Sample paper · GCSE Higher · grades 4–9
GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
The real Paper 2 is 1.5 hour 30 minutes and 80 marks, calculator, and all three papers carry equal weight. This sample is 20 original questions in the same content proportions as the Higher qualification — number 15%, algebra 30%, ratio, proportion and rates of change 20%, geometry and measures 20%, probability 7.5%, statistics 7.5% — with a calculator allowed. AO1 / AO2 / AO3 at this tier: 40% / 30% / 30%.
CalculatorGCSE Higher
Answer key: GCSE Higher sample Paper 2 (calculator)
MathsUKwww.geekhero.co.uk
- (c) 5 — Method: work out the volume of one box, divide the total volume by it, then round down since a partial box cannot fit. Working: volume of one box = 7³ = 343 cm³. 2000 ÷ 343 = 5.83 (2 d.p.). Since only whole boxes fit, the greatest number is 5. Answer: 5. (6 comes from rounding 5.83 up to the nearest whole number instead of rounding down to the number of boxes that actually fit. 343 comes from giving the volume of one box instead of the number of boxes. 5.8 comes from leaving the division as a decimal instead of rounding down to a whole number of boxes.)
- (d) £2000 — This is an arithmetic sequence with first term £500 and common difference £300. The 6th term is 500 + 5 × 300 = 2000. A candidate who uses 6 lots of the increase instead of 5 gets 500 + 6 × 300 = 2300. A candidate who forgets to add the first year's profit at all gets 5 × 300 = 1500. A candidate who miscounts the number of increases as 4 instead of 5 gets 500 + 4 × 300 = 1700.
- (c) 70 cm — Method: convert the real length to centimetres, then divide by the scale factor. Working: 84 m = 8400 cm. 8400 ÷ 120 = 70 cm. Wrong options: 0.7 cm comes from dividing 84 by 120 without converting metres to centimetres; 1,008,000 cm comes from multiplying instead of dividing (8400 × 120); 7 cm comes from converting 84 m to 840 cm (using ×10 instead of ×100) before dividing.
- (a) 310° — Method: give the two rotations opposite signs since they turn in opposite senses — clockwise positive, anticlockwise negative — combine them into a single signed turn, then convert that turn into an angle measured clockwise between 0° and 360°. Working: the first rotation is 200° clockwise, so +200. The second is 250° anticlockwise, so −250. Combined: 200 − 250 = −50, meaning the net effect is a 50° turn anticlockwise. Measured clockwise instead, that same turn is 360 − 50 = 310°. Answer: 310°. Give the two rotations opposite signs before combining them, and convert a negative (anticlockwise) result into a clockwise angle by subtracting it from 360°, not from 180°: taking 50° away from a half turn gives 130°, which is a different rotation altogether; adding the two sizes as if both were clockwise gives 450°, which reduces to 90°; and reporting the anticlockwise size without converting it gives 50°.
- (a) 3,860 — The probability a bulb works correctly is the complement of being defective: 1 − 0.035 = 0.965. Expected number working correctly = 0.965 × 4,000 = 3,860. Using the probability of being defective instead of its complement gives 4,000 × 0.035 = 140, the expected number of DEFECTIVE bulbs, not working ones. Shifting the decimal point in the complement, using 0.0965 instead of 0.965, gives 4,000 × 0.0965 = 386. Assuming every bulb works, ignoring the 0.035 probability altogether, gives the full batch of 4,000.
- (c) Yes — £80 is above the boundary, £78 — Method: a value counts as an outlier when it lies more than 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond the nearer quartile; here that means checking it against upper quartile + 1.5 × interquartile range. Working: the interquartile range is 42 − 18 = 24. 1.5 × 24 = 36, and 42 + 36 = 78, so any saving above £78 is an outlier. Amara saved £80, and 80 is greater than 78. Answer: yes, Amara's saving is an outlier, because £80 is above the outlier boundary, £78. Watch how you build the boundary and what you compare it with: adding the two quartiles instead of subtracting them, 42 + 18 = 60, gives an interquartile range three times too big, and 42 + 1.5 × 60 = 42 + 90 = 132 puts the boundary so far out that £80 wrongly looks ordinary; comparing £80 with the upper quartile alone, £42, checks only that it lies in the top quarter of the data, which every value above £42 does, not that it lies unusually far beyond it; and adding the interquartile range on once instead of one and a half times, 42 + 24 = 66, uses the wrong multiplier, even though £80 still happens to clear that lower boundary too.
- (b) 5.2 × 10⁶ — Method: write the digits as a coefficient that is at least 1 and less than 10, then count the places the decimal point moves to reach that position. Working: the digits give a coefficient of 5.2, and the decimal point travels from the end of 5,200,000 until it sits between the 5 and the 2, a move of 6 places. Answer: 5.2 × 10⁶. The distractors: 52 × 10⁵ is the same amount but not in standard form, because 52 is not less than 10; 5.2 × 10⁵ comes from counting the five zeros in 5,200,000 rather than the six places the decimal point moves; 5.2 × 10⁻⁶ comes from making the index negative because the decimal point was carried to the left.
- (c) 2 — At x = 1, y = 1² − 3(1) = 1 − 3 = −2. At x = 4, y = 4² − 3(4) = 16 − 12 = 4. Gradient of the chord = change in y ÷ change in x = (4 − (−2)) ÷ (4 − 1) = 6 ÷ 3 = 2. Writing down the change in y, 6, and stopping there without dividing by the change in x gives 6. Losing the negative sign on y = −2 at x = 1 and treating it as +2 gives (4 − 2) ÷ (4 − 1) = 2 ÷ 3 = 2/3. Dividing the wrong way round, change in x ÷ change in y, gives (4 − 1) ÷ (4 − (−2)) = 3 ÷ 6 = 1/2.
- (d) £7060 — A 6% decrease each year means the value becomes 100% − 6% = 94% of the previous year's value, and 94% = 0.94, so the multiplier is 0.94. Apply it once for each of the 3 years: £8500 × 0.94 = £7990 after 1 year, £7990 × 0.94 = £7510.60 after 2 years, £7510.60 × 0.94 = £7059.96 after 3 years, which rounds to £7060 to the nearest pound. (£6970 comes from using simple depreciation instead of compound, taking 6% of the original £8500 three times: £8500 − 3 × £510 = £6970. £7990 is the value after only 1 year, forgetting the remaining 2 years. £7511 is the value after only 2 years, £8500 × 0.94² = £7510.60, forgetting the third year.)
- (b) 7 — Method: each coordinate of a midpoint is the mean of the matching pair of coordinates, so the y-coordinate of the midpoint depends on the two y-coordinates alone. Working: the y-coordinates are 4 and 10, so the mean is (4 + 10) ÷ 2 = 14 ÷ 2 = 7. Answer: 7. The distractors: 5 comes from working out the x-coordinate of the midpoint, (2 + 8) ÷ 2 = 5, and writing that down in place of the y-coordinate the question asked for; 3 comes from halving the difference of the y-coordinates, (10 − 4) ÷ 2 = 3, which is half the vertical gap rather than a position; 14 comes from adding the two y-coordinates and forgetting to halve the total.
- (a) 0.09 — Method: two independent events that must both happen are combined by multiplying their probabilities. Working: the same probability 0.3 applies to each day, so the calculation is 0.3 × 0.3. Written as fractions this is 3/10 × 3/10 = 9/100. Answer: the probability is 0.09. The distractors: 0.6 comes from adding 0.3 and 0.3 instead of multiplying them; 0.3 comes from quoting the single-day probability, as though the second day added no further condition; 0.9 comes from multiplying 3 by 3 correctly but keeping only one decimal place in the product instead of two.
- (c) Exactly 1: the subtraction has no rounding at any step. — 10x − x removes the recurring part completely, because the digits after the decimal point in 10x and in x are identical from the tenths place onward, so they cancel exactly: 9.999... − 0.999... = 9.000... = 9. Nothing was rounded to reach 9x = 9, so x = 1 is an exact equality, not an approximation, and the statement that the value is exactly 1, with no rounding at any step, is the correct one. Calling it only approximately 1, on the ground that a recurring decimal can never reach a whole number, misunderstands what the subtraction has just shown: the recurring tail cancels completely, leaving no gap to approximate away. Claiming the method only works because the recurring digit is 9 is also wrong — the same subtraction cancels the recurring part for any repeating digit, not just 9; it is the choice of multiplier (10, matching the one-digit repeat) that makes the cancellation exact, not the digit itself. Saying 10x minus x gives 8.999... rather than 9 misreads the subtraction: 9.999... − 0.999... has no digit to borrow from, since every decimal digit in the two numbers matches, so the result is exactly 9, not 8.999... .
- (a) 0.25 — Method: gradient = vertical rise ÷ horizontal distance. Working: gradient = 3 ÷ 12 = 0.25. Answer: the gradient of the ramp is 0.25. 4 comes from inverting the gradient, dividing the horizontal distance by the vertical rise instead of the other way round. 9 comes from subtracting the rise from the horizontal distance instead of dividing. 36 comes from multiplying the rise and the horizontal distance instead of dividing.
- (d) 12 hours — Since time is inversely proportional to the number of installers, T = k/n. Using n = 4, T = 18: 18 = k ÷ 4, so k = 18 × 4 = 72. The equation is T = 72/n. When n = 6: T = 72 ÷ 6 = 12. Using the original number of installers instead of the new one gives T = 72 ÷ 4 = 18, the wrong value substituted. Treating more installers as needing more time, as if T were directly proportional to n, gives k = 18 ÷ 4 = 4.5 and then T = 4.5 × 6 = 27, the opposite relationship to the one described. Stopping at k = 72 and reporting it gives the time the job would take a single installer working alone — the constant still has to be divided by the new number of installers before it answers the question asked. With 6 installers, the job takes 12 hours.
- (b) x = 5 — Every point on a vertical line has the same x-coordinate, so the equation of a vertical line through (5, 2) is x = 5. "y = 5" mixes up the coordinates, using the x-value of 5 to write a y-equation. "y = 2" is the equation of the horizontal line through (5, 2), not the vertical one. "x = 2" uses the correct letter but the wrong coordinate, the y-value of 2 instead of the x-value of 5.
- (d) 28 — The height decreases by 8 cm at each bounce after the first, so the nth bounce reaches 60−(n−1)×8 cm. For the 5th bounce: 60−4×8=60−32=28. A candidate who subtracts 8 one time too many, five times instead of four, would compute 60−5×8=20. A candidate who adds the decrease instead of subtracting it, a sign error, would compute 60+4×8=92. A candidate who works out only the total decrease and forgets to include the starting height of 60 cm would compute just 5×8=40.
- (c) 135 g — Find the ratio of butter to sugar in the first batch: 240:160, which simplifies to 3:2. For the second batch, sugar = 90 g, so butter = 90 × 3/2 = 135 g. (60 g comes from using the ratio the wrong way round, 90 × 2/3. 170 g comes from subtracting the drop in sugar, 160 − 90 = 70 g, from the original butter amount, 240 − 70, instead of scaling. 240 g comes from not scaling the butter amount at all.)
- (d) Base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal — DE = DF, so triangle DEF is isosceles with DE and DF as the two equal sides. The base angles opposite those equal sides, angle E and angle F, are therefore equal to each other. Angle F = 58°. A student who instead quotes 'Angles in a triangle sum to 180°' has picked a true fact about triangles, but that fact finds a missing angle from the other two — it does not explain why two angles are equal to each other. A student who quotes 'Angles on a straight line sum to 180°' has confused this with a straight-line angle fact, but no straight line of angles is described in this triangle.
- (d) L/6 − 4 — Method: find the length of one equal piece first (divide by 6), then apply the later change (subtract 4) to that piece. Working: one piece is L/6 metres; removing 4 metres from it gives L/6 − 4. Answer: L/6 − 4. L/6 + 4 comes from adding the 4 metres instead of removing it. (L − 4)/6 comes from removing the 4 metres from the whole rope before cutting it into pieces, the wrong order. 4 − L/6 comes from subtracting the piece length from 4 instead of the other way round.
- (b) (2x + 1)/(x − 3) — Factorise both the numerator and the denominator before you cancel anything. The numerator 2x² + 7x + 3 factorises to (2x + 1)(x + 3), and the denominator x² − 9 is a difference of two squares, factorising to (x − 3)(x + 3). The (x + 3) factor is common to both, so it cancels, leaving (2x + 1)/(x − 3). Writing (2x + 1)/(x + 3) comes from factorising x² − 9 as (x + 3)² instead of (x − 3)(x + 3) — a difference of two squares always has one plus and one minus bracket. Writing (2x + 3)/(x − 3) comes from mis-factorising the numerator as (2x + 3)(x + 1) and then wrongly cancelling the (x + 1) against the denominator's (x + 3) as though they were the same bracket. Writing 2x + 1 comes from cancelling the (x + 3) factor correctly but then dropping the remaining (x − 3) on the denominator altogether.
How the 20 questions are shared out
- Number — 3 questions (15% of the qualification)
- Algebra — 6 questions (30% of the qualification)
- Ratio, proportion and rates of change — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Geometry and measures — 4 questions (20% of the qualification)
- Probability — 2 questions (7.5% of the qualification)
- Statistics — 1 question (7.5% of the qualification)
Where an area has fewer printable questions than its share, the shortfall is filled from the other areas. These are original questions, not past papers.