; 20 g comes from treating the fall from 12% to 8% as 4% of the original 500 g, which measures a change in concentration as though it were a mass of water.
- (c) 5 — 0.2 = 1/5, and turning the fraction upside down gives the reciprocal 5/1 = 5. Writing −0.2 mistakes the reciprocal for the negative of the number. Working out 1 − 0.2 = 0.8 mistakes the reciprocal for subtracting the number from 1. Writing 0.5 is the reciprocal of 2, not of 0.2 — a place-value slip that drops the decimal, since 1 ÷ 0.2 = 5 while 1 ÷ 2 = 0.5.
- (c) £3,200 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio from the first investor's amount, then work out the second investor's share before adding both together. Working: £1,200 is 3 parts, so one part is £1,200 ÷ 3 = £400. The second investor's share is 5 × £400 = £2,000, and the total is £1,200 + £2,000 = £3,200. So the total invested is £3,200. Distractor £2,000 is only the second investor's share, without adding the first investor's £1,200. Distractor £2,400 comes from doubling the first investor's amount instead of using the ratio. Distractor £6,000 comes from multiplying £1,200 by 5 directly instead of first finding the value of one part.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.