Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 0.3 — Converting the fractions to decimals, 1/4 = 0.25 and 2/5 = 0.4, so any decimal between 0.25 and 0.4 is a valid answer, and 0.3 fits. Confusing 1/4 with 1/5 and converting it as 0.2 instead of 0.25 gives a value below the true lower bound. Confusing 2/5 with 1/2 and converting it as 0.5 instead of 0.4 gives a value above the true upper bound. Converting the fractions correctly but choosing a decimal above the true upper bound of 0.4 instead of between the two values gives 0.45.
- (b) −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 — Factorise x² − 2x − 8 = (x − 4)(x + 2), giving roots x = 4 and x = −2. Since the coefficient of x² is positive and the inequality is ≤ 0, the solution is the closed interval between the roots, −2 ≤ x ≤ 4, with the roots included because the inequality is not strict. The integers in this interval are −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Distractor routes: −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 drops both endpoints, treating ≤ as if it were the strict inequality <. −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 5)(x + 2), giving an upper root of 5 instead of 4. −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 4)(x + 3), giving a lower root of −3 instead of −2.
- (b) 3:2 — Write both fractions over a common denominator of 4: 3/4 stays as 3/4, and 1/2 = 2/4. Comparing the numerators gives the ratio 3 : 2. Getting 2 : 3 swaps the two parts round. Getting 3 : 1 comes from using the numerator of the first fraction and the original numerator of the second fraction (1) without converting to a common denominator. Getting 2 : 1 comes from using only the denominators, 4 and 2, and simplifying those instead of the numerators.
- (c) cos 45° — cos 45° = √2/2, and √2 cannot be written as an exact fraction, so this value is irrational. tan 0° = 0, sin 90° = 1 and sin 30° = 1/2 are all rational, since each can be written as an exact whole number or fraction.
- (d) 19/30 — Exactly one means only fiction or only non-fiction, not both: 21 + 17 = 38 out of the 60 readers, which simplifies to 19/30. Including the 14 who read both as well gives 21 + 17 + 14 = 52, so 52/60 = 13/15 — that is at least one, not exactly one. Using only the both-count, 14, as the numerator gives 14/60 = 7/30, the probability of reading both, not exactly one. Using 52, the number who read at least one type, as the denominator instead of the full 60 readers surveyed gives 38/52 = 19/26.
- (d) 38, and fairly confident, as 12 °C is inside the range — Method: substitute the forecast temperature into the equation of the line of best fit, then judge the prediction by where that temperature sits among the data the line was drawn from. Working: putting x = 12 into y = −3x + 74 gives −3 × 12 + 74 = 38, so the line predicts 38 hot chocolates. The recorded temperatures run from 4 °C to 18 °C, and 12 °C lies inside that interval, so this is interpolation, the safer kind of prediction. Answer: 38, and fairly confident, as 12 °C is inside the range; the owner should still expect the true figure to differ a little, since the points only lie near the line and not on it. The distractors: being completely certain treats a line of best fit as a rule that fixes each day's sales, when it describes a trend that individual days depart from; saying 12 °C is outside the range misreads the interval 4 °C to 18 °C, and the wrong warning would be attached to a sound prediction; 110 comes from −3 × 12 being taken as +36, giving 36 + 74 = 110, which loses the negative gradient and so predicts that a warm day sells more hot chocolate than a cold one.
- (c) −28 — 6² = 36 and 4³ = 64. Work out 36 − 64 = −28. A candidate who subtracts in the wrong order gets 64 − 36 = 28. A candidate who adds instead of subtracting gets 36 + 64 = 100. A candidate who multiplies the base by the exponent instead of raising the power (6 × 2 − 4 × 3 = 12 − 12) gets 0.
- (a) It gets closer to zero but never actually reaches it. — y = 60 × (0.5)ˣ is always positive, however large x is, because a positive number raised to any power stays positive. As x increases, (0.5)ˣ gets smaller and smaller but never equals zero, so y approaches zero without ever reaching it. Believing the curve reaches zero when x = 60, because 60 is the starting value, mixes up the y-intercept with a stopping point — an exponential decay curve like this one never actually reaches the x-axis, so this is wrong. Believing the curve goes negative for large x is wrong because multiplying a positive number by (0.5) any number of times can never produce a negative result. Believing the curve levels off at y = 0.5, confusing the base of the exponential with its eventual level, is wrong: the base only controls how fast the curve falls, not where it settles — this curve settles at y = 0, not y = 0.5. Whenever you sketch an exponential decay curve, draw it approaching the x-axis but never touching it.
- (d) 48 — Find the rate first: 18 ÷ 3 = 6 bottles per minute. Then apply it to the new time: 6 × 8 = 48 bottles. Working out 18 + (8 − 3) = 23 adds the extra 5 minutes onto the number of bottles instead of scaling proportionally. Working out 18 × 8 = 144 multiplies the given number of bottles by the new number of minutes without finding the rate first. Writing 18 keeps the count the same, not realising it must change with the time. In 8 minutes the machine fills 48 bottles.
- (a) Yes - SSS, the three side lengths all match — Bracket P's sides (12 cm, 16 cm, 20 cm) can each be matched to one of Bracket Q's sides (16 cm, 20 cm, 12 cm) — the same three lengths, just listed differently — so the brackets are congruent by SSS. SAS is wrong here because no angle is stated for either bracket, only three sides. The order the sides are listed in does not matter for SSS — only whether the SET of three lengths matches, and it does, so 'listed in a different order' is not a reason to say no. Nothing extra is needed: SSS proves congruence from side lengths alone, without any angles, so it can be determined.
- (a) 1/10 — There are 4 × 5 = 20 equally likely outcomes in total. The pairs whose product is 12 are Spinner A showing 3 with Spinner B showing 4, and Spinner A showing 4 with Spinner B showing 3, which is 2 outcomes, giving a probability of 2/20 = 1/10. Choosing 1/20 comes from finding only one of the two pairs, (3, 4), and missing (4, 3) as a separate outcome. Choosing 1/8 comes from using 16 as the total number of outcomes, 4 × 4, forgetting that Spinner B has 5 sections rather than 4. Choosing 1/5 comes from listing the factor pairs of 12 as 2 × 6 and 3 × 4 and counting each one in both orders, (2, 6), (6, 2), (3, 4) and (4, 3), giving 4 outcomes out of 20 without checking that neither spinner has a 6 on it.
- (b) 4 m — Blue fabric is 3 parts and this equals 1.5 m, so one part is 1.5 ÷ 3 = 0.5 m. Yellow fabric is 5 parts, so it is 5 × 0.5 = 2.5 m. The total length is 1.5 + 2.5 = 4 m. 2.5 m is the length of yellow fabric only, without adding the blue fabric back in. 1.5 m is just the given length of blue fabric, with the yellow fabric never worked out. 2.4 m comes from swapping the ratio, treating blue as 5 parts and yellow as 3 parts, giving one part as 1.5 ÷ 5 = 0.3 m and yellow as 3 × 0.3 = 0.9 m, then adding 1.5 + 0.9 = 2.4.
- (c) x + 18 — Expand −3(2x − 6) by multiplying both terms by −3: −3 × 2x = −6x and −3 × (−6) = 18, giving 7x − 6x + 18 = x + 18. Writing x − 18 comes from not flipping the sign of the −6 inside the bracket, so −3 × (−6) is treated as −18 instead of +18. Writing x + 6 comes from forgetting to multiply the −6 by 3, only carrying its sign. Writing 13x − 18 comes from treating the whole bracket as being added rather than subtracted, so 3(2x − 6) = 6x − 18 is added to 7x.
- (c) 3 hours — Method: in inverse proportion the product of the two quantities is constant, and here that product is the distance. Working: 60 × 4 = 240 km, so at 80 km/h the time is 240 ÷ 80 = 3. Answer: 3 hours. The distractors: 5 hours 20 minutes comes from treating the relationship as direct, working out 4 × 80 ÷ 60; 2 hours 40 minutes comes from cutting the time by the fraction the speed rose by — the speed went up by one third, so the time was cut by one third — which is not how inverse proportion works; 4 hours comes from dividing the 240 km by the original speed of 60 km/h again instead of by the new speed.
- (a) Reflect in the x-axis, then translate by (0, 7). — Reflecting in the x-axis sends (x, y) to (x, −y); applied to S's vertices (2, 2), (5, 2) and (2, 5) this gives (2, −2), (5, −2) and (2, −5). Translating this image by the vector (0, 7) adds 7 to every y-coordinate, giving (2, 5), (5, 5) and (2, 2), which matches S′ exactly. Using the correct reflection but translating by (7, 0) instead moves the image sideways rather than upwards, giving (9, −2), (12, −2) and (9, −5) — nowhere near S′. Reflecting in the y-axis instead of the x-axis changes the sign of the x-coordinate rather than the y-coordinate, so translating that image by (0, 7) gives (−2, 9), (−5, 9) and (−2, 12), the wrong shape entirely. Rotating 180° about the origin instead of reflecting sends every coordinate to its negative, so translating by (0, 7) gives (−2, 5), (−5, 5) and (−2, 2) — the y-coordinates match S′ but the x-coordinates do not.
- (b) 4 — Adding the two equations: the y-terms, −2y and +2y, cancel, and the x-terms combine to 5x + 3x = 8x; the right-hand sides add to 16 + 16 = 32. This gives 8x = 32, so x = 4. A candidate who adds only one of the right-hand sides, instead of both, would get 8x = 16, so x = 2. A candidate who divides 32 by 4 instead of 8 would get x = 8. A candidate who subtracts the equations instead of adding them, getting 2x − 4y = 0, and then wrongly assumes y = 0, would get x = 0.
- (c) 5/7 — First find the number of children: 84 − 35 = 49. The question compares the adults with the children, not with everyone on the bus, so the denominator is 49 and the numerator is 35, giving 35/49. Both parts divide by 7: 35 ÷ 7 = 5 and 49 ÷ 7 = 7. In its simplest form the fraction is 5/7.
- (b) 5 m — Method: the brace, the width and the height form a right-angled triangle in which the brace faces the right angle, so it is the hypotenuse and Pythagoras' theorem applies, a² + b² = c². Working: c² = 3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25, so c = √25 = 5. Answer: 5 m. The distractors: 7 m comes from adding the two sides, 3 + 4, instead of adding their squares; 25 m comes from stopping at c² = 25 and forgetting to take the square root; 12 m comes from multiplying 3 × 4, which gives the area of the gate in square metres and not a length across it.
- (d) An inequality, because ≤ compares the two sides — The symbol ≤ means 'is less than or equal to', so the statement compares the sizes of the two sides instead of saying they are equal: that makes it an inequality. Solving it gives n ≤ 5, a whole range of values rather than the single value an equation would give. An identity has to be true for every value of the letter, and this fails at n = 6, so it is not one. A formula works one quantity out from another, and there is only one letter here.
- (d) −3 — Method: rewrite the equation in the form y = mx + c, then read off the gradient. Working: y = 4 − 3x can be written as y = −3x + 4, so comparing with y = mx + c gives m = −3. Answer: the gradient is −3. The value 3 comes from ignoring the negative sign on the x term. The value 4 comes from reading off the y-intercept instead of the gradient. The value −4 comes from a sign error, applying the negative sign to the intercept instead of the gradient.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.