Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 90 — Multiply the number of choices for each course: 5 × 6 × 3 = 90. 14 comes from adding the three numbers instead of multiplying them. 30 comes from multiplying only the starters and mains, 5 × 6, and forgetting the dessert. 18 comes from multiplying only the mains and desserts, 6 × 3, and forgetting the starter.
- (a) 9 km — Ravi's house and the library have the same y-coordinate, so the distance between them is the difference between their x-coordinates: 6 − (−3) = 9 km. 3 km comes from dropping the negative sign on Ravi's x-coordinate and working out 6 − 3 instead. 0 km comes from using the y-coordinates, which are equal, instead of the x-coordinates. −9 km comes from working out −3 − 6 = −9 and not converting it to a positive distance.
- (c) 200 students — Method: find the percentage who have a brother or a sister, taking care that the students with both are not counted twice, then take that percentage from 100% and apply the result to the 400 students. Working: 25% + 40% = 65%, but the 15% with both has been counted in each of those figures, so 65% − 15% = 50% have a brother or a sister; that leaves 100% − 50% = 50%, and 50% of 400 = 200. Answer: 200 students. The distractors: 260 students is 65% of 400, the number with a brother or a sister when the 15% overlap is counted twice; 140 students comes from taking that same uncorrected 65% away from the 400; 300 students comes from subtracting only the 25% with a brother and ignoring the sisters altogether.
- (b) (−1, −1) — An enlargement by scale factor −1, centre (2, 1), sends a point P to the point on the opposite side of the centre, the same distance away: the image is 2 × centre − P. For the vertex (5, 3), this gives (2 × 2 − 5, 2 × 1 − 3) = (4 − 5, 2 − 3) = (−1, −1). Treating the centre as though it were the origin, and simply negating the point's coordinates, gives (−5, −3) — this ignores that the true centre is (2, 1), not (0, 0). Using scale factor +1 instead of −1 leaves the point exactly where it started, at (5, 3). Adding the point's displacement from the centre instead of subtracting it gives (2 × 2 + 5, 2 × 1 + 3) = (9, 5). Double the centre and subtract the point, and the image is (−1, −1).
- (c) 0.37 — Method: pool the two runs into one combined set of results, then find the relative frequency of red across all of the spins together. Working: total reds = 16 + 21 = 37. Total spins = 40 + 60 = 100. Relative frequency = 37 ÷ 100 = 0.37. Answer: 0.37. Watch out: writing down 0.40 uses only the first run, 16 ÷ 40, and throws away the extra evidence from the second 60 spins. Writing down 0.35 uses only the second run, 21 ÷ 60, and throws away the first run instead. And writing down 0.375 averages the two runs' separate rates, (0.40 + 0.35) ÷ 2, which treats a run of 40 spins and a run of 60 spins as equally weighted, when pooling the actual counts gives the larger run its fair share of influence.
- (a) Equal means; Class A is more consistent, smaller range. — Method: when two data sets share a measure of location, compare a measure of spread to say more about consistency. Working: both classes have the same mean mark, 14, so on average they performed equally well. Class A has the smaller range, 6, so its marks are more tightly grouped around 14 than Class B's marks, which vary by as much as 14. So Class A's marks were more consistent, even though neither class did better on average. Saying Class B did better because it has the bigger range confuses a wide spread with a high score — a big range describes variability, not performance. Saying Class A did better because it has the smaller range makes the same mistake in the other direction: the two classes are tied on the mean, so neither one 'did better'. Saying the classes cannot be compared because their means are equal misses the whole point of also comparing the range. Always compare both an average AND a spread before describing two data sets — either one alone tells only half the story.
- (b) 400 — Method: round each number to the nearest 100, then subtract the rounded values. Working: 812 rounds to 800 (nearest 100) and 397 rounds to 400 (nearest 100). 800 − 400 = 400. Answer: 400. 500 comes from rounding 397 down to 300 instead of up to the nearest 100, 400. 300 comes from rounding 812 down to 700 instead of up to the nearest 100, 800. 415 is the exact value of 812 − 397, found without rounding first, so it is not an estimate — the spreadsheet's answer of 315 is too far from the estimate of 400 to be correct.
- (c) 5 — Method: substitute the value into the formula, work out the index first and the addition afterwards. Working: x² = (−2) × (−2) = 4, so y = 4 + 1 = 5. Answer: 5. The distractors: −3 comes from squaring only the 2 and keeping the minus sign outside the index, giving −4 + 1; 1 comes from adding the 1 to x before squaring, giving (−2 + 1)²; 4 comes from squaring correctly but stopping there and never adding the 1.
- (c) 2/7 — Method: each number in a ratio counts parts, so the whole is all the parts added together, and the fraction wanted is the cement parts over that total. Working: the mix has 5 + 2 = 7 parts altogether, and 2 of those parts are cement, so the cement is 2/7 of the mix. Answer: 2/7. The distractors: 2/5 comes from writing the cement parts over the sand parts, comparing one part with the other part instead of with the whole; 5/7 comes from writing the sand parts over the total, which answers about the wrong material; 7/2 comes from writing the total over the cement parts, turning the fraction upside down.
- (d) 13 cm — Use Pythagoras' theorem in three dimensions: for a cuboid with edges a, b and c the space diagonal d satisfies d² = a² + b² + c². Substitute a = 3, b = 4, c = 12: d² = 3² + 4² + 12² = 9 + 16 + 144 = 169. Take the square root: d = √169 = 13 cm. Adding the three edges directly, 3 + 4 + 12 = 19 cm, ignores that Pythagoras' theorem is about squares, not lengths, and gives 19 cm. Stopping after squaring and adding, without taking the square root, leaves 169 cm — the squared length, not the length itself. Using only the 4 cm and 12 cm edges finds the diagonal of one face, √(4² + 12²) = √160 = 12.6 cm (1 d.p.), and leaves out the third dimension entirely.
- (c) 15/23 — Method: find P(rough and delayed) and the overall P(delayed) using the tree, then divide. Working: P(rough and delayed) = 0.2 × 0.75 = 0.15. P(calm and delayed) = 0.8 × 0.1 = 0.08. P(delayed) = 0.15 + 0.08 = 0.23. P(rough | delayed) = 0.15 ÷ 0.23 = 15/23. Answer: 15/23. Watch out: leaving the answer as 0.15 (3/20) gives P(rough and delayed) itself, without dividing by the overall probability that a crossing is delayed. Giving 0.75 (3/4) is the probability you were told to start with — that a crossing is delayed GIVEN the sea is rough — which is the reverse of what's being asked. And 0.2 (1/5) is just the original probability that the sea is rough, before you take the fact that the crossing was delayed into account.
- (a) 0.625 — Method: convert the fraction to a decimal so it can be compared properly with 0.6. Working: 5/8 = 0.625, and since 0.625 > 0.6, the larger value is 0.625. Answer: 0.625. 0.6 repeats Sam's incorrect claim, made by comparing single digits rather than full place value. 0.58 comes from converting 5/8 incorrectly, treating it as if it read 5 tenths and 8 hundredths. 0.85 comes from turning the fraction upside down and writing its digits straight after the decimal point, 8 then 5, instead of dividing.
- (c) 1 — At x = 0, f(0) = 4. Applying the transformations in order — reflect in the x-axis first, then translate up by 5 — gives −f(0) + 5 = −4 + 5 = 1. Applying the translation but forgetting the reflection gives f(0) + 5 = 9. Applying the reflection to the whole expression, including the +5, gives −f(0) − 5 = −9. Applying the reflection but forgetting the translation gives −f(0) = −4.
- (a) 2978 — A rise of 6% is a multiplier of 1.06, applied once for each year. After year 1: 2500 × 1.06 = 2650. After year 2: 2650 × 1.06 = 2809. After year 3: 2809 × 1.06 = 2977.54, which is 2978 to the nearest whole number. Multiplying by 1.18 in one go would be wrong, because the second and third years grow from larger numbers than the first.
- (d) (9, −4) — Reflecting (1, 3) in the line x = 4 gives (2 × 4 − 1, 3) = (7, 3). Reflecting (7, 3) in the line y = 1 gives (7, 2 × 1 − 3) = (7, −1). Translating (7, −1) by the vector (2, −3) gives (7 + 2, −1 + (−3)) = (9, −4). Stopping after the two reflections and forgetting the translation gives (7, −1). Applying the translation's y-component with the wrong sign, adding 3 instead of subtracting it, gives (9, 2). Forgetting that the two reflections are centred on (4, 1) rather than the origin, and instead rotating (1, 3) by 180° about the origin to (−1, −3) before translating, gives (1, −6). Do all three steps in order, each one correctly, and the final image is (9, −4).
- (a) 4(x + 3) = 20 and 4x + 3 = 11 when x = 2, so the two expressions are not equivalent, because the bracket means the 3 must be added before multiplying by 4. — Substituting x = 2: 4(x + 3) = 4 × 5 = 20, and 4x + 3 = 8 + 3 = 11. The two values are different, and expanding 4(x + 3) algebraically gives 4x + 12, which can never equal 4x + 3 (that would require 12 = 3) — so the two expressions are never equivalent, for any value of x. The option claiming they become equal for a larger x is wrong: 4x + 12 = 4x + 3 has no solution at all. The option claiming they are equivalent because they share the terms 4x and 3 ignores that the bracket changes the constant term. The option that calculates 4(x + 3) as 11 ignores the bracket completely, applying the 4 only to the x term.
- (a) The hourly rate is £5 and the fixed fee is £7 — The gradient is (27 − 12) ÷ (4 − 1) = 15 ÷ 3 = £5, the hourly rate. Using the point (1, 12): 12 = 5 × 1 + fee, so the fee is 12 − 5 = £7. That gives 'The hourly rate is £5 and the fixed fee is £7'. Swapping the two figures gives the statement with £7 as the rate and £5 as the fee, which has them the wrong way round. Taking the C-value of the first point, £12, as the fixed fee ignores that 1 hour of hire is already included in that £12. Using 15, the change in C, as the hourly rate without dividing by the change in h (3 hours) gives the statement claiming a £15 hourly rate.
- (b) (5, −3) — Method: rotate the point about the given centre first, then translate the image, in the stated order. Working: rotating (0, 2) by 180° about (2, 2) uses the rule (x, y) → (4 − x, 4 − y), since the centre doubles in each coordinate. This gives 4 − 0 = 4 and 4 − 2 = 2, so (0, 2) maps to (4, 2). Translating (4, 2) by the vector (1, −5) gives 4 + 1 = 5 and 2 − 5 = −3, so the final image is (5, −3). Answer: (5, −3). Rotate about the centre GIVEN in the question, (2, 2), not about the origin, and translate the rotated image afterwards, in that order: rotating about the wrong centre, swapping the order, or stopping after one step all give a different point.
- (b) a = 7; turning point (4, 2) — A vertical translation y = f(x) + a moves every point on the graph up or down by a, so the x-coordinate of the turning point stays at 4 and the minimum value becomes −5 + a. Setting −5 + a = 2 and solving gives a = 7, so the new turning point is (4, 2). Rearranging −5 + a = 2 with a sign error, treating it as a = −5 − 2, gives a = −7 while still landing on the correct turning-point coordinates. Correctly finding a = 7 but then writing down the original turning point instead of the shifted one gives (4, −5). Assuming a is simply equal to the new minimum value itself, ignoring the original −5 entirely, gives a = 2.
- (c) x = 2, y = 3 — Method: no letter cancels straight away, so make one letter the subject of one equation and substitute that expression into the other. Working: 2x + y = 7 gives y = 7 − 2x, so x + 2y = 8 becomes x + 2(7 − 2x) = 8, that is x + 14 − 4x = 8, so −3x = −6 and x = 2; substituting back gives y = 7 − 4 = 3. Answer: x = 2, y = 3, which checks in 2 + 6 = 8. The distractors: x = 3, y = 2 comes from adding the equations to x + y = 5 and then subtracting them the wrong way round, writing x − y = 1 instead of x − y = −1; x = 2, y = 5 comes from substituting x = 2 into 2x + y = 7 as 2 + y = 7, dropping the coefficient; x = −2, y = 11 comes from dividing −3x = −6 as though two minus signs gave a negative answer.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.