Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (d) 64 — Method: each time the power increases by 1, the value doubles, since one more 2 is multiplied in. Working: 2⁶ = 2⁵ × 2 = 32 × 2 = 64. Answer: 64. (37 comes from adding the power to the value, 32 + 5, instead of multiplying by the base. 192 comes from multiplying 32 by the new power, 6, instead of by the base, 2. 34 comes from adding the base to the value, 32 + 2, instead of multiplying.)
- (c) n = 4 — Testing n = 4: 4² = 16, and 16 + 4 + 1 = 21, and 21 = 3 × 7 is not a prime number, so this value disproves the claim. Testing n = 1: 1² = 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, which is prime, so it does not disprove the claim. Testing n = 2: 2² = 4, and 4 + 2 + 1 = 7, which is prime. Testing n = 3: 3² = 9, and 9 + 3 + 1 = 13, which is also prime — a counterexample has to give a result that isn't prime, and only n = 4 does that.
- (d) 132 — Method: find the value of one part of the ratio, use it to find Leo's pages, then add both amounts together. Working: 84 ÷ 7 = 12 (value of one part). Leo's pages = 12 × 4 = 48. Total = 84 + 48 = 132. Wrong options: 48 gives only Leo's pages and forgets to add Mia's; 147 comes from reversing the ratio parts (84 ÷ 4 × 7 = 147) and stopping there; 231 comes from reversing the ratio parts and then adding Mia's pages (84 + 147).
- (b) (7, 3) — Reflecting in the line y = x swaps the x- and y-coordinates: (3, 7) → (7, 3). A pupil who reflects in the x-axis instead gets (3, −7). A pupil who reflects in the y-axis instead gets (−3, 7). A pupil who confuses y = x with y = −x, swapping the coordinates and changing both signs, gets (−7, −3). The correct image is (7, 3).
- (a) 952 — 68% = 0.68. The relative frequency from the survey applies to the new group of 1400 shoppers, so the expected number is 0.68 × 1400 = 952. Working out 1 − 0.68 = 0.32 and applying that instead, 0.32 × 1400 = 448, finds the number who have NOT used a self-checkout, not the number who have. Applying 68% to the original sample size of 250 instead of the new total of 1400 gives 0.68 × 250 = 170. Applying the complement percentage to the original sample size, 0.32 × 250 = 80, compounds both mistakes.
- (b) £1,000 — Wages take up 150° out of 360°, so the amount spent on wages is 150 ÷ 360 × 2400 = £1,000. Choosing £600 uses the repairs angle, 90°, instead of the wages angle: 90 ÷ 360 × 2400 = 600. Choosing £3,600 treats the angle in degrees as if it were a percentage, 150 ÷ 100 × 2400 = 3600, instead of dividing by 360°. Choosing £800 uses the angle for the 'other costs' sector, 360 − 90 − 150 = 120°, instead of the wages sector: 120 ÷ 360 × 2400 = 800.
- (d) 1.6 × 10⁵ — 5.6 ÷ 3.5 = 1.6, and 7 − 2 = 5, so the average turnover per shop is 1.6 × 10⁵ pounds. Multiplying the exponents instead of subtracting them gives 7 × 2 = 14, so 1.6 × 10¹⁴. Adding the exponents instead of subtracting them gives 7 + 2 = 9, so 1.6 × 10⁹. Subtracting the coefficients instead of dividing them gives 5.6 − 3.5 = 2.1, so 2.1 × 10⁵.
- (a) 38 — Method: substitute the position number into the rule and follow the order of operations, so the squaring is carried out before the 2 is added. Working: n = 6 gives 6² + 2; 6² means 6 × 6 = 36, and then 2 is added to 36. Answer: 38. The distractors: 14 comes from multiplying the position by 2 instead of squaring it, 6 × 2 + 2; 36 comes from squaring correctly and then forgetting to add the 2; 64 comes from adding the 2 first and squaring afterwards, (6 + 2)².
- (d) 20 litres — The ratio of concentrate to water is 2 : 5, so water = concentrate × 5 ÷ 2. 8 × 5 ÷ 2 = 20, so Priya needs 20 litres of water. Giving 40 litres multiplies by 5 but forgets to divide by 2 (8 × 5 = 40). Giving 3.2 litres uses the ratio inverted, multiplying by 2 ÷ 5 instead of 5 ÷ 2 (8 × 2 ÷ 5 = 3.2). Giving 11 litres uses additive reasoning instead of multiplicative: it adds the difference between the ratio parts, 5 − 2 = 3, onto the amount of concentrate (8 + 3 = 11), but ratios scale by multiplying, not by adding a fixed amount.
- (a) 7.7 m — AB is parallel to DC, so those two sides are each parallel to another side. BC and AD are stated to be not parallel to each other, so neither one is parallel to any other side — these are the two sides that need edging. Adding these: 3.2 + 4.5 = 7.7 m, so 7.7 m is correct. 7.6 m comes from an arithmetic slip when adding 3.2 and 4.5. 15.4 m comes from doubling the correct total, mistakenly assuming edging strip is needed along both faces of each side. 4.5 m comes from using only the longer of the two non-parallel sides and forgetting to add the shorter one.
- (c) 26 — The number who play football or basketball is 27 + 21 − 9 = 39, subtracting the 9 who play both so they are not counted twice. The number who play neither is then 65 − 39 = 26. Giving 39 stops after finding the number who play football or basketball, without taking the complement within the 65 members. Subtracting all three given numbers from 65, 65 − 27 − 21 − 9 = 8, treats the 9 who play both as a separate group rather than a correction for double-counting. Adding 27 and 21 without removing the double-counted 9, then subtracting that total from 65, gives 65 − (27 + 21) = 17.
- (b) No, the true mass could be as high as 852.5 kg — Method: find the upper bound of the true mass and compare it with the weight limit. Working: the display is correct to the nearest 5 kg, so half of 5 kg is 2.5 kg, and the true mass, m kg, satisfies 847.5 ≤ m < 852.5. Part of that interval lies above 850 kg, so the parcels are not definitely within the limit. Answer: the true mass could be as high as 852.5 kg, which is above the limit. ("Yes, the display reads 850 kg, which is not above the limit" compares the limit with the displayed value instead of with the largest value the true mass could take. "Yes, the true mass is at least 847.5 kg and at most 850 kg" uses the correct half unit below but caps the interval at the limit instead of at 852.5 kg. "No, 850 kg on the display rounds up to 855 kg" wrongly treats the displayed value as if it rounds again.)
- (b) (−5, −2) — A rotation of 180° about the origin reverses the sign of both coordinates, so Q = (−5, −2). A candidate who reverses the sign of only the y-coordinate, as if reflecting in the x-axis, gets (5, −2). A candidate who reverses the sign of only the x-coordinate, as if reflecting in the y-axis, gets (−5, 2). A candidate who swaps the coordinates instead of reversing their signs gets (2, 5).
- (c) 40 — Working out successive terms shows where the sequence is heading, but the terms themselves keep changing — the limit is the value where the sequence stops changing, so x_{n+1} = x_n = L there. Substituting into the rule: L = 0.5L + 20. Subtracting 0.5L from both sides: L − 0.5L = 20, so 0.5L = 20, and L = 20 ÷ 0.5 = 40. The individual terms are x_1 = 0.5 × 0 + 20 = 20, x_2 = 0.5 × 20 + 20 = 30 and x_3 = 0.5 × 30 + 20 = 35, getting closer to this value but not equal to it — 35 is only the third term, not the limit. Multiplying by 0.5 instead of dividing at the final step, 20 × 0.5 = 10, undoes the rearrangement rather than completing it, and gives a value smaller than terms the sequence has already passed. Writing the fixed-point equation with the wrong sign, L = 0.5L − 20, gives 0.5L = −20 and L = −40, which cannot be right since every term in the sequence is positive and increasing. The value the sequence is approaching is 40.
- (d) $\binom{0}{4}$ — Add the three vectors component by component: x: 3 + (−7) + 4 = 0; y: −2 + 5 + 1 = 4, giving $\binom{0}{4}$. $\binom{−4}{3}$ comes from adding only the first two vectors and forgetting the third. $\binom{14}{−6}$ comes from reading the second vector as $\binom{7}{−5}$ instead of $\binom{−7}{5}$, flipping its signs. $\binom{4}{0}$ comes from swapping the final x-total and y-total.
- (b) No, because their gradients are 2 and −2 — Method: two lines are parallel exactly when their gradients are equal as signed numbers, so m is read from each equation written in the form y = mx + c and the two are compared. Working: y = 2x + 1 has gradient 2 and y = −2x + 3 has gradient −2; those are not equal, so the lines are not parallel, and indeed one slopes upwards while the other slopes downwards. Answer: No, because their gradients are 2 and −2. The distractors: saying yes because both gradients have size 2 comes from comparing the sizes of the gradients and ignoring their signs; saying yes because the gradients add to 0 comes from using a sum of zero as the test for parallel lines instead of equality of gradients; saying no because the y-intercepts are 1 and 3 reaches the right verdict by the wrong route, since the intercepts decide where the lines sit rather than whether they are parallel.
- (b) Car A, 50 km/h — Method: speed = distance ÷ time for each car, then compare. Working: Car A = 150 ÷ 3 = 50 km/h. Car B = 180 ÷ 4 = 45 km/h. Since 50 > 45, Car A is faster, travelling at 50 km/h. Wrong options: Car B, 45 km/h correctly finds Car B's speed but wrongly names the slower car as faster; Car A, 45 km/h picks the correct car but uses Car B's speed by mistake; Car B, 50 km/h picks the wrong car but uses Car A's correct speed value.
- (b) £2.94 — Method: the price is quoted for each kilogram, so the mass has to be written in kilograms before it is multiplied by the price. Working: 1 kg = 1000 g, so 350 ÷ 1000 = 0.35 and the piece weighs 0.35 kg. The cost is then 8.40 × 0.35 = 2.94. Answer: £2.94. Treating 350 g as 3.5 kg, a division by 100 rather than by 1000, gives 8.40 × 3.5 = 29.40. Multiplying the price by the number of grams gives 8.40 × 350 = 2940. Dividing the price by the mass instead of multiplying gives 8.40 ÷ 0.35 = 24.
- (c) y = 4x − 5 — Parallel lines have the same gradient, so the new line has gradient 4; since it passes through (0, −5), its y-intercept is −5, giving y = 4x − 5. A candidate who drops the negative sign on the y-intercept would write y = 4x + 5. A candidate who changes the sign of the gradient, instead of keeping it the same for a parallel line, would write y = −4x − 5. A candidate who confuses m and c, using the y-intercept of the first line (3) as the gradient of the second, would write y = 3x − 5.
- (a) 4 — a₅ = a₄ + a₃, so a₄ = a₅ − a₃ = 29 − 11 = 18. a₄ = a₃ + a₂, so a₂ = a₄ − a₃ = 18 − 11 = 7. a₃ = a₂ + a₁, so a₁ = a₃ − a₂ = 11 − 7 = 4. Checking forwards: 4, 7, 11, 18, 29. Answering 7 stops one step early, reporting a₂ = 7 instead of continuing back one more step to a₁ — wrong, because the question asks for a₁, not a₂. Answering 18 reports a₄ = 18, an intermediate value found along the way, instead of a₁ — wrong, because a₄ is a term used to reach the answer, not the term the question asks for. Answering 3 takes one backward step too many, working out a further term a₀ = a₂ − a₁ = 7 − 4 = 3 — wrong, because the sequence starts at a₁, so a₁ = 4 is as far back as the question goes.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.