Sample paper · GCSE Foundation · grades 1–5
GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Foundation qualification — number 25%, algebra 20%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 25%, geometry and measures 15%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 50% / 25% / 25%.
CalculatorGCSE Foundation
Answer key: GCSE Foundation sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5/8 — Method: write the decimal over 1000 using its three decimal places, then simplify. Working: 0.625 = 625/1000 = 5/8 (dividing both numerator and denominator by 125). Answer: 5/8. 25/4 comes from writing the decimal over 100 instead of 1000, as if there were only two decimal places. 31/50 comes from rounding 0.625 to 0.62 before converting. 8/5 comes from simplifying correctly to 5/8 and then writing the fraction upside down.
- (d) x = 7 or x = −7 — Method: take the square root of both sides, remembering a square root can be positive or negative. Since x² = 49, x = √49 or x = −√49, so x = 7 or x = −7. Distractor origins: x = 7 forgets the negative root; x = −7 keeps only the negative root and drops the positive one; x = 24.5 comes from dividing 49 by 2 instead of taking a square root.
- (b) 2.5 hours — Method: when two objects move in opposite directions the gap between them grows at the sum of their speeds, so divide the required gap by that combined rate. Working: 80 + 60 = 140 km of gap each hour, and 350 ÷ 140 = 2.5. Answer: 2.5 hours. The distractors: 17.5 hours comes from subtracting the speeds, 80 − 60 = 20, which is the rate for two cars travelling in the same direction; 5 hours comes from using the mean of the two speeds, 70 km/h, instead of their sum; 4.375 hours comes from dividing 350 by 80 and ignoring the second car altogether.
- (a) 080° — The back bearing differs from the given bearing by 180°. Because 260° is greater than 180°, subtract 180°: 260 − 180 = 80°, so the bearing of A from B is 080°. Choosing 440° adds 180° instead of subtracting it, even though the result would be more than a full turn (260 + 180 = 440). Choosing 180° assumes the back bearing is always exactly 180°, ignoring the original bearing altogether. Choosing 100° comes from measuring the reflex angle the other way round the circle (360 − 260 = 100) instead of applying the 180° back-bearing rule.
- (b) 16 — Method: put the counts into a two-way table, complete the row totals, then subtract along the Year 11 row. Working: there are 60 students altogether and 35 are in Year 10, so the number in Year 11 is 60 − 35 = 25. Of those 25 students, 9 chose a sandwich, so the number who chose a hot meal is 25 − 9 = 16. Answer: 16 Year 11 students chose a hot meal. The distractors: 15 comes from subtracting along the Year 10 row instead, 35 − 20 = 15, which is the number of Year 10 hot meals; 25 is the Year 11 row total, written down before the sandwiches are taken off; 31 comes from working with the sandwich figures for the whole school, 60 − 20 − 9 = 31, which counts the Year 10 hot meals as well.
- (a) Chloe's marks are far more spread out than Ben's — Method: a mean reports where a set of values sits, and two sets can sit in the same place while behaving quite differently, so a measure of spread has to be worked out as well. Working: Ben's marks add to 62 + 64 + 65 + 66 + 68 = 325 and 325 ÷ 5 = 65; Chloe's add to 40 + 52 + 65 + 78 + 90 = 325 and 325 ÷ 5 = 65, so the two means agree, as the question says. The ranges do not: Ben's is 68 − 62 = 6 marks, while Chloe's is 90 − 40 = 50 marks. Ben's five marks all sit within 3 marks of 65; Chloe's lowest is 25 marks below it and her highest 25 marks above it. Answer: Chloe's marks are far more spread out than Ben's, which is exactly what the mean cannot show. The distractors: saying Ben's marks are more spread out comes from subtracting in the order the values are written, 62 − 68 = −6 against 40 − 90 = −50, and then reading −6 as the larger spread; saying Chloe scored far more marks in total assumes a wider set of marks must add to more, when both totals are 325; saying the two sets vary by the same amount assumes that equal means force equal spread, when the two ranges are 6 and 50.
- (c) 12 — Method: a square root asks which positive number multiplied by itself gives the number under the root sign. Working: 11 × 11 = 121, which is too small, and 12 × 12 = 144. Answer: 12. The distractors: 14 comes from recalling the wrong square fact, since 14 × 14 = 196; 36 comes from dividing 144 by 4 instead of taking a square root; 72 comes from halving 144, treating a square root as a halving.
- (c) w/6 — Method: a ÷ b is written as a fraction a/b, with the number being divided (w) on top. Working: w ÷ 6 = w/6. Answer: w/6. 6/w comes from writing the numbers the wrong way round, putting the 6 on top instead of w. 6w comes from reading the ÷ sign as ×, multiplying instead of dividing. w − 6 comes from reading ÷ as −, subtracting instead of dividing.
- (c) 48 mm — Method: extension = k × force, where k = extension ÷ force. Working: k = 12 ÷ 5 = 2.4 mm per N. At 20 N: extension = 2.4 × 20 = 48 mm. Wrong options: 32 mm comes from adding the extension and force numbers instead of scaling (12 + 20); 3 mm comes from treating the relationship as inverse proportion (12 × 5 ÷ 20); 36 mm comes from using an incorrect scale factor of 3 between the forces instead of the correct factor of 4 (20 ÷ 5).
- (a) where the angle bisector meets the posts' perpendicular bisector — Being equidistant from the two walls means lying on the angle bisector of the corner; being equidistant from the two posts means lying on the perpendicular bisector of the 4 m segment joining them. A single point satisfying both conditions is wherever those two loci cross. "where the angle bisector meets the line joining the posts" uses the straight line between the posts instead of its perpendicular bisector — a point on that line is not generally equidistant from both posts. "the perpendicular bisector of the posts, alone" satisfies only the posts condition, ignoring the walls entirely. "the angle bisector of the corner, alone" satisfies only the walls condition, ignoring the posts entirely.
- (b) 1/6 — There are 2 outcomes for the coin and 3 outcomes for the spinner, giving 2 × 3 = 6 equally likely pairs: (H,X), (H,Y), (H,Z), (T,X), (T,Y), (T,Z). Only one of these, (H,Z), matches both conditions, so the probability is 1/6. A candidate who answers 1/3 has listed only the spinner's 3 outcomes and ignored the coin. A candidate who answers 1/2 has considered only the coin and ignored the spinner. A candidate who answers 1/5 has missed one pair when listing the possibility space, treating it as 5 outcomes instead of 6.
- (b) No — their possible jump lengths do not overlap — Method: each recorded jump stands for the lengths within half of 0.1 m, that is 0.05 m, of the figure recorded, and Priya is right only if the two ranges overlap. Working: Priya's jump is at least 3.8 − 0.05 = 3.75 m and below 3.85 m, because a jump of 3.85 m would have been recorded as 3.9 m; Nadia's jump is at least 3.85 m and below 3.9 + 0.05 = 3.95 m. Every length Priya could have jumped is below 3.85 m and every length Nadia could have jumped is at least 3.85 m, so Nadia jumped further whatever the exact lengths were. Answer: No — their possible jump lengths do not overlap. The distractors: the reason that a recorded jump is exactly the length jumped reaches the same verdict by treating a rounded record as exact, which is the idea this question tests; both jumps being 3.85 m would put 3.85 m inside Priya's range, when a jump of that length is recorded as 3.9 m; Priya jumping up to 3.9 m goes a whole 0.1 m above her record instead of half of it.
- (a) x = 3 — Method: factorise x² + 2x − 15 as (x + 5)(x − 3), since 5 × (−3) = −15 and 5 + (−3) = 2. Setting each bracket equal to zero gives x + 5 = 0 or x − 3 = 0, so x = −5 or x = 3. Only x = 3 is offered here. Distractor origins: x = −3 reverses the sign of the factor pair, treating the bracket (x − 3) as giving x = −3 instead of x = 3; x = 5 takes the number from the other factor, (x + 5), but with the wrong sign, giving x = 5 instead of x = −5; x = 15 takes the constant term of the original expression as if it were a root, without factorising at all.
- (b) 7980 — After the first year: 8000 × 0.95 = 7600. After the second year: 7600 × 1.05 = 7980. 8000 comes from assuming a 5% decrease followed by a 5% increase returns exactly to the starting number — it does not, because the increase acts on the smaller, already-reduced number. 8400 comes from applying only the second year's 5% increase to the original number: 8000 × 1.05 = 8400. 7600 comes from applying only the first year's 5% decrease and stopping there, without applying the second year's increase.
- (b) 5 m — Method: the brace, the width and the height form a right-angled triangle in which the brace faces the right angle, so it is the hypotenuse and Pythagoras' theorem applies, a² + b² = c². Working: c² = 3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25, so c = √25 = 5. Answer: 5 m. The distractors: 7 m comes from adding the two sides, 3 + 4, instead of adding their squares; 25 m comes from stopping at c² = 25 and forgetting to take the square root; 12 m comes from multiplying 3 × 4, which gives the area of the gate in square metres and not a length across it.
- (c) 3 : 5 — The club is 8 equal shares and the girls take 3 of them, so the boys take 8 − 3 = 5 shares. A ratio compares one part with the other part, so girls : boys = 3 : 5. Writing 3 : 8 compares the girls with the whole club rather than with the boys, 5 : 3 puts the two parts in the wrong order, and 8 : 3 compares the whole club with the girls.
- (b) £47, and T=15+8h is a formula (relates T and h). — The charge is £15 fixed plus £8 for each hour: T=15+8h, so for h=4, T=15+8×4=15+32=47. Because T=15+8h relates two different quantities, the total charge T and the number of hours h, it is a formula, not an equation — an equation is solved for one particular value of an unknown, but this relationship holds for every value of h a job might last. A candidate who forgets to include the fixed £15 fee would compute only 8×4=32. A candidate who adds the three numbers in the formula together instead of multiplying the hourly rate by the number of hours would compute 15+8+4=27. A candidate who correctly finds the charge but mistakes the formula for an equation, treating it as something to be solved for one specific value of h rather than a general relationship between T and h, would pick the correct charge with the wrong classification.
- (a) 1/9 — The ratio copper : tin is 9:1, so write tin over copper: 1/9. (9/1 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, copper over tin. 1/10 comes from comparing the tin to the total mass of the alloy, 1 part out of 10. 9/10 comes from comparing the copper to the total mass of the alloy, 9 parts out of 10.)
- (b) 24 — List multiples of 8 and of 12: multiples of 8 are 8, 16, 24, 32; multiples of 12 are 12, 24, 36. The lowest number in both lists is 24, so the lighthouses next flash together after 24 minutes. Multiplying the two numbers together, 8 × 12, gives 96, which double-counts the common factor of 4 shared by 8 and 12. Working out the highest common factor instead of the lowest common multiple gives 4, far too soon a time for both lighthouses to line up again. Adding the two numbers, 8 + 12, gives 20, which is not even a multiple of either 8 or 12. So the lighthouses next flash together after 24 minutes.
- (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 5 questions (25% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.