Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 360 km — Method: first find the kilometres per litre by dividing distance by fuel used, then multiply this rate by the new tank size. Working: 180 ÷ 6 = 30 km per litre; 30 × 12 = 360 km. Answer: 360 km. 30 km comes from finding the correct fuel consumption but stopping there, without scaling it up to the full tank. 2160 km comes from multiplying the original distance (180) by the tank size (12) directly, skipping the unit rate. 90 km comes from pairing the numbers the wrong way round: dividing the distance by the new tank size, 180 ÷ 12 = 15, and then multiplying by the original 6 litres, 15 × 6 = 90.
- (b) −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 — Factorise x² − 2x − 8 = (x − 4)(x + 2), giving roots x = 4 and x = −2. Since the coefficient of x² is positive and the inequality is ≤ 0, the solution is the closed interval between the roots, −2 ≤ x ≤ 4, with the roots included because the inequality is not strict. The integers in this interval are −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Distractor routes: −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 drops both endpoints, treating ≤ as if it were the strict inequality <. −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 5)(x + 2), giving an upper root of 5 instead of 4. −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3 comes from mis-factorising as (x − 4)(x + 3), giving a lower root of −3 instead of −2.
- (c) m = 6c — Method: the whole is the sum of the parts in the ratio, and the cement is 1 part, so one part weighs c kg. Working: the mix has 5 + 1 = 6 parts, each of mass c kg, so the total mass is 6 × c, giving m = 6c. Answer: m = 6c. The distractors: m = 5c uses the 5 gravel parts as the multiplier and forgets that the cement is in the mix too, so it gives the mass of the gravel and not the total; m = c + 5 comes from reading the ratio as '5 more than' and adding, which treats a number of parts as a mass in kilograms; m = c/6 turns the relationship upside down, as though the total were shared into the cement rather than the cement multiplied up to the total.
- (a) No — the angle is not between the two sides — Method: check whether the given angle sits between the two given sides. Working: the 35° angle is marked away from the corner where the 40 cm and 65 cm edges meet, so it is not the included angle — this is SSA, which is not one of the four basic congruence conditions, so it does not guarantee congruence. Options: 'Yes — SAS' wrongly treats any two sides plus any angle as SAS, without checking the angle's position; 'Yes — SSS' wrongly counts the angle as if it were a third side; 'No — only two sides measured' is not the real reason, since SAS itself only needs two sides, so this reasoning is beside the point. Answer: no, the angle is not between the two sides.
- (b) 0.355 — Method: use the law of total probability across the two Monday branches: P(rain Tue) = P(rain Mon) × P(rain Tue | rain Mon) + P(no rain Mon) × P(rain Tue | no rain Mon). Working: P(no rain Mon) = 1 − 0.3 = 0.7. P(rain Tue) = (0.3 × 0.6) + (0.7 × 0.25) = 0.18 + 0.175 = 0.355. Answer: 0.355. Watch out: using only the rain-Monday branch (0.3 × 0.6) or only the no-rain-Monday branch (0.7 × 0.25) accounts for just one of the two ways Tuesday can turn out rainy — both branches must be added. And swapping which weekday-probability multiplies which branch (0.7 with the rain branch, 0.3 with the no-rain branch) uses the right numbers on the wrong branches.
- (b) On average a plant grew 1.5 cm taller for each extra day — Method: in the equation of a line, the number multiplying x is the gradient, and a gradient states the change in y produced by an increase of 1 in x, read in the units of the two axes. Working: here x is measured in days and y in centimetres, so the gradient 1.5 carries the units centimetres per day. Testing it on the line, 5 days gives 1.5 × 5 + 4 = 11.5 cm and 6 days gives 1.5 × 6 + 4 = 13 cm, a rise of 1.5 cm for the one extra day. Answer: on average a plant grew 1.5 cm taller for each extra day of watering. The distractors: 1.5 cm as the height before any watering is the value of y when x is 0, which is the other number in the equation, 4 cm, so this swaps the gradient and the intercept; 1.5 cm as the gap between the tallest and the shortest plant reads the gradient as a range, when a range is a difference between two of the 16 plants and a gradient is a rate; 1.5 days for each extra centimetre inverts the rate, dividing days by centimetres instead of centimetres by days, and the line gives 1 cm of growth in two thirds of a day.
- (d) 9 — List all the factors of 36 in pairs that multiply to give 36: 1 × 36, 2 × 18, 3 × 12, 4 × 9, and 6 × 6. This gives the factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 36 — nine factors in total, with 6 counted only once even though it appears in a pair with itself. Forgetting that 36 is itself a factor of 36 and leaving it off the list gives 8. Counting the number of factor pairs, five of them, rather than the number of individual factors gives 5. Treating the repeated pair 6 × 6 as two separate factors, 6 and 6 again, gives 10 instead of 9. So 36 has 9 factors.
- (d) 6 — Method: collect the x-terms on one side and the constants on the other, then divide by the remaining coefficient of x. Working: 6x − 3x = 13 + 5, so 3x = 18, x = 18 ÷ 3 = 6. Answer: x = 6. 2.67 comes from a sign error when moving the 5, subtracting instead of adding: 3x = 13 − 5 = 8, x = 8 ÷ 3 ≈ 2.67. 2 comes from a sign error when moving the x-term, adding instead of subtracting: 9x = 18, x = 2. 18 comes from correctly finding 3x = 18 but forgetting to divide by 3.
- (d) 25% — Method: percentage decrease = decrease ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the reduction is £60 − £45 = £15, and 15 ÷ 60 = 0.25, so 0.25 × 100 = 25%. Answer: 25%. The distractors: 15% comes from quoting the £15 reduction as though pounds and per cent were the same thing; 33% comes from dividing the £15 by the new price £45 instead of by the original £60, which gives 33% to the nearest per cent; 75% is the new price written as a percentage of the old one, which is what is still paid rather than what has been taken off.
- (a) 245 m² — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so multiply the smaller area by the square of the length scale factor. Working: the length scale factor is 7 ÷ 3, so the area scale factor is 49 ÷ 9, and the larger area is 45 × 49 ÷ 9 = 5 × 49 = 245. Answer: 245 m². The distractors: 105 m² comes from multiplying by the length scale factor 7 ÷ 3 instead of by its square, the commonest slip on this topic; 315 m² comes from multiplying by 7 and forgetting to divide by 3; 405 m² comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, squaring the wrong part of the ratio.
- (c) 102 — Method: turn the past record into a relative frequency, then use it as an estimate of the probability of rain and multiply by the number of days being predicted for. Working: relative frequency of rain = 70 ÷ 250 = 0.28. Expected rainy days in 365 days = 365 × 0.28 = 102.2, which rounds to about 102 days. Answer: about 102 days. Watch out: writing down 48 swaps which number is the sample and which is the target, working out 70 ÷ 365 × 250 instead of 70 ÷ 250 × 365. Writing down 70 just repeats the original count of rainy days without scaling it up to the new, longer period at all. And writing down 110 comes from rounding the relative frequency to 0.3 before multiplying, 365 × 0.3 = 109.5, when 70 ÷ 250 is exactly 0.28 and needs no rounding at all.
- (b) 28 — Method: count the ordered choices with the product rule and then correct for the double counting, because the two captains have equal standing and so a pair is the same pair whichever captain is named first. Working: there are 8 players who could be named first and 7 who could be named second, giving 8 × 7 = 56 ordered choices; each pair has been counted twice, once in each order, so the number of pairs is 56 ÷ 2 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 56 comes from stopping at 8 × 7 and never halving, which counts each pair of captains twice; 64 comes from working out 8 × 8, which allows the same player to be chosen as both captains; 16 comes from multiplying the 8 players by the 2 captaincies instead of pairing the players with one another.
- (c) 2 — For a geometric sequence, a₄ = a₂ × r². So r² = a₄ ÷ a₂ = 24 ÷ 6 = 4, giving r = 2 or r = −2. Since all the terms are positive, r = 2. 4 comes from computing a₄ ÷ a₂ = 4 and stopping there, without taking the square root to find r. 18 comes from subtracting instead of dividing: a₄ − a₂ = 24 − 6 = 18, taken directly as the common ratio. −2 is the other square root of 4, but it is rejected because all the sequence's terms are given as positive.
- (c) The tangent is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. — Method: at any point where a distance–time graph is momentarily neither increasing nor decreasing, the tangent to the graph at that point is horizontal, and the gradient of a horizontal line is 0 — this is the instantaneous rate of change at that instant. Working: since the hiker's distance is neither increasing nor decreasing at t = 45 minutes, the tangent there is horizontal, so its gradient is 0. Claiming the tangent is vertical, with an undefined gradient, is the opposite of what the stem says: a vertical tangent would mean the distance was changing infinitely fast at that instant, not that it had stopped changing, and on a distance–time graph it cannot happen at all. Reading the gradient as 45, the time value given in the stem, mistakes a value used to LOCATE the point for the rate of change AT that point. Claiming the gradient cannot be found without also knowing the distance at t = 45 minutes overlooks that 'momentarily stationary' already tells you the rate of change directly, without needing to read any distance value at all. Whenever a stem tells you a quantity is momentarily not changing, that is telling you the instantaneous rate of change directly — it is 0, and no further data is needed to find it.
- (d) 1 — sin 30° = 1/2, so (sin 30°)² = 1/4. cos 30° = √3/2, so (cos 30°)² = 3/4. Adding these gives 1/4 + 3/4 = 1. '1/4' only calculates (sin 30°)² and forgets to add the cos 30° term. '3/4' only calculates (cos 30°)² and forgets to add the sin 30° term. '−1/2' comes from subtracting the two squared values instead of adding them: 1/4 − 3/4 = −1/2.
- (b) n² + 4n — First differences of 5, 12, 21, 32, 45 are 7, 9, 11, 13. Second differences are 2, 2, 2, so a = 2 ÷ 2 = 1. Subtracting n² (1, 4, 9, 16, 25) from the totals (5, 12, 21, 32, 45) leaves 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, the linear expression 4n. So the number of oranges is n² + 4n. Using the second difference itself as the coefficient of n², without halving it, gives 2n² + 4n. Finding a = 1 correctly but dropping the linear remainder 4n entirely leaves n². Treating the first first difference (7) as a constant common difference and building a linear formula 5 + 7(n − 1) = 7n − 2 fits only the first two totals, and gives 19 for n = 3 instead of 21.
- (d) 5/4 — Work out the number of free seats: 54 − 24 = 30. Form the fraction 30/24; both numbers share a factor of 6, so 30 ÷ 6 = 5 and 24 ÷ 6 = 4, giving 5/4. 4/5 comes from writing the fraction the wrong way round, as reserved over free (24/30). 5/9 comes from comparing the free seats with the total number of seats (30/54), instead of with the reserved seats. 5/6 comes from miscalculating 54 − 24 as 20 instead of 30, then forming 20/24.
- (a) the lens-shaped region where the two circles overlap — The region within 30 km of the ship is a circle of radius 30 km around the ship; the region within 20 km of the lighthouse is a circle of radius 20 km around the lighthouse. Since 30 + 20 = 50 km is more than the 40 km between them, and 30 − 20 = 10 km is less than 40 km, the two circles genuinely overlap, in a lens-shaped region where both conditions hold at once. "the whole smaller circle, since it fits inside the larger one" would only be true if the 40 km distance between the centres were small enough for one circle to swallow the other, which it is not here. "no overlap — 30 km and 20 km don't add to 40 km" wrongly assumes the two radii must add up to exactly the distance between the centres for an overlap to exist; any total greater than that distance is enough. "a straight strip, exactly halfway between the two" confuses this with an equidistant locus, which is a different problem from the one asked here.
- (c) 72 m — The first section is a triangle with base 4 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 4 × 8 = 16 m. The middle section is a rectangle with base 6 s and height 8 m/s, area = 6 × 8 = 48 m. The final section is a triangle with base 2 s and height 8 m/s, area = 1/2 × 2 × 8 = 8 m. Total distance = 16 + 48 + 8 = 72 m. Treating both sloping sections as full rectangles instead of triangles — forgetting the factor of a half — gives 4 × 8 + 6 × 8 + 2 × 8 = 96 m, which is wrong because a sloping speed-time section is a triangle, not a rectangle. Leaving out the final, decreasing section entirely gives 16 + 48 = 64 m, which is wrong because the cyclist is still moving and covering distance while slowing down. Leaving out the middle, constant-speed section gives 16 + 8 = 24 m, which is wrong because the cyclist covers the most distance of all during the 6 seconds of constant speed.
- (d) 5 — Method: rearrange the formula to make m the subject, then substitute F = 15.50. Working: F = 3 + 2.5m, so subtracting 3 from both sides gives F − 3 = 2.5m, then dividing by 2.5 gives m = (F − 3) / 2.5. Substituting F = 15.50: m = (15.50 − 3) / 2.5 = 12.50 / 2.5 = 5. The value 6.2 comes from dividing 15.50 by 2.5 without subtracting the fixed £3 first. The value 3.2 comes from dividing first and subtracting afterwards, in the wrong order: (15.50 / 2.5) − 3 = 3.2. The value 7.4 comes from adding £3 instead of subtracting it before dividing: (15.50 + 3) / 2.5 = 7.4.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.