Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (b) 23 kg — Method: the rounded value sits exactly in the middle of the error interval. Working: the interval 22.5 ≤ m < 23.5 stretches 0.5 either side of the rounded value, so the rounded value is 23. Answer: 23 kg. (22 kg comes from rounding the lower bound down instead of finding the middle of the interval. 22.5 kg comes from giving the lower bound itself rather than the rounded value. 23.5 kg comes from giving the upper bound itself rather than the rounded value.)
- (c) n = 4 — Testing n = 4: 4² = 16, and 16 + 4 + 1 = 21, and 21 = 3 × 7 is not a prime number, so this value disproves the claim. Testing n = 1: 1² = 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, which is prime, so it does not disprove the claim. Testing n = 2: 2² = 4, and 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, which is prime. Testing n = 3: 3² = 9, and 9 + 3 + 1 = 13, which is also prime — a counterexample has to give a result that isn't prime, and only n = 4 does that.
- (a) 4 : 15 — Convert to the same unit first: 1.5 kg = 1500 g, since 1 kg = 1000 g. This gives the ratio 400 : 1500. Divide both parts by their highest common factor, 100, to get 4 : 15. Giving 40 : 150 divides by 10 only, which is not the highest common factor, so it is not fully simplified. Giving 15 : 4 swaps the order. Giving 4 : 1.5 has not converted 1.5 kg into grams, so the two parts are not measured in the same unit.
- (d) y = 2 — Two reflections in perpendicular lines that cross at a point combine to a 180° rotation about that point. The line x = 3 is vertical, so the second line must be horizontal, and it must pass through the centre of rotation (3, 2) — that line is y = 2. Taking the y-coordinate of the centre but writing it against the wrong letter gives y = 3. Assuming the second line must also be vertical, like the first one, and just swapping in the other coordinate gives x = 2. Reaching for the standard mirror line y = x without checking that it actually passes through (3, 2) gives y = x — it does not pass through that point at all. The line that is both perpendicular to x = 3 and through (3, 2) is y = 2.
- (b) 8,100 — First find the total number of alerts sent in the month: 1,500 × 30 = 45,000. Then apply the probability of a 'STOP' reply: 45,000 × 0.18 = 8,100. Stopping after finding only one day's expected replies, 1,500 × 0.18 = 270, forgets to scale up to the whole month. Multiplying the number of days by the probability instead of by the daily total of alerts gives 30 × 0.18 = 5.4, which rounds to 5. Shifting the decimal point in the probability, using 0.018 instead of 0.18, gives 45,000 × 0.018 = 810.
- (c) The mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3. — Method: work each measure out before the extra value is added and again afterwards, then compare the size of the two changes. Working: before, the six values total 42, so the mean is 42 ÷ 6 = 7, and the middle pair 6 and 8 give a median of (6 + 8) ÷ 2 = 7; after, the seven values total 142, so the mean is 142 ÷ 7 = 20.29 to 2 decimal places, while the median is now the 4th of the seven ordered values, which is 8; the mean has moved by about 13.3 and the median by 1. Answer: the mean, because every value counts towards it, so 100 pulls it from 7 up to about 20.3 — this is why the median is often preferred when a data set contains an outlier. The distractors: the reply that the mean rises by 100 adds the extra value to the mean instead of adding it to the total; the reply that the median moves to 12 takes the largest of the original values as the new middle instead of counting to the 4th of the seven values; the reply about even and odd counts quotes a rule that does not exist, since the median moved because a very large value was added, not because the count of values changed.
- (b) 5 — Method: divide the total amount of sugar by the amount needed for one cake, then round down because a part-used amount of sugar cannot make an extra whole cake. Working: 3 1/2 ÷ 2/3 = 7/2 × 3/2 = 21/4 = 5.25; only 5 complete cakes can be made, since the leftover 0.25 of a portion is not enough for a 6th cake. Answer: 5. 5.25 gives the exact result of the division without rounding down to a whole number of cakes. 7 comes from multiplying 3.5 by 2 and ignoring the need to also divide by 3 as part of dividing by the fraction 2/3. 6 comes from rounding 5.25 up to the nearest whole number instead of down, wrongly assuming a 6th cake could be made from the leftover sugar.
- (b) 158 minutes — Rearranging C = 15 + 0.2m for m: subtract 15 from both sides to get C − 15 = 0.2m, then divide by 0.2: m = (C − 15)/0.2. Substituting C = 46.60: m = (46.60 − 15)/0.2 = 31.60/0.2 = 158. Answering 233 minutes comes from dividing the whole £46.60 by 0.2 without first taking off the £15 fixed charge. Answering 308 minutes comes from adding the £15 instead of subtracting it: (46.60 + 15)/0.2. Answering 218 minutes divides first and subtracts 15 afterwards, in the wrong order: 46.60/0.2 − 15 = 233 − 15 = 218. Ali made 158 minutes of calls.
- (b) No — rate fell by 3.7 thousand/month — Each tangent gradient is the instantaneous growth rate, in thousand subscribers per month. To compare them, subtract the later rate from the earlier one: 4.8 − 1.1 = 3.7. Since 1.1 is less than 4.8, the growth rate has fallen by 3.7 thousand subscribers per month, so the manager is wrong — the app is growing more slowly at 18 months, not faster. Subtracting the other way round and calling the result a rise, 'rate rose by 3.7 thousand/month', gets the direction backwards: the later gradient is the smaller of the two. Adding the two gradients, 4.8 + 1.1 = 5.9, and calling this a combined rate that shows speeding up, is the wrong operation for comparing two rates. Treating the difference 3.7 as a total number of subscribers lost, rather than a rate in thousands per month, confuses a rate with a count. Always subtract the two rates in a sensible order and keep the units in thousands per month.
- (a) 30° — Method: the exterior angles of any convex polygon add up to 360°, and in a regular polygon they are all equal, so divide 360° by the number of sides. Working: 360 ÷ 12 = 30. Answer: 30°. The distractors: 150° is the interior angle, 180 − 30, which answers for the wrong angle at the vertex; 15° comes from dividing 180 by 12, using the angles on a straight line instead of the full turn; 36° comes from dividing 360 by 12 − 2 = 10, carrying the subtraction of 2 out of the interior angle sum formula into a calculation that does not need it.
- (a) 753 — The estimate from 2000 spins is the most reliable, since it comes from the largest sample size, so the best estimate of the probability is 0.251. Over a further 3000 spins, the expected number landing on green is 3000 × 0.251 = 753. Writing 1050 is wrong because 3000 × 0.350 = 1050 uses the estimate from only 20 spins, the LEAST reliable of the three. Writing 870 is wrong because 3000 × 0.290 = 870 uses the estimate from 200 spins rather than the more reliable 2000-spin estimate. Writing 750 is wrong because 3000 × 0.25 = 750 ignores the recorded data completely and simply assumes each of the 4 colours is equally likely. The best estimate is 753 expected green spins.
- (b) £45.90 — The cost is 18 × £3.45 = £62.10. Profit = £108 − £62.10 = £45.90. A candidate who does not borrow in the tenths column, doing 1 − 0 = 1 instead of borrowing to make 10 − 1 = 9 and so leaving the units as 8 − 2 = 6, gets £46.10. A candidate who adds the cost to the selling price instead of subtracting gets £108 + £62.10 = £170.10. A candidate who gives the cost instead of the profit gets £62.10.
- (b) 0.458 — x₁ = (0.4² + 3) ÷ 7 = 3.16 ÷ 7 = 0.4514 (unrounded, 0.451428...). x₂ = (x₁² + 3) ÷ 7 = (0.2038 + 3) ÷ 7 = 3.2038 ÷ 7 = 0.458 (3 d.p.). Choosing 0.632 divides only the 3 by 7 instead of dividing the whole sum x₁² + 3 by 7. Choosing 0.451 repeats the calculation for x₁ instead of moving on to x₂. Choosing 0.493 uses x₁ itself instead of x₁² inside the formula.
- (d) 4 years — Apply the recurrence repeatedly. V_1 = 0.85 × 18000 = 15300. V_2 = 0.85 × 15300 = 13005. V_3 = 0.85 × 13005 = 11054.25. V_4 = 0.85 × 11054.25 = 9396.1125. V_3 = £11054.25 is still above £10000, but V_4 = £9396.11 has dropped below it, so the answer is 4 years. Stopping at V_3 and calling it '3 years' misreads £11054.25 as already below £10000, or comes from wrongly modelling the fall as a flat £2700 a year (15% of the original value each time, without compounding), which crosses £10000 a year too early. Continuing one extra step to V_5 = 0.85 × 9396.1125 = 7986.70 and calling it '5 years' overshoots, since the value had already dropped below £10000 at V_4. Doubling the percentage decrease to 30% by mistake gives V_1 = 0.7 × 18000 = 12600, then V_2 = 0.7 × 12600 = 8820, which is already below £10000 after only 2 years — the wrong rate crosses the threshold too fast.
- (a) 35.9 cm² — Method: the area of any triangle is 1/2 × a × b × sin C, where a and b are two sides and C is the angle between them. Working: the 47° angle lies between AB = 8.6 cm and AC = 11.4 cm, so the area is 1/2 × 8.6 × 11.4 × sin 47° = 49.02 × 0.73135 = 35.851. Answer: the area is 35.9 cm² to 1 decimal place. The distractors: 71.7 cm² comes from leaving out the factor 1/2 and working out 8.6 × 11.4 × sin 47°; 33.4 cm² comes from pressing cos instead of sin, 49.02 × cos 47°, which is the same as using the complement 43° in place of 47°; 52.6 cm² comes from pressing tan instead of sin, 49.02 × tan 47°.
- (c) 6 — Method: substitute the value, work out the top of the fraction first, then the division, and add the 3 last. Working: the top gives 10 − 4 = 6, dividing by 2 gives 6 ÷ 2 = 3, and adding 3 gives 3 + 3 = 6. Answer: 6. The distractors: 11 comes from dividing only the 4 by 2 instead of the whole of the top, giving 10 − 2 + 3; 4.5 comes from dividing the + 3 by 2 as well, giving (10 − 4 + 3) ÷ 2; 0 comes from subtracting the wrong way round on the top, giving (4 − 10) ÷ 2 = −3 and then −3 + 3.
- (a) 60 minutes — Method: for inverse proportion, printers × time is constant. Working: 6 × 40 = 240 (the constant). With 4 printers: 240 ÷ 4 = 60 minutes. Wrong options: 26.7 minutes comes from treating the relationship as direct proportion, scaling the time down as printers decrease (40 × 4 ÷ 6); 24 minutes comes from multiplying the two printer counts together instead of using the constant; 40 minutes comes from not adjusting the time at all for the change in printers.
- (d) 1.1 — Method: multiply the drawing length by the scale factor to get the real length, then convert to the units asked for. Working: 4.4 cm × 25 = 110 cm = 1.1 m. A student who answers 4.4 has forgotten to use the scale at all. A student who answers 110 has correctly worked out the real length in centimetres but forgotten to convert it to metres. A student who answers 11 has used a scale factor of 2.5 instead of 25 by misreading the scale. Answer: 1.1 m.
- (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
- (b) −23 — Expand two of the three brackets first: (x + 5)(x − 2) = x² + 3x − 10. Then multiply this by the remaining bracket: (2x − 1)(x² + 3x − 10) = 2x³ + 6x² − 20x − x² − 3x + 10, which simplifies to 2x³ + 5x² − 23x + 10, so the coefficient of x is −23. Writing −13 comes from a sign slip in the first expansion, combining 5x − 2x as −5x − 2x = −7x instead of +3x, which carries through to a wrong final coefficient. Writing −20 comes from forgetting to distribute the −1 across every term of x² + 3x − 10, dropping the −1 × 3x = −3x contribution. Writing 10 comes from reading off the constant term of the expansion instead of the coefficient of x.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.