Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 0.0479 — Method: round each option to 2 significant figures and check which one gives 0.048. Working: for 0.0479, the first two significant figures are 4 and 7; the next digit is 9, so 7 rounds up to 8, giving 0.048. For 0.0485, the first two significant figures are 4 and 8; the next digit is 5, so 8 rounds up to 9, giving 0.049, not 0.048. 0.052 already has exactly 2 significant figures, 5 and 2, so it stays as 0.052 and does not round to 0.048 at all. 0.04 has only 1 significant figure, so it is already less precise than the 2 significant figures asked for. Answer: 0.0479.
- (a) 9 m — Undo the multiplication by the bracket first: dividing both sides by 2 gives P/2 = l + w. Subtracting the length from both sides gives w = P/2 − l. Substituting the measurements, 46 ÷ 2 = 23, and 23 − 14 = 9, so the width is 9 m. Taking the length off before halving gives (46 − 14) ÷ 2 = 16, which halves the length as well; expanding to P = 2l + 2w and then forgetting to divide by 2 gives 46 − 28 = 18; subtracting the length in the wrong direction gives 23 + 14 = 37.
- (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
- (b) Cuboid — not necessarily a cube — A solid with 6 faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices in which every face is a rectangle is a cuboid, but nothing here confirms that all the edges are the same length, so the box could be a cube or a non-cube cuboid; the most that can be concluded is that it is a cuboid, making 'Cuboid — not necessarily a cube' correct. 'Cube — only a cube fits this' is wrong because a cube is just one particular cuboid; a general cuboid with different length, width and height has exactly the same face, edge and vertex counts and rectangular faces. 'Triangular prism' is wrong because a triangular prism has 5 faces, 9 edges and 6 vertices, and two of its faces are triangles, so it matches neither the counts nor the face shape. 'Not enough information' is wrong because rectangular faces with these counts do pin the solid down to the cuboid family, even though they cannot pin down a cube specifically.
- (c) 0.65 — Overrunning and not overrunning are exhaustive: between them they cover every outcome, so their probabilities sum to 1. Work out 1 − 0.35 = 0.65. Writing 0.35 again is the probability that the appointment overruns, not its complement — the subtraction was never done. Adding instead of subtracting gives 1 + 0.35 = 1.35, which cannot be a probability at all. Subtracting each digit from 10 instead of borrowing from the 1, so 10 − 3 = 7 tenths and 10 − 5 = 5 hundredths, gives 0.75.
- (a) 1.5 — Method: with an even number of values the median is the mean of the two middle values, which for 12 values are the 6th and the 7th once the data are in order. Working: the results are already in order, and 12 ÷ 2 = 6, so the middle pair are the 6th value, 1, and the 7th value, 2; the median is (1 + 2) ÷ 2 = 1.5. Answer: 1.5 brothers and sisters. The distractors: 1 comes from reading the 6th value and stopping there instead of averaging the middle pair; 2 comes from working out the mean, 24 ÷ 12, instead of the median; 6 comes from working out the range, 6 − 0, which measures spread rather than centre.
- (a) 28.8 km/h — A compound unit is converted one part at a time. There are 3600 seconds in an hour, so in one hour the cyclist travels 8 × 3600 = 28 800 metres. There are 1000 metres in a kilometre, so 28 800 m = 28 800 ÷ 1000 = 28.8 km/h. 28 800 km/h leaves the distance in metres, 0.48 km/h converts the seconds to minutes rather than to hours, and 2.22 km/h divides by 3.6 instead of multiplying.
- (c) 45 km/h — Method: speed = distance ÷ time = 90 ÷ 2 = 45 km/h. Distractor origins: 180 km/h multiplies distance by time instead of dividing (90 × 2 = 180); 88 km/h subtracts the time from the distance (90 − 2 = 88); 92 km/h adds the time to the distance (90 + 2 = 92).
- (c) 20 cm — Convert 5 km to centimetres: 5 km = 5000 m = 500 000 cm. Divide by the scale factor: 500 000 ÷ 25 000 = 20, giving 20 cm. Converting only as far as metres, 5000 ÷ 25 000 = 0.2, gives 0.2 cm — the conversion to centimetres was never finished. Dropping a zero in the division gives 2 cm, ten times too small. Misreading the scale as 1 : 2500 instead of 1 : 25 000 gives 500 000 ÷ 2500 = 200 cm, ten times too big.
- (b) A semicircle of radius 4 m, away from the wall. — Every point the dog can reach is at most 4 m from the fixed ring, so without any wall the region would be a full circle of radius 4 m. The wall runs straight through the ring and blocks the dog from crossing it, and since the wall extends further than the lead in both directions, exactly half of that circle is cut off — leaving a semicircle of radius 4 m on the side of the wall the dog is tied on. (A full circle of radius 4 m ignores that the wall blocks half of the region; a quarter circle of radius 4 m would only be correct if the ring were fixed at a corner where two walls met, not along a single straight wall; a rectangle 4 m wide along the wall ignores that the lead lets the dog swing round in a curve, not stay a fixed distance out from the wall.)
- (b) 41/160 — In total, 27 + 14 = 41 of the 160 employees cycle to work, so the probability is 41/160 (41 and 160 share no common factor, so this is already in its simplest form). Writing 27/160 is wrong because it only counts the full-time cyclists and leaves out the 14 part-time cyclists. Writing 41/90 is wrong because it uses the full-time total (90) as the denominator instead of the whole survey (160). Writing 1/5 is wrong because it only uses the part-time branch, simplifying 14/70 to 1/5 and ignoring the full-time cyclists completely. The probability is 41/160.
- (a) 0.55, 58%, 3/5 — Converting all three to decimals: 3/5 = 0.6, 0.55 stays as 0.55, and 58% = 0.58. In order from smallest to largest, this is 0.55, then 58%, then 3/5. Writing the numbers in the reverse order, largest to smallest, gives 3/5, 58%, 0.55. Misconverting 3/5 as 0.5 instead of 0.6 makes it appear smaller than both other values, giving the order 3/5, 0.55, 58%. Misconverting 58% as 0.058 instead of 0.58, by moving the decimal point two extra places, makes it appear smallest of the three, giving the order 58%, 0.55, 3/5.
- (a) −10 — Method: multiply each bracket out, treating the second bracket as being multiplied by −3 because it is subtracted, then collect like terms. Working: 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4 and −3(x + 2) = −3x − 6, so the expression becomes 8x − 4 − 3x − 6 − 5x; the x terms give 8x − 3x − 5x = 0, so no term in x survives, and the numbers give −4 − 6 = −10. Answer: −10. The distractors: 2 comes from expanding −3(x + 2) as −3x + 6, leaving the numbers −4 + 6; 5x − 10 comes from forgetting the final −5x, so the x terms give 8x − 3x = 5x; −7 comes from multiplying the 4 over only the first term of its bracket, giving 8x − 1 and so the numbers −1 − 6.
- (d) 4.7 km — Multiply the map length by the scale factor: 9.4 × 50 000 = 470 000 cm. Convert to kilometres: 470 000 cm = 4700 m = 4.7 km. Converting only to metres and calling the answer 4700 kilometres mistakes metres for kilometres. Misreading the scale as 1 : 5000 instead of 1 : 50 000, 9.4 × 5000 = 47 000 cm = 0.47 km, is ten times too small. Misplacing the decimal point in 9.4 and effectively using 94, 94 × 50 000 = 4 700 000 cm = 47 km, is ten times too big.
- (b) 2 cm — Method: a diameter is made of two radii end to end, so going back from a diameter to a radius undoes that doubling, which gives radius = diameter ÷ 2. Working: the diameter is 4 cm, so the radius is 4 ÷ 2 = 2 cm. Answer: 2 cm. The distractors: 8 cm comes from multiplying by 2 instead of dividing by it, the relationship applied in the wrong direction; 1 cm comes from halving twice, once to reach the radius and then once more as though a second halving were called for; 0.5 cm comes from writing the division upside down as 2 ÷ 4 rather than 4 ÷ 2.
- (a) Fewer than 48,500 people attended — Method: a figure given to the nearest thousand lies within half of 1,000, that is 500, of the figure printed, so the attendance is at least 47,500 and below 48,500. Working: 48,000 − 500 = 47,500 and 48,000 + 500 = 48,500, and an attendance of 48,500 would have been reported as 49,000, so every possible attendance is below 48,500. Answer: Fewer than 48,500 people attended. The distractors: more than 48,500 turns the upper limit of the range into a minimum; fewer than 47,500 uses the lower limit as though it were the upper one; more than 48,000 assumes the printed figure was rounded down, when it could just as well have been rounded up from a smaller attendance.
- (a) x + 3 — Method: "years older" is an addition, and the number of years is added to the age that is known in terms of the letter. Working: Jack's age is x, and Kwame is 3 years older, so Kwame's age is x + 3. Answer: x + 3. The distractors: x − 3 comes from reading "older" as "younger" and subtracting instead of adding; 3x comes from reading "3 years older" as "3 times as old" and multiplying; 3 − x comes from writing the calculation the wrong way round, taking Jack's age from the 3 rather than adding.
- (d) £82.50 — Find the hourly rate: £52.50 ÷ 7 = £7.50 per hour. For 11 hours: 11 × £7.50 = £82.50. £30 comes from working out the pay for only the extra 4 hours (4 × £7.50), and forgetting to include the original £52.50. £99 comes from misremembering the hourly rate as £9 instead of £7.50, then 11 × £9. £56.50 comes from adding the extra number of hours (4) straight onto the pay in pounds (52.5 + 4), confusing hours with pounds.
- (d) 3,200,000 — 1 million = 1,000,000, so 3.2 million = 3.2 × 1,000,000 = 3,200,000. A candidate who moves the decimal point one place too many gets 32,000,000. A candidate who moves it one place too few gets 320,000. A candidate who writes the .2 as extra thousands instead of hundred-thousands gets 3,002,000.
- (b) 1 : 3 — Write the two lengths as a ratio: 5 : 15. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 5, to give 1 : 3. Writing 3 : 1 swaps the order, comparing B to A instead of A to B. Leaving the ratio as 5 : 15 has not been simplified. Finding 1 : 2 comes from comparing the smaller length to the gap between the two lengths (15 − 5 = 10, then wrongly simplifying 5 : 10), not from comparing the two lengths themselves.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.