Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 120 — For the lowest common multiple, take each prime that appears in either factorisation, raised to the higher power. In 2³ × 3 and 2² × 3 × 5, the prime 2 appears with power 3 in one and power 2 in the other — take the higher, 2³; the prime 3 appears with the same power in both, 3¹; and the prime 5 appears only in the second factorisation, so use 5¹. Multiplying these, 2³ × 3 × 5, gives 120. Taking the lower power of 2 instead of the higher, and leaving out 5 altogether, gives the highest common factor, 12, instead. Multiplying the two original numbers together, 24 × 60, gives 1440, which double-counts every shared prime factor. Assuming the lowest common multiple is simply the larger of the two numbers gives 60, but 60 is not a multiple of 24 — 60 ÷ 24 does not divide exactly. So the lowest common multiple of 24 and 60 is 120.
- (b) 3 — Method: rearrange the equation into the form y = mx + c first, then read off the gradient. Working: dividing 4y = 12x + 20 by 4 gives y = 3x + 5, so the gradient is 3. The value 12 comes from reading the coefficient of x before dividing the equation by 4. The value 20 comes from using the constant term of the unsimplified equation instead of the gradient. The value 5 comes from finding the y-intercept, 20 / 4 = 5, and giving that instead of the gradient.
- (a) 45% — Method: percentage increase = increase ÷ original amount × 100. Working: the increase is £116 − £80 = £36, and 36 ÷ 80 = 0.45, so 0.45 × 100 = 45%. Answer: 45%. The distractors: 36% comes from quoting the £36 increase as though pounds and per cent were the same thing; 31% comes from dividing the £36 increase by the new price £116 instead of by the original £80, which gives 31% to the nearest per cent; 145% is the new price written as a percentage of the original price, which is the whole of the new price rather than the increase.
- (d) 13 cm — Use Pythagoras' theorem in three dimensions: for a cuboid with edges a, b and c the space diagonal d satisfies d² = a² + b² + c². Substitute a = 3, b = 4, c = 12: d² = 3² + 4² + 12² = 9 + 16 + 144 = 169. Take the square root: d = √169 = 13 cm. Adding the three edges directly, 3 + 4 + 12 = 19 cm, ignores that Pythagoras' theorem is about squares, not lengths, and gives 19 cm. Stopping after squaring and adding, without taking the square root, leaves 169 cm — the squared length, not the length itself. Using only the 4 cm and 12 cm edges finds the diagonal of one face, √(4² + 12²) = √160 = 12.6 cm (1 d.p.), and leaves out the third dimension entirely.
- (c) 39.5% — Win, draw and lose are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, so their probabilities sum to 100%: 42% + 18.5% = 60.5% is the percentage that wins or draws. 100% − 60.5% = 39.5% is the percentage that neither wins nor draws. Adding 42% and 18.5% and stopping there, 60.5%, is the probability of winning or drawing, not of neither. Subtracting only the 42% from 100% gives 58.0%, ignoring the draw percentage. Subtracting only the 18.5% from 100% gives 81.5%, ignoring the win percentage.
- (c) The median, £160,000, as one very high price lifts the mean — Method: find both averages, then choose the one that sits closer to the bulk of the data. Working: in order the prices are 140,000, 150,000, 160,000, 170,000 and 580,000, so the median is the third of the five, £160,000. For the mean, 140,000 + 150,000 + 160,000 + 170,000 + 580,000 = 1,200,000 and 1,200,000 ÷ 5 = 240,000, so the mean is £240,000. Four of the five houses sold for £170,000 or less, so a reader told that a typical price is £240,000 would expect to pay at least £70,000 more than any of those four cost. Answer: the median, £160,000, as one very high price lifts the mean. The distractors: £580,000 is the middle value of the list as it is printed, which is the median only when the values have first been put in order; £240,000 is the mean, chosen on the ground that a median ignores three of the five prices, but a median uses all five to find which one is central and is then untroubled by how extreme the outer values are; £155,000 comes from deleting the £580,000 house and taking the mean of what is left, since 140,000 + 150,000 + 160,000 + 170,000 = 620,000 and 620,000 ÷ 4 = 155,000, but a real sale may not be thrown away merely for being large.
- (b) Chloe's estimate — √70 = 8.3666... to 4 decimal places. Comparing each estimate against this: Ben's 8.3 is 0.0666 away; Chloe's 8.4 is only 0.0334 away; Dan's 8.9 is 0.5334 away; Ella's 8.5 is 0.1334 away. Chloe's estimate is closest, because her method tests an actual calculation, 8.5² = 72.25, sees that it overshoots 70, and corrects slightly downward from it, rather than only comparing which perfect square is nearer. Ben's sharing-out is not a bad idea in itself — 70 sits 6 of the way along the 17 from 64 to 81, so 'about a third of the way' from 8 to 9 points at roughly 8.35 — but he then rounds that position down to 8.3, and it is that rounding, not the sharing-out, that leaves him twice as far from √70 as Chloe. Dan's claim that 81 is closer to 70 than 64 is is backwards: 70 − 64 = 6, while 81 − 70 = 11, so 64 is in fact the nearer square, which makes his estimate of 8.9 the furthest from the truth of all four. Ella's plain midpoint of 8 and 9 tests nothing at all: √70 does not sit halfway between 8 and 9, and her 8.5 lands further from √70 than Chloe's checked estimate does.
- (b) x = 3, y = 4 — −x² + 6x − 5 = −(x² − 6x) − 5 = −[(x − 3)² − 9] − 5 = −(x − 3)² + 9 − 5 = −(x − 3)² + 4. Because the coefficient of x² is negative, −(x − 3)² is at most zero, so this turning point is a maximum. Substituting x = 3 gives (x − 3)² = 0, so y = 4, confirming the maximum value 4 at x = 3: turning point (3, 4). Using 6 instead of half of 6 inside the bracket — forgetting to halve before completing the square — lands on turning point (6, 31), wrong, because only half the coefficient belongs inside the bracket. Reading the bracket's sign directly as the turning point's x-coordinate gives (−3, 4) — wrong, because (x − 3)² is zero at x = 3, not x = −3. Computing 5 − 9 = −4 instead of 9 − 5 = 4 flips the sign of the constant, giving (3, −4) — wrong, since the constant must be evaluated as 9 minus 5, not 5 minus 9. Whenever the leading coefficient is negative, the turning point is a maximum, not a minimum — check by substituting back into the original equation.
- (d) 7/5 — The number of unbroken crayons is 60 − 25 = 35. The comparison is with the broken crayons, so the broken crayons are the denominator: 35/25. Both parts divide by 5: 35 ÷ 5 = 7 and 25 ÷ 5 = 5. The fraction is 7/5, which is greater than 1 because there are more unbroken crayons than broken ones.
- (a) 245 m² — Method: for similar figures the ratio of the areas is the square of the ratio of the lengths, so multiply the smaller area by the square of the length scale factor. Working: the length scale factor is 7 ÷ 3, so the area scale factor is 49 ÷ 9, and the larger area is 45 × 49 ÷ 9 = 5 × 49 = 245. Answer: 245 m². The distractors: 105 m² comes from multiplying by the length scale factor 7 ÷ 3 instead of by its square, the commonest slip on this topic; 315 m² comes from multiplying by 7 and forgetting to divide by 3; 405 m² comes from multiplying by 3² = 9, squaring the wrong part of the ratio.
- (b) 12/25 — List every outcome as an ordered pair (first dice, second dice) out of the 25 equally likely outcomes. The pairs with a difference of exactly 2 are (1, 3), (3, 1), (2, 4), (4, 2), (3, 5) and (5, 3), the pairs with a difference of 3 are (1, 4), (4, 1), (2, 5) and (5, 2), and the pairs with a difference of 4 are (1, 5) and (5, 1), giving 6 + 4 + 2 = 12 outcomes with a difference of at least 2, so the probability is 12/25. Choosing 13/25 comes from finding the probability that the two scores differ by LESS than 2 instead, using the remaining 13 outcomes, the opposite of what was asked. Choosing 10/25 comes from forgetting the two outcomes where the difference is 4, (1, 5) and (5, 1), and adding only the difference-2 and difference-3 outcomes, 6 + 4 = 10 out of 25. Choosing 6/25 comes from counting only the pairs with a difference of exactly 2, forgetting that differences of 3 and 4 also count as at least 2.
- (c) 23.375 — The error intervals are 7.5 ≤ base < 8.5 and 4.5 ≤ height < 5.5. The upper bound of the area uses the upper bound of both the base and the height, then halves the product: 8.5 × 5.5 ÷ 2 = 23.375 cm². Using the lower bound of both dimensions instead, 7.5 × 4.5 ÷ 2 = 16.875, gives the lower bound of the area rather than the upper one. Multiplying the two upper bounds together but forgetting to halve for the triangle formula, 8.5 × 5.5 = 46.750, treats the triangle as if it were a rectangle. Using the given values directly without applying any bound at all, 8 × 5 ÷ 2 = 20.000, ignores that each rounded measurement has its own range of possible values.
- (c) 7 — To reverse the rule, subtract the constant then divide by the coefficient: 30−2=28, then 28÷4=7, so n=7. A candidate who adds the constant instead of subtracting it, a sign error when rearranging, would compute (30+2)÷4=32÷4=8. A candidate who subtracts the constant correctly but then forgets to divide by the coefficient would stop at 30−2=28. A candidate who treats 4n+2 as a single term 6n, adding the coefficient and constant together, would compute 30÷6=5.
- (b) The ratio C : m is not constant because the formula includes a fixed charge of £3 as well as the charge per mile. — For the ratio C : m to stay constant, C must be directly proportional to m, i.e. C = km with no constant term. Because of the +3 fixed charge, C is not directly proportional to m: for example m = 1 gives C = 5.5 (ratio 5.5 : 1), while m = 10 gives C = 28 (ratio 2.8 : 1) — the ratio has changed.
- (c) 9 cm — The scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle PQR is PQ ÷ AB = 12 ÷ 8 = 1.5. So PR = AC × 1.5 = 6 × 1.5 = 9 cm. (4 cm comes from using the scale factor upside down, AB ÷ PQ; 10 cm comes from adding the difference between AB and PQ, 4 cm, to AC instead of scaling; 16 cm comes from multiplying PQ by the ratio AB : AC instead of scaling AC by the correct scale factor.)
- (d) k < 4 — Method: the number of real solutions of ax² + bx + c = 0 is decided by the discriminant b² − 4ac, and two different real solutions need it to be greater than zero. Working: here a = 1, b = −4 and c = k, so b² − 4ac = 16 − 4k; the condition is 16 − 4k > 0, which gives 16 > 4k and then k < 4. Answer: k < 4; for example k = 3 gives x² − 4x + 3 = 0, whose solutions are 1 and 3. The distractors: k ≤ 4 comes from using b² − 4ac ≥ 0, which also allows the single repeated solution at k = 4; k > 4 comes from dividing −4k > −16 by −4 without reversing the inequality sign; k < 16 comes from leaving the factor 4 out of 4ac and solving 16 − k > 0.
- (d) 19% — Method: write each decrease as a multiplier, multiply the multipliers, then compare the result with 100%. Working: a 10% decrease is a multiplier of 0.9, so the two reductions together give 0.9 × 0.9 = 0.81; the final price is 81% of the original, so the price has fallen by 100% − 81% = 19%. Answer: an overall decrease of 19%. The distractors: 20% comes from adding the two reductions, 10% + 10%, which charges the second 10% against the original price instead of against the already reduced price; 21% comes from using the increase multiplier by mistake, since 1.1 × 1.1 = 1.21, and reading that 21% as a decrease; 81% is the percentage of the original price still being paid, not the percentage taken off.
- (b) 4 m — The two triangles are similar, so height ÷ shadow is the same for both objects. For the post, height ÷ shadow = 1.2 ÷ 1.8. Flagpole height = 6 × (1.2 ÷ 1.8) = 4 m. A student who multiplies the flagpole's shadow by the post's height without applying the ratio gets 6 × 1.2 = 7.2 m. A student who assumes a constant DIFFERENCE between shadow and height instead of a constant ratio finds the post's shadow minus height, 1.8 − 1.2 = 0.6 m, then subtracts that from the flagpole's shadow to get 6 − 0.6 = 5.4 m.
- (d) An equation, true for one value of x — 2x + 5 = 17 is only true when x = 6, so it is an equation. A candidate who ignores the equals sign and focuses only on the x terms and numbers present picks the expression option. A candidate who sees an equals sign and assumes it must relate two different quantities, as a formula does, picks that option, missing that there is only one quantity, x, involved here. A candidate who wrongly checks whether both sides look similar in structure rather than testing specific values picks the identity option, missing that the two sides are not equal for every value of x.
- (c) 37.5 — The tangent at (18, 24) is 18x + 24y = 900 (using ax + by = r² with a = 18, b = 24, r² = 900). Setting x = 0 to find the y-intercept: 24y = 900, so y = 37.5. Choosing 900 skips the division by 24 and just repeats the constant. Choosing 50 divides the constant by the x-coefficient 18 instead of the y-coefficient 24. Choosing 1.25 uses the radius 30 instead of r² = 900 as the constant before dividing.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.