Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 28 — Method: count the ordered choices with the product rule and then correct for the double counting, because the two captains have equal standing and so a pair is the same pair whichever captain is named first. Working: there are 8 players who could be named first and 7 who could be named second, giving 8 × 7 = 56 ordered choices; each pair has been counted twice, once in each order, so the number of pairs is 56 ÷ 2 = 28. Answer: 28. The distractors: 56 comes from stopping at 8 × 7 and never halving, which counts each pair of captains twice; 64 comes from working out 8 × 8, which allows the same player to be chosen as both captains; 16 comes from multiplying the 8 players by the 2 captaincies instead of pairing the players with one another.
- (d) x = 1 and x = 2 — Method: where a line meets a curve the two expressions for y are equal, so set them equal and solve the quadratic that results. Working: x² − 1 = 3x − 3 collects to x² − 3x + 2 = 0; factorising gives (x − 1)(x − 2) = 0, so x = 1 or x = 2, and each value gives the same y on both graphs. Answer: x = 1 and x = 2. The distractors: x = −1 and x = −2 come from factorising as (x + 1)(x + 2) and so reversing the sign of both roots; x = −1 and x = 4 come from moving the −3 across the equals sign without changing its sign, which gives x² − 3x − 4 = 0; x = 1 and x = −1 come from setting each expression equal to zero separately instead of equal to each other.
- (c) £478.40 — Method: apply the percentage increase, then apply the percentage decrease to the new price. Working: after the increase, the laptop costs £520 × 1.15. Multiplying this result by 0.80 gives the final price, £478.40. Answer: £478.40. £494 comes from combining the two percentages into a single net change (15% − 20% = −5%) and applying it directly, £520 × 0.95 = £494, instead of applying the two changes one after the other. £416 comes from applying only the 20% decrease to the original price, £520 × 0.80 = £416, forgetting the increase entirely. £598 comes from applying only the 15% increase and stopping there, forgetting to apply the decrease at all.
- (d) 6 cm — Method: CH cuts the triangle into two smaller right-angled triangles, so Pythagoras' theorem can be written in each of the three right-angled triangles and the results combined. Working: HB = 12 − 3 = 9 cm. In triangle ACH, CH² = AC² − 3² = AC² − 9; in triangle CHB, CH² = CB² − 9² = CB² − 81. Setting those equal gives AC² − 9 = CB² − 81. In triangle ABC, AC² + CB² = 12² = 144, so CB² = 144 − AC². Substituting gives AC² − 9 = 144 − AC² − 81, so 2 × AC² = 72 and AC² = 36, giving AC = 6. Answer: 6 cm. The distractors: 36 cm comes from stopping at AC² = 36 and never taking the square root; 9 cm is HB, the other part of the hypotenuse, written down in place of AC; 4 cm comes from working out 12 ÷ 3, treating AH as a scale factor between the two triangles rather than as a length.
- (b) 2/11 — Method: restrict the 36 equally likely outcomes to those where at least one die shows a 5, then find what fraction of THOSE give a total of 8. Working: outcomes with at least one 5: (5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4), (5, 5), (5, 6), (1, 5), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5), (6, 5) — 11 outcomes. Among these, the total is 8 for (5, 3) and (3, 5) — 2 outcomes. P(total 8 | at least one 5) = 2/11. Answer: 2/11. Watch out: 5/36 is P(total 8) over the full 36 outcomes — it ignores that you already know one die shows a 5. Treating the condition as 'the first die shows a 5' instead of 'at least one die shows a 5' restricts you to only 6 outcomes and misses the (3, 5) case, giving 1/6. And counting only (5, 3) but not its reverse (3, 5) inside the correct 11-outcome list gives 1/11 instead of 2/11.
- (c) No — 8 from one class is too small to represent the school. — Method: judge reliability by asking whether the sample is both large enough, and spread across the population, relative to what it is meant to represent. Working: 8 pupils is a tiny fraction of the school's 1,000 pupils, and all 8 come from a single class rather than a range of year groups, so the sample is both too small and too narrow to represent the whole school reliably. She is not right. Saying any sample size gives an equally reliable estimate ignores that reliability generally improves with a larger, more representative sample. Saying the method is unreliable because it was not done online is not a reason connected to sample size or representativeness at all. Saying 8 is reliable because it is more than half her class compares the sample to the wrong population — the school has 1,000 pupils, not one class. Always judge a sample's size against the population it is meant to represent, not against a smaller group within it.
- (c) 6 — The units digit must be even, so it can be 2 or 8, giving 2 choices. The tens digit can then be any of the remaining 3 digits, since one digit has been used for the units. Multiply: 2 × 3 = 6. 12 comes from working out how many two-digit numbers can be made in total, 4 × 3 = 12, ignoring the requirement that the number is even. 8 comes from choosing the units digit from 2 options and then wrongly allowing any of the 4 digits again for the tens digit, 2 × 4 = 8, which lets a digit repeat. 2 comes from counting only the choices for the units digit and forgetting the tens digit.
- (d) x = 2 — Method: expand the bracket by multiplying both terms inside it by 2, then undo the addition and the multiplication in turn. Working: expanding gives 2x + 6 = 10; subtracting 6 from both sides gives 2x = 4; dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 2. Answer: x = 2. The distractors: x = 5 comes from dividing both sides by 2 first, reaching x + 3 = 5 and writing 5 without taking the 3 away; x = 8 comes from adding 6 to both sides instead of subtracting it, giving 2x = 16; x = 3.5 comes from expanding 2(x + 3) as 2x + 3, multiplying only the x by the 2, which leads to 2x = 7.
- (a) 1000m — Method: kilograms are a smaller unit than tonnes, so change tonnes into kilograms by multiplying by 1000. Working: m tonnes = m × 1000 kg = 1000m kg. So the expression is 1000m. Distractor m/1000 comes from dividing by 1000 instead of multiplying, which would make the number of kilograms smaller than the number of tonnes, the wrong way round. Distractor 1000 + m comes from adding the conversion factor instead of multiplying by it. Distractor m − 1000 comes from subtracting the conversion factor instead of multiplying by it.
- (d) 600 cm² — Enlarging by scale factor 2 makes the new dimensions 10 × 2 = 20 cm and 15 × 2 = 30 cm, so the poster's area = 20 × 30 = 600 cm². A pupil who scales the original area, 150 cm², by the scale factor itself instead of by its square gets 150 × 2 = 300 cm². A pupil who adds the scale factor to each dimension instead of multiplying gets (10 + 2) × (15 + 2) = 204 cm². A pupil who forgets to enlarge the postcard at all just uses the original area, 150 cm². The correct area of the poster is 600 cm².
- (b) £13.50 — The total cost of Nadia's 25 tickets is 25 × £1.50 = £37.50. The expected number of winning tickets is 25 × 0.12 = 3, so the expected prize money is 3 × £8 = £24.00. Nadia's expected loss is the cost minus the expected prize money: £37.50 − £24.00 = £13.50. A candidate who answers £24.00 has given the expected prize money and mistaken it for the loss. A candidate who answers £37.50 has given the total cost of the tickets, forgetting to subtract the expected prize money. A candidate who answers £34.50 has subtracted the expected number of wins, 3, from the cost instead of first converting it to prize money by multiplying by £8.
- (b) 5/27 — Method: multiply the numerators together and the denominators together, then simplify. Working: (5 × 2)/(6 × 9) = 10/54 = 5/27. Answer: 5/27. 7/15 comes from adding the fractions instead of multiplying: (5+2)/(6+9) = 7/15. 15/4 comes from flipping the second fraction, as if dividing: (5 × 9)/(6 × 2) = 45/12 = 15/4. 5/3 comes from cancelling the two denominators against each other, dividing both 6 and 9 by 3 to leave 5/2 × 2/3 = 10/6 = 5/3; cancelling is only valid between a numerator and a denominator, never between two denominators.
- (b) (x + 2)/3 — Start with y = 3x − 2 and swap x and y: x = 3y − 2. Add 2 to both sides: x + 2 = 3y. Divide both sides by 3: y = (x + 2)/3, so f⁻¹(x) = (x + 2)/3. Writing x/3 + 2 comes from dividing only the 3y term by 3 and leaving the +2 outside the division — the 2 must be added before you divide, not after. Writing (x − 2)/3 comes from keeping the subtraction sign instead of flipping it to addition when the −2 is moved across the equals sign. Writing 3x + 2 comes from swapping x and y but never actually solving for y — just changing the sign of the constant term.
- (c) 48 mm — Method: extension = k × force, where k = extension ÷ force. Working: k = 12 ÷ 5 = 2.4 mm per N. At 20 N: extension = 2.4 × 20 = 48 mm. Wrong options: 32 mm comes from adding the extension and force numbers instead of scaling (12 + 20); 3 mm comes from treating the relationship as inverse proportion (12 × 5 ÷ 20); 36 mm comes from using an incorrect scale factor of 3 between the forces instead of the correct factor of 4 (20 ÷ 5).
- (b) An enlargement, centre O, scale factor −1/2. — A single enlargement with a negative scale factor both changes the size (by the magnitude of the factor) and rotates the image 180° about the centre (giving the inverted orientation) in one transformation. Halving the size needs a magnitude of 1/2, and inverting needs a negative sign, so the scale factor is −1/2, centre O. 'Scale factor 1/2' gives the correct size but no inversion, since a positive scale factor keeps the same orientation. 'A 180° rotation with no change in size' gives the inversion but not the halving — K is described as smaller than J, so size must change too. 'Scale factor −2' inverts correctly but doubles the size instead of halving it.
- (a) −1 — Reflecting y = sin x in the x-axis gives y = −sin x, so g(x) = −sin x. Since sin 90° = 1, g(90) = −1. Reading sin 90° = 1 and forgetting to apply the reflection gives 1. Misreading the angle as 0° instead of 90° gives sin 0° = 0, so 0. Confusing sin 90° with sin 30° = 0.5, then reflecting it, gives −0.5.
- (c) Falling at £950 per year — The gradient of a tangent on a value-age graph is a rate, in pounds per year, so −950 means the van's value is falling at £950 per year at that instant. Writing this as 950% per year mistakes a rate measured in pounds per year for a percentage — the units of a gradient come from the units on the two axes, £ and years, not from a percentage. Saying the value 'falls by £950 over the next year' treats the instantaneous rate at age 2 as if it stayed constant for a whole year, which finds an average future change, not the instantaneous rate at age 2 itself. Reading the sign the wrong way round gives 'rising at £950 per year', which would mean the van is gaining value. Always match the units of a gradient to the units on the two axes of the graph.
- (b) 2 500 000 cm³ — Method: a volume conversion uses the length factor three times, once for each dimension. Working: 1 m = 100 cm, so a cube of side 1 m is a cube of side 100 cm, and 100 × 100 × 100 = 1 000 000, giving 1 m³ = 1 000 000 cm³. Then 2.5 × 1 000 000 = 2 500 000. Answer: 2 500 000 cm³. Using the plain length factor 100 gives 250 cm³. Using 1000, which is the factor that turns cubic metres into litres, gives 2500 cm³. Using 10 000, which is the factor that belongs to square metres and square centimetres, gives 25 000 cm³.
- (b) 10 — Check n = 9: a₉ = 3 × 2⁸ = 3 × 256 = 768, below 1,000. Check n = 10: a₁₀ = 3 × 2⁹ = 3 × 512 = 1,536, above 1,000. So the first term greater than 1,000 is at position n = 10. Answering 9 comes from forgetting the −1 shift and using the formula as 3 × 2ⁿ instead of 3 × 2ⁿ⁻¹: checking 3 × 2⁹ = 1,536 (which exceeds 1,000) but then reporting the position as n = 9, the exponent used, instead of n = 10 — wrong, because the exponent in the real formula is n − 1, not n. Answering 11 comes from going one term too far: correctly finding that a₁₀ already exceeds 1,000, but then checking one position further and reporting n = 11 instead of stopping at the first position that already works — wrong, because n = 11 is not the FIRST term greater than 1,000. Answering 1,536 gives the VALUE of the term (a₁₀ itself) rather than its position — wrong, because the question asks which term it is (the value of n), not what that term is worth.
- (b) £115, and C = 40 + 25h is a formula — Substitute h = 3 into the rule, multiplying before adding. The hours cost 25 × 3 = 75, and adding the call-out fee gives 40 + 75 = 115, so the charge is £115. The rule itself links two different quantities, C and h, and lets one be worked out from the other, so it is a formula; an expression would have no equals sign in it. Adding the fee before multiplying gives 65 × 3 = 195, which charges the call-out fee three times over, and stopping at 40 + 25 leaves £65, the charge for a single hour.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.