Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 1/3 — To subtract these fractions, first write 3/4 with a denominator of 12: 3/4 = 9/12. Then 9/12 − 5/12 = 4/12, which simplifies to 1/3. Subtracting the numerators and the denominators separately, (3 − 5)/(4 − 12), gives −2/−8, which simplifies to 1/4. Changing 3/4 to twelfths by only changing the denominator, without scaling the numerator to match, gives 3/12 − 5/12 = −2/12, which simplifies to −1/6. Adding the fractions instead of subtracting them, 9/12 + 5/12, gives 14/12, which simplifies to 7/6.
- (b) 5 — Set n² + 4n = 45, so n² + 4n − 45 = 0. This factorises as (n + 9)(n − 5) = 0, giving n = −9 or n = 5. Since a term number must be positive, n = 5. Taking the magnitude of the rejected negative solution, 9, instead of discarding it, gives 9. Dividing 45 by the coefficient of n and ignoring the n² term entirely, 45 ÷ 4 = 11.25, rounded to the nearest whole number, gives 11. Dropping the linear term 4n and solving n² = 45 instead, the nearest whole number to √45 = 6.708 is 7.
- (c) 24p — Method: change the price to pence, then find what one tenth of 1 kg costs, since 100 g is one tenth of 1 kg. Working: £2.40 = 240p per kg, and 240 ÷ 10 = 24p per 100 g. So the cost is 24p per 100 g. Distractor 2.4p comes from dividing by 100 instead of 10. Distractor 2400p comes from multiplying by 10 instead of dividing. Distractor 240p comes from using the price per kg without scaling it down to 100 g.
- (d) 1.1 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length, then convert to the units asked for. Working: 4.4 cm × 25 = 110 cm = 1.1 m. A student who answers 4.4 has forgotten to use the scale at all. A student who answers 110 has correctly worked out the real length in centimetres but forgotten to convert it to metres. A student who answers 11 has used a scale factor of 2.5 instead of 25 by misreading the scale. Answer: 1.1 m.
- (b) 12/19 — Method: turn the percentages into expected frequencies out of 1000, total the faulty pens, then divide supplier Y's faulty pens by that total, because the pen picked is known to be faulty. Working: supplier X provided 700 pens and 2% of them are faulty, which is 14 pens. Supplier Y provided 300 pens and 8% of them are faulty, which is 24 pens. Altogether 38 pens are faulty, so the probability is 24/38, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 gives 12/19. Answer: the probability is 12/19. The distractors: 3/10 is supplier Y's share of the stock, the answer before the faulty information is used at all; 3/125 is 24/1000, the probability that a pen is from supplier Y and faulty, which stops at the joint probability and never divides by the probability of a fault; 4/5 is 8 divided by 2 + 8, comparing the two fault rates as though the suppliers provided equal numbers of pens, so the 70 to 30 split is thrown away.
- (a) Equal means; Class A is more consistent, smaller range. — Method: when two data sets share a measure of location, compare a measure of spread to say more about consistency. Working: both classes have the same mean mark, 14, so on average they performed equally well. Class A has the smaller range, 6, so its marks are more tightly grouped around 14 than Class B's marks, which vary by as much as 14. So Class A's marks were more consistent, even though neither class did better on average. Saying Class B did better because it has the bigger range confuses a wide spread with a high score — a big range describes variability, not performance. Saying Class A did better because it has the smaller range makes the same mistake in the other direction: the two classes are tied on the mean, so neither one 'did better'. Saying the classes cannot be compared because their means are equal misses the whole point of also comparing the range. Always compare both an average AND a spread before describing two data sets — either one alone tells only half the story.
- (b) 400 — Method: round each number to the nearest 100, then subtract the rounded values. Working: 812 rounds to 800 (nearest 100) and 397 rounds to 400 (nearest 100). 800 − 400 = 400. Answer: 400. 500 comes from rounding 397 down to 300 instead of up to the nearest 100, 400. 300 comes from rounding 812 down to 700 instead of up to the nearest 100, 800. 415 is the exact value of 812 − 397, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate — the spreadsheet's answer of 315 is too far from the estimate of 400 to be correct.
- (d) It is n-shaped, since the x² coefficient is negative. — The coefficient of x² is −2, which is negative, so the quadratic curve opens downward — shaped like an n, with a maximum turning point. Saying it is U-shaped focuses only on x² being non-negative and ignores that the −2 in front of it flips the whole curve to open downward. Saying it is a straight line confuses having a constant term with being linear — any equation with an x² term is a curve, not a line. Saying it repeatedly rises and falls like a wave describes a trigonometric graph such as y = sin x, not a quadratic.
- (b) −1% — Method: write each change as a multiplier and multiply them. A 10% fall is × 0.9 and a 10% rise is × 1.1. Working: 0.9 × 1.1 = 0.99, so the final price is 99% of the original, which is 1% less. Answer: an overall change of −1%. The distractors: 0% comes from assuming a 10% fall and a 10% rise cancel — they do not, because the rise is 10% of a smaller amount; +1% has the size right but the sign wrong, from reading the multiplier 0.99 as 1% above 1 instead of 1% below it; −2% comes from finding the 1% fall and then counting it once for each of the two changes.
- (b) 2 500 000 cm³ — Method: a volume conversion uses the length factor three times, once for each dimension. Working: 1 m = 100 cm, so a cube of side 1 m is a cube of side 100 cm, and 100 × 100 × 100 = 1 000 000, giving 1 m³ = 1 000 000 cm³. Then 2.5 × 1 000 000 = 2 500 000. Answer: 2 500 000 cm³. Using the plain length factor 100 gives 250 cm³. Using 1000, which is the factor that turns cubic metres into litres, gives 2500 cm³. Using 10 000, which is the factor that belongs to square metres and square centimetres, gives 25 000 cm³.
- (d) 75% — Method: count how many cards are not hearts, write that count over the total number of cards, cancel the fraction down and then turn it into a percentage. Working: 52 − 13 = 39 cards are not hearts, so the probability is 39/52; dividing the numerator and the denominator by 13 gives 3/4, and 3/4 = 0.75, so 0.75 × 100 = 75. Answer: 75%, three quarters of the way along the 0 to 1 scale. The distractors: 25% comes from giving the probability that the card is a heart, 13 out of 52, which cancels to 1/4; 50% comes from reading 'not a heart' as 'not a red card' and halving the pack; 39% comes from writing the count of 39 cards straight down as the percentage without comparing it with the 52 cards in the pack.
- (b) (2 + 3) × 5 − 1 — 2 + 3 = 5, then 5 × 5 = 25, then 25 − 1 = 24, so the brackets belong around 2 + 3. Placing them around 5 − 1 instead gives 5 − 1 = 4, then 3 × 4 = 12, then 2 + 12 = 14. Leaving the multiplication bracketed instead changes nothing, because it already had priority: 3 × 5 = 15, then 2 + 15 = 17, then 17 − 1 = 16. Bracketing both 2 + 3 and 5 − 1 uses two pairs instead of the one asked for: 2 + 3 = 5, 5 − 1 = 4, then 5 × 4 = 20.
- (a) It is 2(w + (w + 3)) = 4w + 6, not 2w + 3. — The perimeter of a rectangle is twice the width plus twice the length: 2 × w + 2 × (w + 3) = 2w + 2w + 6 = 4w + 6, so the gardener's 2w + 3 is wrong. Writing w + (w + 3) = 2w + 3 forgets to double the sides at all, only adding one width and one length once. Writing 4(w + 3) = 4w + 12 wrongly treats all four sides as equal to the length, as if the garden were a square. Writing 3w + 6 comes from doubling the length correctly but adding the width only once instead of doubling it too.
- (a) 4 days — Method: the fence is a fixed amount of work, so builders × days is constant; find that product and divide it by the new number of builders. Working: 3 × 12 = 36 builder-days of work, so with 9 builders the time is 36 ÷ 9 = 4 days. Answer: 4 days. The distractors: 6 days comes from halving the 12 days because there are more builders, rather than dividing by the factor of 3 by which the workforce has grown; 36 days is the constant product of builders and days, given as a number of days instead of being shared between the builders; 9 days comes from taking 3 days off the 12, treating three extra builders as three fewer days, which is additive rather than proportional.
- (a) Reflect in the x-axis, then translate by (0, 7). — Reflecting in the x-axis sends (x, y) to (x, −y); applied to S's vertices (2, 2), (5, 2) and (2, 5) this gives (2, −2), (5, −2) and (2, −5). Translating this image by the vector (0, 7) adds 7 to every y-coordinate, giving (2, 5), (5, 5) and (2, 2), which matches S′ exactly. Using the correct reflection but translating by (7, 0) instead moves the image sideways rather than upwards, giving (9, −2), (12, −2) and (9, −5) — nowhere near S′. Reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate rather than the y-coordinate, so translating that image by (0, 7) gives (−2, 9), (−5, 9) and (−2, 12), the wrong shape entirely. Rotating 180° about the origin instead of reflecting sends every coordinate to its negative, so translating by (0, 7) gives (−2, 5), (−5, 5) and (−2, 2) — the y-coordinates match S′ but the x-coordinates do not.
- (b) £2.00 — Subtracting the second equation from the first eliminates the pastries: (3c + 2p) − (2c + 2p) = 9.60 − 7.60, so c = 2.00. A candidate who divides the first total by the number of coffees alone, ignoring the pastries, would get 9.60 ÷ 3 = £3.20. A candidate who finds the price of a pastry instead of a coffee — using c = 2.00 in 2c + 2p = 7.60 to get p = 1.80 — would answer £1.80. A candidate who reaches the correct difference of £2.00 but then mistakenly divides again or misplaces the decimal point would get £0.20.
- (d) 400 — The area scale factor is the length scale factor squared: 20² = 400, so the real car's surface area is 400 times the model's. 20 comes from using the length scale factor itself, without squaring it. 8000 comes from cubing the length scale factor (20³), instead of squaring it — cubing is the rule for volume, not area. 40 comes from doubling the length scale factor (2 × 20), instead of squaring it.
- (c) 5 hours — The distance from the origin to (7, 24) is √(7² + 24²) = √(49 + 576) = √625 = 25 km. Travelling at 5 km per hour, the time taken is 25 ÷ 5 = 5 hours. 25 hours mistakes the distance itself for the time, forgetting to divide by the speed. 125 hours comes from multiplying the distance by the speed, 25 × 5, instead of dividing. 0.2 hours comes from dividing the speed by the distance, 5 ÷ 25, the wrong way round.
- (d) (x − 7)² + 1 is at least 1 for every x, so y is never 0 — x² − 14x + 50 = (x − 7)² − 7² + 50 = (x − 7)² + 1. Since a squared term can never be negative, (x − 7)² ≥ 0 for every real x, so y = (x − 7)² + 1 ≥ 1 for every x — y is always at least 1, so it can never equal 0, and the curve never crosses the x-axis. Claiming the discriminant is positive is wrong on the facts: b² − 4ac = (−14)² − 4(1)(50) = 196 − 200 = −4, which is NEGATIVE, not positive — a negative discriminant is in fact the standard reason a quadratic has no real roots, so this option misstates its own sign. Claiming the turning point is at (7, −1) is wrong because completing the square gives (x − 7)² + 1, so the turning point is (7, 1) — the constant is +1, not −1, and a point with a negative y-coordinate would sit BELOW the x-axis, not above it, contradicting the option's own claim. Claiming that 50 being positive is enough is wrong because it ignores the −14x term completely — a positive constant term alone does not guarantee y stays positive for every x (the expression still dips down towards its turning point before growing again, and it is the completed square that shows how far it dips, not the constant on its own).
- (a) n² + 4n + 4 — The whole patio-plus-border square has side length (n + 2), so the total is (n + 2)². Expanding this bracket correctly gives n² + 4n + 4, which matches 9, 16, 25, 36 for n = 1, 2, 3, 4. Expanding (n + 2)² by squaring each term separately, as if (a + b)² = a² + b², gives n² + 4, which is already wrong at n = 1 (it gives 5, not 9). Multiplying out (n + 2)(n + 2) as n² + 2n + 2n but forgetting the final 2 × 2 gives n² + 4n, which is 5 short at every value of n. Counting the patio twice — once as the n² inner square and again inside the (n + 2)² total — gives n² + (n² + 4n + 4) = 2n² + 4n + 4.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.