Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (a) 8 × 10² — Method: to multiply numbers written in standard form, multiply the coefficients and add the indices. Working: 4 × 2 = 8 for the coefficients, and −3 + 5 = 2 for the indices; 8 already lies between 1 and 10, so no adjustment is needed. Answer: 8 × 10². The distractors: 6 × 10² comes from adding the coefficients, 4 + 2, instead of multiplying them; 8 × 10⁸ comes from ignoring the minus sign and adding 3 + 5; 8 × 10⁻¹⁵ comes from multiplying the indices, −3 × 5, instead of adding them.
- (c) h = V / (lw) — Method: undo the multiplication by lw by dividing both sides by lw. Working: V = lwh, so dividing both sides by lw gives h = V / (lw). The value h = V − lw comes from subtracting lw instead of dividing by it. The value h = Vlw comes from multiplying by lw instead of dividing. The value h = lw / V comes from inverting the fraction, dividing lw by V instead of V by lw.
- (a) 4/5 — Method: find the June takings first, then write them over the May takings and cancel. Working: the takings fell by £900, so June is £4500 − £900 = £3600; the fraction is 3600/4500, and dividing the numerator and the denominator by 900 gives 4/5. Answer: 4/5 of the May takings. The distractors: 1/5 comes from writing the fall over the May takings, 900/4500, which answers how far the takings dropped rather than what June's takings are compared with May's; 5/4 comes from writing May over June, 4500/3600, reversing the order the question asks for; 4/9 comes from writing June over the two months added together, 3600/8100, a part-to-whole fraction when the comparison asked for is with May alone.
- (c) Two angles and one side are known; x is another side — The sine rule needs a matching pair, a side and the angle opposite it, that you already know, so you can set up a ratio with the unknown. When two angles and one side are known, you can find the third angle from the angle sum, giving you an angle opposite the known side and an angle opposite x: the sine rule applies directly. When all three sides are known and x is an angle, there is no side-angle pair available at all, so the cosine rule, rearranged for an angle, is what's needed instead. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is the third side, again there is no matching side-angle pair yet, so the cosine rule finds the third side directly. When two sides and the included angle are known and x is one of the other angles, you still have no side-angle pair to start from — the cosine rule has to be used first, to find the third side, before any angle can be found. Only the two-angles-and-a-side case hands you a ready-made pair, which is exactly what the sine rule needs.
- (b) 26 — Method: n(G ∪ H) = n(G) + n(H) − n(G ∩ H), taking off the overlap once so the pupils who study both subjects are not counted twice. Working: 19 + 15 − 8 = 26. Answer: 26. Watch out: adding 19 and 15 without taking off the overlap gives 34, which counts the 8 pupils who study both subjects twice. Taking the 8 off both totals before adding, 19 − 8 + 15 − 8 = 18, counts only the pupils who study exactly one of the two subjects and leaves out the 8 who study both. And writing down 11, which is 19 − 8, gives the number who study geography only, not the number who study geography or history or both.
- (a) x = 0 gives y = −20: a negative number sold — The y-intercept is the value the line predicts when x = 0: y = 3 × 0 − 20 = −20. A kiosk cannot sell a negative number of ice creams, so this is not a sensible estimate. The 3 in the equation is the gradient, not the intercept, so an option claiming x = 0 gives y = 3 has swapped the two numbers around — substituting x = 0 makes the 3x term equal 0, leaving −20, not 3. The danger of extrapolating to very high temperatures is a real issue with this line, but it is a different issue from the y-intercept, so it does not answer this question. And whether x = 0 could occur on a trading day is beside the point: the model still makes that prediction, and it is the prediction itself, −20, that is impossible.
- (c) 3.2 litres — The blue paint is 3 of the 8 equal shares in the mix, that is 3/8 of the total. Three shares are 1.2 litres, so one share is 1.2 ÷ 3 = 0.4 litres. The whole mix is 8 shares: 8 × 0.4 = 3.2 litres. 2 litres is the volume of white paint, 1.92 litres divides the blue paint by the white paint's 5 shares instead of its own 3, and 9.6 litres treats the 1.2 litres as a single share.
- (a) 25 — Gradient = change in y ÷ change in x = (100 − 0) ÷ (4 − 0) = 100 ÷ 4 = 25. Dividing time by distance instead of distance by time gives 0.04; multiplying the two values instead of dividing gives 400; stopping at the change in distance, 100, forgets to divide by the change in time.
- (c) 40 cm — First find the real pitch length using Plan A's scale: 8 × 1000 = 8000 cm. Now find its length on Plan B using Plan B's scale: 8000 ÷ 200 = 40 cm. Assuming both plans use the same scale and leaving the length as 8 cm ignores that Plan B has a different scale. Using the ratio of the two scales upside down, 200 ÷ 1000 = 0.2, then 8 × 0.2 = 1.6, gives 1.6 cm — Plan B is drawn to a larger scale than Plan A, so lengths on it should be bigger, not smaller. Dividing by 2000 instead of 200 gives 4 cm, ten times too small.
- (a) (−1, −0.5) — Method: for an enlargement centred at a point O that is not the origin, first find the point's position relative to O, multiply that by the scale factor, then add O's coordinates back on — image = O + k × (F − O). Working: F relative to O is (4, 2) − (2, 1) = (2, 1). Multiplying by the scale factor, −1.5 × (2, 1) = (−3, −1.5). Adding O back on: (2, 1) + (−3, −1.5) = (−1, −0.5). Answer: (−1, −0.5). Measure F's position from the aperture O, not from the origin, apply the full signed scale factor −1.5 to that displacement, and add O's own coordinates back on afterwards: measuring from the origin instead of O, treating the factor as +1.5, or adding O onto the wrong displacement all place the image mark somewhere else.
- (a) 0.45, different from 0.4 for all the households — Method: work out the probability inside the restricted group of garden owners, then work out the probability across the whole survey, and compare the two. Working: 54 of the 120 households with a garden own a dog, so the conditional probability is 54 divided by 120, which is 0.45. Across the whole survey 80 of the 200 households own a dog, which is 0.4. Since 0.45 is not 0.4, having a garden changes the chance of owning a dog and the two events are not independent. Answer: 0.45, different from 0.4 for all the households. The distractors: 0.27 is 54/200, dividing the households with both by the whole survey instead of by the 120 with a garden; 0.675 is 54/80, the probability that a household has a garden given that it owns a dog, which is the condition and the event the wrong way round; 0.4 is 80/200, the probability of owning a dog with the garden information never used, which is why that route also reports no difference.
- (b) 1.45 ≤ m < 1.55 — The flour's mass is labelled 1.5 kg, correct to the nearest 0.1 kg, so half of 0.1 kg is added to and subtracted from 1.5 kg to find the interval: 1.5 − 0.05 = 1.45 and 1.5 + 0.05 = 1.55, giving 1.45 ≤ m < 1.55. '1.4 ≤ m < 1.6' comes from taking the whole 0.1 kg as the margin either side, instead of half of it. '1.45 < m ≤ 1.55' comes from writing the inequality signs the wrong way round — the lower bound should be included and the upper bound excluded, not the other way round. '1.45 ≤ m ≤ 1.55' comes from including the upper bound, when the convention is that the upper bound is never actually reached.
- (b) (2, 6) — y = f(x − 3) translates y = f(x) horizontally by 3 units to the RIGHT — inside the brackets, subtracting moves the graph in the positive x-direction. Turning point (−1, 6) → (−1 + 3, 6) = (2, 6). The common slip is to move LEFT instead, since the sign inside the bracket is negative — that gives (−4, 6). Changing the y-coordinate instead of the x-coordinate, as in (−1, 3) or (−1, 9), treats this as a vertical shift, which y = f(x − 3) is not.
- (d) 1.5 — Method: the length scale factor is the square root of the area scale factor, not the area scale factor itself. Working: the area scale factor is 45 ÷ 20 = 2.25, and the square root of 2.25 is 1.5. Answer: 1.5. Nadia's answer, 2.25, is the AREA scale factor — she never took the square root to get back to the length scale factor. 4.5 comes from doubling the area scale factor instead of taking its square root. 0.67 comes from taking the square root in the wrong direction, finding the scale factor from the larger rug to the smaller rug instead of the other way round.
- (b) Parallel, since AB and DC are both horizontal lines — A and B both have y-coordinate 1, so AB is horizontal; D and C both have y-coordinate 4, so DC is horizontal too. Two horizontal lines are always parallel, so AB and DC are parallel. "Not parallel, since AB and DC have different lengths" is wrong twice over: AB runs from x = 1 to x = 5 and DC from x = 2 to x = 6, so both are in fact 4 units long, and in any case length has no bearing on whether two lines are parallel — only direction does. "Not parallel, since AB is horizontal and DC is vertical" misreads the coordinates of D and C, which share the y-coordinate 4 and so give a horizontal line, not a vertical one. "Parallel, since A and D have the same x-coordinate" rests on a false claim: A has x-coordinate 1 and D has x-coordinate 2, so they do not share an x-coordinate — and even if they did, it would say nothing about whether AB is parallel to DC.
- (a) −3/4 — Method: the tangent at a point on a circle is perpendicular to the radius drawn to that point, so find the gradient of the radius and then take its negative reciprocal. Working: the radius joins (0, 0) to (6, 8), so its gradient is 8 ÷ 6, which cancels to 4/3. Turning 4/3 upside down gives 3/4, and changing the sign gives −3/4. Answer: the gradient of the tangent is −3/4. The distractors: 4/3 is the gradient of the radius itself, quoted without taking the perpendicular at all; −4/3 changes the sign but leaves the fraction the same way up, so the two gradients do not multiply to give −1; 3/4 turns the fraction upside down but keeps it positive, which is the other half of the same rule left undone.
- (a) 0.62 miles — The gradient of the line is the change in miles divided by the change in kilometres: 31 ÷ 50 = 0.62, so 1 kilometre converts to 0.62 miles. Dividing the wrong way round, 50 ÷ 31 = 1.612..., rounds to 1.61 miles — that finds how many kilometres are in 1 mile, not the reverse. Doubling the gradient, 1.24 miles, comes from using 62 ÷ 50 instead of 31 ÷ 50. Reading off the y-coordinate of the given point without dividing by the x-coordinate gives 31.00 miles, which is the number of miles for 50 kilometres, not for 1 kilometre.
- (c) 8 — Method: the exterior angles of a polygon add up to 360°, so divide 360° by the size of one exterior angle. Working: 360 ÷ 45 = 8. Answer: 8 sides. A candidate who divides into a half turn instead of a full turn, working out 180 ÷ 45, gets 4. A candidate who reads off the given exterior angle as if it were the number of sides gets 45. A candidate who subtracts instead of dividing, working out 360 − 45, gets 315.
- (d) 23 — Method: let the smallest integer be n, so the three consecutive integers are n, n + 1 and n + 2. Form the equation n + (n + 1) + (n + 2) = 72. Working: simplify the left side: 3n + 3 = 72, so 3n = 69, giving n = 23. Answer: 23. 24 comes from dividing 72 by 3 directly, 72 ÷ 3 = 24, which finds the middle integer rather than realising the three numbers differ. 25 comes from correctly finding n = 23 but reading off the largest integer, n + 2, instead of the smallest as asked. 21 comes from dividing first and subtracting after, (72 ÷ 3) − 3, instead of subtracting 3 before dividing by 3.
- (a) x = 3/2 or x = −3/2 — Method: the equation has an x² term and a number but no x term, so make x² the subject and then take the square root of both sides, keeping the negative root as well as the positive one. Working: adding 9 to both sides of 4x² − 9 = 0 gives 4x² = 9, and dividing both sides by 4 gives x² = 9/4. Square-rooting the top and the bottom of 9/4 gives 3/2, so x = 3/2 or x = −3/2, and each value checks out because 4 × 9/4 − 9 = 0. Answer: x = 3/2 or x = −3/2. The distractors: x = 3 or x = −3 comes from square-rooting both sides of 4x² = 9 without first dividing by the 4, so the coefficient of x² is ignored; x = 9/4 or x = −9/4 comes from stopping at x² = 9/4 and writing that value down as x, leaving the square root undone; x = 3/2 only comes from taking the positive square root of 9/4 and losing the negative solution.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.