Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 5/27 — Method: multiply the numerators together and the denominators together, then simplify. Working: (5 × 2)/(6 × 9) = 10/54 = 5/27. Answer: 5/27. 7/15 comes from adding the fractions instead of multiplying: (5+2)/(6+9) = 7/15. 15/4 comes from flipping the second fraction, as if dividing: (5 × 9)/(6 × 2) = 45/12 = 15/4. 5/3 comes from cancelling the two denominators against each other, dividing both 6 and 9 by 3 to leave 5/2 × 2/3 = 10/6 = 5/3; cancelling is only valid between a numerator and a denominator, never between two denominators.
- (a) x > 4 — Subtract 2x from both sides: 3x − 3 > 9. Add 3 to both sides: 3x > 12. Divide both sides by 3: x > 4. A candidate who subtracts 3 from 9 instead of adding gets 3x > 6, so x > 2. A candidate who divides correctly but wrongly flips the inequality (as if dividing by a negative) gets x < 4. A candidate who multiplies by 3 instead of dividing gets x > 36.
- (b) t = 5 and t = 7 (closest, evenly spaced) — To estimate the instantaneous rate of change at t = 6, use the chord centred on t = 6 with the closest readings on either side, t = 5 and t = 7. The gradient of this chord is 15.4 − 17.5 = −2.1, then −2.1 ÷ 2 = −1.05 cm per minute. The interval t = 3 to t = 9 is also centred on t = 6 but is wider: 13.4 − 18.7 = −5.3, then −5.3 ÷ 6 ≈ −0.88 cm per minute — this brings in more of the curve's own change in steepness, so it is a worse estimate of the rate at the single instant t = 6. Using t = 6 and t = 7 only gives 15.4 − 16.6 = −1.2, then −1.2 ÷ 1 = −1.2 cm per minute, but this is not centred on t = 6 — it estimates the rate over (6, 7), not at t = 6 itself. Using t = 0 and t = 6 gives 16.6 − 20.0 = −3.4, then −3.4 ÷ 6 ≈ −0.57 cm per minute, the average rate for the whole first six minutes, not the rate at the instant t = 6. Always choose the chord that brackets the point as closely as possible.
- (a) 90° clockwise about (0, 0) — Two reflections in lines through a common point compose to a single rotation about that point, through an angle equal to twice the angle between the two lines, in the direction from the first line to the second. The line y = x makes a 45° angle with the line y = 0, so the resulting rotation turns through 2 × 45° = 90°; testing the point (1, 0) — which reflects to (0, 1) in y = x, then to (0, −1) in y = 0 — shows the turn is clockwise, about the origin where the two lines cross. Taking the rotation anticlockwise instead reverses the direction the two reflections actually compose in. Using 45° directly, without doubling the angle between the lines, gives an angle equal to only half the true rotation. Treating any pair of reflecting lines as perpendicular, and so always giving a 180° rotation, ignores that these two lines actually meet at 45°, not 90°.
- (a) 195 — The relative frequency from the trial is 52 ÷ 80 = 0.65, and the expected number of point-up landings in 300 drops is 0.65 × 300 = 195. Giving 52 as the answer reuses the original count from the 80-drop trial without scaling it up to 300 drops at all. Misreading 52 out of 80 as 52% and finding 52% of 300 gives 156. Finding the expected number of point-DOWN landings instead of point-up, using the relative frequency 28 ÷ 80 = 0.35, gives 0.35 × 300 = 105.
- (c) 156 cm — Method: to combine two groups' means, multiply each group's mean by its own number of pupils, add the two totals together, then divide by the total number of pupils in both groups. Working: 20 × 150 = 3,000 cm for the boys and 10 × 168 = 1,680 cm for the girls, giving a combined total of 3,000 + 1,680 = 4,680 cm. Dividing by all 30 pupils gives 4,680 ÷ 30 = 156 cm. Giving 159 cm averages the two means, (150 + 168) ÷ 2, treating the two groups as if they had the same number of pupils, when there are twice as many boys as girls. Giving 4,680 cm finds the correct combined total height but stops there, forgetting the final division by the 30 pupils. Giving 234 cm divides the combined total by 20, the number of boys only, forgetting that the total also includes the 10 girls. Always weight each mean by its own group size, and always divide by the TOTAL number of pupils in both groups combined.
- (d) 360 km — Method: first find the kilometres per litre by dividing distance by fuel used, then multiply this rate by the new tank size. Working: 180 ÷ 6 = 30 km per litre; 30 × 12 = 360 km. Answer: 360 km. 30 km comes from finding the correct fuel consumption but stopping there, without scaling it up to the full tank. 2160 km comes from multiplying the original distance (180) by the tank size (12) directly, skipping the unit rate. 90 km comes from pairing the numbers the wrong way round: dividing the distance by the new tank size, 180 ÷ 12 = 15, and then multiplying by the original 6 litres, 15 × 6 = 90.
- (b) (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) — To subtract these fractions, write them over the common denominator (x − 1)(x + 3): the numerator becomes 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1). Expanding gives 4x + 12 − 2x + 2, which simplifies to 2x + 14, so the answer is (2x + 14)/((x − 1)(x + 3)). Writing (2x + 11)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from not distributing the minus sign fully across the second bracket, treating −2(x − 1) as −2x − 1 instead of −2x + 2. Writing 2/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from subtracting the two original numerators directly, 4 − 2 = 2, the same mistake as subtracting fractions without a common denominator. Writing (2x − 10)/((x − 1)(x + 3)) comes from swapping which numerator multiplies which bracket, forming 4(x − 1) − 2(x + 3) instead of 4(x + 3) − 2(x − 1).
- (c) 5 : 9 — Write the ratio mass : cost = 3 : 5.4. Multiply both parts by 10 to clear the decimal: 30 : 54. Both numbers share a factor of 6, so 30 ÷ 6 = 5 and 54 ÷ 6 = 9, giving 5 : 9. 3 : 5 comes from ignoring the decimal point and treating £5.40 as £5. 9 : 5 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, cost to mass instead of mass to cost. 1 : 18 comes from multiplying only the cost by 10 instead of both parts, giving 3 : 54, and then cancelling that correctly to 1 : 18 — the cancelling is fine, but the ratio being cancelled is not the right one.
- (a) (5, 4) — Method: find the vector from the centre to the point, multiply it by the scale factor, then add the result back to the centre. Working: the vector from (2, 4) to (8, 4) is (6, 0); multiplying by 1/2 gives (3, 0); adding this to the centre (2, 4) gives (5, 4). Options: (4, 2) comes from multiplying the original coordinates by 1/2 directly, ignoring the centre of enlargement; (14, 4) comes from using a scale factor of 2 instead of 1/2, giving (2, 4) + 2×(6, 0) = (14, 4); (8, 2) comes from halving only the y-coordinate and leaving the x-coordinate unchanged. Answer: (5, 4).
- (b) 57/100 — Pooling both trials: total heads = 24 + 33 = 57, total flips = 40 + 60 = 100, so the combined relative frequency is 57/100, which is already in its simplest form since 57 and 100 share no common factor. Averaging the two separate relative frequencies instead, (24/40 + 33/60) ÷ 2 = (0.6 + 0.55) ÷ 2 = 0.575 = 23/40, treats the two trials as equally weighted even though Ben made more flips, which is not correct. Using only Leah's data gives 24/40 = 3/5. Using only Ben's data gives 33/60 = 11/20.
- (d) 0.024 cm — Method: significant figures are counted from the first non-zero digit; the zeros in front of it only fix the place value and are not significant. Working: in 0.02384 the first significant figure is 2 and the second is 3, so the rounding is decided by the next digit, 8. As 8 is 5 or more, the second significant figure goes up from 3 to 4, in the same place value. Answer: 0.024 cm. The distractors: 0.023 cm comes from chopping the 84 off instead of rounding it; 0.02 cm comes from counting the leading zeros as significant figures, so the 2 is taken as the second figure and the rounding stops there; 0.0238 cm is 0.02384 correct to 3 significant figures, one figure too many.
- (c) 2 < x < 3 — Factorise x² − 5x + 6 = (x − 2)(x − 3), giving roots x = 2 and x = 3. Since the coefficient of x² is positive, the graph is a U-shape that dips below the x-axis between its roots. So x² − 5x + 6 < 0 for 2 < x < 3. Distractor routes: x < 2 or x > 3 takes the region OUTSIDE the roots, where the graph is above the x-axis, the opposite of what is wanted. 2 ≤ x ≤ 3 uses ≤ instead of the strict < the question asks for, wrongly including the roots themselves, where the expression equals zero, not less than zero. −3 < x < −2 comes from factorising as (x + 2)(x + 3), reversing the sign of both roots.
- (c) The tangent is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. — Method: at any point where a distance–time graph is momentarily neither increasing nor decreasing, the tangent to the graph at that point is horizontal, and the gradient of a horizontal line is 0 — this is the instantaneous rate of change at that instant. Working: since the hiker's distance is neither increasing nor decreasing at t = 45 minutes, the tangent there is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. Claiming the tangent is vertical, with an undefined gradient, is the opposite of what the stem says: a vertical tangent would mean the distance was changing infinitely fast at that instant, not that it had stopped changing, and on a distance–time graph it cannot happen at all. Reading the gradient as 45, the time value given in the stem, mistakes a value used to LOCATE the point for the rate of change AT that point. Claiming the gradient cannot be found without also knowing the distance at t = 45 minutes overlooks that 'momentarily stationary' already tells you the rate of change directly, without needing to read any distance value at all. Whenever a stem tells you a quantity is momentarily not changing, that is telling you the instantaneous rate of change directly — it is 0, and no further data is needed to find it.
- (d) (1/2)a + (1/2)c — Method: X is the midpoint of AC, so OX = OA + (1/2)AC, with AC = c − a. Working: OX = a + 1/2(c − a) = a − (1/2)a + (1/2)c = (1/2)a + (1/2)c. Answer: OX = (1/2)a + (1/2)c. Since OB = a + c, this is exactly half of OB, so OX = (1/2)OB, meaning X lies on OB at its midpoint too — the two diagonals bisect each other. Forgetting to halve AC at all gives a + c, which is OB itself, not its midpoint; halving only the c-term gives (1/2)a + c; and a sign error on the c-term gives (1/2)a − (1/2)c. Halve the whole of AC, both terms together, and add it to OA rather than to a alone.
- (d) n and n + 1 are consecutive integers, so one of them must be even; this makes n(n + 1) even, so 4n(n + 1) is 4 × an even number, which is a multiple of 8. — The proof needs a reason why n(n + 1) is even, not just an assertion. n and n + 1 are consecutive integers, so exactly one of them is even; multiplying by that even number keeps n(n + 1) even, so 4n(n + 1) = 4 × (an even number), and 4 × an even number always has a further factor of 2 hidden inside it, making the whole product a multiple of 8. The option 'is a multiple of 4, and because n and n + 1 are consecutive integers, it must be a multiple of 8' asserts the multiple-of-8 conclusion directly from 'multiple of 4' and 'consecutive integers' without ever showing that n(n + 1) itself is even — the missing step is exactly what earns the mark. The option '4n is always a multiple of 4 ... which means it is a multiple of 8' mistakes 4n being a multiple of 4 for the whole product 4n(n + 1) being a multiple of 8; that extra factor of 2 only comes from n(n + 1) being even, not from 4n alone. The option that expands to 4n² + 4n and calls it 'clearly a multiple of 8' never checks for a factor of 2 beyond the 4 already there — the word 'clearly' is standing in for a missing argument.
- (d) 1.5 — Method: the length scale factor is the square root of the area scale factor, not the area scale factor itself. Working: the area scale factor is 45 ÷ 20 = 2.25, and the square root of 2.25 is 1.5. Answer: 1.5. Nadia's answer, 2.25, is the AREA scale factor — she never took the square root to get back to the length scale factor. 4.5 comes from doubling the area scale factor instead of taking its square root. 0.67 comes from taking the square root in the wrong direction, finding the scale factor from the larger rug to the smaller rug instead of the other way round.
- (c) ∠XYZ — The angle at a named vertex is written with that vertex's letter in the middle, flanked by its two neighbouring vertices. The angle at Y sits between X and Z, its neighbours in quadrilateral WXYZ, so it is written ∠XYZ. ∠WXY names the angle at X, since X is the middle letter, not Y. ∠YZW names the angle at Z, since Z is the middle letter. ∠ZWX names the angle at W, since W is the middle letter.
- (d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
- (a) 2 m/s² — Method: acceleration = change in speed ÷ time = (17 − 5) ÷ 6 = 12 ÷ 6 = 2 m/s². Distractor origins: 12 m/s² stops after finding the change in speed and forgets to divide by the time; 22 m/s² adds the two speeds instead of subtracting them, and also forgets to divide by time (5 + 17 = 22); 72 m/s² multiplies the change in speed by the time instead of dividing (12 × 6 = 72).
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.