Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
The real Paper 1 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, non-calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with no calculator-only items. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
Non-calculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 1 (non-calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 88.8 — Multiply as whole numbers first, ignoring the decimal point: 37 × 24. Split it as 37 × 20 = 740 and 37 × 4 = 148, so 37 × 24 = 740 + 148 = 888. 3.7 has 1 decimal place and 24 has none, so the answer needs 1 decimal place: 88.8. Counting the 2 digits in "3.7" as though that were the number of decimal places gives 8.88 instead of 1 decimal place. Leaving the decimal point out altogether gives 888. Misreading 37 × 4 as 138 rather than 148 gives a running total of 878, placed with 1 decimal place as 87.8. So 3.7 × 24 = 88.8.
- (a) False — 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, not 8x − 3. — Expand the bracket by multiplying both terms by 4: 4 × 2x = 8x and 4 × (−3) = −12, so 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 12, which is not 8x − 3 — the student is wrong. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 8x − 3 comes from multiplying only the 2x by 4 and copying the −3 across unchanged. Saying 4(2x − 3) = 2x − 12 comes from multiplying only the −3 by 4 and leaving 2x unmultiplied. Claiming it is true because both expressions are linear ignores that equivalence depends on the actual coefficients, not the type of expression.
- (c) 16% — Method: scale each concentration to its own mass to find the salt it contains, add the two masses of salt, then write the ratio of salt to mixture per 100 g. Working: 10:100 = x:300 gives 30 g of salt, and 25:100 = y:200 gives 50 g of salt; the mixture holds 30 + 50 = 80 g of salt in 300 + 200 = 500 g of solution; 80:500 = 16:100. Answer: 16%. The distractors: 17.5% is the mean of 10% and 25%, which ignores that there is more of the weaker solution than of the stronger one; 19% comes from swapping the two concentrations over, working out (300 × 25% + 200 × 10%) ÷ 500; 26.7% comes from dividing the 80 g of salt by the 300 g of the first solution rather than by the 500 g of mixture.
- (c) 40.5 kg — Since the statues are made from the same material, mass is proportional to volume, which scales with the cube of the length scale factor. The length scale factor is 45 ÷ 30 = 1.5, so the volume (and mass) scale factor is 1.5³ = 3.375. The larger statue's mass is 12 × 3.375 = 40.5 kg. 18 kg comes from multiplying by the length factor 1.5 directly. 27 kg comes from using the area scale factor 1.5² = 2.25 instead of the volume scale factor. 54 kg comes from treating 'cubed' as 'multiplied by 3', giving 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 instead of 1.5³.
- (a) 1/3 — Method: for two independent spinners, multiply the probability of each separate outcome, but first work out each spinner's own probability correctly, using how many of its equal sections actually carry that result. Working: Spinner A has 2 even numbers, 2 and 4, out of 4 sections, so P(even) = 2/4 = 1/2. Spinner B has 2 red sections out of 3, so P(red) = 2/3. Multiplying gives 1/2 × 2/3, which cancels down to 1/3. Answer: 1/3. Watch out: writing down 1/4 treats Spinner B's two colours as equally likely and uses 1/2 for red, when in fact 2 of its 3 sections are red — the sections are not split evenly between the two colours. Writing down 1/6 undercounts Spinner A's even numbers as just one out of four instead of two. And writing down 5/6 applies the 'at least one' formula, P(A) + P(B) − P(A)×P(B), which answers a different question about EITHER spinner landing the right way, not both together.
- (c) 75 — Method: the number in a class is the area of its bar, frequency density × class width, so work out the frequency of each class that lies at or above 10 minutes and add them. Working: the class 10 ≤ t < 25 is 15 minutes wide with a frequency density of 3.2, giving 3.2 × 15 = 48 members; the class 25 ≤ t < 55 is 30 minutes wide with a frequency density of 0.9, giving 0.9 × 30 = 27 members; the total charged is 48 + 27 = 75. Answer: 75 members pay the extra charge. The distractors: 4.1 comes from adding the two frequency densities, 3.2 + 0.9, as though each height were a count; 93 comes from including the class 0 ≤ t < 10 as well, 1.8 × 10 = 18 added to 48 and 27, which charges every member; 27 comes from using only the class 25 ≤ t < 55 and forgetting that 10 ≤ t < 25 is also at or above 10 minutes.
- (c) 693 — Method: multiplying a bracket by a number multiplies every term inside it, so 7 × (100 − 1) = 7 × 100 − 7 × 1. Working: 7 × 100 = 700 and 7 × 1 = 7, so the calculation becomes 700 − 7 = 693. Answer: 693. The distractors: 699 comes from subtracting the 1 itself rather than 7 lots of it, giving 700 − 1 = 699; 707 comes from adding the second product instead of subtracting it, giving 700 + 7 = 707; 700 comes from rounding 99 up to 100 and then offering the estimate 7 × 100 as an exact value.
- (c) x = 2 and x = 3 — x² − 5x + 6 factorises as (x − 2)(x − 3), since −2 and −3 multiply to give 6 and add to give −5. The graph crosses the x-axis where each bracket equals zero: x − 2 = 0 gives x = 2, and x − 3 = 0 gives x = 3. The option x = −2 and x = −3 comes from reading the signs inside the brackets directly instead of solving x − 2 = 0 and x − 3 = 0. The option x = 2 and x = −3 mixes up the sign of only one root. The option x = −1 and x = −6 comes from picking the wrong pair of factors of 6 (1 and 6 instead of 2 and 3) and then reading their signs directly from the brackets.
- (a) 10 — Method: two equal fractions can be rearranged by cross-multiplying, multiplying each numerator by the other denominator. Working: 4 × 5 = 2 × x, so 2x = 20 and x = 20 ÷ 2 = 10. Answer: 10. The distractors: 20 comes from cross-multiplying to 4 × 5 = 20 and stopping there, without dividing by the 2; 8 comes from multiplying the two numerators, 4 × 2; 2.5 comes from working only with the right-hand fraction, 5 ÷ 2, and ignoring the 4.
- (a) 80° — In triangle ABD, the three angles sum to 180°: angle BAD = 180° − 35° − 65° = 80°. ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral, so the exterior angle at C, angle BCE, is equal to the interior angle at the opposite vertex, angle BAD: angle BCE = 80°. Adding the two given angles in triangle ABD instead of subtracting them from 180°, 35° + 65° = 100°, and then applying the exterior-angle rule correctly still gives the wrong angle BAD and so the wrong exterior angle, 100°. Halving the correct angle BAD, 80° ÷ 2 = 40°, confuses the exterior-angle rule with a different circle theorem in which one angle is half of another. Doubling it instead, 80° × 2 = 160°, makes the same kind of confusion in the other direction.
- (d) 315 — The relative frequency from the survey is 42 ÷ 120 = 0.35, so the expected number who prefer paper bags among 900 shoppers is 0.35 × 900 = 315. Giving 42 as the answer reuses the original survey count without scaling it up to 900 shoppers at all. Finding the expected number who prefer PLASTIC bags instead of paper, using the relative frequency 78 ÷ 120 = 0.65, gives 0.65 × 900 = 585. Using 1000 shoppers instead of the 900 actually stated gives 0.35 × 1000 = 350.
- (d) 0.3 — Converting the fractions to decimals, 1/4 = 0.25 and 2/5 = 0.4, so any decimal between 0.25 and 0.4 is a valid answer, and 0.3 fits. Confusing 1/4 with 1/5 and converting it as 0.2 instead of 0.25 gives a value below the true lower bound. Confusing 2/5 with 1/2 and converting it as 0.5 instead of 0.4 gives a value above the true upper bound. Converting the fractions correctly but choosing a decimal above the true upper bound of 0.4 instead of between the two values gives 0.45.
- (b) (3x + 1)(2x − 3) — To factorise 6x² − 7x − 3, look for two numbers that multiply to 6 × (−3) = −18 and add to −7: these are −9 and 2. Splitting the middle term gives 6x² − 9x + 2x − 3, which groups to 3x(2x − 3) + 1(2x − 3) = (3x + 1)(2x − 3). Writing (3x − 1)(2x + 3) comes from using the pair 9 and −2 instead — the right product but the wrong signs, giving +7x instead of −7x. Writing (6x − 1)(x + 3) comes from picking the factor pair 18 and −1: it multiplies to −18 correctly, but it adds to 17, not −7, so checking only the product splits the middle term as 6x² + 18x − x − 3 and pairs the wrong factors of 6 and 3 together. Writing (x − 3)(6x + 1) comes from that same unchecked pair used the other way round, splitting the middle term as 6x² + x − 18x − 3.
- (c) 500 g — Method: a concentration of 10% is the ratio 10:100, and the salt and the solution in the beaker must be in that same ratio, so write 10:100 = 50:m and scale. Working: 50 ÷ 10 = 5, so the salt is 5 times the 10 of the ratio; the solution must be 5 times the 100 of the ratio, giving 5 × 100 = 500 g. Answer: 500 g. The distractors: 5 g comes from working out 10% of 50 g, which treats the 50 g as the whole solution when it is the salt inside it; 450 g comes from scaling correctly and then taking the 50 g of salt away, which gives the mass of water rather than the mass of the whole solution; 5000 g comes from dividing by 0.01 instead of 0.1, that is from writing 10% as 0.01.
- (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.
- (c) {x : x ≤ −4} ∪ {x : x ≥ 4} — Rearrange so one side is zero: x² − 16 ≥ 0, then factorise: (x − 4)(x + 4) ≥ 0. The critical values are x = −4 and x = 4. Since the coefficient of x² is positive, the graph is a U-shape that is on or above the x-axis outside its roots, so the solution is x ≤ −4 or x ≥ 4, written as {x : x ≤ −4} ∪ {x : x ≥ 4}. Distractor routes: {x : −4 ≤ x ≤ 4} takes the region BETWEEN the roots, which is where x² − 16 is negative, the opposite region. {x : x ≥ 4} keeps only the positive square root and drops the negative branch entirely. {x : x ≤ 4} comes from a sign error, treating the inequality as if it were x² ≤ 16.
- (b) 2/5 — The ratio red : yellow is 6:15, so write red over yellow: 6/15. Divide both numbers by their highest common factor, 3: 6÷3 = 2, 15÷3 = 5, giving 2/5. (5/2 comes from writing the ratio the wrong way round, yellow over red, 15/6, which simplifies to 5/2. 2/7 comes from comparing the red paint to the total amount of paint, 6 parts out of 21. 5/7 comes from comparing the yellow paint to the total amount of paint, 15 parts out of 21.)
- (d) (2, −1) — Method: for an enlargement, image = centre + k × (point − centre), so the centre satisfies centre = (image − k × point) ÷ (1 − k). Working: with k = 5, point (4, 1) and image (12, 9): 5 × (4, 1) = (20, 5); (12, 9) − (20, 5) = (−8, 4); dividing by 1 − 5 = −4 gives (2, −1). Answer: (2, −1), the centre of the enlargement, is the only invariant point since the scale factor is not 1. Subtracting the point itself instead of k times the point, (12, 9) − (4, 1) = (8, 8), then dividing by −4 gives (−2, −2); dividing by k − 1 = 4 instead of 1 − k = −4 gives (−2, 1); and simply taking the midpoint of the point and its image ignores the scale factor altogether and gives (8, 5). The centre of an enlargement is never just the midpoint between a point and its image unless the scale factor happens to be −1 — always use the full centre formula and keep the scale factor k in it.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (d) Line 3 — Method: check each line of Chloe's working against the correct algebraic step. Working: Line 1 to Line 2 is correct, subtracting 2x from both sides gives 3x − 4 = 8. But Line 2 to Line 3 should add 4 to both sides, giving 3x = 12, not 3x = 4 — the constant −4 has been dropped rather than removed correctly. Line 4 follows correctly from Chloe's own, incorrect, Line 3. Answer: Line 3. Line 1 is simply the original equation, copied out correctly. Line 2 correctly subtracts 2x from both sides of Line 1. Line 4 divides Chloe's own Line 3 by 3 correctly — the arithmetic there is fine, the mistake happened one line earlier.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.