Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) An under-estimate, by 8 — Method: work out the exact product, then compare it with the estimate; an estimate that is smaller than the exact value is an under-estimate, and the difference between them is the size of the error. Working: 48 × 21 = 48 × 20 + 48 = 960 + 48 = 1,008, and 1,008 − 1,000 = 8, so the estimate falls short. Answer: an under-estimate, by 8. The distractors: an over-estimate by 8 has the size of the error right but the direction wrong, and comes from assuming that rounding 48 up to 50 must push the estimate above the exact value, without allowing for 21 being rounded down; an over-estimate by 19 comes from working out 48 × 21 as 48 × 20 + 21 = 981, adding a 21 where another 48 belongs; the claim that the estimate is exactly right comes from arguing that one number was rounded up and the other down, so the two changes must cancel.
- (b) 12 — Method: substitute the total cost into the formula, then subtract the fixed cost and divide by the cost per person. Working: 92 = 6p + 20, so 6p = 92 − 20 = 72, p = 72 ÷ 6 = 12. Answer: 12 people. 15.33 comes from dividing the whole £92 by £6 without first subtracting the £20 fixed cost: 92 ÷ 6 ≈ 15.33. 4.3 comes from swapping the two amounts round, subtracting £6 and dividing by £20: (92 − 6) ÷ 20 = 4.3. 18.67 comes from adding the fixed cost instead of subtracting it: (92 + 20) ÷ 6 ≈ 18.67.
- (d) £270 — Method: the £90 is a difference between two shares, so turn it into a number of parts before finding the value of one part. Working: the largest share is 3 parts and the smallest is 1 part, so the difference is 3 − 1 = 2 parts and 2 parts are worth £90; one part = £90 ÷ 2 = £45; the whole amount is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 parts, so 6 × £45 = £270. Answer: £270. The distractors: £540 comes from treating the £90 as the value of one part and multiplying it by the 6 parts; £180 comes from finding the £45 correctly but adding only the 1-part and 3-part shares and forgetting the middle share; £135 comes from multiplying £45 by 3 and giving the largest share instead of the total.
- (a) (4, −4) — A point is invariant under a reflection only if it lies exactly on the mirror line. The line y = −x consists of every point where the y-coordinate is the negative of the x-coordinate: (4, −4) satisfies this, since −4 = −(4), so it is invariant. (5, 5) lies on the line y = x, a different line altogether, not y = −x. (4, 4) has equal coordinates, but that alone does not put it on y = −x; it would need y = −4, not 4. (−4, −4) also has equal coordinates and lies on y = x, not y = −x — its coordinates would need opposite signs to sit on the given mirror line. Only a point whose coordinates are negatives of each other stays fixed under this reflection.
- (c) 0.2 — Let P(green) = x, so P(blue) = 2x. Red, blue, green and yellow are exhaustive: 0.05 + 0.35 + x + 2x = 1, so 0.4 + 3x = 1, giving 3x = 0.6 and x = 0.2. So P(green) = 0.2. Splitting the remaining 0.6 evenly between blue and green, ignoring the 2:1 ratio, gives 0.3. Working out x correctly but then reporting 2x, the probability of blue, gives 0.4. Stopping after finding that blue and green together account for 0.6, without dividing by the three equal shares of x, gives 0.6.
- (a) 1,400 and 1,240, so combine the samples for one estimate — Method: scale each sample up to the whole stock, then use the fact that a larger sample gives a more reliable estimate than a smaller one. Working: the first sample gives 35 ÷ 50 = 0.7 and 0.7 × 2,000 = 1,400 paperbacks; the second gives 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62 and 0.62 × 2,000 = 1,240 paperbacks. Two random samples of the same size are expected to differ a little, so neither estimate is wrong. Putting the two together gives 35 + 31 = 66 paperbacks in 100 books, and 66 ÷ 100 = 0.66 with 0.66 × 2,000 = 1,320, an estimate resting on twice as many books as either volunteer checked. Answer: 1,400 and 1,240, so combine the samples for one estimate. The distractors: keeping 1,400 because it is larger picks an estimate by its size, when both samples held 50 books and neither has a stronger claim; saying a volunteer must have miscounted assumes two random samples ought to agree exactly, which is precisely what random sampling does not promise; 1,750 and 1,550 come from 35 × 50 = 1,750 and 31 × 50 = 1,550, multiplying each count by the size of the sample instead of scaling by 2,000 ÷ 50.
- (a) 6 × 10² metres — Method: distance = speed × time, so multiply the coefficients and add the indices. Working: 3 × 2 = 6 for the coefficients, and 8 + (−6) = 2 for the indices; 6 lies between 1 and 10, so the coefficient needs no adjustment. Answer: 6 × 10² metres, which is 600 metres. The distractors: 5 × 10² metres comes from adding the coefficients, 3 + 2, instead of multiplying them; 6 × 10¹⁴ metres comes from subtracting the indices, 8 − (−6), which is the rule for dividing rather than for multiplying; 6 × 10⁻⁴⁸ metres comes from multiplying the indices, 8 × (−6), instead of adding them.
- (c) x = 0, y = 3 and x = 3, y = 0 — Substitute y = 3 − x into x² + y² = 9: x² + (3 − x)² = 9. Expanding (3 − x)² = 9 − 6x + x² gives x² + 9 − 6x + x² = 9, which simplifies to 2x² − 6x = 0, or 2x(x − 3) = 0, so x = 0 or x = 3. Using y = 3 − x: x = 0 gives y = 3; x = 3 gives y = 0. Distractor routes: x = 0, y = 3 alone stops after the factor 2x = 0 and never checks the second factor, x − 3 = 0. x = 0, y = 3 and x = −3, y = 6 comes from factorising 2x² − 6x as 2x(x + 3), a sign error that gives a second root of −3 instead of 3. x = 0, y = 3 and x = 6, y = −3 comes from expanding (3 − x)² as 9 − 6x, dropping the x² term, which changes the quadratic to x² − 6x = 0 and its second root to 6.
- (c) 16 cm — Corresponding sides of similar triangles are all in the same ratio. Use the pair whose lengths are both known: the scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is 12 ÷ 6 = 2. Since QR corresponds to BC, multiply BC by that scale factor: 8 × 2 = 16, so QR = 16 cm.
- (a) the lens-shaped region where the two circles overlap — The region within 30 km of the ship is a circle of radius 30 km around the ship; the region within 20 km of the lighthouse is a circle of radius 20 km around the lighthouse. Since 30 + 20 = 50 km is more than the 40 km between them, and 30 − 20 = 10 km is less than 40 km, the two circles genuinely overlap, in a lens-shaped region where both conditions hold at once. "the whole smaller circle, since it fits inside the larger one" would only be true if the 40 km distance between the centres were small enough for one circle to swallow the other, which it is not here. "no overlap — 30 km and 20 km don't add to 40 km" wrongly assumes the two radii must add up to exactly the distance between the centres for an overlap to exist; any total greater than that distance is enough. "a straight strip, exactly halfway between the two" confuses this with an equidistant locus, which is a different problem from the one asked here.
- (d) 12/17 — Method: the person picked is known to have passed, so the sample space is everyone who passed; divide the course takers who passed by that total. Working: 120 course takers and 50 others passed, so 170 people passed. The course takers who passed give 120/170, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 10 gives 12/17. Answer: the probability is 12/17. The distractors: 4/5 is 120/150, the probability that someone passed given that they took the course, which reverses the condition and the event; 12/25 is 120/250, dividing by everyone who sat the test rather than by the 170 who passed; 17/25 is 170/250, the probability that a person picked from everyone sitting the test passed, which answers a different question altogether.
- (c) 2700 cm² — Convert both lengths to the same unit before multiplying: 0.6 m = 60 cm. The area is 45 × 60 = 2700 cm². Multiplying without converting 0.6 m to centimetres at all, treating it as 0.6 cm, gives 45 × 0.6 = 27 cm². Converting 0.6 m to centimetres by multiplying by 10 instead of 100 gives 6 cm, and 45 × 6 = 270 cm². Converting 0.6 m to centimetres by multiplying by 1000 instead of 100 gives 600 cm, and 45 × 600 = 27000 cm².
- (b) 2n + 3 — Method: multiply the cost per mile by the number of miles to get an expression, then add the fixed fee as a separate term. Working: n miles at £2 each is 2n; add the £3 fixed fee: 2n + 3. Answer: 2n + 3. 3n + 2 comes from swapping the fee and the rate round, treating £3 as the rate per mile and £2 as the fixed fee. 5n comes from adding the fee and the rate together first (3 + 2 = 5) and multiplying the result by n, instead of keeping the fixed fee as its own term. 2n − 3 comes from subtracting the fixed fee instead of adding it.
- (d) 1.00 litres — Squash is 2/9 of the mixture, so the squash volume is 4.5 × 2/9 = 1.00 litres. Using the water's fraction, 7/9, instead of squash's gives 4.5 × 7/9 = 3.50 litres — the volume of water, not squash. Dividing 4.5 by 9 but forgetting to multiply by the numerator 2 gives 4.5 ÷ 9 = 0.50 litres, which is only 1/9 of the mixture. Halving the total volume instead of applying the fraction 2/9 gives 4.5 ÷ 2 = 2.25 litres, which assumes the mixture is half squash.
- (b) Neither, because both coordinates differ — A line segment is horizontal only when both points share the same y-coordinate, and vertical only when both points share the same x-coordinate. Here A has x-coordinate −4 and B has x-coordinate 2, which differ, and A has y-coordinate 3 and B has y-coordinate 6, which also differ, so the segment is neither horizontal nor vertical. Every point has a y-coordinate and an x-coordinate, so simply having one is not a reason for the line to be horizontal or vertical — both of those wrong reasons ignore that the coordinates must match, not just exist. The x-coordinates do increase from A to B, but an increasing x-coordinate on its own describes a slope, not a horizontal line.
- (a) Overestimates — trapezium edges lie above the curve. — For a concave-up curve, each chord connecting two points on the curve lies ABOVE the curve between those points, because the curve bends away from the chord underneath it. The trapezium rule uses these chords as the top edges of each trapezium, so the trapeziums cover a larger region than the true area under the curve — the estimate is an overestimate. Saying it underestimates because the edges lie below the curve gets the direction backwards: for a concave-up curve the edges lie above, not below. Saying it overestimates 'because more strips always increase it' gives the right verdict for the wrong reason — using MORE, narrower strips makes a trapezium estimate more accurate and brings it closer to the true area, it does not simply increase the total. Saying the estimate is exact ignores that straight edges cannot follow a curved line perfectly; there is always a gap between the chord and the curve on a bend, which is exactly what makes the rule an estimate rather than an exact calculation.
- (a) 1000m — Method: kilograms are a smaller unit than tonnes, so change tonnes into kilograms by multiplying by 1000. Working: m tonnes = m × 1000 kg = 1000m kg. So the expression is 1000m. Distractor m/1000 comes from dividing by 1000 instead of multiplying, which would make the number of kilograms smaller than the number of tonnes, the wrong way round. Distractor 1000 + m comes from adding the conversion factor instead of multiplying by it. Distractor m − 1000 comes from subtracting the conversion factor instead of multiplying by it.
- (a) 2.40m — Method: a cost found from a rate is the rate multiplied by the amount bought. Working: the rate is £2.40 per kilogram and the amount is m kilograms, so the cost is 2.40 × m. Answer: 2.40m. A candidate who divides the amount by the rate instead of multiplying writes m/2.40. A candidate who adds the rate to the amount instead of multiplying writes 2.40 + m. A candidate who subtracts the rate from the amount instead of multiplying writes m − 2.40.
- (b) x² + y² = 1369 — For a circle centred at the origin, the radius squared equals the sum of the squares of the coordinates of any point on it: r² = 12² + 35² = 144 + 1225 = 1369. The equation is x² + y² = 1369. x² + y² = 2209 comes from adding the coordinates first and then squaring the sum: (12 + 35)² = 47² = 2209, instead of squaring each coordinate separately. x² + y² = 1225 comes from using only 35² and leaving out the 12² term. x² + y² = 144 comes from using only 12² and leaving out the 35² term.
- (d) −11/60 — The radius from the origin to (11, 60) has gradient 60/11. The tangent is perpendicular to this radius, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal: −1 ÷ (60/11) = −11/60. Choosing 60/11 uses the radius's gradient unchanged, without applying perpendicularity. Choosing −60/11 negates the radius's gradient but forgets to take its reciprocal. Choosing 11/60 takes the reciprocal correctly but keeps the gradient positive instead of negative.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.