Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 300 — Method: round each number to 1 significant figure, then divide the rounded values. Working: 8,900 rounds to 9,000 and 29 rounds to 30; cancelling a zero from each gives 900 ÷ 3. Answer: 300. The distractors: 450 comes from rounding 29 down to 20 instead of to the nearest ten, giving 9,000 ÷ 20; 3,000 comes from rounding 29 to 3 rather than to 30, a place-value slip that divides by a number ten times too small; 307 is the exact quotient rounded to the nearest whole number, worked out in full when the question asks for an estimate.
- (d) x = 0 or x = 6 — Method: factorise by taking out the common factor x: x(x − 6) = 0, so x = 0 or x − 6 = 0, giving x = 0 or x = 6. Distractor origins: x = 6 comes from dividing both sides by x, which loses the solution x = 0; x = 0 stops after finding only one factor; x = 3 comes from halving the coefficient of x instead of factorising.
- (a) 4 days — Method: the fence is a fixed amount of work, so builders × days is constant; find that product and divide it by the new number of builders. Working: 3 × 12 = 36 builder-days of work, so with 9 builders the time is 36 ÷ 9 = 4 days. Answer: 4 days. The distractors: 6 days comes from halving the 12 days because there are more builders, rather than dividing by the factor of 3 by which the workforce has grown; 36 days is the constant product of builders and days, given as a number of days instead of being shared between the builders; 9 days comes from taking 3 days off the 12, treating three extra builders as three fewer days, which is additive rather than proportional.
- (c) (−35, −55) — Add the three stages component by component to find the drone's position relative to base: (30+(−10)+15, 40+20+(−5)) = (35, 55). The flight back to base is the negative of this vector, reversing both numbers: (−35, −55). (35, 55) is the vector from base to the drone's position — it forgets to reverse direction for the return flight. (−35, 55) only reverses the top number. (35, −55) only reverses the bottom number.
- (b) 1/8 — Shrubs, bedding plants and trees are the three branches at the first stage of the tree, so they must total 240: tree sales = 240 − 96 − 114 = 30. So P(tree) = 30/240 = 1/8. Using the shrub count instead, 96/240 = 2/5, is the probability of a shrub sale, not a tree sale. Using the bedding-plant count instead, 114/240 = 19/40, is the probability of a bedding-plant sale. Subtracting the bedding count from the shrub count (114 − 96 = 18) instead of subtracting both from 240 gives 18/240 = 3/40, which is not the number of tree sales at all.
- (d) 19 kg — Method: estimate the mean of grouped data by multiplying each class's midpoint by its frequency, adding the four totals, then dividing by the total frequency. Working: the midpoints are 5, 15, 25 and 35 kg. The weighted totals are 11 × 5 = 55, 5 × 15 = 75, 5 × 25 = 125 and 9 × 35 = 315, which add to 570. Dividing by the 30 dogs gives an estimate of 570 ÷ 30 = 19 kg. Giving 5 kg reads off the midpoint of the modal class, 0 < m ≤ 10, the class with the most dogs — but the class with the most dogs is not where the mean falls, and neither is a substitute for actually calculating it. Giving 20 kg averages the four midpoints, (5 + 15 + 25 + 35) ÷ 4, treating every class as equally likely and ignoring that far more dogs are in the lightest and heaviest classes than in the middle two. Giving 570 kg stops after finding the correct weighted total and forgets the final division by the 30 dogs. Always weight each midpoint by its own frequency, and always finish by dividing by the total frequency, not the number of classes.
- (a) 3/13 — Vegetables are 9 of the 9 + 4 = 13 parts, so vegetables are 9/13 of the plot. Potatoes are a third of the vegetable section, so potatoes are 1/3 of 9/13, which is 9/39, simplifying to 3/13, of the whole plot. 9/13 comes from stopping after finding the fraction of the plot that is vegetables, without taking the further third for potatoes. 1/3 gives the fraction of the vegetable section that is potatoes, not the fraction of the whole plot. 4/39 comes from taking a third of the flowers' fraction, 4/13, instead of the vegetables' fraction.
- (c) 1 — At x = 0, f(0) = 4. Applying the transformations in order — reflect in the x-axis first, then translate up by 5 — gives −f(0) + 5 = −4 + 5 = 1. Applying the translation but forgetting the reflection gives f(0) + 5 = 9. Applying the reflection to the whole expression, including the +5, gives −f(0) − 5 = −9. Applying the reflection but forgetting the translation gives −f(0) = −4.
- (c) The tangent is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. — Method: at any point where a distance–time graph is momentarily neither increasing nor decreasing, the tangent to the graph at that point is horizontal, and the gradient of a horizontal line is 0 — this is the instantaneous rate of change at that instant. Working: since the hiker's distance is neither increasing nor decreasing at t = 45 minutes, the tangent there is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. Claiming the tangent is vertical, with an undefined gradient, is the opposite of what the stem says: a vertical tangent would mean the distance was changing infinitely fast at that instant, not that it had stopped changing, and on a distance–time graph it cannot happen at all. Reading the gradient as 45, the time value given in the stem, mistakes a value used to LOCATE the point for the rate of change AT that point. Claiming the gradient cannot be found without also knowing the distance at t = 45 minutes overlooks that 'momentarily stationary' already tells you the rate of change directly, without needing to read any distance value at all. Whenever a stem tells you a quantity is momentarily not changing, that is telling you the instantaneous rate of change directly — it is 0, and no further data is needed to find it.
- (c) VW — Method: within one circle a chord's distance from the centre is fixed by its length, because a chord passing nearer the centre cuts further across the circle; so the chord that lies closest to the centre is simply the longest one listed. Working: the four lengths are 6 cm, 10 cm, 14 cm and 15 cm. Placing them in order, the greatest is 15 cm, and that length belongs to VW, so VW lies closest to the centre. Answer: VW. The distractors: PQ comes from reversing the rule and taking the shortest chord to be the one tucked nearest the centre; TU comes from knowing that the very longest chord is a diameter, deciding that such a chord passes through the centre rather than lying close to it, ruling the 15 cm chord out on that ground and taking the next longest; RS comes from reading 'closest to the centre' as 'nearest the middle of the list of lengths' and picking a middling value.
- (b) 0.355 — Method: use the law of total probability across the two Monday branches: P(rain Tue) = P(rain Mon) × P(rain Tue | rain Mon) + P(no rain Mon) × P(rain Tue | no rain Mon). Working: P(no rain Mon) = 1 − 0.3 = 0.7. P(rain Tue) = (0.3 × 0.6) + (0.7 × 0.25) = 0.18 + 0.175 = 0.355. Answer: 0.355. Watch out: using only the rain-Monday branch (0.3 × 0.6) or only the no-rain-Monday branch (0.7 × 0.25) accounts for just one of the two ways Tuesday can turn out rainy — both branches must be added. And swapping which weekday-probability multiplies which branch (0.7 with the rain branch, 0.3 with the no-rain branch) uses the right numbers on the wrong branches.
- (a) 2² × 3 — Method: divide repeatedly by the smallest prime that goes in, until 1 is reached, then write the primes used as a product with indices. Working: 12 ÷ 2 = 6, 6 ÷ 2 = 3 and 3 ÷ 3 = 1, so the primes used are 2, 2 and 3, which is written as 2² × 3. Answer: 2² × 3. The distractors: 2 × 6 comes from stopping at the first factor pair without splitting the 6, which is not prime; 2 × 3 comes from listing each prime once and losing the repeat, and it multiplies to 6 rather than 12; 2 × 3² puts the index on the wrong prime and multiplies to 18.
- (a) y = (x − 2)² + 3 — Since (x − 2)² is never negative, (x − 2)² + 3 is always at least 3, so y can never equal 0 and the graph never crosses the x-axis. The other three graphs are all given in a factorised or difference-of-squares form that shows two real roots: y = (x − 2)(x + 3) crosses at x = 2 and x = −3; y = x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3) crosses at x = 3 and x = −3; y = (x + 4)(x − 1) crosses at x = −4 and x = 1.
- (c) 135 g — Find the ratio of butter to sugar in the first batch: 240:160, which simplifies to 3:2. For the second batch, sugar = 90 g, so butter = 90 × 3/2 = 135 g. (60 g comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 2/3. 170 g comes from subtracting the drop in sugar, 160 − 90 = 70 g, from the original butter amount, 240 − 70, instead of scaling. 240 g comes from not scaling the butter amount at all.)
- (b) Cuboid — not necessarily a cube — A solid with 6 faces, 12 edges and 8 vertices in which every face is a rectangle is a cuboid, but nothing here confirms that all the edges are the same length, so the box could be a cube or a non-cube cuboid; the most that can be concluded is that it is a cuboid, making 'Cuboid — not necessarily a cube' correct. 'Cube — only a cube fits this' is wrong because a cube is just one particular cuboid; a general cuboid with different length, width and height has exactly the same face, edge and vertex counts and rectangular faces. 'Triangular prism' is wrong because a triangular prism has 5 faces, 9 edges and 6 vertices, and two of its faces are triangles, so it matches neither the counts nor the face shape. 'Not enough information' is wrong because rectangular faces with these counts do pin the solid down to the cuboid family, even though they cannot pin down a cube specifically.
- (d) $y = x^2 + 3$ — Method: a point lies on a curve only if substituting its x-coordinate into the equation gives back its y-coordinate, so read one or two points off curve B and test each equation. Working: curve B crosses the y-axis at (0, 3), and its lowest point is also (0, 3); substituting x = 0 into y = x² + 3 gives 0² + 3 = 3, which matches. Checking a second point: at x = 2 curve B is at y = 7, and 2² + 3 = 4 + 3 = 7, which matches as well. Answer: curve B has equation y = x² + 3. Distractor refutation: y = x² − 3 comes from reading the 3 as a move down instead of a move up; substituting x = 0 gives −3, so that curve would cross the y-axis three squares below the origin, while curve B crosses it three squares above. y = (x − 3)² comes from putting the 3 inside the brackets; substituting x = 0 gives (−3)² = 9, and that curve's lowest point is at (3, 0), three squares to the right along the x-axis, whereas curve B has its lowest point on the y-axis. y = x² + 3x comes from attaching the 3 to the x term instead of writing it on its own; substituting x = 0 gives 0² + 3 × 0 = 0, so that curve passes through the origin, and curve B does not pass through the origin.
- (d) 12 hours — Since time is inversely proportional to the number of installers, T = k/n. Using n = 4, T = 18: 18 = k ÷ 4, so k = 18 × 4 = 72. The equation is T = 72/n. When n = 6: T = 72 ÷ 6 = 12. Using the original number of installers instead of the new one gives T = 72 ÷ 4 = 18, the wrong value substituted. Treating more installers as needing more time, as if T were directly proportional to n, gives k = 18 ÷ 4 = 4.5 and then T = 4.5 × 6 = 27, the opposite relationship to the one described. Stopping at k = 72 and reporting it gives the time the job would take a single installer working alone — the constant still has to be divided by the new number of installers before it answers the question asked. With 6 installers, the job takes 12 hours.
- (d) A rectangle — Method: to find the plan view, work out the outline traced when looking straight down onto the solid from directly above, not the outline shown in the angled sketch. Working: this solid has two identical flat round ends joined by one curved surface, and it is lying on its side rather than standing upright; viewed from above, the curved surface gives two straight edges running the full length of the solid, the width of the round ends apart, and each flat round end — seen edge-on from directly above — also becomes a straight edge of that same width, with no curve remaining. Four straight edges, with opposite sides equal and meeting at right angles, form a rectangle. Answer: a rectangle. The distractors: a circle comes from picturing the solid as if it were standing upright on one of its flat ends, giving the plan of an upright version instead of working out the plan of the solid as it actually lies. An oval comes from copying the foreshortened shape of a round end as it is drawn in the angled sketch, instead of working out the true shape seen from directly above, which has no such foreshortening. A rectangle with rounded ends comes from carrying the curve of the round ends over into the plan view, when in fact a flat round end viewed edge-on from directly above shows no curve at all, only a straight edge.
- (c) 4 — x² + 12x + 40 = (x + 6)² − 6² + 40 = (x + 6)² + 4, so a = 6 and b = 4. Since (x + 6)² can never be negative, y = (x + 6)² + 4 is smallest when the bracket is zero, so the minimum value of y is 4. Giving 40 instead reads off the ORIGINAL constant term and ignores the completing-the-square step entirely — wrong, because 40 is the value of y when x = 0, not the minimum value. Giving −6 instead answers with the x-coordinate of the turning point (where the bracket is zero) rather than the minimum y-value itself — wrong, because the question asks for the minimum value of y, not the value of x that produces it. Giving 36 instead stops after squaring half the coefficient, 6² = 36, without combining it with the 40 already in the expression — wrong, because the minimum value is 40 minus 36, not 36 on its own.
- (b) £14 — Method: read the fixed charge (the cost at 0 miles) and the rate (the cost per extra mile) from the graph, then use them to work out the cost for a distance beyond the part that is plotted. Working: the graph shows a fixed charge of £2 at 0 miles, and the cost rises by £2 for every extra mile, so for 6 miles the cost is £2 + (£2 × 6) = £2 + £12 = £14. Answer: £14. Distractor refutation: £12 comes from multiplying the rate by the distance and leaving out the £2 fixed charge. £8 comes from misreading the rate as £1 per mile instead of £2 per mile. £24 comes from adding the fixed charge to the rate first and then multiplying the total by the distance, instead of multiplying the rate by the distance and then adding the fixed charge.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.